Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves

• A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist 2012, Vol.193 (2), p.481-493
Hauptverfasser: Geeta, R, Dávalos, Liliana M, Levy, André, Bohs, Lynn, Lavin, Mathew, Mummenhoff, Klaus, Sinha, Neelima, Wojciechowski, Martin F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 493
container_issue 2
container_start_page 481
container_title The New phytologist
container_volume 193
creator Geeta, R
Dávalos, Liliana M
Levy, André
Bohs, Lynn
Lavin, Mathew
Mummenhoff, Klaus
Sinha, Neelima
Wojciechowski, Martin F
description • A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of changes in leaf shape. • Seven datasets (diverse angiosperms and six nested clades, Sapindales, Apiales, Papaveraceae, Fabaceae, Lepidium, Solanum) were analysed using maximum likelihood and parsimony methods to estimate asymmetries in rates of change among character states. • Simple leaves are most frequent among angiosperm lineages today, were inferred to be ancestral in angiosperms and tended to be retained in evolution (stasis). Complex leaves slowly originated (‘gains’) and quickly reverted to simple leaves (‘losses’) multiple times, with a significantly greater rate of losses than gains. Lobed leaves may be a labile intermediate step between different forms. The nested clades showed mixed trends; Solanum, like the angiosperms in general, had higher rates of losses than gains, but the other clades had higher rates of gains than losses. • The angiosperm‐wide pattern could be taken as a null model to test leaf evolution patterns in particular clades, in which patterns of variation suggest clade‐specific processes that have yet to be investigated fully.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03951.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921149613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>newphytologist.193.2.481</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>newphytologist.193.2.481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-c348af3f9b779149c40f63a97e20e69e34560f408f4d43b47e3adc26e7cc9b883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9vFCEUxYnR2G31KyhvvnRG_g0DJj6YRq2x0SbaxDfCzl5WNrPDCGy3--3LOOs-ywvcy_kd4IAQpqSmZbzd1FRIXSnK25oRSmvCdUPrhydocdp4ihaEMFVJIX-dofOUNoQQ3Uj2HJ0xRjRtGrlAt18BRj-ssc84-e3Ywzvs-rCHODXH3g454QzDCueAI2Trh0tsSxnhHmIu3csjh3uw95BeoGfO9gleHucLdPfp48-r6-rm--cvVx9uqk4oQquOC2Udd3rZtpoK3QniJLe6BUZAauCikcQJopxYCb4ULXC76piEtuv0Uil-gd7MvmMMf3aQstn61EFfbgxhl4xmtNhKyotSzcouhpQiODNGv7XxYCgxU5xmY6bUzJSameI0f-M0DwV9dTxkt9zC6gT-y68I3s-Cve_h8N_G5tvt9bQqfDXzm5RDPPED7Mffhxz6sPblZVRzw4xQk_71rHc2GLuOPpm7H8VZlL-lhDaEPwKhu5x9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921149613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>IngentaConnect Backfiles</source><source>Wiley</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Geeta, R ; Dávalos, Liliana M ; Levy, André ; Bohs, Lynn ; Lavin, Mathew ; Mummenhoff, Klaus ; Sinha, Neelima ; Wojciechowski, Martin F</creator><creatorcontrib>Geeta, R ; Dávalos, Liliana M ; Levy, André ; Bohs, Lynn ; Lavin, Mathew ; Mummenhoff, Klaus ; Sinha, Neelima ; Wojciechowski, Martin F</creatorcontrib><description>• A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of changes in leaf shape. • Seven datasets (diverse angiosperms and six nested clades, Sapindales, Apiales, Papaveraceae, Fabaceae, Lepidium, Solanum) were analysed using maximum likelihood and parsimony methods to estimate asymmetries in rates of change among character states. • Simple leaves are most frequent among angiosperm lineages today, were inferred to be ancestral in angiosperms and tended to be retained in evolution (stasis). Complex leaves slowly originated (‘gains’) and quickly reverted to simple leaves (‘losses’) multiple times, with a significantly greater rate of losses than gains. Lobed leaves may be a labile intermediate step between different forms. The nested clades showed mixed trends; Solanum, like the angiosperms in general, had higher rates of losses than gains, but the other clades had higher rates of gains than losses. • The angiosperm‐wide pattern could be taken as a null model to test leaf evolution patterns in particular clades, in which patterns of variation suggest clade‐specific processes that have yet to be investigated fully.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03951.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22091556</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>angiosperm ; Angiosperms ; Apiales ; Biological Evolution ; character ; complex leaves ; Computer Simulation ; Data coding ; data collection ; Databases as Topic ; Datasets ; development ; Evolution ; Fabaceae ; Leaves ; Lepidium ; Likelihood Functions ; Magnoliopsida - anatomy &amp; histology ; Magnoliopsida - genetics ; Models, Biological ; Papaveraceae ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Plant Leaves - anatomy &amp; histology ; Plant Leaves - genetics ; Plant morphology ; rate of evolution ; Rates of change ; reversal ; Sapindales ; simple leaves ; Solanum ; stasis ; Taxa</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2012, Vol.193 (2), p.481-493</ispartof><rights>2012 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2011 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2011 New Phytologist Trust.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-c348af3f9b779149c40f63a97e20e69e34560f408f4d43b47e3adc26e7cc9b883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-c348af3f9b779149c40f63a97e20e69e34560f408f4d43b47e3adc26e7cc9b883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/newphytologist.193.2.481$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/newphytologist.193.2.481$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,4009,27902,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22091556$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geeta, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dávalos, Liliana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohs, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavin, Mathew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mummenhoff, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Neelima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojciechowski, Martin F</creatorcontrib><title>Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>• A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of changes in leaf shape. • Seven datasets (diverse angiosperms and six nested clades, Sapindales, Apiales, Papaveraceae, Fabaceae, Lepidium, Solanum) were analysed using maximum likelihood and parsimony methods to estimate asymmetries in rates of change among character states. • Simple leaves are most frequent among angiosperm lineages today, were inferred to be ancestral in angiosperms and tended to be retained in evolution (stasis). Complex leaves slowly originated (‘gains’) and quickly reverted to simple leaves (‘losses’) multiple times, with a significantly greater rate of losses than gains. Lobed leaves may be a labile intermediate step between different forms. The nested clades showed mixed trends; Solanum, like the angiosperms in general, had higher rates of losses than gains, but the other clades had higher rates of gains than losses. • The angiosperm‐wide pattern could be taken as a null model to test leaf evolution patterns in particular clades, in which patterns of variation suggest clade‐specific processes that have yet to be investigated fully.</description><subject>angiosperm</subject><subject>Angiosperms</subject><subject>Apiales</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>character</subject><subject>complex leaves</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Data coding</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Databases as Topic</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>development</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fabaceae</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Lepidium</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - genetics</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Papaveraceae</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - genetics</subject><subject>Plant morphology</subject><subject>rate of evolution</subject><subject>Rates of change</subject><subject>reversal</subject><subject>Sapindales</subject><subject>simple leaves</subject><subject>Solanum</subject><subject>stasis</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9vFCEUxYnR2G31KyhvvnRG_g0DJj6YRq2x0SbaxDfCzl5WNrPDCGy3--3LOOs-ywvcy_kd4IAQpqSmZbzd1FRIXSnK25oRSmvCdUPrhydocdp4ihaEMFVJIX-dofOUNoQQ3Uj2HJ0xRjRtGrlAt18BRj-ssc84-e3Ywzvs-rCHODXH3g454QzDCueAI2Trh0tsSxnhHmIu3csjh3uw95BeoGfO9gleHucLdPfp48-r6-rm--cvVx9uqk4oQquOC2Udd3rZtpoK3QniJLe6BUZAauCikcQJopxYCb4ULXC76piEtuv0Uil-gd7MvmMMf3aQstn61EFfbgxhl4xmtNhKyotSzcouhpQiODNGv7XxYCgxU5xmY6bUzJSameI0f-M0DwV9dTxkt9zC6gT-y68I3s-Cve_h8N_G5tvt9bQqfDXzm5RDPPED7Mffhxz6sPblZVRzw4xQk_71rHc2GLuOPpm7H8VZlL-lhDaEPwKhu5x9</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Geeta, R</creator><creator>Dávalos, Liliana M</creator><creator>Levy, André</creator><creator>Bohs, Lynn</creator><creator>Lavin, Mathew</creator><creator>Mummenhoff, Klaus</creator><creator>Sinha, Neelima</creator><creator>Wojciechowski, Martin F</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>New Phytologist Trust</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves</title><author>Geeta, R ; Dávalos, Liliana M ; Levy, André ; Bohs, Lynn ; Lavin, Mathew ; Mummenhoff, Klaus ; Sinha, Neelima ; Wojciechowski, Martin F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-c348af3f9b779149c40f63a97e20e69e34560f408f4d43b47e3adc26e7cc9b883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>angiosperm</topic><topic>Angiosperms</topic><topic>Apiales</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>character</topic><topic>complex leaves</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Data coding</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Databases as Topic</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>development</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fabaceae</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Lepidium</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - genetics</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Papaveraceae</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - genetics</topic><topic>Plant morphology</topic><topic>rate of evolution</topic><topic>Rates of change</topic><topic>reversal</topic><topic>Sapindales</topic><topic>simple leaves</topic><topic>Solanum</topic><topic>stasis</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geeta, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dávalos, Liliana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohs, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavin, Mathew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mummenhoff, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Neelima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojciechowski, Martin F</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geeta, R</au><au>Dávalos, Liliana M</au><au>Levy, André</au><au>Bohs, Lynn</au><au>Lavin, Mathew</au><au>Mummenhoff, Klaus</au><au>Sinha, Neelima</au><au>Wojciechowski, Martin F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>193</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>481</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>481-493</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>• A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of changes in leaf shape. • Seven datasets (diverse angiosperms and six nested clades, Sapindales, Apiales, Papaveraceae, Fabaceae, Lepidium, Solanum) were analysed using maximum likelihood and parsimony methods to estimate asymmetries in rates of change among character states. • Simple leaves are most frequent among angiosperm lineages today, were inferred to be ancestral in angiosperms and tended to be retained in evolution (stasis). Complex leaves slowly originated (‘gains’) and quickly reverted to simple leaves (‘losses’) multiple times, with a significantly greater rate of losses than gains. Lobed leaves may be a labile intermediate step between different forms. The nested clades showed mixed trends; Solanum, like the angiosperms in general, had higher rates of losses than gains, but the other clades had higher rates of gains than losses. • The angiosperm‐wide pattern could be taken as a null model to test leaf evolution patterns in particular clades, in which patterns of variation suggest clade‐specific processes that have yet to be investigated fully.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22091556</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03951.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-646X
ispartof The New phytologist, 2012, Vol.193 (2), p.481-493
issn 0028-646X
1469-8137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921149613
source Jstor Complete Legacy; IngentaConnect Backfiles; Wiley; MEDLINE; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects angiosperm
Angiosperms
Apiales
Biological Evolution
character
complex leaves
Computer Simulation
Data coding
data collection
Databases as Topic
Datasets
development
Evolution
Fabaceae
Leaves
Lepidium
Likelihood Functions
Magnoliopsida - anatomy & histology
Magnoliopsida - genetics
Models, Biological
Papaveraceae
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Plant Leaves - anatomy & histology
Plant Leaves - genetics
Plant morphology
rate of evolution
Rates of change
reversal
Sapindales
simple leaves
Solanum
stasis
Taxa
title Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A00%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Keeping%20it%20simple:%20flowering%20plants%20tend%20to%20retain,%20and%20revert%20to,%20simple%20leaves&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Geeta,%20R&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=481-493&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03951.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3Enewphytologist.193.2.481%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921149613&rft_id=info:pmid/22091556&rft_jstor_id=newphytologist.193.2.481&rfr_iscdi=true