“Machine” consciousness and “artificial” thought: An operational architectonics model guided approach
Instead of using low-level neurophysiology mimicking and exploratory programming methods commonly used in the machine consciousness field, the hierarchical operational architectonics (OA) framework of brain and mind functioning proposes an alternative conceptual–theoretical framework as a new direct...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain research 2012-01, Vol.1428 (5), p.80-92 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 92 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | Brain research |
container_volume | 1428 |
creator | Fingelkurts, Andrew A Fingelkurts, Alexander A Neves, Carlos F.H |
description | Instead of using low-level neurophysiology mimicking and exploratory programming methods commonly used in the machine consciousness field, the hierarchical operational architectonics (OA) framework of brain and mind functioning proposes an alternative conceptual–theoretical framework as a new direction in the area of model-driven machine (robot) consciousness engineering. The unified brain–mind theoretical OA model explicitly captures (though in an informal way) the basic essence of brain functional architecture, which indeed constitutes a theory of consciousness. The OA describes the neurophysiological basis of the phenomenal level of brain organization. In this context the problem of producing man-made “machine” consciousness and “artificial” thought is a matter of duplicating all levels of the operational architectonics hierarchy (with its inherent rules and mechanisms) found in the brain electromagnetic field. We hope that the conceptual–theoretical framework described in this paper will stimulate the interest of mathematicians and/or computer scientists to abstract and formalize principles of hierarchy of brain operations which are the building blocks for phenomenal consciousness and thought. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.079 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920789326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0006899310025928</els_id><sourcerecordid>920789326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-92c61d0a3ba289e19eb2b2c80fa19c0d7c8933c6e1c0c81033d49152f9b324e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktuFDEQhi0EIkPgCsE7Vj2U7X6ZBSKKCCAFsQhZW267esZDtz3Y3ZGyy0HI5XIS3JqEBZusLNt__fX4ipATBmsGrH6_W3dROx8xrTksj2wNjXxGVqxteFHzEp6TFQDURSulOCKvUtrlqxASXpIjzpiArF-R8f72z3dtts7j_e0dNcEn48KcPKZEtbc0_-s4ud4Zp4dFMm3DvNlOH-ipp2GPUU8ueD1QHbPLhGYK3plEx2BxoJvZWbRU7_cx5CyvyYteDwnfPJzH5Or888-zr8XFjy_fzk4vClOV5VRIbmpmQYtO81Yik9jxjpsWes2kAduYVgphamQGTMtyV7aUrOK97AQvsRTH5N3BN6f9PWOa1OiSwWHQHnNzSnJosgWvn1ayupZVIxfP-qA0MaQUsVf76EYdbxQDtTBRO_XIRC1MFGMqzzgHnjykmLsR7b-wRwhZ8PYg6HVQehNdUleX2aHKwKSQzVLlp4MC89CuHUaVKaE3aF3ME1c2uKer-PifhRlcJqWHX3iDaRfmmCkmxVTiCtTlsjvL6jAAXkneir8UhcOx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916695794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Machine” consciousness and “artificial” thought: An operational architectonics model guided approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Fingelkurts, Andrew A ; Fingelkurts, Alexander A ; Neves, Carlos F.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Fingelkurts, Andrew A ; Fingelkurts, Alexander A ; Neves, Carlos F.H</creatorcontrib><description>Instead of using low-level neurophysiology mimicking and exploratory programming methods commonly used in the machine consciousness field, the hierarchical operational architectonics (OA) framework of brain and mind functioning proposes an alternative conceptual–theoretical framework as a new direction in the area of model-driven machine (robot) consciousness engineering. The unified brain–mind theoretical OA model explicitly captures (though in an informal way) the basic essence of brain functional architecture, which indeed constitutes a theory of consciousness. The OA describes the neurophysiological basis of the phenomenal level of brain organization. In this context the problem of producing man-made “machine” consciousness and “artificial” thought is a matter of duplicating all levels of the operational architectonics hierarchy (with its inherent rules and mechanisms) found in the brain electromagnetic field. We hope that the conceptual–theoretical framework described in this paper will stimulate the interest of mathematicians and/or computer scientists to abstract and formalize principles of hierarchy of brain operations which are the building blocks for phenomenal consciousness and thought.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21130079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Artificial mind ; brain ; Brain architecture ; Computers ; Conscious operation ; consciousness ; Consciousness - physiology ; EEG ; Electroencephalography ; engineering ; Humans ; Many-body field dynamics ; Mental Processes - physiology ; Metastability ; Neurology ; neurophysiology ; Operational architectonics ; Robot ; Robotics ; scientists ; Theory of Mind ; Thinking - physiology</subject><ispartof>Brain research, 2012-01, Vol.1428 (5), p.80-92</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-92c61d0a3ba289e19eb2b2c80fa19c0d7c8933c6e1c0c81033d49152f9b324e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-92c61d0a3ba289e19eb2b2c80fa19c0d7c8933c6e1c0c81033d49152f9b324e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21130079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fingelkurts, Andrew A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fingelkurts, Alexander A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Carlos F.H</creatorcontrib><title>“Machine” consciousness and “artificial” thought: An operational architectonics model guided approach</title><title>Brain research</title><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><description>Instead of using low-level neurophysiology mimicking and exploratory programming methods commonly used in the machine consciousness field, the hierarchical operational architectonics (OA) framework of brain and mind functioning proposes an alternative conceptual–theoretical framework as a new direction in the area of model-driven machine (robot) consciousness engineering. The unified brain–mind theoretical OA model explicitly captures (though in an informal way) the basic essence of brain functional architecture, which indeed constitutes a theory of consciousness. The OA describes the neurophysiological basis of the phenomenal level of brain organization. In this context the problem of producing man-made “machine” consciousness and “artificial” thought is a matter of duplicating all levels of the operational architectonics hierarchy (with its inherent rules and mechanisms) found in the brain electromagnetic field. We hope that the conceptual–theoretical framework described in this paper will stimulate the interest of mathematicians and/or computer scientists to abstract and formalize principles of hierarchy of brain operations which are the building blocks for phenomenal consciousness and thought.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial mind</subject><subject>brain</subject><subject>Brain architecture</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Conscious operation</subject><subject>consciousness</subject><subject>Consciousness - physiology</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>engineering</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Many-body field dynamics</subject><subject>Mental Processes - physiology</subject><subject>Metastability</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>neurophysiology</subject><subject>Operational architectonics</subject><subject>Robot</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>scientists</subject><subject>Theory of Mind</subject><subject>Thinking - physiology</subject><issn>0006-8993</issn><issn>1872-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktuFDEQhi0EIkPgCsE7Vj2U7X6ZBSKKCCAFsQhZW267esZDtz3Y3ZGyy0HI5XIS3JqEBZusLNt__fX4ipATBmsGrH6_W3dROx8xrTksj2wNjXxGVqxteFHzEp6TFQDURSulOCKvUtrlqxASXpIjzpiArF-R8f72z3dtts7j_e0dNcEn48KcPKZEtbc0_-s4ud4Zp4dFMm3DvNlOH-ipp2GPUU8ueD1QHbPLhGYK3plEx2BxoJvZWbRU7_cx5CyvyYteDwnfPJzH5Or888-zr8XFjy_fzk4vClOV5VRIbmpmQYtO81Yik9jxjpsWes2kAduYVgphamQGTMtyV7aUrOK97AQvsRTH5N3BN6f9PWOa1OiSwWHQHnNzSnJosgWvn1ayupZVIxfP-qA0MaQUsVf76EYdbxQDtTBRO_XIRC1MFGMqzzgHnjykmLsR7b-wRwhZ8PYg6HVQehNdUleX2aHKwKSQzVLlp4MC89CuHUaVKaE3aF3ME1c2uKer-PifhRlcJqWHX3iDaRfmmCkmxVTiCtTlsjvL6jAAXkneir8UhcOx</recordid><startdate>20120105</startdate><enddate>20120105</enddate><creator>Fingelkurts, Andrew A</creator><creator>Fingelkurts, Alexander A</creator><creator>Neves, Carlos F.H</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120105</creationdate><title>“Machine” consciousness and “artificial” thought: An operational architectonics model guided approach</title><author>Fingelkurts, Andrew A ; Fingelkurts, Alexander A ; Neves, Carlos F.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-92c61d0a3ba289e19eb2b2c80fa19c0d7c8933c6e1c0c81033d49152f9b324e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial mind</topic><topic>brain</topic><topic>Brain architecture</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Conscious operation</topic><topic>consciousness</topic><topic>Consciousness - physiology</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>engineering</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Many-body field dynamics</topic><topic>Mental Processes - physiology</topic><topic>Metastability</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>neurophysiology</topic><topic>Operational architectonics</topic><topic>Robot</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>scientists</topic><topic>Theory of Mind</topic><topic>Thinking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fingelkurts, Andrew A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fingelkurts, Alexander A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Carlos F.H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fingelkurts, Andrew A</au><au>Fingelkurts, Alexander A</au><au>Neves, Carlos F.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Machine” consciousness and “artificial” thought: An operational architectonics model guided approach</atitle><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><date>2012-01-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>1428</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>80-92</pages><issn>0006-8993</issn><eissn>1872-6240</eissn><abstract>Instead of using low-level neurophysiology mimicking and exploratory programming methods commonly used in the machine consciousness field, the hierarchical operational architectonics (OA) framework of brain and mind functioning proposes an alternative conceptual–theoretical framework as a new direction in the area of model-driven machine (robot) consciousness engineering. The unified brain–mind theoretical OA model explicitly captures (though in an informal way) the basic essence of brain functional architecture, which indeed constitutes a theory of consciousness. The OA describes the neurophysiological basis of the phenomenal level of brain organization. In this context the problem of producing man-made “machine” consciousness and “artificial” thought is a matter of duplicating all levels of the operational architectonics hierarchy (with its inherent rules and mechanisms) found in the brain electromagnetic field. We hope that the conceptual–theoretical framework described in this paper will stimulate the interest of mathematicians and/or computer scientists to abstract and formalize principles of hierarchy of brain operations which are the building blocks for phenomenal consciousness and thought.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21130079</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.079</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-8993 |
ispartof | Brain research, 2012-01, Vol.1428 (5), p.80-92 |
issn | 0006-8993 1872-6240 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920789326 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Artificial Intelligence Artificial mind brain Brain architecture Computers Conscious operation consciousness Consciousness - physiology EEG Electroencephalography engineering Humans Many-body field dynamics Mental Processes - physiology Metastability Neurology neurophysiology Operational architectonics Robot Robotics scientists Theory of Mind Thinking - physiology |
title | “Machine” consciousness and “artificial” thought: An operational architectonics model guided approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CMachine%E2%80%9D%20consciousness%20and%20%E2%80%9Cartificial%E2%80%9D%20thought:%20An%20operational%20architectonics%20model%20guided%20approach&rft.jtitle=Brain%20research&rft.au=Fingelkurts,%20Andrew%20A&rft.date=2012-01-05&rft.volume=1428&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=80-92&rft.issn=0006-8993&rft.eissn=1872-6240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E920789326%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916695794&rft_id=info:pmid/21130079&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0006899310025928&rfr_iscdi=true |