Do structural changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of breast cancer complicate the evaluation of mammograms in a long-term follow-up?
Abstract The purpose of the study was to assess whether postoperative changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays complicate the mammographic evaluation. 54 patients receiving breast-conserving surgery and IORT were compared to a control group of 48 pati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2012-03, Vol.81 (3), p.e255-e259 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e259 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e255 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Wasser, K Ruch, M Brade, J Schoeber, C Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U Schnitzer, A Engel, D Wenz, F Sütterlin, M Schoenberg, S.O Buesing, K.A |
description | Abstract The purpose of the study was to assess whether postoperative changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays complicate the mammographic evaluation. 54 patients receiving breast-conserving surgery and IORT were compared to a control group of 48 patients with conventional breast-conserving treatment. All patients were included in routine follow-ups (≥3 years) with mammography accompanied by ultrasound. By retrospective consensus reading the mammographic changes in the tumour bed were classified as absent, low or distinct. Using the same grading it was classified whether mammographic evaluation was complicated due to postoperative changes. Focusing the yearly follow-ups within a period of four years, distinct changes were found significantly more often after IORT (52–62% vs. 7–30%). After IORT the evaluation was significantly more often distinctly complicated in each follow-up, except for year 1 (16–21% vs. 0–8%). In the IORT group the distribution of findings was nearly stable over time. In the control group it changed over time and a distinctly complicated evaluation was no longer seen in the follow-ups of years 3 and 4. Overall, further non-routine diagnostic procedures due to unclear findings in the tumour bed became necessary in 7% (IORT) vs. 8% (control group) of the patients ( p = 0.86). Evaluation of mammograms is complicated after IORT. In contrast to conventionally treated patients postoperative changes and difficulties of evaluation do not decrease over time. Overall, after IORT the diagnostic uncertainty does not seem to be increased in ultrasound supported mammographic follow-ups. The topic needs further evaluation with larger study samples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921142283</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X11002014</els_id><sourcerecordid>921142283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a3c2c676e65e8be782bd79b5d70bbbcb39bed8e950dad30d487bd6e003aa8143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsuO0zAUjRCIGQa-AAl5ByxS_EjjZAEIDa-RRhoJumBnXdu3HRcnDrZT1O_hR3HbgQUbVle6Og_dc25VPWV0wShrX20XuI1gF5wytqB8UXb3qnPWSV5LyeX96pxKTmvadN_OqkcpbSmly6bnD6szzoRsm16cV7_eB5JynE2eI3hibmHcYCJuJPkWSZ6HMEei0RJYZ4xlnyOECSNkt0NS7F0owAjTnry4uvmyeknCmuiIkDIxMJrCMWGYvDOQ8aiJO_BzoYfxAB1gGMImwnD0BOLDuKmL00DWwfvws56nt4-rB2vwCZ_czYtq9fHD6vJzfX3z6ery3XVtGiZyDcJw08oW2yV2GmXHtZW9XlpJtdZGi77c0WG_pBasoLbppLYtUioAOtaIi-r5SXaK4ceMKavBJYPew4hhTqrnjDWcd6IgxQlpYkgp4lpN0Q0Q94pRdehGbdWxG3XoRlGuyq6wnt3pz3pA-5fzp4wCeH0CYDly5zCqZByWDK2LaLKywf3H4M0_fOPdWJL333GPaVuqHEt-iqlUCOrr4T0O38EYpUWnEb8BQja5qQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921142283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do structural changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of breast cancer complicate the evaluation of mammograms in a long-term follow-up?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wasser, K ; Ruch, M ; Brade, J ; Schoeber, C ; Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U ; Schnitzer, A ; Engel, D ; Wenz, F ; Sütterlin, M ; Schoenberg, S.O ; Buesing, K.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wasser, K ; Ruch, M ; Brade, J ; Schoeber, C ; Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U ; Schnitzer, A ; Engel, D ; Wenz, F ; Sütterlin, M ; Schoenberg, S.O ; Buesing, K.A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The purpose of the study was to assess whether postoperative changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays complicate the mammographic evaluation. 54 patients receiving breast-conserving surgery and IORT were compared to a control group of 48 patients with conventional breast-conserving treatment. All patients were included in routine follow-ups (≥3 years) with mammography accompanied by ultrasound. By retrospective consensus reading the mammographic changes in the tumour bed were classified as absent, low or distinct. Using the same grading it was classified whether mammographic evaluation was complicated due to postoperative changes. Focusing the yearly follow-ups within a period of four years, distinct changes were found significantly more often after IORT (52–62% vs. 7–30%). After IORT the evaluation was significantly more often distinctly complicated in each follow-up, except for year 1 (16–21% vs. 0–8%). In the IORT group the distribution of findings was nearly stable over time. In the control group it changed over time and a distinctly complicated evaluation was no longer seen in the follow-ups of years 3 and 4. Overall, further non-routine diagnostic procedures due to unclear findings in the tumour bed became necessary in 7% (IORT) vs. 8% (control group) of the patients ( p = 0.86). Evaluation of mammograms is complicated after IORT. In contrast to conventionally treated patients postoperative changes and difficulties of evaluation do not decrease over time. Overall, after IORT the diagnostic uncertainty does not seem to be increased in ultrasound supported mammographic follow-ups. The topic needs further evaluation with larger study samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21376493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Follow up ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Mammography ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2012-03, Vol.81 (3), p.e255-e259</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a3c2c676e65e8be782bd79b5d70bbbcb39bed8e950dad30d487bd6e003aa8143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a3c2c676e65e8be782bd79b5d70bbbcb39bed8e950dad30d487bd6e003aa8143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X11002014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21376493$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wasser, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruch, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brade, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoeber, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnitzer, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenz, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sütterlin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenberg, S.O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buesing, K.A</creatorcontrib><title>Do structural changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of breast cancer complicate the evaluation of mammograms in a long-term follow-up?</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>Abstract The purpose of the study was to assess whether postoperative changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays complicate the mammographic evaluation. 54 patients receiving breast-conserving surgery and IORT were compared to a control group of 48 patients with conventional breast-conserving treatment. All patients were included in routine follow-ups (≥3 years) with mammography accompanied by ultrasound. By retrospective consensus reading the mammographic changes in the tumour bed were classified as absent, low or distinct. Using the same grading it was classified whether mammographic evaluation was complicated due to postoperative changes. Focusing the yearly follow-ups within a period of four years, distinct changes were found significantly more often after IORT (52–62% vs. 7–30%). After IORT the evaluation was significantly more often distinctly complicated in each follow-up, except for year 1 (16–21% vs. 0–8%). In the IORT group the distribution of findings was nearly stable over time. In the control group it changed over time and a distinctly complicated evaluation was no longer seen in the follow-ups of years 3 and 4. Overall, further non-routine diagnostic procedures due to unclear findings in the tumour bed became necessary in 7% (IORT) vs. 8% (control group) of the patients ( p = 0.86). Evaluation of mammograms is complicated after IORT. In contrast to conventionally treated patients postoperative changes and difficulties of evaluation do not decrease over time. Overall, after IORT the diagnostic uncertainty does not seem to be increased in ultrasound supported mammographic follow-ups. The topic needs further evaluation with larger study samples.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow up</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsuO0zAUjRCIGQa-AAl5ByxS_EjjZAEIDa-RRhoJumBnXdu3HRcnDrZT1O_hR3HbgQUbVle6Og_dc25VPWV0wShrX20XuI1gF5wytqB8UXb3qnPWSV5LyeX96pxKTmvadN_OqkcpbSmly6bnD6szzoRsm16cV7_eB5JynE2eI3hibmHcYCJuJPkWSZ6HMEei0RJYZ4xlnyOECSNkt0NS7F0owAjTnry4uvmyeknCmuiIkDIxMJrCMWGYvDOQ8aiJO_BzoYfxAB1gGMImwnD0BOLDuKmL00DWwfvws56nt4-rB2vwCZ_czYtq9fHD6vJzfX3z6ery3XVtGiZyDcJw08oW2yV2GmXHtZW9XlpJtdZGi77c0WG_pBasoLbppLYtUioAOtaIi-r5SXaK4ceMKavBJYPew4hhTqrnjDWcd6IgxQlpYkgp4lpN0Q0Q94pRdehGbdWxG3XoRlGuyq6wnt3pz3pA-5fzp4wCeH0CYDly5zCqZByWDK2LaLKywf3H4M0_fOPdWJL333GPaVuqHEt-iqlUCOrr4T0O38EYpUWnEb8BQja5qQ</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Wasser, K</creator><creator>Ruch, M</creator><creator>Brade, J</creator><creator>Schoeber, C</creator><creator>Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U</creator><creator>Schnitzer, A</creator><creator>Engel, D</creator><creator>Wenz, F</creator><creator>Sütterlin, M</creator><creator>Schoenberg, S.O</creator><creator>Buesing, K.A</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Do structural changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of breast cancer complicate the evaluation of mammograms in a long-term follow-up?</title><author>Wasser, K ; Ruch, M ; Brade, J ; Schoeber, C ; Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U ; Schnitzer, A ; Engel, D ; Wenz, F ; Sütterlin, M ; Schoenberg, S.O ; Buesing, K.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a3c2c676e65e8be782bd79b5d70bbbcb39bed8e950dad30d487bd6e003aa8143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow up</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wasser, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruch, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brade, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoeber, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnitzer, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenz, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sütterlin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenberg, S.O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buesing, K.A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wasser, K</au><au>Ruch, M</au><au>Brade, J</au><au>Schoeber, C</au><au>Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U</au><au>Schnitzer, A</au><au>Engel, D</au><au>Wenz, F</au><au>Sütterlin, M</au><au>Schoenberg, S.O</au><au>Buesing, K.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do structural changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of breast cancer complicate the evaluation of mammograms in a long-term follow-up?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e255</spage><epage>e259</epage><pages>e255-e259</pages><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>Abstract The purpose of the study was to assess whether postoperative changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays complicate the mammographic evaluation. 54 patients receiving breast-conserving surgery and IORT were compared to a control group of 48 patients with conventional breast-conserving treatment. All patients were included in routine follow-ups (≥3 years) with mammography accompanied by ultrasound. By retrospective consensus reading the mammographic changes in the tumour bed were classified as absent, low or distinct. Using the same grading it was classified whether mammographic evaluation was complicated due to postoperative changes. Focusing the yearly follow-ups within a period of four years, distinct changes were found significantly more often after IORT (52–62% vs. 7–30%). After IORT the evaluation was significantly more often distinctly complicated in each follow-up, except for year 1 (16–21% vs. 0–8%). In the IORT group the distribution of findings was nearly stable over time. In the control group it changed over time and a distinctly complicated evaluation was no longer seen in the follow-ups of years 3 and 4. Overall, further non-routine diagnostic procedures due to unclear findings in the tumour bed became necessary in 7% (IORT) vs. 8% (control group) of the patients ( p = 0.86). Evaluation of mammograms is complicated after IORT. In contrast to conventionally treated patients postoperative changes and difficulties of evaluation do not decrease over time. Overall, after IORT the diagnostic uncertainty does not seem to be increased in ultrasound supported mammographic follow-ups. The topic needs further evaluation with larger study samples.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>21376493</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.016</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2012-03, Vol.81 (3), p.e255-e259 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921142283 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy Breast Neoplasms - surgery Chi-Square Distribution Combined Modality Therapy Female Follow up Follow-Up Studies Humans Mammography Mastectomy, Segmental Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Radiology Radiotherapy Retrospective Studies Ultrasonography, Mammary |
title | Do structural changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of breast cancer complicate the evaluation of mammograms in a long-term follow-up? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A32%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20structural%20changes%20in%20the%20tumour%20bed%20after%20intraoperative%20radiotherapy%20(IORT)%20of%20breast%20cancer%20complicate%20the%20evaluation%20of%20mammograms%20in%20a%20long-term%20follow-up?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Wasser,%20K&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e255&rft.epage=e259&rft.pages=e255-e259&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E921142283%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921142283&rft_id=info:pmid/21376493&rft_els_id=S0720048X11002014&rfr_iscdi=true |