Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process

This paper draws upon case study research to explore deviant social work. This is defined as small-scale acts of resistance, subterfuge, deception or even sabotage that are typically hidden yet scattered throughout parts of the social work labour process. Taking a wide variety of forms that can incl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The British journal of social work 2011-04, Vol.41 (3), p.576-593
Hauptverfasser: Carey, Malcolm, Foster, Victoria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 593
container_issue 3
container_start_page 576
container_title The British journal of social work
container_volume 41
creator Carey, Malcolm
Foster, Victoria
description This paper draws upon case study research to explore deviant social work. This is defined as small-scale acts of resistance, subterfuge, deception or even sabotage that are typically hidden yet scattered throughout parts of the social work labour process. Taking a wide variety of forms that can include recalcitrant attitudes as well as practices, deviant social work can be seen as being distinct from radical social work, most notably due to its implicit, pragmatic, non-idealistic and individual dispositions and strategies that are not rooted within epistemological, professional or other institutionally defined parameters. In contrast, positive deviant social work seeks as its maxim application and tangible support to vulnerable people above theoretical critique, rhetoric or perpetual reflexivity. Just as significant, because of its covert and disparate expressions, deviant social work also largely evades managerial or policy-led forms of location, surveillance and control. It is concluded that only engagement with an eclectic mix of critical theories is likely to help us locate and understand the many forms of resistance that inevitably emerge within an unpredictable, demanding, highly regulated and under-resourced quasi-professional labour process such as social work.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bjsw/bcq148
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921288207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43771438</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43771438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-36904fc1dd41e8fc66d07c5297cd9af6310b795c8654224b94cafd05b9edb1bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0kFvFCEYBmBiNHGtnjybEC9bY8byATMMvZnVapNNNNVGbxMGmC7rLLTAuPqL_JsyrjGNBz1x4PnewJcXocdAXgCR7KTfpv1Jr2-At3fQAnjTVrRhn--iBSG8rhgQeh89SGlLCBE1gQX6ce5zDGbSzl_h5Sv71Smfl_hD0E6N-FOIX07xKvhsv-VJjS7NLG8sXrudywmHAV8o43Sxt0bwfuPGlPGlNzamrLyZx47Porra2ZJlnuELm9x8oy3eu7xx_lfq7Yy16sMU8fsYtE3pIbo3qDHZR7_PI3R59vrj6m21fvfmfPVyXWnOaK5YIwkfNBjDwbaDbhpDhK6pFNpINTRlA72QtW6bmlPKe8m1Ggype2lND71mR2h5yL2O4WayKXc7l7QdR-VtmFInKdC2pUT8X5KiuGh4kcf_lFADBcnK2wt9-hfdliX48uOuFTUAFWTOe35AOoaUoh266-h2Kn7vgHRzD7q5B92hB0U_OehtyiH-oZwJAZy17CdTQLKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>875112704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Carey, Malcolm ; Foster, Victoria</creator><creatorcontrib>Carey, Malcolm ; Foster, Victoria</creatorcontrib><description>This paper draws upon case study research to explore deviant social work. This is defined as small-scale acts of resistance, subterfuge, deception or even sabotage that are typically hidden yet scattered throughout parts of the social work labour process. Taking a wide variety of forms that can include recalcitrant attitudes as well as practices, deviant social work can be seen as being distinct from radical social work, most notably due to its implicit, pragmatic, non-idealistic and individual dispositions and strategies that are not rooted within epistemological, professional or other institutionally defined parameters. In contrast, positive deviant social work seeks as its maxim application and tangible support to vulnerable people above theoretical critique, rhetoric or perpetual reflexivity. Just as significant, because of its covert and disparate expressions, deviant social work also largely evades managerial or policy-led forms of location, surveillance and control. It is concluded that only engagement with an eclectic mix of critical theories is likely to help us locate and understand the many forms of resistance that inevitably emerge within an unpredictable, demanding, highly regulated and under-resourced quasi-professional labour process such as social work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq148</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSWAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Attitudes ; Critical Theory ; Deceit ; Deviance ; Deviant behavior ; Epistemology ; Labor ; Labour process ; Pragmatism ; Radical social work ; Radicalism ; Radicals ; Reflexivity ; Research methods ; Resistance ; Rhetoric ; Sentences ; Social control ; Social services ; Social Work ; Social workers ; Surveillance ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 2011-04, Vol.41 (3), p.576-593</ispartof><rights>The British Association of Social Workers 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-36904fc1dd41e8fc66d07c5297cd9af6310b795c8654224b94cafd05b9edb1bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-36904fc1dd41e8fc66d07c5297cd9af6310b795c8654224b94cafd05b9edb1bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43771438$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43771438$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carey, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Victoria</creatorcontrib><title>Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>This paper draws upon case study research to explore deviant social work. This is defined as small-scale acts of resistance, subterfuge, deception or even sabotage that are typically hidden yet scattered throughout parts of the social work labour process. Taking a wide variety of forms that can include recalcitrant attitudes as well as practices, deviant social work can be seen as being distinct from radical social work, most notably due to its implicit, pragmatic, non-idealistic and individual dispositions and strategies that are not rooted within epistemological, professional or other institutionally defined parameters. In contrast, positive deviant social work seeks as its maxim application and tangible support to vulnerable people above theoretical critique, rhetoric or perpetual reflexivity. Just as significant, because of its covert and disparate expressions, deviant social work also largely evades managerial or policy-led forms of location, surveillance and control. It is concluded that only engagement with an eclectic mix of critical theories is likely to help us locate and understand the many forms of resistance that inevitably emerge within an unpredictable, demanding, highly regulated and under-resourced quasi-professional labour process such as social work.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Critical Theory</subject><subject>Deceit</subject><subject>Deviance</subject><subject>Deviant behavior</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Labour process</subject><subject>Pragmatism</subject><subject>Radical social work</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Radicals</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Social control</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Social workers</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0kFvFCEYBmBiNHGtnjybEC9bY8byATMMvZnVapNNNNVGbxMGmC7rLLTAuPqL_JsyrjGNBz1x4PnewJcXocdAXgCR7KTfpv1Jr2-At3fQAnjTVrRhn--iBSG8rhgQeh89SGlLCBE1gQX6ce5zDGbSzl_h5Sv71Smfl_hD0E6N-FOIX07xKvhsv-VJjS7NLG8sXrudywmHAV8o43Sxt0bwfuPGlPGlNzamrLyZx47Porra2ZJlnuELm9x8oy3eu7xx_lfq7Yy16sMU8fsYtE3pIbo3qDHZR7_PI3R59vrj6m21fvfmfPVyXWnOaK5YIwkfNBjDwbaDbhpDhK6pFNpINTRlA72QtW6bmlPKe8m1Ggype2lND71mR2h5yL2O4WayKXc7l7QdR-VtmFInKdC2pUT8X5KiuGh4kcf_lFADBcnK2wt9-hfdliX48uOuFTUAFWTOe35AOoaUoh266-h2Kn7vgHRzD7q5B92hB0U_OehtyiH-oZwJAZy17CdTQLKg</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Carey, Malcolm</creator><creator>Foster, Victoria</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process</title><author>Carey, Malcolm ; Foster, Victoria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-36904fc1dd41e8fc66d07c5297cd9af6310b795c8654224b94cafd05b9edb1bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Critical Theory</topic><topic>Deceit</topic><topic>Deviance</topic><topic>Deviant behavior</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Labour process</topic><topic>Pragmatism</topic><topic>Radical social work</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Radicals</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Social control</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Social workers</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carey, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Victoria</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carey, Malcolm</au><au>Foster, Victoria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>576</spage><epage>593</epage><pages>576-593</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><coden>BJSWAS</coden><abstract>This paper draws upon case study research to explore deviant social work. This is defined as small-scale acts of resistance, subterfuge, deception or even sabotage that are typically hidden yet scattered throughout parts of the social work labour process. Taking a wide variety of forms that can include recalcitrant attitudes as well as practices, deviant social work can be seen as being distinct from radical social work, most notably due to its implicit, pragmatic, non-idealistic and individual dispositions and strategies that are not rooted within epistemological, professional or other institutionally defined parameters. In contrast, positive deviant social work seeks as its maxim application and tangible support to vulnerable people above theoretical critique, rhetoric or perpetual reflexivity. Just as significant, because of its covert and disparate expressions, deviant social work also largely evades managerial or policy-led forms of location, surveillance and control. It is concluded that only engagement with an eclectic mix of critical theories is likely to help us locate and understand the many forms of resistance that inevitably emerge within an unpredictable, demanding, highly regulated and under-resourced quasi-professional labour process such as social work.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjsw/bcq148</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-3102
ispartof The British journal of social work, 2011-04, Vol.41 (3), p.576-593
issn 0045-3102
1468-263X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921288207
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Altruism
Attitudes
Critical Theory
Deceit
Deviance
Deviant behavior
Epistemology
Labor
Labour process
Pragmatism
Radical social work
Radicalism
Radicals
Reflexivity
Research methods
Resistance
Rhetoric
Sentences
Social control
Social services
Social Work
Social workers
Surveillance
Vulnerability
title Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introducing%20'Deviant'%20Social%20Work:%20Contextualising%20the%20Limits%20of%20Radical%20Social%20Work%20whilst%20Understanding%20(Fragmented)%20Resistance%20within%20the%20Social%20Work%20Labour%20Process&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Carey,%20Malcolm&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=576&rft.epage=593&rft.pages=576-593&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft.coden=BJSWAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcq148&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43771438%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=875112704&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43771438&rfr_iscdi=true