Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in a dialysis unit

Scand J Caring Sci; 2012; 26; 61–69 
Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end‐stage renal disease in a dialysis unit Aim:  A patient’s right to influence treatment and health care has been guaranteed by Norwegian law since 1999. The aim of this study was to explore how...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of caring sciences 2012-03, Vol.26 (1), p.61-69
Hauptverfasser: Aasen, Elin M., Kvangarsnes, Marit, Heggen, Kåre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 61
container_title Scandinavian journal of caring sciences
container_volume 26
creator Aasen, Elin M.
Kvangarsnes, Marit
Heggen, Kåre
description Scand J Caring Sci; 2012; 26; 61–69 
Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end‐stage renal disease in a dialysis unit Aim:  A patient’s right to influence treatment and health care has been guaranteed by Norwegian law since 1999. The aim of this study was to explore how elderly patients with end‐stage renal disease who are undergoing treatment with haemodialysis for the rest of their lives perceive patient participation in a dialysis unit. Methods:  This study, which was inspired by critical discourse analysis, drew on data derived from transcribed interviews with 11 patients. Findings:  Two discourses related to patient participation were identified. The first and dominant discourse was called the health‐care team’s power and dominance. Both environmental conditions and the team’s practice exercised power and control over the patients. The patients trusted the health‐care team, but some felt powerless and were afraid of what might happen if they refused to follow the instructions. The health‐care team owned the knowledge and decided what the patients needed to know. Most of all the patients wanted dialogue about the future. After years of treatment, patient identity seemed to be threatened by this situation. The second discourse is called the patients struggling for shared decision‐making. Some patients struggled to be involved in decision‐making about ‘dry weight’, diet, blood access and time of treatment when these factors threatened their well‐being and the quality of their daily lives. Conclusions:  The elderly patients’ right to participate in their haemodialysis treatment did not seem to be well incorporated into the social practices of haemodialysis units. Changing the social practices in the dialysis units from a paternalistic ideology to an ideology of participation will require consideration of the context, the dialogue and the process of shared decision‐making with the patient.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00904.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921719853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>921719853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4384-2dcfbbff05dc856d067e19b0f3a4c19b93c7c41f32b5dbdc478d18864acce69e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVtvEzEQha0K1IbSv1D5DV528W3XXomXKoKCWkGlcnm0vPZscdhLsB0l-fd4SZvHCr_MjPydGekchDAlJc3v3aqkQtKilpSVjFBaEtIQUe5O0OL48QItCFO8aDhVZ-hVjCtCSFUReorOGJVUcUEWaLiDYGGd_DRGPHV4bZKHMeUakrd-HqcRm2EaH2LC0DsI_f6Jinjr0y8MoytiMg-AA4ymx85HMBGwz8I8mH4ffcSb0afX6GVn-ggXj_Ucff_44dvyU3H79frz8uq2sIIrUTBnu7btOlI5q6rakVoCbVrScSNsbhpupRW046ytXOuskMpRpWphrIW6AX6O3hz2rsP0ZwMx6cFHC31vRpg2UTezAY2qeCbfPkvSbBqThFcio-qA2jDFGKDT6-AHE_YZ0nMseqVn9_Xsvp5j0f9i0bssvXy8smkHcEfhUw4ZeH8Atr6H_X8v1vfL-9xkeXGQ-5hgd5Sb8DtruKz0zy_XWrEb-ePuZqkZ_wvUh6xX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1000270354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in a dialysis unit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Aasen, Elin M. ; Kvangarsnes, Marit ; Heggen, Kåre</creator><creatorcontrib>Aasen, Elin M. ; Kvangarsnes, Marit ; Heggen, Kåre</creatorcontrib><description>Scand J Caring Sci; 2012; 26; 61–69 
Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end‐stage renal disease in a dialysis unit Aim:  A patient’s right to influence treatment and health care has been guaranteed by Norwegian law since 1999. The aim of this study was to explore how elderly patients with end‐stage renal disease who are undergoing treatment with haemodialysis for the rest of their lives perceive patient participation in a dialysis unit. Methods:  This study, which was inspired by critical discourse analysis, drew on data derived from transcribed interviews with 11 patients. Findings:  Two discourses related to patient participation were identified. The first and dominant discourse was called the health‐care team’s power and dominance. Both environmental conditions and the team’s practice exercised power and control over the patients. The patients trusted the health‐care team, but some felt powerless and were afraid of what might happen if they refused to follow the instructions. The health‐care team owned the knowledge and decided what the patients needed to know. Most of all the patients wanted dialogue about the future. After years of treatment, patient identity seemed to be threatened by this situation. The second discourse is called the patients struggling for shared decision‐making. Some patients struggled to be involved in decision‐making about ‘dry weight’, diet, blood access and time of treatment when these factors threatened their well‐being and the quality of their daily lives. Conclusions:  The elderly patients’ right to participate in their haemodialysis treatment did not seem to be well incorporated into the social practices of haemodialysis units. Changing the social practices in the dialysis units from a paternalistic ideology to an ideology of participation will require consideration of the context, the dialogue and the process of shared decision‐making with the patient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0283-9318</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00904.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21718340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; critical discourse analysis ; elderly ; Female ; hemodialysis ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Narration ; Norway ; Nursing ; Paternalism ; Patient Participation ; Patient Preference ; Patient Rights ; Renal Dialysis</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2012-03, Vol.26 (1), p.61-69</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences © 2011 Nordic College of Caring Science</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences © 2011 Nordic College of Caring Science.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4384-2dcfbbff05dc856d067e19b0f3a4c19b93c7c41f32b5dbdc478d18864acce69e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4384-2dcfbbff05dc856d067e19b0f3a4c19b93c7c41f32b5dbdc478d18864acce69e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1471-6712.2011.00904.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1471-6712.2011.00904.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21718340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aasen, Elin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvangarsnes, Marit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heggen, Kåre</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in a dialysis unit</title><title>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</title><addtitle>Scand J Caring Sci</addtitle><description>Scand J Caring Sci; 2012; 26; 61–69 
Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end‐stage renal disease in a dialysis unit Aim:  A patient’s right to influence treatment and health care has been guaranteed by Norwegian law since 1999. The aim of this study was to explore how elderly patients with end‐stage renal disease who are undergoing treatment with haemodialysis for the rest of their lives perceive patient participation in a dialysis unit. Methods:  This study, which was inspired by critical discourse analysis, drew on data derived from transcribed interviews with 11 patients. Findings:  Two discourses related to patient participation were identified. The first and dominant discourse was called the health‐care team’s power and dominance. Both environmental conditions and the team’s practice exercised power and control over the patients. The patients trusted the health‐care team, but some felt powerless and were afraid of what might happen if they refused to follow the instructions. The health‐care team owned the knowledge and decided what the patients needed to know. Most of all the patients wanted dialogue about the future. After years of treatment, patient identity seemed to be threatened by this situation. The second discourse is called the patients struggling for shared decision‐making. Some patients struggled to be involved in decision‐making about ‘dry weight’, diet, blood access and time of treatment when these factors threatened their well‐being and the quality of their daily lives. Conclusions:  The elderly patients’ right to participate in their haemodialysis treatment did not seem to be well incorporated into the social practices of haemodialysis units. Changing the social practices in the dialysis units from a paternalistic ideology to an ideology of participation will require consideration of the context, the dialogue and the process of shared decision‐making with the patient.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>critical discourse analysis</subject><subject>elderly</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hemodialysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Narration</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Paternalism</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Patient Rights</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><issn>0283-9318</issn><issn>1471-6712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVtvEzEQha0K1IbSv1D5DV528W3XXomXKoKCWkGlcnm0vPZscdhLsB0l-fd4SZvHCr_MjPydGekchDAlJc3v3aqkQtKilpSVjFBaEtIQUe5O0OL48QItCFO8aDhVZ-hVjCtCSFUReorOGJVUcUEWaLiDYGGd_DRGPHV4bZKHMeUakrd-HqcRm2EaH2LC0DsI_f6Jinjr0y8MoytiMg-AA4ymx85HMBGwz8I8mH4ffcSb0afX6GVn-ggXj_Ucff_44dvyU3H79frz8uq2sIIrUTBnu7btOlI5q6rakVoCbVrScSNsbhpupRW046ytXOuskMpRpWphrIW6AX6O3hz2rsP0ZwMx6cFHC31vRpg2UTezAY2qeCbfPkvSbBqThFcio-qA2jDFGKDT6-AHE_YZ0nMseqVn9_Xsvp5j0f9i0bssvXy8smkHcEfhUw4ZeH8Atr6H_X8v1vfL-9xkeXGQ-5hgd5Sb8DtruKz0zy_XWrEb-ePuZqkZ_wvUh6xX</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Aasen, Elin M.</creator><creator>Kvangarsnes, Marit</creator><creator>Heggen, Kåre</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in a dialysis unit</title><author>Aasen, Elin M. ; Kvangarsnes, Marit ; Heggen, Kåre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4384-2dcfbbff05dc856d067e19b0f3a4c19b93c7c41f32b5dbdc478d18864acce69e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>critical discourse analysis</topic><topic>elderly</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hemodialysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Narration</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Paternalism</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Patient Rights</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aasen, Elin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvangarsnes, Marit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heggen, Kåre</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aasen, Elin M.</au><au>Kvangarsnes, Marit</au><au>Heggen, Kåre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in a dialysis unit</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Caring Sci</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>61-69</pages><issn>0283-9318</issn><eissn>1471-6712</eissn><abstract>Scand J Caring Sci; 2012; 26; 61–69 
Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end‐stage renal disease in a dialysis unit Aim:  A patient’s right to influence treatment and health care has been guaranteed by Norwegian law since 1999. The aim of this study was to explore how elderly patients with end‐stage renal disease who are undergoing treatment with haemodialysis for the rest of their lives perceive patient participation in a dialysis unit. Methods:  This study, which was inspired by critical discourse analysis, drew on data derived from transcribed interviews with 11 patients. Findings:  Two discourses related to patient participation were identified. The first and dominant discourse was called the health‐care team’s power and dominance. Both environmental conditions and the team’s practice exercised power and control over the patients. The patients trusted the health‐care team, but some felt powerless and were afraid of what might happen if they refused to follow the instructions. The health‐care team owned the knowledge and decided what the patients needed to know. Most of all the patients wanted dialogue about the future. After years of treatment, patient identity seemed to be threatened by this situation. The second discourse is called the patients struggling for shared decision‐making. Some patients struggled to be involved in decision‐making about ‘dry weight’, diet, blood access and time of treatment when these factors threatened their well‐being and the quality of their daily lives. Conclusions:  The elderly patients’ right to participate in their haemodialysis treatment did not seem to be well incorporated into the social practices of haemodialysis units. Changing the social practices in the dialysis units from a paternalistic ideology to an ideology of participation will require consideration of the context, the dialogue and the process of shared decision‐making with the patient.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21718340</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00904.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0283-9318
ispartof Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2012-03, Vol.26 (1), p.61-69
issn 0283-9318
1471-6712
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921719853
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
critical discourse analysis
elderly
Female
hemodialysis
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Male
Narration
Norway
Nursing
Paternalism
Patient Participation
Patient Preference
Patient Rights
Renal Dialysis
title Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in a dialysis unit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20of%20patient%20participation%20amongst%20elderly%20patients%20with%20end-stage%20renal%20disease%20in%20a%20dialysis%20unit&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20caring%20sciences&rft.au=Aasen,%20Elin%20M.&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=61-69&rft.issn=0283-9318&rft.eissn=1471-6712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00904.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E921719853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1000270354&rft_id=info:pmid/21718340&rfr_iscdi=true