Genomics of Compositae weeds: EST libraries, microarrays, and evidence of introgression

Premise of study: Weeds cause considerable environmental and economic damage. However, genomic characterization of weeds has lagged behind that of model plants and crop species. Here we describe the development of genomic tools and resources for 11 weeds from the Compositae family that will serve as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of botany 2012-02, Vol.99 (2), p.209-218
Hauptverfasser: Lai, Zhao, Kane, Nolan C., Kozik, Alex, Hodgins, Kathryn A., Dlugosch, Katrina M., Barker, Michael S., Matvienko, Marta, Yu, Qian, Turner, Kathryn G., Pearl, Stephanie Anne, Bell, Graeme D. M., Zou, Yi, Grassa, Chris, Guggisberg, Alessia, Adams, Keith L., Anderson, James V., Horvath, David P., Kesseli, Richard V., Burke, John M., Michelmore, Richard W., Rieseberg, Loren H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue 2
container_start_page 209
container_title American journal of botany
container_volume 99
creator Lai, Zhao
Kane, Nolan C.
Kozik, Alex
Hodgins, Kathryn A.
Dlugosch, Katrina M.
Barker, Michael S.
Matvienko, Marta
Yu, Qian
Turner, Kathryn G.
Pearl, Stephanie Anne
Bell, Graeme D. M.
Zou, Yi
Grassa, Chris
Guggisberg, Alessia
Adams, Keith L.
Anderson, James V.
Horvath, David P.
Kesseli, Richard V.
Burke, John M.
Michelmore, Richard W.
Rieseberg, Loren H.
description Premise of study: Weeds cause considerable environmental and economic damage. However, genomic characterization of weeds has lagged behind that of model plants and crop species. Here we describe the development of genomic tools and resources for 11 weeds from the Compositae family that will serve as a basis for subsequent population and comparative genomic analyses. Because hybridization has been suggested as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness, we also analyze these genomic data for evidence of hybridization. Methods: We generated 22 expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries for the 11 targeted weeds using Sanger, 454, and Illumina sequencing, compared the coverage and quality of sequence assemblies, and developed NimbleGen microarrays for expression analyses in five taxa. When possible, we also compared the distributions of Ks values between orthologs of congeneric taxa to detect and quantify hybridization and introgression. Results: Gene discovery was enhanced by sequencing from multiple tissues, normalization of DNA libraries, and especially greater sequencing depth. However, assemblies from short sequence reads sometimes failed to resolve close paralogs. Substantial introgression was detected in Centaurea and Helianthus, but not in Ambrosia and Lactuca. Conclusions: Transcriptome sequencing using next-generation platforms has greatly reduced the cost of genomic studies of nonmodel organisms, and the ESTs and microarrays reported here will accelerate volutionary and molecular investigations of Compositae weeds. Our study also shows how ortholog comparisons can be used to approximately estimate the genome-wide extent of introgression and to identify genes that have been exchanged between hybridizing taxa.
doi_str_mv 10.3732/ajb.1100313
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921427695</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41415355</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41415355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-164096175408da5fb5a0e91b66508453408c4caeade6f65bf7ed06d6e03bf1663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1P3DAQhq2qqCzQU8-tol5Aollm_JWYG6z4aLUSB6h6jJxkUnmVxFt7F7T_vka7cODAyRrreR_J85qxLwhTUQh-Zhf1FBFAoPjAJqhEkXM0xUc2AQCeG-R8nx3EuEijkYZ_YvucgyqxxAn7c0OjH1wTM99lMz8sfXQrS9kTURvPs6v7h6x3dbDBUfyRJTB4G4LdpMGObUaPrqWxoee0G1fB_w0Uo_PjEdvrbB_p8-48ZL-vrx5mt_n87ubn7GKeN1Iak6OWYDQWSkLZWtXVygIZrLVWUEol0nUjG0u2Jd1pVXcFtaBbTSDqDrUWh-x4610G_29NcVUNLjbU93Ykv46V4Sh5oY1K5Mm7JAIvAYtSQkK_v0EXfh3G9I7kE6IsuJEJOt1CaSUxBuqqZXCDDZtkqp6LqVIx1a6YRH_bKdf1QO0r-9JEAnALPLmeNu-5qotflxw4mJT5us0s4sqH14xEmX6BUuI_pzKfUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>923387294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genomics of Compositae weeds: EST libraries, microarrays, and evidence of introgression</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lai, Zhao ; Kane, Nolan C. ; Kozik, Alex ; Hodgins, Kathryn A. ; Dlugosch, Katrina M. ; Barker, Michael S. ; Matvienko, Marta ; Yu, Qian ; Turner, Kathryn G. ; Pearl, Stephanie Anne ; Bell, Graeme D. M. ; Zou, Yi ; Grassa, Chris ; Guggisberg, Alessia ; Adams, Keith L. ; Anderson, James V. ; Horvath, David P. ; Kesseli, Richard V. ; Burke, John M. ; Michelmore, Richard W. ; Rieseberg, Loren H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lai, Zhao ; Kane, Nolan C. ; Kozik, Alex ; Hodgins, Kathryn A. ; Dlugosch, Katrina M. ; Barker, Michael S. ; Matvienko, Marta ; Yu, Qian ; Turner, Kathryn G. ; Pearl, Stephanie Anne ; Bell, Graeme D. M. ; Zou, Yi ; Grassa, Chris ; Guggisberg, Alessia ; Adams, Keith L. ; Anderson, James V. ; Horvath, David P. ; Kesseli, Richard V. ; Burke, John M. ; Michelmore, Richard W. ; Rieseberg, Loren H.</creatorcontrib><description>Premise of study: Weeds cause considerable environmental and economic damage. However, genomic characterization of weeds has lagged behind that of model plants and crop species. Here we describe the development of genomic tools and resources for 11 weeds from the Compositae family that will serve as a basis for subsequent population and comparative genomic analyses. Because hybridization has been suggested as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness, we also analyze these genomic data for evidence of hybridization. Methods: We generated 22 expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries for the 11 targeted weeds using Sanger, 454, and Illumina sequencing, compared the coverage and quality of sequence assemblies, and developed NimbleGen microarrays for expression analyses in five taxa. When possible, we also compared the distributions of Ks values between orthologs of congeneric taxa to detect and quantify hybridization and introgression. Results: Gene discovery was enhanced by sequencing from multiple tissues, normalization of DNA libraries, and especially greater sequencing depth. However, assemblies from short sequence reads sometimes failed to resolve close paralogs. Substantial introgression was detected in Centaurea and Helianthus, but not in Ambrosia and Lactuca. Conclusions: Transcriptome sequencing using next-generation platforms has greatly reduced the cost of genomic studies of nonmodel organisms, and the ESTs and microarrays reported here will accelerate volutionary and molecular investigations of Compositae weeds. Our study also shows how ortholog comparisons can be used to approximately estimate the genome-wide extent of introgression and to identify genes that have been exchanged between hybridizing taxa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1100313</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22058181</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Society of America</publisher><subject>Ambrosia ; Asteraceae ; Asteraceae - genetics ; Centaurea ; Complementary DNA ; Compositae ; Databases, Genetic ; DNA, Complementary - genetics ; Ecological genetics ; ESTs ; Evolution, Molecular ; Expressed Sequence Tags ; Gene Expression Profiling ; Gene Library ; Genetic Variation ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Genomics - methods ; Helianthus ; Hybridization ; Hybridization and Introgression ; Hybridization, Genetic ; introgression ; invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Lactuca ; Libraries ; microarray development ; next‐generation sequencing ; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis ; Plant sciences ; Plants ; RNA, Plant - genetics ; sequence assemblies ; Sequencing ; Sunflowers ; Taxa ; Taxonomy ; transcriptome sequencing ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2012-02, Vol.99 (2), p.209-218</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2012 Botanical Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Feb 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-164096175408da5fb5a0e91b66508453408c4caeade6f65bf7ed06d6e03bf1663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-164096175408da5fb5a0e91b66508453408c4caeade6f65bf7ed06d6e03bf1663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41415355$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41415355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22058181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lai, Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Nolan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozik, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, Kathryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlugosch, Katrina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matvienko, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kathryn G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearl, Stephanie Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Graeme D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassa, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guggisberg, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Keith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, James V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvath, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesseli, Richard V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelmore, Richard W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieseberg, Loren H.</creatorcontrib><title>Genomics of Compositae weeds: EST libraries, microarrays, and evidence of introgression</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>Premise of study: Weeds cause considerable environmental and economic damage. However, genomic characterization of weeds has lagged behind that of model plants and crop species. Here we describe the development of genomic tools and resources for 11 weeds from the Compositae family that will serve as a basis for subsequent population and comparative genomic analyses. Because hybridization has been suggested as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness, we also analyze these genomic data for evidence of hybridization. Methods: We generated 22 expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries for the 11 targeted weeds using Sanger, 454, and Illumina sequencing, compared the coverage and quality of sequence assemblies, and developed NimbleGen microarrays for expression analyses in five taxa. When possible, we also compared the distributions of Ks values between orthologs of congeneric taxa to detect and quantify hybridization and introgression. Results: Gene discovery was enhanced by sequencing from multiple tissues, normalization of DNA libraries, and especially greater sequencing depth. However, assemblies from short sequence reads sometimes failed to resolve close paralogs. Substantial introgression was detected in Centaurea and Helianthus, but not in Ambrosia and Lactuca. Conclusions: Transcriptome sequencing using next-generation platforms has greatly reduced the cost of genomic studies of nonmodel organisms, and the ESTs and microarrays reported here will accelerate volutionary and molecular investigations of Compositae weeds. Our study also shows how ortholog comparisons can be used to approximately estimate the genome-wide extent of introgression and to identify genes that have been exchanged between hybridizing taxa.</description><subject>Ambrosia</subject><subject>Asteraceae</subject><subject>Asteraceae - genetics</subject><subject>Centaurea</subject><subject>Complementary DNA</subject><subject>Compositae</subject><subject>Databases, Genetic</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary - genetics</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>ESTs</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Expressed Sequence Tags</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling</subject><subject>Gene Library</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genomics - methods</subject><subject>Helianthus</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Hybridization and Introgression</subject><subject>Hybridization, Genetic</subject><subject>introgression</subject><subject>invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Lactuca</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>microarray development</subject><subject>next‐generation sequencing</subject><subject>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis</subject><subject>Plant sciences</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>RNA, Plant - genetics</subject><subject>sequence assemblies</subject><subject>Sequencing</subject><subject>Sunflowers</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>transcriptome sequencing</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1P3DAQhq2qqCzQU8-tol5Aollm_JWYG6z4aLUSB6h6jJxkUnmVxFt7F7T_vka7cODAyRrreR_J85qxLwhTUQh-Zhf1FBFAoPjAJqhEkXM0xUc2AQCeG-R8nx3EuEijkYZ_YvucgyqxxAn7c0OjH1wTM99lMz8sfXQrS9kTURvPs6v7h6x3dbDBUfyRJTB4G4LdpMGObUaPrqWxoee0G1fB_w0Uo_PjEdvrbB_p8-48ZL-vrx5mt_n87ubn7GKeN1Iak6OWYDQWSkLZWtXVygIZrLVWUEol0nUjG0u2Jd1pVXcFtaBbTSDqDrUWh-x4610G_29NcVUNLjbU93Ykv46V4Sh5oY1K5Mm7JAIvAYtSQkK_v0EXfh3G9I7kE6IsuJEJOt1CaSUxBuqqZXCDDZtkqp6LqVIx1a6YRH_bKdf1QO0r-9JEAnALPLmeNu-5qotflxw4mJT5us0s4sqH14xEmX6BUuI_pzKfUQ</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>Lai, Zhao</creator><creator>Kane, Nolan C.</creator><creator>Kozik, Alex</creator><creator>Hodgins, Kathryn A.</creator><creator>Dlugosch, Katrina M.</creator><creator>Barker, Michael S.</creator><creator>Matvienko, Marta</creator><creator>Yu, Qian</creator><creator>Turner, Kathryn G.</creator><creator>Pearl, Stephanie Anne</creator><creator>Bell, Graeme D. M.</creator><creator>Zou, Yi</creator><creator>Grassa, Chris</creator><creator>Guggisberg, Alessia</creator><creator>Adams, Keith L.</creator><creator>Anderson, James V.</creator><creator>Horvath, David P.</creator><creator>Kesseli, Richard V.</creator><creator>Burke, John M.</creator><creator>Michelmore, Richard W.</creator><creator>Rieseberg, Loren H.</creator><general>Botanical Society of America</general><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>Genomics of Compositae weeds: EST libraries, microarrays, and evidence of introgression</title><author>Lai, Zhao ; Kane, Nolan C. ; Kozik, Alex ; Hodgins, Kathryn A. ; Dlugosch, Katrina M. ; Barker, Michael S. ; Matvienko, Marta ; Yu, Qian ; Turner, Kathryn G. ; Pearl, Stephanie Anne ; Bell, Graeme D. M. ; Zou, Yi ; Grassa, Chris ; Guggisberg, Alessia ; Adams, Keith L. ; Anderson, James V. ; Horvath, David P. ; Kesseli, Richard V. ; Burke, John M. ; Michelmore, Richard W. ; Rieseberg, Loren H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-164096175408da5fb5a0e91b66508453408c4caeade6f65bf7ed06d6e03bf1663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Ambrosia</topic><topic>Asteraceae</topic><topic>Asteraceae - genetics</topic><topic>Centaurea</topic><topic>Complementary DNA</topic><topic>Compositae</topic><topic>Databases, Genetic</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary - genetics</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>ESTs</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Expressed Sequence Tags</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling</topic><topic>Gene Library</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genomics - methods</topic><topic>Helianthus</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Hybridization and Introgression</topic><topic>Hybridization, Genetic</topic><topic>introgression</topic><topic>invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Lactuca</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>microarray development</topic><topic>next‐generation sequencing</topic><topic>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis</topic><topic>Plant sciences</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>RNA, Plant - genetics</topic><topic>sequence assemblies</topic><topic>Sequencing</topic><topic>Sunflowers</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>transcriptome sequencing</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lai, Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Nolan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozik, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, Kathryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlugosch, Katrina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matvienko, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kathryn G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearl, Stephanie Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Graeme D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassa, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guggisberg, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Keith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, James V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvath, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesseli, Richard V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelmore, Richard W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieseberg, Loren H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lai, Zhao</au><au>Kane, Nolan C.</au><au>Kozik, Alex</au><au>Hodgins, Kathryn A.</au><au>Dlugosch, Katrina M.</au><au>Barker, Michael S.</au><au>Matvienko, Marta</au><au>Yu, Qian</au><au>Turner, Kathryn G.</au><au>Pearl, Stephanie Anne</au><au>Bell, Graeme D. M.</au><au>Zou, Yi</au><au>Grassa, Chris</au><au>Guggisberg, Alessia</au><au>Adams, Keith L.</au><au>Anderson, James V.</au><au>Horvath, David P.</au><au>Kesseli, Richard V.</au><au>Burke, John M.</au><au>Michelmore, Richard W.</au><au>Rieseberg, Loren H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genomics of Compositae weeds: EST libraries, microarrays, and evidence of introgression</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>209-218</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>Premise of study: Weeds cause considerable environmental and economic damage. However, genomic characterization of weeds has lagged behind that of model plants and crop species. Here we describe the development of genomic tools and resources for 11 weeds from the Compositae family that will serve as a basis for subsequent population and comparative genomic analyses. Because hybridization has been suggested as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness, we also analyze these genomic data for evidence of hybridization. Methods: We generated 22 expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries for the 11 targeted weeds using Sanger, 454, and Illumina sequencing, compared the coverage and quality of sequence assemblies, and developed NimbleGen microarrays for expression analyses in five taxa. When possible, we also compared the distributions of Ks values between orthologs of congeneric taxa to detect and quantify hybridization and introgression. Results: Gene discovery was enhanced by sequencing from multiple tissues, normalization of DNA libraries, and especially greater sequencing depth. However, assemblies from short sequence reads sometimes failed to resolve close paralogs. Substantial introgression was detected in Centaurea and Helianthus, but not in Ambrosia and Lactuca. Conclusions: Transcriptome sequencing using next-generation platforms has greatly reduced the cost of genomic studies of nonmodel organisms, and the ESTs and microarrays reported here will accelerate volutionary and molecular investigations of Compositae weeds. Our study also shows how ortholog comparisons can be used to approximately estimate the genome-wide extent of introgression and to identify genes that have been exchanged between hybridizing taxa.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Society of America</pub><pmid>22058181</pmid><doi>10.3732/ajb.1100313</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9122
ispartof American journal of botany, 2012-02, Vol.99 (2), p.209-218
issn 0002-9122
1537-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921427695
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Ambrosia
Asteraceae
Asteraceae - genetics
Centaurea
Complementary DNA
Compositae
Databases, Genetic
DNA, Complementary - genetics
Ecological genetics
ESTs
Evolution, Molecular
Expressed Sequence Tags
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Library
Genetic Variation
Genomes
Genomics
Genomics - methods
Helianthus
Hybridization
Hybridization and Introgression
Hybridization, Genetic
introgression
invasive plants
Invasive species
Lactuca
Libraries
microarray development
next‐generation sequencing
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Plant sciences
Plants
RNA, Plant - genetics
sequence assemblies
Sequencing
Sunflowers
Taxa
Taxonomy
transcriptome sequencing
Weeds
title Genomics of Compositae weeds: EST libraries, microarrays, and evidence of introgression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A37%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomics%20of%20Compositae%20weeds:%20EST%20libraries,%20microarrays,%20and%20evidence%20of%20introgression&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Lai,%20Zhao&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=209-218&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.3732/ajb.1100313&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41415355%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=923387294&rft_id=info:pmid/22058181&rft_jstor_id=41415355&rfr_iscdi=true