Cancer prevention in ulcerative colitis: Long‐term outcome following fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy

Background: Patients with long‐standing ulcerative colitis require repeated endoscopies for early detection of neoplasias, which, however, are frequently missed by standard colonoscopy. Fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy is known to improve the detection rate but the long‐term effects of fluorescence‐g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Inflammatory bowel diseases 2012-03, Vol.18 (3), p.489-495
Hauptverfasser: Fusco, Virginia, Ebert, Bernd, Weber‐Eibel, Jutta, Jost, Christian, Fleige, Barbara, Stolte, Manfred, Oberhuber, Georg, Rinneberg, Herbert, Lochs, Herbert, Ortner, Marianne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 495
container_issue 3
container_start_page 489
container_title Inflammatory bowel diseases
container_volume 18
creator Fusco, Virginia
Ebert, Bernd
Weber‐Eibel, Jutta
Jost, Christian
Fleige, Barbara
Stolte, Manfred
Oberhuber, Georg
Rinneberg, Herbert
Lochs, Herbert
Ortner, Marianne
description Background: Patients with long‐standing ulcerative colitis require repeated endoscopies for early detection of neoplasias, which, however, are frequently missed by standard colonoscopy. Fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy is known to improve the detection rate but the long‐term effects of fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy are unknown. Methods: Colitis patients with negative findings at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy entered a prospective long‐term study with conventional colonoscopies at 2‐year intervals. Risk and time to progression were evaluated. The positive predictive value was assessed in patients with neoplasias at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy who underwent immediate total colectomy. Results: Thirty‐one patients with negative fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy were surveyed for a mean of 7.8 ± 0.9 years. Neoplasia was observed in only two of them (6%) after 7 and 8 years of follow‐up, respectively. Neoplasia at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy was observed in 10 patients. In all of them, multiple flat low‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia was diagnosed. At immediate colectomy performed in eight of them, the diagnosis of flat low‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia was confirmed, corresponding to a positive predictive value of 100%. However, synchronous more advanced neoplasia was detected in three of the eight patients (38%). All patients, those with and those without neoplasia, were alive at the end of the study. Conclusions: Fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy misses, in contrast to standard colonoscopy, few, if any, patients with neoplasia. Most neoplasia‐negative patients remain negative during prolonged follow‐up. However, when low‐grade dysplasia is diagnosed by fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy, colectomy is recommended because more than a third of the patients harbor synchronous, more advanced neoplasia. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;)
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ibd.21703
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921560024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>921560024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-fba460b464e697199248b30e226dcf966cbfffc79304f072dc6b0677cbe4b85a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUQC0EolAY-AGUDTGk2I7rxGxQnlIlFpij2LkuRk5c7KRVNz6Bb-RLcGlhQx5sWeceXR2ETggeEYzphZH1iJIcZzvogIwznrKCsd34xnmRYiGKAToM4S2i8Yh9NKCEswJTcoBeJ1WrwCdzDwtoO-PaxLRJb-Nf1ZkFJMpZ05lwmUxdO_v6-OzAN4nrO-UaSLSz1i1NO0u07Z2HoCDaIjXrTQ31eti1Lig3Xx2hPV3ZAMfbe4he7m6fJw_p9On-cXI1TVVGWZZqWTGOJeMMuMiJEJQVMsNAKa-VFpwrqbVWucgw0zinteIS8zxXEpgsxlU2RGcb79y79x5CVzYmrmVt1YLrQykoGfNYgkXyfEMq70LwoMu5N03lVyXB5bprGbuWP10je7q19rKB-o_8DRmBiw2wNBZW_5vKx-ubjfIbweiFpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921560024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cancer prevention in ulcerative colitis: Long‐term outcome following fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Fusco, Virginia ; Ebert, Bernd ; Weber‐Eibel, Jutta ; Jost, Christian ; Fleige, Barbara ; Stolte, Manfred ; Oberhuber, Georg ; Rinneberg, Herbert ; Lochs, Herbert ; Ortner, Marianne</creator><creatorcontrib>Fusco, Virginia ; Ebert, Bernd ; Weber‐Eibel, Jutta ; Jost, Christian ; Fleige, Barbara ; Stolte, Manfred ; Oberhuber, Georg ; Rinneberg, Herbert ; Lochs, Herbert ; Ortner, Marianne</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Patients with long‐standing ulcerative colitis require repeated endoscopies for early detection of neoplasias, which, however, are frequently missed by standard colonoscopy. Fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy is known to improve the detection rate but the long‐term effects of fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy are unknown. Methods: Colitis patients with negative findings at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy entered a prospective long‐term study with conventional colonoscopies at 2‐year intervals. Risk and time to progression were evaluated. The positive predictive value was assessed in patients with neoplasias at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy who underwent immediate total colectomy. Results: Thirty‐one patients with negative fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy were surveyed for a mean of 7.8 ± 0.9 years. Neoplasia was observed in only two of them (6%) after 7 and 8 years of follow‐up, respectively. Neoplasia at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy was observed in 10 patients. In all of them, multiple flat low‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia was diagnosed. At immediate colectomy performed in eight of them, the diagnosis of flat low‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia was confirmed, corresponding to a positive predictive value of 100%. However, synchronous more advanced neoplasia was detected in three of the eight patients (38%). All patients, those with and those without neoplasia, were alive at the end of the study. Conclusions: Fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy misses, in contrast to standard colonoscopy, few, if any, patients with neoplasia. Most neoplasia‐negative patients remain negative during prolonged follow‐up. However, when low‐grade dysplasia is diagnosed by fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy, colectomy is recommended because more than a third of the patients harbor synchronous, more advanced neoplasia. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21703</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21648021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adenoma - diagnosis ; Adenoma - pathology ; Adenoma - surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Colectomy ; Colitis, Ulcerative - pathology ; Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colonic Neoplasms - pathology ; Colonic Neoplasms - surgery ; Colonoscopy ; colorectal cancer ; Female ; Fluorescence ; fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; low‐grade dysplasia ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Population Surveillance ; Predictive Value of Tests ; surveillance ; Time Factors ; ulcerative colitis</subject><ispartof>Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2012-03, Vol.18 (3), p.489-495</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Crohn's &amp; Colitis Foundation of America, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-fba460b464e697199248b30e226dcf966cbfffc79304f072dc6b0677cbe4b85a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-fba460b464e697199248b30e226dcf966cbfffc79304f072dc6b0677cbe4b85a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fibd.21703$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fibd.21703$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21648021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fusco, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebert, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber‐Eibel, Jutta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleige, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolte, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberhuber, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinneberg, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochs, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortner, Marianne</creatorcontrib><title>Cancer prevention in ulcerative colitis: Long‐term outcome following fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy</title><title>Inflammatory bowel diseases</title><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><description>Background: Patients with long‐standing ulcerative colitis require repeated endoscopies for early detection of neoplasias, which, however, are frequently missed by standard colonoscopy. Fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy is known to improve the detection rate but the long‐term effects of fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy are unknown. Methods: Colitis patients with negative findings at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy entered a prospective long‐term study with conventional colonoscopies at 2‐year intervals. Risk and time to progression were evaluated. The positive predictive value was assessed in patients with neoplasias at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy who underwent immediate total colectomy. Results: Thirty‐one patients with negative fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy were surveyed for a mean of 7.8 ± 0.9 years. Neoplasia was observed in only two of them (6%) after 7 and 8 years of follow‐up, respectively. Neoplasia at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy was observed in 10 patients. In all of them, multiple flat low‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia was diagnosed. At immediate colectomy performed in eight of them, the diagnosis of flat low‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia was confirmed, corresponding to a positive predictive value of 100%. However, synchronous more advanced neoplasia was detected in three of the eight patients (38%). All patients, those with and those without neoplasia, were alive at the end of the study. Conclusions: Fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy misses, in contrast to standard colonoscopy, few, if any, patients with neoplasia. Most neoplasia‐negative patients remain negative during prolonged follow‐up. However, when low‐grade dysplasia is diagnosed by fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy, colectomy is recommended because more than a third of the patients harbor synchronous, more advanced neoplasia. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;)</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Colectomy</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - pathology</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>low‐grade dysplasia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>surveillance</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>ulcerative colitis</subject><issn>1078-0998</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUQC0EolAY-AGUDTGk2I7rxGxQnlIlFpij2LkuRk5c7KRVNz6Bb-RLcGlhQx5sWeceXR2ETggeEYzphZH1iJIcZzvogIwznrKCsd34xnmRYiGKAToM4S2i8Yh9NKCEswJTcoBeJ1WrwCdzDwtoO-PaxLRJb-Nf1ZkFJMpZ05lwmUxdO_v6-OzAN4nrO-UaSLSz1i1NO0u07Z2HoCDaIjXrTQ31eti1Lig3Xx2hPV3ZAMfbe4he7m6fJw_p9On-cXI1TVVGWZZqWTGOJeMMuMiJEJQVMsNAKa-VFpwrqbVWucgw0zinteIS8zxXEpgsxlU2RGcb79y79x5CVzYmrmVt1YLrQykoGfNYgkXyfEMq70LwoMu5N03lVyXB5bprGbuWP10je7q19rKB-o_8DRmBiw2wNBZW_5vKx-ubjfIbweiFpw</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Fusco, Virginia</creator><creator>Ebert, Bernd</creator><creator>Weber‐Eibel, Jutta</creator><creator>Jost, Christian</creator><creator>Fleige, Barbara</creator><creator>Stolte, Manfred</creator><creator>Oberhuber, Georg</creator><creator>Rinneberg, Herbert</creator><creator>Lochs, Herbert</creator><creator>Ortner, Marianne</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Cancer prevention in ulcerative colitis: Long‐term outcome following fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy</title><author>Fusco, Virginia ; Ebert, Bernd ; Weber‐Eibel, Jutta ; Jost, Christian ; Fleige, Barbara ; Stolte, Manfred ; Oberhuber, Georg ; Rinneberg, Herbert ; Lochs, Herbert ; Ortner, Marianne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-fba460b464e697199248b30e226dcf966cbfffc79304f072dc6b0677cbe4b85a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adenoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Colectomy</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - pathology</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>low‐grade dysplasia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>surveillance</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>ulcerative colitis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fusco, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebert, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber‐Eibel, Jutta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleige, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolte, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberhuber, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinneberg, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochs, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortner, Marianne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fusco, Virginia</au><au>Ebert, Bernd</au><au>Weber‐Eibel, Jutta</au><au>Jost, Christian</au><au>Fleige, Barbara</au><au>Stolte, Manfred</au><au>Oberhuber, Georg</au><au>Rinneberg, Herbert</au><au>Lochs, Herbert</au><au>Ortner, Marianne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cancer prevention in ulcerative colitis: Long‐term outcome following fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy</atitle><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>495</epage><pages>489-495</pages><issn>1078-0998</issn><eissn>1536-4844</eissn><abstract>Background: Patients with long‐standing ulcerative colitis require repeated endoscopies for early detection of neoplasias, which, however, are frequently missed by standard colonoscopy. Fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy is known to improve the detection rate but the long‐term effects of fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy are unknown. Methods: Colitis patients with negative findings at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy entered a prospective long‐term study with conventional colonoscopies at 2‐year intervals. Risk and time to progression were evaluated. The positive predictive value was assessed in patients with neoplasias at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy who underwent immediate total colectomy. Results: Thirty‐one patients with negative fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy were surveyed for a mean of 7.8 ± 0.9 years. Neoplasia was observed in only two of them (6%) after 7 and 8 years of follow‐up, respectively. Neoplasia at index fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy was observed in 10 patients. In all of them, multiple flat low‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia was diagnosed. At immediate colectomy performed in eight of them, the diagnosis of flat low‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia was confirmed, corresponding to a positive predictive value of 100%. However, synchronous more advanced neoplasia was detected in three of the eight patients (38%). All patients, those with and those without neoplasia, were alive at the end of the study. Conclusions: Fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy misses, in contrast to standard colonoscopy, few, if any, patients with neoplasia. Most neoplasia‐negative patients remain negative during prolonged follow‐up. However, when low‐grade dysplasia is diagnosed by fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy, colectomy is recommended because more than a third of the patients harbor synchronous, more advanced neoplasia. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;)</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>21648021</pmid><doi>10.1002/ibd.21703</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-0998
ispartof Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2012-03, Vol.18 (3), p.489-495
issn 1078-0998
1536-4844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921560024
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Adenoma - diagnosis
Adenoma - pathology
Adenoma - surgery
Adult
Aged
Colectomy
Colitis, Ulcerative - pathology
Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Colonic Neoplasms - pathology
Colonic Neoplasms - surgery
Colonoscopy
colorectal cancer
Female
Fluorescence
fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
low‐grade dysplasia
Male
Middle Aged
Population Surveillance
Predictive Value of Tests
surveillance
Time Factors
ulcerative colitis
title Cancer prevention in ulcerative colitis: Long‐term outcome following fluorescence‐guided colonoscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T01%3A16%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cancer%20prevention%20in%20ulcerative%20colitis:%20Long%E2%80%90term%20outcome%20following%20fluorescence%E2%80%90guided%20colonoscopy&rft.jtitle=Inflammatory%20bowel%20diseases&rft.au=Fusco,%20Virginia&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=495&rft.pages=489-495&rft.issn=1078-0998&rft.eissn=1536-4844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ibd.21703&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E921560024%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921560024&rft_id=info:pmid/21648021&rfr_iscdi=true