more stems the merrier: advantages of multi‐stemmed architecture for the demography of understorey trees in a temperate broadleaf woodland
1. Multi‐stemmed trees are an understudied but common component of temperate broadleaf forests that can provide insight into how plants persist and regenerate within communities. In particular, multi‐stemmed architecture may be an important trait for the growth and survival of trees in forest unders...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of ecology 2012-01, Vol.100 (1), p.171-183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | The Journal of ecology |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Tanentzap, Andrew J. Mountford, Edward P. Cooke, Arnold S. Coomes, David A. |
description | 1. Multi‐stemmed trees are an understudied but common component of temperate broadleaf forests that can provide insight into how plants persist and regenerate within communities. In particular, multi‐stemmed architecture may be an important trait for the growth and survival of trees in forest understoreys that have to cope with low light levels, but this idea has been rarely tested using long‐term individual‐level data. 2. We use measurements of 8527 individual woody stems from 1985, 1996 and 2008 to model the growth, survival and recruitment of hazel (Corylus avellana) and hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata and C. monogyna) trees as a function of neighbourhood competition in the understorey of a minimum‐intervention, mixed‐ash woodland in England. We test the effects of browsing by deer (Muntiacus reevesi) on woodland dynamics by comparing demographic rates during a period of high deer densities (1985–1996) with rates recorded from 1996 to 2008, when sustained culling substantially reduced deer densities. 3. Growth and survival of hazel and hawthorn trees increased with the number of stems they possessed, demonstrating clear benefits to multi‐stemmed architecture. Surviving trees continued to accumulate basal area and stems without any clear upper limit after 23 years. However, increasing numbers of stems generally reduced the growth and recruitment of stems within multi‐stemmed trees. 4. Temporal differences in deer browsing appeared to influence the strength of intra‐specific (i.e. inter‐stem) competition and, consequently, the growth, survival and recruitment of multi‐stemmed trees. Most notably, stem survival declined with the number of stems in a tree only after deer culling, but not during a period of high deer densities, suggesting that intense deer browsing reduced resource competition among stems. Inter‐specific neighbourhood competition had no detectable effect on hazel or hawthorn demography. 5. Synthesis. Multi‐stemmed architecture is an advantageous trait for understorey trees in temperate woodlands relative to the allocation of resources towards the growth of a single stem. We suggest that the low light levels of forest understoreys favour ‘persistence’, through multi‐stemmed growth, rather than ‘regeneration’ niches (i.e. periodic recruitment through seed), with the advantage of this life‐history strategy influenced by herbivory and intra‐specific competition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01879.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920793190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41333097</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41333097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5149-ac088de0586b78da2dd3576c5f120b60664c3f240fbc72443c3ebb22a8f9e4e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkGL1DAYhosoOK7-BDEI4mnGL0nbNIKHZdhdlQUPuueQJl9mWtpmTFp35-YP8OBv9JeYbpc5eDKXBPI-D194k2WEwoam9a7dUF4WaybyYsOA0g3QSsjN3aNsdbp4nK0AGFtDLsTT7FmMLQCUooBV9qv3AUkcsY9k3CPpMYQGw3ui7Q89jHqHkXhH-qkbmz8_f8_BHi3RweybEc04Jdr5cM9a7P0u6MP-OCPTYDHEMemPZAyYPM1ANEmCAwY9IqmD17ZD7cit97bTg32ePXG6i_jiYT_Lbi4vvm0_rq-_XH3anl-vTUFzudYGqsoiFFVZi8pqZi0vRGkKRxnUJZRlbrhjObjaCJbn3HCsa8Z05STmWPGz7O3iPQT_fcI4qr6JBrs0A_opKslASE4lpOTrf5Ktn8KQhlOSUilAFCKFqiVkgo8xoFOH0PQ6HBUFNZekWjV3oeYu1FySui9J3SX0zYNfR6M7F_RgmnjiWcEkLyVNuQ9L7rbp8PjffvX5YjufEv9y4du5kROfU845yPkJr5Z7p73Su5BmuPmaTHn6KMArJvhfcUS7HA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>911970757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>more stems the merrier: advantages of multi‐stemmed architecture for the demography of understorey trees in a temperate broadleaf woodland</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tanentzap, Andrew J. ; Mountford, Edward P. ; Cooke, Arnold S. ; Coomes, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanentzap, Andrew J. ; Mountford, Edward P. ; Cooke, Arnold S. ; Coomes, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Multi‐stemmed trees are an understudied but common component of temperate broadleaf forests that can provide insight into how plants persist and regenerate within communities. In particular, multi‐stemmed architecture may be an important trait for the growth and survival of trees in forest understoreys that have to cope with low light levels, but this idea has been rarely tested using long‐term individual‐level data. 2. We use measurements of 8527 individual woody stems from 1985, 1996 and 2008 to model the growth, survival and recruitment of hazel (Corylus avellana) and hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata and C. monogyna) trees as a function of neighbourhood competition in the understorey of a minimum‐intervention, mixed‐ash woodland in England. We test the effects of browsing by deer (Muntiacus reevesi) on woodland dynamics by comparing demographic rates during a period of high deer densities (1985–1996) with rates recorded from 1996 to 2008, when sustained culling substantially reduced deer densities. 3. Growth and survival of hazel and hawthorn trees increased with the number of stems they possessed, demonstrating clear benefits to multi‐stemmed architecture. Surviving trees continued to accumulate basal area and stems without any clear upper limit after 23 years. However, increasing numbers of stems generally reduced the growth and recruitment of stems within multi‐stemmed trees. 4. Temporal differences in deer browsing appeared to influence the strength of intra‐specific (i.e. inter‐stem) competition and, consequently, the growth, survival and recruitment of multi‐stemmed trees. Most notably, stem survival declined with the number of stems in a tree only after deer culling, but not during a period of high deer densities, suggesting that intense deer browsing reduced resource competition among stems. Inter‐specific neighbourhood competition had no detectable effect on hazel or hawthorn demography. 5. Synthesis. Multi‐stemmed architecture is an advantageous trait for understorey trees in temperate woodlands relative to the allocation of resources towards the growth of a single stem. We suggest that the low light levels of forest understoreys favour ‘persistence’, through multi‐stemmed growth, rather than ‘regeneration’ niches (i.e. periodic recruitment through seed), with the advantage of this life‐history strategy influenced by herbivory and intra‐specific competition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01879.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; ash‐maple woodland ; basal area ; Biological and medical sciences ; Browsing ; Community ecology ; coppice ; Corylus avellana ; Crataegus laevigata ; crowding ; Deer ; demography ; Ecological competition ; Forest ecology ; forest trees ; forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbivores ; herbivory ; hierarchical Bayesian models ; Human ecology ; Muntiacus ; neighbourhood models ; niche ; niches ; Plant ecology ; Plant growth ; Plant population and community dynamics ; recruitment ; sprouting ; Stems ; Survival analysis ; Synecology ; temporal variation ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Tree growth ; Trees ; Understory ; woodlands</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2012-01, Vol.100 (1), p.171-183</ispartof><rights>2012 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. Journal of Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jan 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5149-ac088de0586b78da2dd3576c5f120b60664c3f240fbc72443c3ebb22a8f9e4e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5149-ac088de0586b78da2dd3576c5f120b60664c3f240fbc72443c3ebb22a8f9e4e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41333097$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41333097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25293691$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanentzap, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mountford, Edward P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Arnold S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomes, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>more stems the merrier: advantages of multi‐stemmed architecture for the demography of understorey trees in a temperate broadleaf woodland</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>1. Multi‐stemmed trees are an understudied but common component of temperate broadleaf forests that can provide insight into how plants persist and regenerate within communities. In particular, multi‐stemmed architecture may be an important trait for the growth and survival of trees in forest understoreys that have to cope with low light levels, but this idea has been rarely tested using long‐term individual‐level data. 2. We use measurements of 8527 individual woody stems from 1985, 1996 and 2008 to model the growth, survival and recruitment of hazel (Corylus avellana) and hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata and C. monogyna) trees as a function of neighbourhood competition in the understorey of a minimum‐intervention, mixed‐ash woodland in England. We test the effects of browsing by deer (Muntiacus reevesi) on woodland dynamics by comparing demographic rates during a period of high deer densities (1985–1996) with rates recorded from 1996 to 2008, when sustained culling substantially reduced deer densities. 3. Growth and survival of hazel and hawthorn trees increased with the number of stems they possessed, demonstrating clear benefits to multi‐stemmed architecture. Surviving trees continued to accumulate basal area and stems without any clear upper limit after 23 years. However, increasing numbers of stems generally reduced the growth and recruitment of stems within multi‐stemmed trees. 4. Temporal differences in deer browsing appeared to influence the strength of intra‐specific (i.e. inter‐stem) competition and, consequently, the growth, survival and recruitment of multi‐stemmed trees. Most notably, stem survival declined with the number of stems in a tree only after deer culling, but not during a period of high deer densities, suggesting that intense deer browsing reduced resource competition among stems. Inter‐specific neighbourhood competition had no detectable effect on hazel or hawthorn demography. 5. Synthesis. Multi‐stemmed architecture is an advantageous trait for understorey trees in temperate woodlands relative to the allocation of resources towards the growth of a single stem. We suggest that the low light levels of forest understoreys favour ‘persistence’, through multi‐stemmed growth, rather than ‘regeneration’ niches (i.e. periodic recruitment through seed), with the advantage of this life‐history strategy influenced by herbivory and intra‐specific competition.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>ash‐maple woodland</subject><subject>basal area</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Browsing</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>coppice</subject><subject>Corylus avellana</subject><subject>Crataegus laevigata</subject><subject>crowding</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>demography</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>herbivory</subject><subject>hierarchical Bayesian models</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Muntiacus</subject><subject>neighbourhood models</subject><subject>niche</subject><subject>niches</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant population and community dynamics</subject><subject>recruitment</subject><subject>sprouting</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Tree growth</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Understory</subject><subject>woodlands</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkkGL1DAYhosoOK7-BDEI4mnGL0nbNIKHZdhdlQUPuueQJl9mWtpmTFp35-YP8OBv9JeYbpc5eDKXBPI-D194k2WEwoam9a7dUF4WaybyYsOA0g3QSsjN3aNsdbp4nK0AGFtDLsTT7FmMLQCUooBV9qv3AUkcsY9k3CPpMYQGw3ui7Q89jHqHkXhH-qkbmz8_f8_BHi3RweybEc04Jdr5cM9a7P0u6MP-OCPTYDHEMemPZAyYPM1ANEmCAwY9IqmD17ZD7cit97bTg32ePXG6i_jiYT_Lbi4vvm0_rq-_XH3anl-vTUFzudYGqsoiFFVZi8pqZi0vRGkKRxnUJZRlbrhjObjaCJbn3HCsa8Z05STmWPGz7O3iPQT_fcI4qr6JBrs0A_opKslASE4lpOTrf5Ktn8KQhlOSUilAFCKFqiVkgo8xoFOH0PQ6HBUFNZekWjV3oeYu1FySui9J3SX0zYNfR6M7F_RgmnjiWcEkLyVNuQ9L7rbp8PjffvX5YjufEv9y4du5kROfU845yPkJr5Z7p73Su5BmuPmaTHn6KMArJvhfcUS7HA</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Tanentzap, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Mountford, Edward P.</creator><creator>Cooke, Arnold S.</creator><creator>Coomes, David A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>more stems the merrier: advantages of multi‐stemmed architecture for the demography of understorey trees in a temperate broadleaf woodland</title><author>Tanentzap, Andrew J. ; Mountford, Edward P. ; Cooke, Arnold S. ; Coomes, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5149-ac088de0586b78da2dd3576c5f120b60664c3f240fbc72443c3ebb22a8f9e4e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>ash‐maple woodland</topic><topic>basal area</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Browsing</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>coppice</topic><topic>Corylus avellana</topic><topic>Crataegus laevigata</topic><topic>crowding</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>demography</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>herbivory</topic><topic>hierarchical Bayesian models</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Muntiacus</topic><topic>neighbourhood models</topic><topic>niche</topic><topic>niches</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant population and community dynamics</topic><topic>recruitment</topic><topic>sprouting</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Tree growth</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Understory</topic><topic>woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanentzap, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mountford, Edward P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Arnold S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomes, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanentzap, Andrew J.</au><au>Mountford, Edward P.</au><au>Cooke, Arnold S.</au><au>Coomes, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>more stems the merrier: advantages of multi‐stemmed architecture for the demography of understorey trees in a temperate broadleaf woodland</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>171-183</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><coden>JECOAB</coden><abstract>1. Multi‐stemmed trees are an understudied but common component of temperate broadleaf forests that can provide insight into how plants persist and regenerate within communities. In particular, multi‐stemmed architecture may be an important trait for the growth and survival of trees in forest understoreys that have to cope with low light levels, but this idea has been rarely tested using long‐term individual‐level data. 2. We use measurements of 8527 individual woody stems from 1985, 1996 and 2008 to model the growth, survival and recruitment of hazel (Corylus avellana) and hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata and C. monogyna) trees as a function of neighbourhood competition in the understorey of a minimum‐intervention, mixed‐ash woodland in England. We test the effects of browsing by deer (Muntiacus reevesi) on woodland dynamics by comparing demographic rates during a period of high deer densities (1985–1996) with rates recorded from 1996 to 2008, when sustained culling substantially reduced deer densities. 3. Growth and survival of hazel and hawthorn trees increased with the number of stems they possessed, demonstrating clear benefits to multi‐stemmed architecture. Surviving trees continued to accumulate basal area and stems without any clear upper limit after 23 years. However, increasing numbers of stems generally reduced the growth and recruitment of stems within multi‐stemmed trees. 4. Temporal differences in deer browsing appeared to influence the strength of intra‐specific (i.e. inter‐stem) competition and, consequently, the growth, survival and recruitment of multi‐stemmed trees. Most notably, stem survival declined with the number of stems in a tree only after deer culling, but not during a period of high deer densities, suggesting that intense deer browsing reduced resource competition among stems. Inter‐specific neighbourhood competition had no detectable effect on hazel or hawthorn demography. 5. Synthesis. Multi‐stemmed architecture is an advantageous trait for understorey trees in temperate woodlands relative to the allocation of resources towards the growth of a single stem. We suggest that the low light levels of forest understoreys favour ‘persistence’, through multi‐stemmed growth, rather than ‘regeneration’ niches (i.e. periodic recruitment through seed), with the advantage of this life‐history strategy influenced by herbivory and intra‐specific competition.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01879.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0477 |
ispartof | The Journal of ecology, 2012-01, Vol.100 (1), p.171-183 |
issn | 0022-0477 1365-2745 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920793190 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology ash‐maple woodland basal area Biological and medical sciences Browsing Community ecology coppice Corylus avellana Crataegus laevigata crowding Deer demography Ecological competition Forest ecology forest trees forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Herbivores herbivory hierarchical Bayesian models Human ecology Muntiacus neighbourhood models niche niches Plant ecology Plant growth Plant population and community dynamics recruitment sprouting Stems Survival analysis Synecology temporal variation Terrestrial ecosystems Tree growth Trees Understory woodlands |
title | more stems the merrier: advantages of multi‐stemmed architecture for the demography of understorey trees in a temperate broadleaf woodland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A22%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=more%20stems%20the%20merrier:%20advantages%20of%20multi%E2%80%90stemmed%20architecture%20for%20the%20demography%20of%20understorey%20trees%20in%20a%20temperate%20broadleaf%20woodland&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Tanentzap,%20Andrew%20J.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=171-183&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft.coden=JECOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01879.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41333097%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=911970757&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41333097&rfr_iscdi=true |