Chest Wall Kinematics during Speech Breathing in Tracheoesophageal Speakers
Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to determine how tracheoesophageal (TE) speakers manipulate the chest wall (rib cage and abdomen) to speak and how respiratory compromise (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COPD) and task variables influence those behaviors. Methods: The chest wa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology rhinology & laryngology, 2012-01, Vol.121 (1), p.28-37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives:
The purpose of the present study was to determine how tracheoesophageal (TE) speakers manipulate the chest wall (rib cage and abdomen) to speak and how respiratory compromise (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COPD) and task variables influence those behaviors.
Methods:
The chest wall movements of 11 male TE speakers (5 with COPD and 6 without COPD) were measured during tidal breathing, spontaneous speech, and reading. Repeated-measures multivariate analyses were used to compare breathing behaviors across speech tasks and by respiratory health. Additional repeated-measures multivariate analyses and 1-way analyses of variance were conducted on temporal, aerodynamic, and linguistic measures.
Results:
There was a significant main effect of task and a significant interaction effect of COPD and task on chest wall movements. Rib cage movements varied by task, whereas abdominal movements were as predicted. There was a significant difference in utterance length by task. There were no main effects of COPD on the chest wall and no significant group differences in utterance length, aerodynamic measures, or intelligibility. The TE speakers were generally accurate in inspiring at appropriate linguistic boundaries.
Conclusions:
The results suggest that there is robust control for speech breathing following laryngectomy, but that there is also increased effort within the chest wall. Implications for future research considerations are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-4894 1943-572X |
DOI: | 10.1177/000348941212100106 |