Effect of operating temperature on performance of microbial fuel cell
The performance of dual chambered mediator-less microbial fuel cell (MFC) operated under batch mode was evaluated under different operating temperatures, ranging between 20 and 55 degrees C, with step increase in temperature of 5 degrees C. Synthetic wastewater with sucrose as carbon source having c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 2011-01, Vol.64 (4), p.917-922 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 922 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 917 |
| container_title | Water science and technology |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | Behera, M Murthy, S S R Ghangrekar, M M |
| description | The performance of dual chambered mediator-less microbial fuel cell (MFC) operated under batch mode was evaluated under different operating temperatures, ranging between 20 and 55 degrees C, with step increase in temperature of 5 degrees C. Synthetic wastewater with sucrose as carbon source having chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 519-555 mg/L was used in the study. Temperature was a crucial factor in the performance of MFCs for both COD removal and electricity production. The MFC demonstrated highest COD removal efficiency of 84% and power density normalized to the anode surface area of 34.38 mW/m2 at operating temperature of 40 degrees C. Higher VSS to SS ratio was observed at the operating temperature between 35 and 45 degrees C. Under different operating temperatures the observed sludge yield was in the range of 0.05 to 0.14 g VSS/g COD removed. The maximum Coulombic and energy efficiencies were obtained at 40 degrees C, with values of 7.39 and 13.14%, respectively. Internal resistance of the MFC decreased with increase in operating temperature. Maximum internal resistance of 1,150 omega was observed when the MFC was operated at 20 degrees C; whereas the minimum internal resistance (552 omega) was observed at 55 degrees C. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2011.704 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920809996</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>920809996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-73ab588f294e9628dc74c0b03595ba5db7895565f4521f16b31874a4405456693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1PwzAUxC0EoqWwMaNIDCykPH_bI6rKh1SJBWbLSW2UKomLnQjx3-NCYWBhejf8dHp3h9A5hjnBQty8p2FOAOO5BHaAplhrUWpJySGaApG0xITQCTpJaQMAkjI4RhNCQEtQMEXLpfeuHorgi7B10Q5N_1oMrvvSY3RF6IusfYid7Wu347qmjqFqbFv40bVF7dr2FB152yZ3tr8z9HK3fF48lKun-8fF7aqsKYehlNRWXClPNHNaELWuJauhAso1ryxfV1JpzgX3jBPssagoVpJZxoAzLoSmM3T17buN4W10aTBdk3YP2N6FMRlNciidG_ifBC4UcM4yefmH3IQx9jmGwZpRJTFQkqnrbypnTyk6b7ax6Wz8MBjMbgeTdzC7HUzeIeMXe9Ox6tz6F_4pnn4CixuAmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943871032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of operating temperature on performance of microbial fuel cell</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Behera, M ; Murthy, S S R ; Ghangrekar, M M</creator><creatorcontrib>Behera, M ; Murthy, S S R ; Ghangrekar, M M</creatorcontrib><description>The performance of dual chambered mediator-less microbial fuel cell (MFC) operated under batch mode was evaluated under different operating temperatures, ranging between 20 and 55 degrees C, with step increase in temperature of 5 degrees C. Synthetic wastewater with sucrose as carbon source having chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 519-555 mg/L was used in the study. Temperature was a crucial factor in the performance of MFCs for both COD removal and electricity production. The MFC demonstrated highest COD removal efficiency of 84% and power density normalized to the anode surface area of 34.38 mW/m2 at operating temperature of 40 degrees C. Higher VSS to SS ratio was observed at the operating temperature between 35 and 45 degrees C. Under different operating temperatures the observed sludge yield was in the range of 0.05 to 0.14 g VSS/g COD removed. The maximum Coulombic and energy efficiencies were obtained at 40 degrees C, with values of 7.39 and 13.14%, respectively. Internal resistance of the MFC decreased with increase in operating temperature. Maximum internal resistance of 1,150 omega was observed when the MFC was operated at 20 degrees C; whereas the minimum internal resistance (552 omega) was observed at 55 degrees C.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2011.704</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22097080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Biochemical fuel cells ; Bioelectric Energy Sources ; Carbon sources ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Electric power generation ; Fuel cells ; Fuel technology ; Microorganisms ; Operating temperature ; Power efficiency ; Removal ; Sewage ; Sludge ; Sucrose ; Sugar ; Temperature ; Temperature effects ; Wastewater</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2011-01, Vol.64 (4), p.917-922</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-73ab588f294e9628dc74c0b03595ba5db7895565f4521f16b31874a4405456693</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22097080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behera, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, S S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghangrekar, M M</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of operating temperature on performance of microbial fuel cell</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>The performance of dual chambered mediator-less microbial fuel cell (MFC) operated under batch mode was evaluated under different operating temperatures, ranging between 20 and 55 degrees C, with step increase in temperature of 5 degrees C. Synthetic wastewater with sucrose as carbon source having chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 519-555 mg/L was used in the study. Temperature was a crucial factor in the performance of MFCs for both COD removal and electricity production. The MFC demonstrated highest COD removal efficiency of 84% and power density normalized to the anode surface area of 34.38 mW/m2 at operating temperature of 40 degrees C. Higher VSS to SS ratio was observed at the operating temperature between 35 and 45 degrees C. Under different operating temperatures the observed sludge yield was in the range of 0.05 to 0.14 g VSS/g COD removed. The maximum Coulombic and energy efficiencies were obtained at 40 degrees C, with values of 7.39 and 13.14%, respectively. Internal resistance of the MFC decreased with increase in operating temperature. Maximum internal resistance of 1,150 omega was observed when the MFC was operated at 20 degrees C; whereas the minimum internal resistance (552 omega) was observed at 55 degrees C.</description><subject>Biochemical fuel cells</subject><subject>Bioelectric Energy Sources</subject><subject>Carbon sources</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Fuel technology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Operating temperature</subject><subject>Power efficiency</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb1PwzAUxC0EoqWwMaNIDCykPH_bI6rKh1SJBWbLSW2UKomLnQjx3-NCYWBhejf8dHp3h9A5hjnBQty8p2FOAOO5BHaAplhrUWpJySGaApG0xITQCTpJaQMAkjI4RhNCQEtQMEXLpfeuHorgi7B10Q5N_1oMrvvSY3RF6IusfYid7Wu347qmjqFqbFv40bVF7dr2FB152yZ3tr8z9HK3fF48lKun-8fF7aqsKYehlNRWXClPNHNaELWuJauhAso1ryxfV1JpzgX3jBPssagoVpJZxoAzLoSmM3T17buN4W10aTBdk3YP2N6FMRlNciidG_ifBC4UcM4yefmH3IQx9jmGwZpRJTFQkqnrbypnTyk6b7ax6Wz8MBjMbgeTdzC7HUzeIeMXe9Ox6tz6F_4pnn4CixuAmQ</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Behera, M</creator><creator>Murthy, S S R</creator><creator>Ghangrekar, M M</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Effect of operating temperature on performance of microbial fuel cell</title><author>Behera, M ; Murthy, S S R ; Ghangrekar, M M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-73ab588f294e9628dc74c0b03595ba5db7895565f4521f16b31874a4405456693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biochemical fuel cells</topic><topic>Bioelectric Energy Sources</topic><topic>Carbon sources</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Fuel technology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Operating temperature</topic><topic>Power efficiency</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behera, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, S S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghangrekar, M M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behera, M</au><au>Murthy, S S R</au><au>Ghangrekar, M M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of operating temperature on performance of microbial fuel cell</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>917</spage><epage>922</epage><pages>917-922</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>The performance of dual chambered mediator-less microbial fuel cell (MFC) operated under batch mode was evaluated under different operating temperatures, ranging between 20 and 55 degrees C, with step increase in temperature of 5 degrees C. Synthetic wastewater with sucrose as carbon source having chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 519-555 mg/L was used in the study. Temperature was a crucial factor in the performance of MFCs for both COD removal and electricity production. The MFC demonstrated highest COD removal efficiency of 84% and power density normalized to the anode surface area of 34.38 mW/m2 at operating temperature of 40 degrees C. Higher VSS to SS ratio was observed at the operating temperature between 35 and 45 degrees C. Under different operating temperatures the observed sludge yield was in the range of 0.05 to 0.14 g VSS/g COD removed. The maximum Coulombic and energy efficiencies were obtained at 40 degrees C, with values of 7.39 and 13.14%, respectively. Internal resistance of the MFC decreased with increase in operating temperature. Maximum internal resistance of 1,150 omega was observed when the MFC was operated at 20 degrees C; whereas the minimum internal resistance (552 omega) was observed at 55 degrees C.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>22097080</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2011.704</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
| ispartof | Water science and technology, 2011-01, Vol.64 (4), p.917-922 |
| issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920809996 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Biochemical fuel cells Bioelectric Energy Sources Carbon sources Chemical oxygen demand Electric power generation Fuel cells Fuel technology Microorganisms Operating temperature Power efficiency Removal Sewage Sludge Sucrose Sugar Temperature Temperature effects Wastewater |
| title | Effect of operating temperature on performance of microbial fuel cell |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A02%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20operating%20temperature%20on%20performance%20of%20microbial%20fuel%20cell&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Behera,%20M&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=917&rft.epage=922&rft.pages=917-922&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2011.704&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E920809996%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943871032&rft_id=info:pmid/22097080&rfr_iscdi=true |