Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process
This paper draws upon case study research to explore deviant social work. This is defined as small-scale acts of resistance, subterfuge, deception or even sabotage that are typically hidden yet scattered throughout parts of the social work labour process. Taking a wide variety of forms that can incl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The British journal of social work 2011-04, Vol.41 (3), p.576-593 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 593 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 576 |
container_title | The British journal of social work |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Carey, Malcolm Foster, Victoria |
description | This paper draws upon case study research to explore deviant social work. This is defined as small-scale acts of resistance, subterfuge, deception or even sabotage that are typically hidden yet scattered throughout parts of the social work labour process. Taking a wide variety of forms that can include recalcitrant attitudes as well as practices, deviant social work can be seen as being distinct from radical social work, most notably due to its implicit, pragmatic, non-idealistic and individual dispositions and strategies that are not rooted within epistemological, professional or other institutionally defined parameters. In contrast, positive deviant social work seeks as its maxim application and tangible support to vulnerable people above theoretical critique, rhetoric or perpetual reflexivity. Just as significant, because of its covert and disparate expressions, deviant social work also largely evades managerial or policy-led forms of location, surveillance and control. It is concluded that only engagement with an eclectic mix of critical theories is likely to help us locate and understand the many forms of resistance that inevitably emerge within an unpredictable, demanding, highly regulated and under-resourced quasi-professional labour process such as social work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bjsw/bcq148 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921288207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43771438</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43771438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-36904fc1dd41e8fc66d07c5297cd9af6310b795c8654224b94cafd05b9edb1bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0kFvFCEYBmBiNHGtnjybEC9bY8byATMMvZnVapNNNNVGbxMGmC7rLLTAuPqL_JsyrjGNBz1x4PnewJcXocdAXgCR7KTfpv1Jr2-At3fQAnjTVrRhn--iBSG8rhgQeh89SGlLCBE1gQX6ce5zDGbSzl_h5Sv71Smfl_hD0E6N-FOIX07xKvhsv-VJjS7NLG8sXrudywmHAV8o43Sxt0bwfuPGlPGlNzamrLyZx47Porra2ZJlnuELm9x8oy3eu7xx_lfq7Yy16sMU8fsYtE3pIbo3qDHZR7_PI3R59vrj6m21fvfmfPVyXWnOaK5YIwkfNBjDwbaDbhpDhK6pFNpINTRlA72QtW6bmlPKe8m1Ggype2lND71mR2h5yL2O4WayKXc7l7QdR-VtmFInKdC2pUT8X5KiuGh4kcf_lFADBcnK2wt9-hfdliX48uOuFTUAFWTOe35AOoaUoh266-h2Kn7vgHRzD7q5B92hB0U_OehtyiH-oZwJAZy17CdTQLKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>875112704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Carey, Malcolm ; Foster, Victoria</creator><creatorcontrib>Carey, Malcolm ; Foster, Victoria</creatorcontrib><description>This paper draws upon case study research to explore deviant social work. This is defined as small-scale acts of resistance, subterfuge, deception or even sabotage that are typically hidden yet scattered throughout parts of the social work labour process. Taking a wide variety of forms that can include recalcitrant attitudes as well as practices, deviant social work can be seen as being distinct from radical social work, most notably due to its implicit, pragmatic, non-idealistic and individual dispositions and strategies that are not rooted within epistemological, professional or other institutionally defined parameters. In contrast, positive deviant social work seeks as its maxim application and tangible support to vulnerable people above theoretical critique, rhetoric or perpetual reflexivity. Just as significant, because of its covert and disparate expressions, deviant social work also largely evades managerial or policy-led forms of location, surveillance and control. It is concluded that only engagement with an eclectic mix of critical theories is likely to help us locate and understand the many forms of resistance that inevitably emerge within an unpredictable, demanding, highly regulated and under-resourced quasi-professional labour process such as social work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq148</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSWAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Attitudes ; Critical Theory ; Deceit ; Deviance ; Deviant behavior ; Epistemology ; Labor ; Labour process ; Pragmatism ; Radical social work ; Radicalism ; Radicals ; Reflexivity ; Research methods ; Resistance ; Rhetoric ; Sentences ; Social control ; Social services ; Social Work ; Social workers ; Surveillance ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 2011-04, Vol.41 (3), p.576-593</ispartof><rights>The British Association of Social Workers 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-36904fc1dd41e8fc66d07c5297cd9af6310b795c8654224b94cafd05b9edb1bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-36904fc1dd41e8fc66d07c5297cd9af6310b795c8654224b94cafd05b9edb1bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43771438$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43771438$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carey, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Victoria</creatorcontrib><title>Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>This paper draws upon case study research to explore deviant social work. This is defined as small-scale acts of resistance, subterfuge, deception or even sabotage that are typically hidden yet scattered throughout parts of the social work labour process. Taking a wide variety of forms that can include recalcitrant attitudes as well as practices, deviant social work can be seen as being distinct from radical social work, most notably due to its implicit, pragmatic, non-idealistic and individual dispositions and strategies that are not rooted within epistemological, professional or other institutionally defined parameters. In contrast, positive deviant social work seeks as its maxim application and tangible support to vulnerable people above theoretical critique, rhetoric or perpetual reflexivity. Just as significant, because of its covert and disparate expressions, deviant social work also largely evades managerial or policy-led forms of location, surveillance and control. It is concluded that only engagement with an eclectic mix of critical theories is likely to help us locate and understand the many forms of resistance that inevitably emerge within an unpredictable, demanding, highly regulated and under-resourced quasi-professional labour process such as social work.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Critical Theory</subject><subject>Deceit</subject><subject>Deviance</subject><subject>Deviant behavior</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Labour process</subject><subject>Pragmatism</subject><subject>Radical social work</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Radicals</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Social control</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Social workers</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0kFvFCEYBmBiNHGtnjybEC9bY8byATMMvZnVapNNNNVGbxMGmC7rLLTAuPqL_JsyrjGNBz1x4PnewJcXocdAXgCR7KTfpv1Jr2-At3fQAnjTVrRhn--iBSG8rhgQeh89SGlLCBE1gQX6ce5zDGbSzl_h5Sv71Smfl_hD0E6N-FOIX07xKvhsv-VJjS7NLG8sXrudywmHAV8o43Sxt0bwfuPGlPGlNzamrLyZx47Porra2ZJlnuELm9x8oy3eu7xx_lfq7Yy16sMU8fsYtE3pIbo3qDHZR7_PI3R59vrj6m21fvfmfPVyXWnOaK5YIwkfNBjDwbaDbhpDhK6pFNpINTRlA72QtW6bmlPKe8m1Ggype2lND71mR2h5yL2O4WayKXc7l7QdR-VtmFInKdC2pUT8X5KiuGh4kcf_lFADBcnK2wt9-hfdliX48uOuFTUAFWTOe35AOoaUoh266-h2Kn7vgHRzD7q5B92hB0U_OehtyiH-oZwJAZy17CdTQLKg</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Carey, Malcolm</creator><creator>Foster, Victoria</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process</title><author>Carey, Malcolm ; Foster, Victoria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-36904fc1dd41e8fc66d07c5297cd9af6310b795c8654224b94cafd05b9edb1bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Critical Theory</topic><topic>Deceit</topic><topic>Deviance</topic><topic>Deviant behavior</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Labour process</topic><topic>Pragmatism</topic><topic>Radical social work</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Radicals</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Social control</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Social workers</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carey, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Victoria</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carey, Malcolm</au><au>Foster, Victoria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>576</spage><epage>593</epage><pages>576-593</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><coden>BJSWAS</coden><abstract>This paper draws upon case study research to explore deviant social work. This is defined as small-scale acts of resistance, subterfuge, deception or even sabotage that are typically hidden yet scattered throughout parts of the social work labour process. Taking a wide variety of forms that can include recalcitrant attitudes as well as practices, deviant social work can be seen as being distinct from radical social work, most notably due to its implicit, pragmatic, non-idealistic and individual dispositions and strategies that are not rooted within epistemological, professional or other institutionally defined parameters. In contrast, positive deviant social work seeks as its maxim application and tangible support to vulnerable people above theoretical critique, rhetoric or perpetual reflexivity. Just as significant, because of its covert and disparate expressions, deviant social work also largely evades managerial or policy-led forms of location, surveillance and control. It is concluded that only engagement with an eclectic mix of critical theories is likely to help us locate and understand the many forms of resistance that inevitably emerge within an unpredictable, demanding, highly regulated and under-resourced quasi-professional labour process such as social work.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjsw/bcq148</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-3102 |
ispartof | The British journal of social work, 2011-04, Vol.41 (3), p.576-593 |
issn | 0045-3102 1468-263X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921288207 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Altruism Attitudes Critical Theory Deceit Deviance Deviant behavior Epistemology Labor Labour process Pragmatism Radical social work Radicalism Radicals Reflexivity Research methods Resistance Rhetoric Sentences Social control Social services Social Work Social workers Surveillance Vulnerability |
title | Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented) Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introducing%20'Deviant'%20Social%20Work:%20Contextualising%20the%20Limits%20of%20Radical%20Social%20Work%20whilst%20Understanding%20(Fragmented)%20Resistance%20within%20the%20Social%20Work%20Labour%20Process&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Carey,%20Malcolm&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=576&rft.epage=593&rft.pages=576-593&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft.coden=BJSWAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcq148&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43771438%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=875112704&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43771438&rfr_iscdi=true |