Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation
A reliable prediction of mould risk in buildings is important to ensure a healthy environment and to avoid social and economical damage. Whereas previously the temperature ratio was often used to minimize the mould risk, nowadays- more advanced - mould prediction models can be found (e.g. isopleth s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Building and environment 2012-05, Vol.51, p.296-310 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 310 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 296 |
container_title | Building and environment |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | VEREECKEN, Evy ROELS, Staf |
description | A reliable prediction of mould risk in buildings is important to ensure a healthy environment and to avoid social and economical damage. Whereas previously the temperature ratio was often used to minimize the mould risk, nowadays- more advanced - mould prediction models can be found (e.g. isopleth systems, biohygrothermal model, ESP-r mould prediction model, empirical VTT model). These models include the main influencing factors for mould growth: the surface temperature and relative humidity. However, they are based on either experiments or assumptions and some of them neglect a third important influencing factor: the exposure time. The current paper gives an overview of the different existing models and analyses the impact of the mould prediction model on the mould risk evaluation. To do so, the existing mould prediction models are used to predict the mould risk for different temperature and relative humidity courses. The mould risk, the time until mould growth starts and the mould intensity according to the existing prediction models are compared. Based on the obtained results, the influence of simplifications or shortcomings in the mould prediction models is discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920796188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671351658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1761089c38a955288f0572d8ce2e6b165c46f05c95c1a39ee53ecd46e51d57df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfQfYietma2Wyy2aMU_0FREAVvIU1mMTXdrUm34rc3a6tHYWDgze_Ng0fIKdAJUBCXi8m8d95iu5kUFGCShlK2R0YgK5YLWb7ukxFlgubACnZIjmJc0GSsWTkiD0-4cfiZdU227Hpvs1VA68zadW0SLPqY6dZm6zd0IXNt43tsDWY_1wEPLr5nuNG-14PnmBw02kc82e0xebm5fp7e5bPH2_vp1Sw3ZSHWOVQCqKwNk7rmvJCyobwqrDRYoJiD4KYUSTI1N6BZjcgZGlsK5GB5ZRs2Jufbv6vQffQY12rpokHvdYtdH1Vd0KoWIGUiL_4lQVTAeIocULFFTehiDNioVXBLHb4UUDVUrRbqt2o1VK3SpKqT8WyXoaPRvgm6NS7-uQsuSpAA7Bt9hYG8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671351658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>VEREECKEN, Evy ; ROELS, Staf</creator><creatorcontrib>VEREECKEN, Evy ; ROELS, Staf</creatorcontrib><description>A reliable prediction of mould risk in buildings is important to ensure a healthy environment and to avoid social and economical damage. Whereas previously the temperature ratio was often used to minimize the mould risk, nowadays- more advanced - mould prediction models can be found (e.g. isopleth systems, biohygrothermal model, ESP-r mould prediction model, empirical VTT model). These models include the main influencing factors for mould growth: the surface temperature and relative humidity. However, they are based on either experiments or assumptions and some of them neglect a third important influencing factor: the exposure time. The current paper gives an overview of the different existing models and analyses the impact of the mould prediction model on the mould risk evaluation. To do so, the existing mould prediction models are used to predict the mould risk for different temperature and relative humidity courses. The mould risk, the time until mould growth starts and the mould intensity according to the existing prediction models are compared. Based on the obtained results, the influence of simplifications or shortcomings in the mould prediction models is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BUENDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Damage ; Economics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Mathematical models ; Molds ; Mould growths ; Pollution indoor buildings ; Relative humidity ; Risk ; Simplification ; Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2012-05, Vol.51, p.296-310</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1761089c38a955288f0572d8ce2e6b165c46f05c95c1a39ee53ecd46e51d57df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1761089c38a955288f0572d8ce2e6b165c46f05c95c1a39ee53ecd46e51d57df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25641811$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VEREECKEN, Evy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROELS, Staf</creatorcontrib><title>Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>A reliable prediction of mould risk in buildings is important to ensure a healthy environment and to avoid social and economical damage. Whereas previously the temperature ratio was often used to minimize the mould risk, nowadays- more advanced - mould prediction models can be found (e.g. isopleth systems, biohygrothermal model, ESP-r mould prediction model, empirical VTT model). These models include the main influencing factors for mould growth: the surface temperature and relative humidity. However, they are based on either experiments or assumptions and some of them neglect a third important influencing factor: the exposure time. The current paper gives an overview of the different existing models and analyses the impact of the mould prediction model on the mould risk evaluation. To do so, the existing mould prediction models are used to predict the mould risk for different temperature and relative humidity courses. The mould risk, the time until mould growth starts and the mould intensity according to the existing prediction models are compared. Based on the obtained results, the influence of simplifications or shortcomings in the mould prediction models is discussed.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Molds</subject><subject>Mould growths</subject><subject>Pollution indoor buildings</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Simplification</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfQfYietma2Wyy2aMU_0FREAVvIU1mMTXdrUm34rc3a6tHYWDgze_Ng0fIKdAJUBCXi8m8d95iu5kUFGCShlK2R0YgK5YLWb7ukxFlgubACnZIjmJc0GSsWTkiD0-4cfiZdU227Hpvs1VA68zadW0SLPqY6dZm6zd0IXNt43tsDWY_1wEPLr5nuNG-14PnmBw02kc82e0xebm5fp7e5bPH2_vp1Sw3ZSHWOVQCqKwNk7rmvJCyobwqrDRYoJiD4KYUSTI1N6BZjcgZGlsK5GB5ZRs2Jufbv6vQffQY12rpokHvdYtdH1Vd0KoWIGUiL_4lQVTAeIocULFFTehiDNioVXBLHb4UUDVUrRbqt2o1VK3SpKqT8WyXoaPRvgm6NS7-uQsuSpAA7Bt9hYG8</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>VEREECKEN, Evy</creator><creator>ROELS, Staf</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation</title><author>VEREECKEN, Evy ; ROELS, Staf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1761089c38a955288f0572d8ce2e6b165c46f05c95c1a39ee53ecd46e51d57df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Molds</topic><topic>Mould growths</topic><topic>Pollution indoor buildings</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Simplification</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VEREECKEN, Evy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROELS, Staf</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VEREECKEN, Evy</au><au>ROELS, Staf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><spage>296</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>296-310</pages><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><coden>BUENDB</coden><abstract>A reliable prediction of mould risk in buildings is important to ensure a healthy environment and to avoid social and economical damage. Whereas previously the temperature ratio was often used to minimize the mould risk, nowadays- more advanced - mould prediction models can be found (e.g. isopleth systems, biohygrothermal model, ESP-r mould prediction model, empirical VTT model). These models include the main influencing factors for mould growth: the surface temperature and relative humidity. However, they are based on either experiments or assumptions and some of them neglect a third important influencing factor: the exposure time. The current paper gives an overview of the different existing models and analyses the impact of the mould prediction model on the mould risk evaluation. To do so, the existing mould prediction models are used to predict the mould risk for different temperature and relative humidity courses. The mould risk, the time until mould growth starts and the mould intensity according to the existing prediction models are compared. Based on the obtained results, the influence of simplifications or shortcomings in the mould prediction models is discussed.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-1323 |
ispartof | Building and environment, 2012-05, Vol.51, p.296-310 |
issn | 0360-1323 1873-684X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920796188 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Buildings. Public works Computation methods. Tables. Charts Damage Economics Exact sciences and technology Mathematical models Molds Mould growths Pollution indoor buildings Relative humidity Risk Simplification Structural analysis. Stresses |
title | Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T06%3A41%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20mould%20prediction%20models%20and%20their%20influence%20on%20mould%20risk%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=VEREECKEN,%20Evy&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=51&rft.spage=296&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=296-310&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft.coden=BUENDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671351658%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671351658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |