Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Risser Sign: Is It a Reliable and Reproducible Method?

A prospective study of ultrasonographic evaluation (UE) results of the Risser sign (RS) in adolescents. This study aims to assess the efficiency of UE of RS, compare it with radiographic evaluation, and investigate the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of UE. The use of ultrasound in ortho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2012-02, Vol.37 (4), p.316-320
Hauptverfasser: TORLAK, Gurkan, KITER, Esat, OTO, Murat, AKMAN, Alp
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 320
container_issue 4
container_start_page 316
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 37
creator TORLAK, Gurkan
KITER, Esat
OTO, Murat
AKMAN, Alp
description A prospective study of ultrasonographic evaluation (UE) results of the Risser sign (RS) in adolescents. This study aims to assess the efficiency of UE of RS, compare it with radiographic evaluation, and investigate the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of UE. The use of ultrasound in orthopedic practice has a growing popularity. As a noninvasive radiological method, the evaluation of RS seems to be a promising alternative in patients suffering from scoliosis who require a long-term follow-up. This study consists of 142 patients (70 female and 72 male cases) aged between 10 and 17 years, with a mean age of 13.8 ± 1.7 years. Menarche experience, body mass index, and skinfold thickness of the patients were recorded. Forty-five patients were found to have scoliosis. All ultrasonographic and radiographic evaluations were made by 2 blinded orthopedists. X-ray was considered as the gold standard. Percentage accuracy of UE was found to be 77.7% (κ = 0.698) for the first examiner and 64.30% (κ = 0.542) for the second examiner. Intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement were 0.971 and 0.924 for the UE, respectively. Moreover, interexaminer agreement for radiographic evaluation was 0.689. No significant difference was observed between the values of scoliosis and nonscoliosis patients. When the patients with a skinfold thickness of 16 mm or less and more than 16 mm were examined, the percentage accuracy of the UE was 80.43% (κ = 0.727) for the first group, whereas it was 72.91% (κ = 0.637) in the other group. We found the intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement for the UE of RS to be reliable. In radiographic evaluation of RS, the intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement were lower. These findings were also consistent with data from the literature. In conclusion, UE of RS is a reliable method; however, the results may vary when x-ray is considered as the gold standard.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821cfe3f
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921720223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>921720223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-n199t-8530460e06db65daa7aad98836ca61ce89477b30c27b35c192406610a6394d543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0N9LwzAQB_AgipvT_0AkL-JTZ340aeKL6Jg6mAibe_CpXJN0i2TtbFrB_96KE1_uuC8fjuMQOqdkTInOru8XyzEpCOWOU8WoKR0vD9CQCqYSSoU-REPCJUtYyuUAncT4TgiRnOpjNGBUEKWUGKK3VWgbiHVVrxvYbbzB008IHbS-rnBd4nbj8MLH6Bq89OvqBs8inrUY8MIFD0VwGCrbD7umtp3xP8Gzaze1vT1FRyWE6M72fYRWD9PXyVMyf3mcTe7mSUW1bhMlOEklcUTaQgoLkAFYrRSXBiQ1Tuk0ywpODOurMFSzlEhJCUiuUytSPkJXv3v7Ez46F9t866NxIUDl6i7mmtGMEcZ4Ly_2siu2zua7xm-h-cr_vtGDyz2AaCCUDVTGx38nBJNaKP4NgTduvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921720223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Risser Sign: Is It a Reliable and Reproducible Method?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>TORLAK, Gurkan ; KITER, Esat ; OTO, Murat ; AKMAN, Alp</creator><creatorcontrib>TORLAK, Gurkan ; KITER, Esat ; OTO, Murat ; AKMAN, Alp</creatorcontrib><description>A prospective study of ultrasonographic evaluation (UE) results of the Risser sign (RS) in adolescents. This study aims to assess the efficiency of UE of RS, compare it with radiographic evaluation, and investigate the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of UE. The use of ultrasound in orthopedic practice has a growing popularity. As a noninvasive radiological method, the evaluation of RS seems to be a promising alternative in patients suffering from scoliosis who require a long-term follow-up. This study consists of 142 patients (70 female and 72 male cases) aged between 10 and 17 years, with a mean age of 13.8 ± 1.7 years. Menarche experience, body mass index, and skinfold thickness of the patients were recorded. Forty-five patients were found to have scoliosis. All ultrasonographic and radiographic evaluations were made by 2 blinded orthopedists. X-ray was considered as the gold standard. Percentage accuracy of UE was found to be 77.7% (κ = 0.698) for the first examiner and 64.30% (κ = 0.542) for the second examiner. Intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement were 0.971 and 0.924 for the UE, respectively. Moreover, interexaminer agreement for radiographic evaluation was 0.689. No significant difference was observed between the values of scoliosis and nonscoliosis patients. When the patients with a skinfold thickness of 16 mm or less and more than 16 mm were examined, the percentage accuracy of the UE was 80.43% (κ = 0.727) for the first group, whereas it was 72.91% (κ = 0.637) in the other group. We found the intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement for the UE of RS to be reliable. In radiographic evaluation of RS, the intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement were lower. These findings were also consistent with data from the literature. In conclusion, UE of RS is a reliable method; however, the results may vary when x-ray is considered as the gold standard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821cfe3f</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21508885</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Determination by Skeleton ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Menarche ; Miscellaneous ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging ; Single-Blind Method ; Toxicology ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2012-02, Vol.37 (4), p.316-320</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25526958$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21508885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TORLAK, Gurkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KITER, Esat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OTO, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKMAN, Alp</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Risser Sign: Is It a Reliable and Reproducible Method?</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>A prospective study of ultrasonographic evaluation (UE) results of the Risser sign (RS) in adolescents. This study aims to assess the efficiency of UE of RS, compare it with radiographic evaluation, and investigate the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of UE. The use of ultrasound in orthopedic practice has a growing popularity. As a noninvasive radiological method, the evaluation of RS seems to be a promising alternative in patients suffering from scoliosis who require a long-term follow-up. This study consists of 142 patients (70 female and 72 male cases) aged between 10 and 17 years, with a mean age of 13.8 ± 1.7 years. Menarche experience, body mass index, and skinfold thickness of the patients were recorded. Forty-five patients were found to have scoliosis. All ultrasonographic and radiographic evaluations were made by 2 blinded orthopedists. X-ray was considered as the gold standard. Percentage accuracy of UE was found to be 77.7% (κ = 0.698) for the first examiner and 64.30% (κ = 0.542) for the second examiner. Intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement were 0.971 and 0.924 for the UE, respectively. Moreover, interexaminer agreement for radiographic evaluation was 0.689. No significant difference was observed between the values of scoliosis and nonscoliosis patients. When the patients with a skinfold thickness of 16 mm or less and more than 16 mm were examined, the percentage accuracy of the UE was 80.43% (κ = 0.727) for the first group, whereas it was 72.91% (κ = 0.637) in the other group. We found the intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement for the UE of RS to be reliable. In radiographic evaluation of RS, the intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement were lower. These findings were also consistent with data from the literature. In conclusion, UE of RS is a reliable method; however, the results may vary when x-ray is considered as the gold standard.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Determination by Skeleton</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Menarche</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0N9LwzAQB_AgipvT_0AkL-JTZ340aeKL6Jg6mAibe_CpXJN0i2TtbFrB_96KE1_uuC8fjuMQOqdkTInOru8XyzEpCOWOU8WoKR0vD9CQCqYSSoU-REPCJUtYyuUAncT4TgiRnOpjNGBUEKWUGKK3VWgbiHVVrxvYbbzB008IHbS-rnBd4nbj8MLH6Bq89OvqBs8inrUY8MIFD0VwGCrbD7umtp3xP8Gzaze1vT1FRyWE6M72fYRWD9PXyVMyf3mcTe7mSUW1bhMlOEklcUTaQgoLkAFYrRSXBiQ1Tuk0ywpODOurMFSzlEhJCUiuUytSPkJXv3v7Ez46F9t866NxIUDl6i7mmtGMEcZ4Ly_2siu2zua7xm-h-cr_vtGDyz2AaCCUDVTGx38nBJNaKP4NgTduvQ</recordid><startdate>20120215</startdate><enddate>20120215</enddate><creator>TORLAK, Gurkan</creator><creator>KITER, Esat</creator><creator>OTO, Murat</creator><creator>AKMAN, Alp</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120215</creationdate><title>Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Risser Sign: Is It a Reliable and Reproducible Method?</title><author>TORLAK, Gurkan ; KITER, Esat ; OTO, Murat ; AKMAN, Alp</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n199t-8530460e06db65daa7aad98836ca61ce89477b30c27b35c192406610a6394d543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Determination by Skeleton</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Menarche</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TORLAK, Gurkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KITER, Esat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OTO, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKMAN, Alp</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TORLAK, Gurkan</au><au>KITER, Esat</au><au>OTO, Murat</au><au>AKMAN, Alp</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Risser Sign: Is It a Reliable and Reproducible Method?</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2012-02-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>316</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>316-320</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>A prospective study of ultrasonographic evaluation (UE) results of the Risser sign (RS) in adolescents. This study aims to assess the efficiency of UE of RS, compare it with radiographic evaluation, and investigate the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of UE. The use of ultrasound in orthopedic practice has a growing popularity. As a noninvasive radiological method, the evaluation of RS seems to be a promising alternative in patients suffering from scoliosis who require a long-term follow-up. This study consists of 142 patients (70 female and 72 male cases) aged between 10 and 17 years, with a mean age of 13.8 ± 1.7 years. Menarche experience, body mass index, and skinfold thickness of the patients were recorded. Forty-five patients were found to have scoliosis. All ultrasonographic and radiographic evaluations were made by 2 blinded orthopedists. X-ray was considered as the gold standard. Percentage accuracy of UE was found to be 77.7% (κ = 0.698) for the first examiner and 64.30% (κ = 0.542) for the second examiner. Intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement were 0.971 and 0.924 for the UE, respectively. Moreover, interexaminer agreement for radiographic evaluation was 0.689. No significant difference was observed between the values of scoliosis and nonscoliosis patients. When the patients with a skinfold thickness of 16 mm or less and more than 16 mm were examined, the percentage accuracy of the UE was 80.43% (κ = 0.727) for the first group, whereas it was 72.91% (κ = 0.637) in the other group. We found the intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement for the UE of RS to be reliable. In radiographic evaluation of RS, the intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement were lower. These findings were also consistent with data from the literature. In conclusion, UE of RS is a reliable method; however, the results may vary when x-ray is considered as the gold standard.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>21508885</pmid><doi>10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821cfe3f</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2012-02, Vol.37 (4), p.316-320
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921720223
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Age Determination by Skeleton
Biological and medical sciences
Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord
Child
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Menarche
Miscellaneous
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging
Single-Blind Method
Toxicology
Ultrasonography
title Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Risser Sign: Is It a Reliable and Reproducible Method?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A26%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasonographic%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20Risser%20Sign:%20Is%20It%20a%20Reliable%20and%20Reproducible%20Method?&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=TORLAK,%20Gurkan&rft.date=2012-02-15&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=316&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=316-320&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821cfe3f&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E921720223%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921720223&rft_id=info:pmid/21508885&rfr_iscdi=true