Calcium phosphate cement in orbital reconstructions
Treatment of facial trauma sequelae is a complex and challenging process. There is still controversy over suitable materials for orbital wall reconstruction. This study evaluated calcium phosphate cement (CPC) implants manufactured by rapid prototyping in the repair of orbital wall defects secondary...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2012-01, Vol.23 (1), p.145-148 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 148 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 145 |
| container_title | The Journal of craniofacial surgery |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Ciprandi, Maria Teresa Ortiz Primo, Bruno Tochetto Gassen, Humberto Thomazi Closs, Luciane Quadrado Hernandez, Pedro Antonio Gonzalez Silva, Jr, Aurelício Novaes |
| description | Treatment of facial trauma sequelae is a complex and challenging process. There is still controversy over suitable materials for orbital wall reconstruction. This study evaluated calcium phosphate cement (CPC) implants manufactured by rapid prototyping in the repair of orbital wall defects secondary to trauma. Computed tomographic scans of 5 patients were used for surgery planning and production of CPC implants. Implants were used to restore orbital wall anatomy, ocular alignment, and facial contour. Benefits resulting from the use of implants, such as a reduced operating time, patient response to biomaterial implantation, biomaterial integrity and stability, and patient satisfaction with treatment, were analyzed qualitatively. Our results suggest that CPC is an effective and safe material for orbital reconstruction because of its biocompatibility and easy production and placement. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182413d31 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922214918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>922214918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-c3cef586753f4bda1f5ceaaf586389b3213d37304c378a369f450eea9ad3e643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gcjePG1NMtmPHGWxKhQ8tPeQzU7oyn6ZZA_-e1NaPXiZeRned2Z4CLlndM2oLJ521W5Na8oAgZVcMGiAXZAlyyBPoQB-GTUVMuW8yBbkxvtPSjljPL8mC84hWiQsCVS6M-3cJ9Nh9NNBB0wM9jiEpB2S0dVt0F3i0IyDD242oY3illxZ3Xm8O_cV2W9e9tVbuv14fa-et6kBmodYDdqszIsMrKgbzWxmUOvjCEpZAz--XAAVBopSQy6tyCiilroBzAWsyONp7eTGrxl9UH3rDXadHnCcvZKccyYkK6NTnJzGjd47tGpyba_dt2JUHWGpCEv9hxVjD-cDc91j8xf6pQM_99xl4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922214918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calcium phosphate cement in orbital reconstructions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Ciprandi, Maria Teresa Ortiz ; Primo, Bruno Tochetto ; Gassen, Humberto Thomazi ; Closs, Luciane Quadrado ; Hernandez, Pedro Antonio Gonzalez ; Silva, Jr, Aurelício Novaes</creator><creatorcontrib>Ciprandi, Maria Teresa Ortiz ; Primo, Bruno Tochetto ; Gassen, Humberto Thomazi ; Closs, Luciane Quadrado ; Hernandez, Pedro Antonio Gonzalez ; Silva, Jr, Aurelício Novaes</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment of facial trauma sequelae is a complex and challenging process. There is still controversy over suitable materials for orbital wall reconstruction. This study evaluated calcium phosphate cement (CPC) implants manufactured by rapid prototyping in the repair of orbital wall defects secondary to trauma. Computed tomographic scans of 5 patients were used for surgery planning and production of CPC implants. Implants were used to restore orbital wall anatomy, ocular alignment, and facial contour. Benefits resulting from the use of implants, such as a reduced operating time, patient response to biomaterial implantation, biomaterial integrity and stability, and patient satisfaction with treatment, were analyzed qualitatively. Our results suggest that CPC is an effective and safe material for orbital reconstruction because of its biocompatibility and easy production and placement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-2275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182413d31</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22337393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use ; Bone Substitutes - chemistry ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Calcium Phosphates - chemistry ; Calcium Phosphates - therapeutic use ; Calcium Sulfate - chemistry ; Computer-Aided Design ; Dentistry ; Diplopia - surgery ; Enophthalmos - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ocular Motility Disorders - surgery ; Orbit - surgery ; Orbital Diseases - surgery ; Orbital Fractures - surgery ; Patient Care Planning ; Patient Safety ; Patient Satisfaction ; Phosphates - chemistry ; Prospective Studies ; Prostheses and Implants ; Prosthesis Design ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Time Factors ; Tomography, Spiral Computed ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2012-01, Vol.23 (1), p.145-148</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-c3cef586753f4bda1f5ceaaf586389b3213d37304c378a369f450eea9ad3e643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-c3cef586753f4bda1f5ceaaf586389b3213d37304c378a369f450eea9ad3e643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22337393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ciprandi, Maria Teresa Ortiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primo, Bruno Tochetto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gassen, Humberto Thomazi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Closs, Luciane Quadrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Pedro Antonio Gonzalez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jr, Aurelício Novaes</creatorcontrib><title>Calcium phosphate cement in orbital reconstructions</title><title>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><description>Treatment of facial trauma sequelae is a complex and challenging process. There is still controversy over suitable materials for orbital wall reconstruction. This study evaluated calcium phosphate cement (CPC) implants manufactured by rapid prototyping in the repair of orbital wall defects secondary to trauma. Computed tomographic scans of 5 patients were used for surgery planning and production of CPC implants. Implants were used to restore orbital wall anatomy, ocular alignment, and facial contour. Benefits resulting from the use of implants, such as a reduced operating time, patient response to biomaterial implantation, biomaterial integrity and stability, and patient satisfaction with treatment, were analyzed qualitatively. Our results suggest that CPC is an effective and safe material for orbital reconstruction because of its biocompatibility and easy production and placement.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - chemistry</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Calcium Phosphates - chemistry</subject><subject>Calcium Phosphates - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Calcium Sulfate - chemistry</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diplopia - surgery</subject><subject>Enophthalmos - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ocular Motility Disorders - surgery</subject><subject>Orbit - surgery</subject><subject>Orbital Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Orbital Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Phosphates - chemistry</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, Spiral Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1049-2275</issn><issn>1536-3732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gcjePG1NMtmPHGWxKhQ8tPeQzU7oyn6ZZA_-e1NaPXiZeRned2Z4CLlndM2oLJ521W5Na8oAgZVcMGiAXZAlyyBPoQB-GTUVMuW8yBbkxvtPSjljPL8mC84hWiQsCVS6M-3cJ9Nh9NNBB0wM9jiEpB2S0dVt0F3i0IyDD242oY3illxZ3Xm8O_cV2W9e9tVbuv14fa-et6kBmodYDdqszIsMrKgbzWxmUOvjCEpZAz--XAAVBopSQy6tyCiilroBzAWsyONp7eTGrxl9UH3rDXadHnCcvZKccyYkK6NTnJzGjd47tGpyba_dt2JUHWGpCEv9hxVjD-cDc91j8xf6pQM_99xl4Q</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Ciprandi, Maria Teresa Ortiz</creator><creator>Primo, Bruno Tochetto</creator><creator>Gassen, Humberto Thomazi</creator><creator>Closs, Luciane Quadrado</creator><creator>Hernandez, Pedro Antonio Gonzalez</creator><creator>Silva, Jr, Aurelício Novaes</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Calcium phosphate cement in orbital reconstructions</title><author>Ciprandi, Maria Teresa Ortiz ; Primo, Bruno Tochetto ; Gassen, Humberto Thomazi ; Closs, Luciane Quadrado ; Hernandez, Pedro Antonio Gonzalez ; Silva, Jr, Aurelício Novaes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-c3cef586753f4bda1f5ceaaf586389b3213d37304c378a369f450eea9ad3e643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - chemistry</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Calcium Phosphates - chemistry</topic><topic>Calcium Phosphates - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Calcium Sulfate - chemistry</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diplopia - surgery</topic><topic>Enophthalmos - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ocular Motility Disorders - surgery</topic><topic>Orbit - surgery</topic><topic>Orbital Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Orbital Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Phosphates - chemistry</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, Spiral Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ciprandi, Maria Teresa Ortiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primo, Bruno Tochetto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gassen, Humberto Thomazi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Closs, Luciane Quadrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Pedro Antonio Gonzalez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jr, Aurelício Novaes</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ciprandi, Maria Teresa Ortiz</au><au>Primo, Bruno Tochetto</au><au>Gassen, Humberto Thomazi</au><au>Closs, Luciane Quadrado</au><au>Hernandez, Pedro Antonio Gonzalez</au><au>Silva, Jr, Aurelício Novaes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calcium phosphate cement in orbital reconstructions</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>145-148</pages><issn>1049-2275</issn><eissn>1536-3732</eissn><abstract>Treatment of facial trauma sequelae is a complex and challenging process. There is still controversy over suitable materials for orbital wall reconstruction. This study evaluated calcium phosphate cement (CPC) implants manufactured by rapid prototyping in the repair of orbital wall defects secondary to trauma. Computed tomographic scans of 5 patients were used for surgery planning and production of CPC implants. Implants were used to restore orbital wall anatomy, ocular alignment, and facial contour. Benefits resulting from the use of implants, such as a reduced operating time, patient response to biomaterial implantation, biomaterial integrity and stability, and patient satisfaction with treatment, were analyzed qualitatively. Our results suggest that CPC is an effective and safe material for orbital reconstruction because of its biocompatibility and easy production and placement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22337393</pmid><doi>10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182413d31</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1049-2275 |
| ispartof | The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2012-01, Vol.23 (1), p.145-148 |
| issn | 1049-2275 1536-3732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922214918 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adult Biocompatible Materials - chemistry Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use Bone Substitutes - chemistry Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use Calcium Phosphates - chemistry Calcium Phosphates - therapeutic use Calcium Sulfate - chemistry Computer-Aided Design Dentistry Diplopia - surgery Enophthalmos - surgery Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Male Middle Aged Ocular Motility Disorders - surgery Orbit - surgery Orbital Diseases - surgery Orbital Fractures - surgery Patient Care Planning Patient Safety Patient Satisfaction Phosphates - chemistry Prospective Studies Prostheses and Implants Prosthesis Design Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods Time Factors Tomography, Spiral Computed Treatment Outcome |
| title | Calcium phosphate cement in orbital reconstructions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T23%3A02%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calcium%20phosphate%20cement%20in%20orbital%20reconstructions&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20craniofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Ciprandi,%20Maria%20Teresa%20Ortiz&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=145-148&rft.issn=1049-2275&rft.eissn=1536-3732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182413d31&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E922214918%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922214918&rft_id=info:pmid/22337393&rfr_iscdi=true |