Spatial distribution and habitat selection in coexisting species of mountain ungulates
One of the main objectives of community ecology is to understand the conditions allowing species to coexist, which requires identifying how co-occurring species use and share space and resources. Species of the same trophic level, such as large herbivores, are of fundamental interest in that context...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecography (Copenhagen) 2012-01, Vol.35 (1), p.44-53 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 53 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 44 |
container_title | Ecography (Copenhagen) |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Darmon, Gaëlle Calenge, Clément Loison, Anne Jullien, Jean-Michel Maillard, Daniel Lopez, Jean-François |
description | One of the main objectives of community ecology is to understand the conditions allowing species to coexist, which requires identifying how co-occurring species use and share space and resources. Species of the same trophic level, such as large herbivores, are of fundamental interest in that context because competition for resources is likely. Segregation in space or on some axes of the ecological niche are processes allowing coexistence, yet, both are seldom studied jointly. Based on annual spring censuses collected for 11 yr, we analysed the degree of overlap in spatial distribution among chamois Rupicapra rupicapra and mouflon Ovis gmelini musimon, 2 species of similar size that coexist on the same alpine pastures. We further investigated whether they differed in terms of habitat selection processes, and identified which environmental factors led to species being aggregated or segregated. The areas of intensive use for 2 species were more spatially aggregated than expected by chance. Habitat selection was studied using multivariate methods based on the niche concept, considering the presence of 1 species as an environmental variable for the other. Despite a large overlap in niches (88%), segregation was significant as chamois preferred meadows dominated by Sesleria and Carex sempervirens while mouflon selected meadows dominated by Carex ferruginea and avoided being close to areas affected by human activities. Importantly, habitat selection within each species was not affected by the presence of the other species. Coexistence between these 2 species and spatial overlap may be permitted because resource partitioning occurs at a fine temporal and/or spatial scale. We underscore that joint approaches of spatial and ecological processes are necessary to disclose the type of interaction (neutral, facilitation or competition) at play within a community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06664.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920791517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41406212</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41406212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5804-537d585bfbe83b0d2f68bda0532ab7f4118d7a4aa5ea6faeaceee290526423163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiNEJZaWn4AUCSFOSf0Rf-SChJZ2i9pSpBY4WpNkUhyyzmInYvvv6zTVHjjhy1h-3nk9eidJUkpyGs9pl1NJSEaEVjkjlOZESlnk-xfJ6gBeJitSEpkpUZJXyesQOkIoK6VeJT9udzBa6NPGhtHbahrt4FJwTfoLKjvCmAbssX56tS6tB9xHoXX3adhhbTGkQ5tuh8mNEPHk7qceRgwnyVELfcA3z_U4-X5-dre-yK5uNl_Wn66yWmhSZIKrRmhRtRVqXpGGtVJXDRDBGVSqLSjVjYICQCDIFhBqRGQlEUwWjFPJj5MPi-_OD38mDKPZ2lBj34PDYQqmZESVVFAVle_-UXbD5F0czsycKqU1jyq9qGo_hOCxNTtvt-AfDCVmztt0Zo7VzLGaOW_zlLfZx9b3zx9AqKFvPbjahkM_E5wLVsyDfFx0f22PD__tb87WN5v5Gg3eLgZdGAd_MChoQSSjLPJs4XFRuD9w8L-NVFwJ8_Prxny-vLu4pN-uzTl_BI_TrRY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517177883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial distribution and habitat selection in coexisting species of mountain ungulates</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Darmon, Gaëlle ; Calenge, Clément ; Loison, Anne ; Jullien, Jean-Michel ; Maillard, Daniel ; Lopez, Jean-François</creator><creatorcontrib>Darmon, Gaëlle ; Calenge, Clément ; Loison, Anne ; Jullien, Jean-Michel ; Maillard, Daniel ; Lopez, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><description>One of the main objectives of community ecology is to understand the conditions allowing species to coexist, which requires identifying how co-occurring species use and share space and resources. Species of the same trophic level, such as large herbivores, are of fundamental interest in that context because competition for resources is likely. Segregation in space or on some axes of the ecological niche are processes allowing coexistence, yet, both are seldom studied jointly. Based on annual spring censuses collected for 11 yr, we analysed the degree of overlap in spatial distribution among chamois Rupicapra rupicapra and mouflon Ovis gmelini musimon, 2 species of similar size that coexist on the same alpine pastures. We further investigated whether they differed in terms of habitat selection processes, and identified which environmental factors led to species being aggregated or segregated. The areas of intensive use for 2 species were more spatially aggregated than expected by chance. Habitat selection was studied using multivariate methods based on the niche concept, considering the presence of 1 species as an environmental variable for the other. Despite a large overlap in niches (88%), segregation was significant as chamois preferred meadows dominated by Sesleria and Carex sempervirens while mouflon selected meadows dominated by Carex ferruginea and avoided being close to areas affected by human activities. Importantly, habitat selection within each species was not affected by the presence of the other species. Coexistence between these 2 species and spatial overlap may be permitted because resource partitioning occurs at a fine temporal and/or spatial scale. We underscore that joint approaches of spatial and ecological processes are necessary to disclose the type of interaction (neutral, facilitation or competition) at play within a community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-7590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0587</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06664.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carex ; Chamois ; Coexistence ; Competition ; Ecological competition ; Ecological niches ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat selection ; Herbivores ; Mammalia ; Meadows ; Mouflon ; Pixels ; Spatial distribution ; Ungulates ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Ecography (Copenhagen), 2012-01, Vol.35 (1), p.44-53</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Ecography</rights><rights>2011 The Authors</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5804-537d585bfbe83b0d2f68bda0532ab7f4118d7a4aa5ea6faeaceee290526423163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5804-537d585bfbe83b0d2f68bda0532ab7f4118d7a4aa5ea6faeaceee290526423163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41406212$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41406212$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25335247$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Darmon, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calenge, Clément</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loison, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jullien, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maillard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial distribution and habitat selection in coexisting species of mountain ungulates</title><title>Ecography (Copenhagen)</title><addtitle>Ecography</addtitle><description>One of the main objectives of community ecology is to understand the conditions allowing species to coexist, which requires identifying how co-occurring species use and share space and resources. Species of the same trophic level, such as large herbivores, are of fundamental interest in that context because competition for resources is likely. Segregation in space or on some axes of the ecological niche are processes allowing coexistence, yet, both are seldom studied jointly. Based on annual spring censuses collected for 11 yr, we analysed the degree of overlap in spatial distribution among chamois Rupicapra rupicapra and mouflon Ovis gmelini musimon, 2 species of similar size that coexist on the same alpine pastures. We further investigated whether they differed in terms of habitat selection processes, and identified which environmental factors led to species being aggregated or segregated. The areas of intensive use for 2 species were more spatially aggregated than expected by chance. Habitat selection was studied using multivariate methods based on the niche concept, considering the presence of 1 species as an environmental variable for the other. Despite a large overlap in niches (88%), segregation was significant as chamois preferred meadows dominated by Sesleria and Carex sempervirens while mouflon selected meadows dominated by Carex ferruginea and avoided being close to areas affected by human activities. Importantly, habitat selection within each species was not affected by the presence of the other species. Coexistence between these 2 species and spatial overlap may be permitted because resource partitioning occurs at a fine temporal and/or spatial scale. We underscore that joint approaches of spatial and ecological processes are necessary to disclose the type of interaction (neutral, facilitation or competition) at play within a community.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carex</subject><subject>Chamois</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Ecological niches</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Meadows</subject><subject>Mouflon</subject><subject>Pixels</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0906-7590</issn><issn>1600-0587</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiNEJZaWn4AUCSFOSf0Rf-SChJZ2i9pSpBY4WpNkUhyyzmInYvvv6zTVHjjhy1h-3nk9eidJUkpyGs9pl1NJSEaEVjkjlOZESlnk-xfJ6gBeJitSEpkpUZJXyesQOkIoK6VeJT9udzBa6NPGhtHbahrt4FJwTfoLKjvCmAbssX56tS6tB9xHoXX3adhhbTGkQ5tuh8mNEPHk7qceRgwnyVELfcA3z_U4-X5-dre-yK5uNl_Wn66yWmhSZIKrRmhRtRVqXpGGtVJXDRDBGVSqLSjVjYICQCDIFhBqRGQlEUwWjFPJj5MPi-_OD38mDKPZ2lBj34PDYQqmZESVVFAVle_-UXbD5F0czsycKqU1jyq9qGo_hOCxNTtvt-AfDCVmztt0Zo7VzLGaOW_zlLfZx9b3zx9AqKFvPbjahkM_E5wLVsyDfFx0f22PD__tb87WN5v5Gg3eLgZdGAd_MChoQSSjLPJs4XFRuD9w8L-NVFwJ8_Prxny-vLu4pN-uzTl_BI_TrRY</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Darmon, Gaëlle</creator><creator>Calenge, Clément</creator><creator>Loison, Anne</creator><creator>Jullien, Jean-Michel</creator><creator>Maillard, Daniel</creator><creator>Lopez, Jean-François</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Spatial distribution and habitat selection in coexisting species of mountain ungulates</title><author>Darmon, Gaëlle ; Calenge, Clément ; Loison, Anne ; Jullien, Jean-Michel ; Maillard, Daniel ; Lopez, Jean-François</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5804-537d585bfbe83b0d2f68bda0532ab7f4118d7a4aa5ea6faeaceee290526423163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carex</topic><topic>Chamois</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Ecological niches</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Meadows</topic><topic>Mouflon</topic><topic>Pixels</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Darmon, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calenge, Clément</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loison, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jullien, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maillard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecography (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Darmon, Gaëlle</au><au>Calenge, Clément</au><au>Loison, Anne</au><au>Jullien, Jean-Michel</au><au>Maillard, Daniel</au><au>Lopez, Jean-François</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial distribution and habitat selection in coexisting species of mountain ungulates</atitle><jtitle>Ecography (Copenhagen)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecography</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>44-53</pages><issn>0906-7590</issn><eissn>1600-0587</eissn><abstract>One of the main objectives of community ecology is to understand the conditions allowing species to coexist, which requires identifying how co-occurring species use and share space and resources. Species of the same trophic level, such as large herbivores, are of fundamental interest in that context because competition for resources is likely. Segregation in space or on some axes of the ecological niche are processes allowing coexistence, yet, both are seldom studied jointly. Based on annual spring censuses collected for 11 yr, we analysed the degree of overlap in spatial distribution among chamois Rupicapra rupicapra and mouflon Ovis gmelini musimon, 2 species of similar size that coexist on the same alpine pastures. We further investigated whether they differed in terms of habitat selection processes, and identified which environmental factors led to species being aggregated or segregated. The areas of intensive use for 2 species were more spatially aggregated than expected by chance. Habitat selection was studied using multivariate methods based on the niche concept, considering the presence of 1 species as an environmental variable for the other. Despite a large overlap in niches (88%), segregation was significant as chamois preferred meadows dominated by Sesleria and Carex sempervirens while mouflon selected meadows dominated by Carex ferruginea and avoided being close to areas affected by human activities. Importantly, habitat selection within each species was not affected by the presence of the other species. Coexistence between these 2 species and spatial overlap may be permitted because resource partitioning occurs at a fine temporal and/or spatial scale. We underscore that joint approaches of spatial and ecological processes are necessary to disclose the type of interaction (neutral, facilitation or competition) at play within a community.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06664.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0906-7590 |
ispartof | Ecography (Copenhagen), 2012-01, Vol.35 (1), p.44-53 |
issn | 0906-7590 1600-0587 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920791517 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animal behavior Biological and medical sciences Carex Chamois Coexistence Competition Ecological competition Ecological niches Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitat selection Herbivores Mammalia Meadows Mouflon Pixels Spatial distribution Ungulates Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
title | Spatial distribution and habitat selection in coexisting species of mountain ungulates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T10%3A58%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20distribution%20and%20habitat%20selection%20in%20coexisting%20species%20of%20mountain%20ungulates&rft.jtitle=Ecography%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=Darmon,%20Ga%C3%ABlle&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=44-53&rft.issn=0906-7590&rft.eissn=1600-0587&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06664.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41406212%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517177883&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41406212&rfr_iscdi=true |