Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves
• A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New phytologist 2012, Vol.193 (2), p.481-493 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 493 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 481 |
container_title | The New phytologist |
container_volume | 193 |
creator | Geeta, R Dávalos, Liliana M Levy, André Bohs, Lynn Lavin, Mathew Mummenhoff, Klaus Sinha, Neelima Wojciechowski, Martin F |
description | • A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of changes in leaf shape. • Seven datasets (diverse angiosperms and six nested clades, Sapindales, Apiales, Papaveraceae, Fabaceae, Lepidium, Solanum) were analysed using maximum likelihood and parsimony methods to estimate asymmetries in rates of change among character states. • Simple leaves are most frequent among angiosperm lineages today, were inferred to be ancestral in angiosperms and tended to be retained in evolution (stasis). Complex leaves slowly originated (‘gains’) and quickly reverted to simple leaves (‘losses’) multiple times, with a significantly greater rate of losses than gains. Lobed leaves may be a labile intermediate step between different forms. The nested clades showed mixed trends; Solanum, like the angiosperms in general, had higher rates of losses than gains, but the other clades had higher rates of gains than losses. • The angiosperm‐wide pattern could be taken as a null model to test leaf evolution patterns in particular clades, in which patterns of variation suggest clade‐specific processes that have yet to be investigated fully. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03951.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921149613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>newphytologist.193.2.481</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>newphytologist.193.2.481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-c348af3f9b779149c40f63a97e20e69e34560f408f4d43b47e3adc26e7cc9b883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9vFCEUxYnR2G31KyhvvnRG_g0DJj6YRq2x0SbaxDfCzl5WNrPDCGy3--3LOOs-ywvcy_kd4IAQpqSmZbzd1FRIXSnK25oRSmvCdUPrhydocdp4ihaEMFVJIX-dofOUNoQQ3Uj2HJ0xRjRtGrlAt18BRj-ssc84-e3Ywzvs-rCHODXH3g454QzDCueAI2Trh0tsSxnhHmIu3csjh3uw95BeoGfO9gleHucLdPfp48-r6-rm--cvVx9uqk4oQquOC2Udd3rZtpoK3QniJLe6BUZAauCikcQJopxYCb4ULXC76piEtuv0Uil-gd7MvmMMf3aQstn61EFfbgxhl4xmtNhKyotSzcouhpQiODNGv7XxYCgxU5xmY6bUzJSameI0f-M0DwV9dTxkt9zC6gT-y68I3s-Cve_h8N_G5tvt9bQqfDXzm5RDPPED7Mffhxz6sPblZVRzw4xQk_71rHc2GLuOPpm7H8VZlL-lhDaEPwKhu5x9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921149613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>IngentaConnect Backfiles</source><source>Wiley</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Geeta, R ; Dávalos, Liliana M ; Levy, André ; Bohs, Lynn ; Lavin, Mathew ; Mummenhoff, Klaus ; Sinha, Neelima ; Wojciechowski, Martin F</creator><creatorcontrib>Geeta, R ; Dávalos, Liliana M ; Levy, André ; Bohs, Lynn ; Lavin, Mathew ; Mummenhoff, Klaus ; Sinha, Neelima ; Wojciechowski, Martin F</creatorcontrib><description>• A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of changes in leaf shape. • Seven datasets (diverse angiosperms and six nested clades, Sapindales, Apiales, Papaveraceae, Fabaceae, Lepidium, Solanum) were analysed using maximum likelihood and parsimony methods to estimate asymmetries in rates of change among character states. • Simple leaves are most frequent among angiosperm lineages today, were inferred to be ancestral in angiosperms and tended to be retained in evolution (stasis). Complex leaves slowly originated (‘gains’) and quickly reverted to simple leaves (‘losses’) multiple times, with a significantly greater rate of losses than gains. Lobed leaves may be a labile intermediate step between different forms. The nested clades showed mixed trends; Solanum, like the angiosperms in general, had higher rates of losses than gains, but the other clades had higher rates of gains than losses. • The angiosperm‐wide pattern could be taken as a null model to test leaf evolution patterns in particular clades, in which patterns of variation suggest clade‐specific processes that have yet to be investigated fully.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03951.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22091556</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>angiosperm ; Angiosperms ; Apiales ; Biological Evolution ; character ; complex leaves ; Computer Simulation ; Data coding ; data collection ; Databases as Topic ; Datasets ; development ; Evolution ; Fabaceae ; Leaves ; Lepidium ; Likelihood Functions ; Magnoliopsida - anatomy & histology ; Magnoliopsida - genetics ; Models, Biological ; Papaveraceae ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Plant Leaves - anatomy & histology ; Plant Leaves - genetics ; Plant morphology ; rate of evolution ; Rates of change ; reversal ; Sapindales ; simple leaves ; Solanum ; stasis ; Taxa</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2012, Vol.193 (2), p.481-493</ispartof><rights>2012 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2011 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2011 New Phytologist Trust.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-c348af3f9b779149c40f63a97e20e69e34560f408f4d43b47e3adc26e7cc9b883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-c348af3f9b779149c40f63a97e20e69e34560f408f4d43b47e3adc26e7cc9b883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/newphytologist.193.2.481$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/newphytologist.193.2.481$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,4009,27902,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22091556$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geeta, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dávalos, Liliana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohs, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavin, Mathew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mummenhoff, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Neelima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojciechowski, Martin F</creatorcontrib><title>Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>• A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of changes in leaf shape. • Seven datasets (diverse angiosperms and six nested clades, Sapindales, Apiales, Papaveraceae, Fabaceae, Lepidium, Solanum) were analysed using maximum likelihood and parsimony methods to estimate asymmetries in rates of change among character states. • Simple leaves are most frequent among angiosperm lineages today, were inferred to be ancestral in angiosperms and tended to be retained in evolution (stasis). Complex leaves slowly originated (‘gains’) and quickly reverted to simple leaves (‘losses’) multiple times, with a significantly greater rate of losses than gains. Lobed leaves may be a labile intermediate step between different forms. The nested clades showed mixed trends; Solanum, like the angiosperms in general, had higher rates of losses than gains, but the other clades had higher rates of gains than losses. • The angiosperm‐wide pattern could be taken as a null model to test leaf evolution patterns in particular clades, in which patterns of variation suggest clade‐specific processes that have yet to be investigated fully.</description><subject>angiosperm</subject><subject>Angiosperms</subject><subject>Apiales</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>character</subject><subject>complex leaves</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Data coding</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Databases as Topic</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>development</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fabaceae</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Lepidium</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - genetics</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Papaveraceae</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - genetics</subject><subject>Plant morphology</subject><subject>rate of evolution</subject><subject>Rates of change</subject><subject>reversal</subject><subject>Sapindales</subject><subject>simple leaves</subject><subject>Solanum</subject><subject>stasis</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9vFCEUxYnR2G31KyhvvnRG_g0DJj6YRq2x0SbaxDfCzl5WNrPDCGy3--3LOOs-ywvcy_kd4IAQpqSmZbzd1FRIXSnK25oRSmvCdUPrhydocdp4ihaEMFVJIX-dofOUNoQQ3Uj2HJ0xRjRtGrlAt18BRj-ssc84-e3Ywzvs-rCHODXH3g454QzDCueAI2Trh0tsSxnhHmIu3csjh3uw95BeoGfO9gleHucLdPfp48-r6-rm--cvVx9uqk4oQquOC2Udd3rZtpoK3QniJLe6BUZAauCikcQJopxYCb4ULXC76piEtuv0Uil-gd7MvmMMf3aQstn61EFfbgxhl4xmtNhKyotSzcouhpQiODNGv7XxYCgxU5xmY6bUzJSameI0f-M0DwV9dTxkt9zC6gT-y68I3s-Cve_h8N_G5tvt9bQqfDXzm5RDPPED7Mffhxz6sPblZVRzw4xQk_71rHc2GLuOPpm7H8VZlL-lhDaEPwKhu5x9</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Geeta, R</creator><creator>Dávalos, Liliana M</creator><creator>Levy, André</creator><creator>Bohs, Lynn</creator><creator>Lavin, Mathew</creator><creator>Mummenhoff, Klaus</creator><creator>Sinha, Neelima</creator><creator>Wojciechowski, Martin F</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>New Phytologist Trust</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves</title><author>Geeta, R ; Dávalos, Liliana M ; Levy, André ; Bohs, Lynn ; Lavin, Mathew ; Mummenhoff, Klaus ; Sinha, Neelima ; Wojciechowski, Martin F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-c348af3f9b779149c40f63a97e20e69e34560f408f4d43b47e3adc26e7cc9b883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>angiosperm</topic><topic>Angiosperms</topic><topic>Apiales</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>character</topic><topic>complex leaves</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Data coding</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Databases as Topic</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>development</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fabaceae</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Lepidium</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - genetics</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Papaveraceae</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - genetics</topic><topic>Plant morphology</topic><topic>rate of evolution</topic><topic>Rates of change</topic><topic>reversal</topic><topic>Sapindales</topic><topic>simple leaves</topic><topic>Solanum</topic><topic>stasis</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geeta, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dávalos, Liliana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohs, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavin, Mathew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mummenhoff, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Neelima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojciechowski, Martin F</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geeta, R</au><au>Dávalos, Liliana M</au><au>Levy, André</au><au>Bohs, Lynn</au><au>Lavin, Mathew</au><au>Mummenhoff, Klaus</au><au>Sinha, Neelima</au><au>Wojciechowski, Martin F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>193</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>481</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>481-493</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>• A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of changes in leaf shape. • Seven datasets (diverse angiosperms and six nested clades, Sapindales, Apiales, Papaveraceae, Fabaceae, Lepidium, Solanum) were analysed using maximum likelihood and parsimony methods to estimate asymmetries in rates of change among character states. • Simple leaves are most frequent among angiosperm lineages today, were inferred to be ancestral in angiosperms and tended to be retained in evolution (stasis). Complex leaves slowly originated (‘gains’) and quickly reverted to simple leaves (‘losses’) multiple times, with a significantly greater rate of losses than gains. Lobed leaves may be a labile intermediate step between different forms. The nested clades showed mixed trends; Solanum, like the angiosperms in general, had higher rates of losses than gains, but the other clades had higher rates of gains than losses. • The angiosperm‐wide pattern could be taken as a null model to test leaf evolution patterns in particular clades, in which patterns of variation suggest clade‐specific processes that have yet to be investigated fully.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22091556</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03951.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-646X |
ispartof | The New phytologist, 2012, Vol.193 (2), p.481-493 |
issn | 0028-646X 1469-8137 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921149613 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; IngentaConnect Backfiles; Wiley; MEDLINE; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access); EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | angiosperm Angiosperms Apiales Biological Evolution character complex leaves Computer Simulation Data coding data collection Databases as Topic Datasets development Evolution Fabaceae Leaves Lepidium Likelihood Functions Magnoliopsida - anatomy & histology Magnoliopsida - genetics Models, Biological Papaveraceae Phylogenetics Phylogeny Plant Leaves - anatomy & histology Plant Leaves - genetics Plant morphology rate of evolution Rates of change reversal Sapindales simple leaves Solanum stasis Taxa |
title | Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A00%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Keeping%20it%20simple:%20flowering%20plants%20tend%20to%20retain,%20and%20revert%20to,%20simple%20leaves&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Geeta,%20R&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=481-493&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03951.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3Enewphytologist.193.2.481%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921149613&rft_id=info:pmid/22091556&rft_jstor_id=newphytologist.193.2.481&rfr_iscdi=true |