Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation

A reliable prediction of mould risk in buildings is important to ensure a healthy environment and to avoid social and economical damage. Whereas previously the temperature ratio was often used to minimize the mould risk, nowadays- more advanced - mould prediction models can be found (e.g. isopleth s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Building and environment 2012-05, Vol.51, p.296-310
Hauptverfasser: VEREECKEN, Evy, ROELS, Staf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue
container_start_page 296
container_title Building and environment
container_volume 51
creator VEREECKEN, Evy
ROELS, Staf
description A reliable prediction of mould risk in buildings is important to ensure a healthy environment and to avoid social and economical damage. Whereas previously the temperature ratio was often used to minimize the mould risk, nowadays- more advanced - mould prediction models can be found (e.g. isopleth systems, biohygrothermal model, ESP-r mould prediction model, empirical VTT model). These models include the main influencing factors for mould growth: the surface temperature and relative humidity. However, they are based on either experiments or assumptions and some of them neglect a third important influencing factor: the exposure time. The current paper gives an overview of the different existing models and analyses the impact of the mould prediction model on the mould risk evaluation. To do so, the existing mould prediction models are used to predict the mould risk for different temperature and relative humidity courses. The mould risk, the time until mould growth starts and the mould intensity according to the existing prediction models are compared. Based on the obtained results, the influence of simplifications or shortcomings in the mould prediction models is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920796188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671351658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1761089c38a955288f0572d8ce2e6b165c46f05c95c1a39ee53ecd46e51d57df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfQfYietma2Wyy2aMU_0FREAVvIU1mMTXdrUm34rc3a6tHYWDgze_Ng0fIKdAJUBCXi8m8d95iu5kUFGCShlK2R0YgK5YLWb7ukxFlgubACnZIjmJc0GSsWTkiD0-4cfiZdU227Hpvs1VA68zadW0SLPqY6dZm6zd0IXNt43tsDWY_1wEPLr5nuNG-14PnmBw02kc82e0xebm5fp7e5bPH2_vp1Sw3ZSHWOVQCqKwNk7rmvJCyobwqrDRYoJiD4KYUSTI1N6BZjcgZGlsK5GB5ZRs2Jufbv6vQffQY12rpokHvdYtdH1Vd0KoWIGUiL_4lQVTAeIocULFFTehiDNioVXBLHb4UUDVUrRbqt2o1VK3SpKqT8WyXoaPRvgm6NS7-uQsuSpAA7Bt9hYG8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671351658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>VEREECKEN, Evy ; ROELS, Staf</creator><creatorcontrib>VEREECKEN, Evy ; ROELS, Staf</creatorcontrib><description>A reliable prediction of mould risk in buildings is important to ensure a healthy environment and to avoid social and economical damage. Whereas previously the temperature ratio was often used to minimize the mould risk, nowadays- more advanced - mould prediction models can be found (e.g. isopleth systems, biohygrothermal model, ESP-r mould prediction model, empirical VTT model). These models include the main influencing factors for mould growth: the surface temperature and relative humidity. However, they are based on either experiments or assumptions and some of them neglect a third important influencing factor: the exposure time. The current paper gives an overview of the different existing models and analyses the impact of the mould prediction model on the mould risk evaluation. To do so, the existing mould prediction models are used to predict the mould risk for different temperature and relative humidity courses. The mould risk, the time until mould growth starts and the mould intensity according to the existing prediction models are compared. Based on the obtained results, the influence of simplifications or shortcomings in the mould prediction models is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BUENDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Damage ; Economics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Mathematical models ; Molds ; Mould growths ; Pollution indoor buildings ; Relative humidity ; Risk ; Simplification ; Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2012-05, Vol.51, p.296-310</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1761089c38a955288f0572d8ce2e6b165c46f05c95c1a39ee53ecd46e51d57df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1761089c38a955288f0572d8ce2e6b165c46f05c95c1a39ee53ecd46e51d57df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25641811$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VEREECKEN, Evy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROELS, Staf</creatorcontrib><title>Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>A reliable prediction of mould risk in buildings is important to ensure a healthy environment and to avoid social and economical damage. Whereas previously the temperature ratio was often used to minimize the mould risk, nowadays- more advanced - mould prediction models can be found (e.g. isopleth systems, biohygrothermal model, ESP-r mould prediction model, empirical VTT model). These models include the main influencing factors for mould growth: the surface temperature and relative humidity. However, they are based on either experiments or assumptions and some of them neglect a third important influencing factor: the exposure time. The current paper gives an overview of the different existing models and analyses the impact of the mould prediction model on the mould risk evaluation. To do so, the existing mould prediction models are used to predict the mould risk for different temperature and relative humidity courses. The mould risk, the time until mould growth starts and the mould intensity according to the existing prediction models are compared. Based on the obtained results, the influence of simplifications or shortcomings in the mould prediction models is discussed.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Molds</subject><subject>Mould growths</subject><subject>Pollution indoor buildings</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Simplification</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfQfYietma2Wyy2aMU_0FREAVvIU1mMTXdrUm34rc3a6tHYWDgze_Ng0fIKdAJUBCXi8m8d95iu5kUFGCShlK2R0YgK5YLWb7ukxFlgubACnZIjmJc0GSsWTkiD0-4cfiZdU227Hpvs1VA68zadW0SLPqY6dZm6zd0IXNt43tsDWY_1wEPLr5nuNG-14PnmBw02kc82e0xebm5fp7e5bPH2_vp1Sw3ZSHWOVQCqKwNk7rmvJCyobwqrDRYoJiD4KYUSTI1N6BZjcgZGlsK5GB5ZRs2Jufbv6vQffQY12rpokHvdYtdH1Vd0KoWIGUiL_4lQVTAeIocULFFTehiDNioVXBLHb4UUDVUrRbqt2o1VK3SpKqT8WyXoaPRvgm6NS7-uQsuSpAA7Bt9hYG8</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>VEREECKEN, Evy</creator><creator>ROELS, Staf</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation</title><author>VEREECKEN, Evy ; ROELS, Staf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1761089c38a955288f0572d8ce2e6b165c46f05c95c1a39ee53ecd46e51d57df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Molds</topic><topic>Mould growths</topic><topic>Pollution indoor buildings</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Simplification</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VEREECKEN, Evy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROELS, Staf</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VEREECKEN, Evy</au><au>ROELS, Staf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><spage>296</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>296-310</pages><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><coden>BUENDB</coden><abstract>A reliable prediction of mould risk in buildings is important to ensure a healthy environment and to avoid social and economical damage. Whereas previously the temperature ratio was often used to minimize the mould risk, nowadays- more advanced - mould prediction models can be found (e.g. isopleth systems, biohygrothermal model, ESP-r mould prediction model, empirical VTT model). These models include the main influencing factors for mould growth: the surface temperature and relative humidity. However, they are based on either experiments or assumptions and some of them neglect a third important influencing factor: the exposure time. The current paper gives an overview of the different existing models and analyses the impact of the mould prediction model on the mould risk evaluation. To do so, the existing mould prediction models are used to predict the mould risk for different temperature and relative humidity courses. The mould risk, the time until mould growth starts and the mould intensity according to the existing prediction models are compared. Based on the obtained results, the influence of simplifications or shortcomings in the mould prediction models is discussed.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1323
ispartof Building and environment, 2012-05, Vol.51, p.296-310
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920796188
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Buildings. Public works
Computation methods. Tables. Charts
Damage
Economics
Exact sciences and technology
Mathematical models
Molds
Mould growths
Pollution indoor buildings
Relative humidity
Risk
Simplification
Structural analysis. Stresses
title Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T06%3A41%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20mould%20prediction%20models%20and%20their%20influence%20on%20mould%20risk%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=VEREECKEN,%20Evy&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=51&rft.spage=296&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=296-310&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft.coden=BUENDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671351658%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671351658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true