Digital camera simulation
We describe a simulation of the complete image processing pipeline of a digital camera, beginning with a radiometric description of the scene captured by the camera and ending with a radiometric description of the image rendered on a display. We show that there is a good correspondence between measu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied optics (2004) 2012-02, Vol.51 (4), p.A80-90 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 90 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | A80 |
| container_title | Applied optics (2004) |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Farrell, Joyce E Catrysse, Peter B Wandell, Brian A |
| description | We describe a simulation of the complete image processing pipeline of a digital camera, beginning with a radiometric description of the scene captured by the camera and ending with a radiometric description of the image rendered on a display. We show that there is a good correspondence between measured and simulated sensor performance. Through the use of simulation, we can quantify the effects of individual digital camera components on system performance and image quality. This computational approach can be helpful for both camera design and image quality assessment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1364/AO.51.000A80 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920227606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>920227606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-42f212ce5a970a4492ceb8b9910ef44872b74417bec25fde5560246ba3f5c7543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90DtPwzAUBWALgWgpbCwsqBsMJFxfv-IxKk-pUhaQ2CzHdVBQ0pQ4Gfj3GKUwMp0zfDrDIeScQkqZ5Ld5kQqaAkCewQGZIxUiYVSKQzKPVScUs7cZOQnhA4AJrtUxmSEyUJThnFzc1e_1YJuls63v7TLU7djYoe62p-Sosk3wZ_tckNeH-5fVU7IuHp9X-TpxDNmQcKyQovPCagWWcx17mZVaU_AV55nCUnFOVekdimrjhZCAXJaWVcIpwdmCXE27u777HH0YTFsH55vGbn03BqMREJUEGeX1v5JGqEFIyiK9majruxB6X5ldX7e2_4rI_Nxm8sIIaqbbIr_cL49l6zd_-Pcn9g34J2SK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1022905613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digital camera simulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Optica Publishing Group Journals</source><creator>Farrell, Joyce E ; Catrysse, Peter B ; Wandell, Brian A</creator><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Joyce E ; Catrysse, Peter B ; Wandell, Brian A</creatorcontrib><description>We describe a simulation of the complete image processing pipeline of a digital camera, beginning with a radiometric description of the scene captured by the camera and ending with a radiometric description of the image rendered on a display. We show that there is a good correspondence between measured and simulated sensor performance. Through the use of simulation, we can quantify the effects of individual digital camera components on system performance and image quality. This computational approach can be helpful for both camera design and image quality assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-128X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-3165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-4522</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1364/AO.51.000A80</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22307132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Cameras ; Computer Simulation ; Computer-Aided Design ; Design engineering ; Digital cameras ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Image quality ; Models, Theoretical ; Photography - instrumentation ; Pipelines ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Transducers</subject><ispartof>Applied optics (2004), 2012-02, Vol.51 (4), p.A80-90</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-42f212ce5a970a4492ceb8b9910ef44872b74417bec25fde5560246ba3f5c7543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-42f212ce5a970a4492ceb8b9910ef44872b74417bec25fde5560246ba3f5c7543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3246,27906,27907</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22307132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Joyce E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catrysse, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandell, Brian A</creatorcontrib><title>Digital camera simulation</title><title>Applied optics (2004)</title><addtitle>Appl Opt</addtitle><description>We describe a simulation of the complete image processing pipeline of a digital camera, beginning with a radiometric description of the scene captured by the camera and ending with a radiometric description of the image rendered on a display. We show that there is a good correspondence between measured and simulated sensor performance. Through the use of simulation, we can quantify the effects of individual digital camera components on system performance and image quality. This computational approach can be helpful for both camera design and image quality assessment.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Digital cameras</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Photography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Transducers</subject><issn>1559-128X</issn><issn>2155-3165</issn><issn>1539-4522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90DtPwzAUBWALgWgpbCwsqBsMJFxfv-IxKk-pUhaQ2CzHdVBQ0pQ4Gfj3GKUwMp0zfDrDIeScQkqZ5Ld5kQqaAkCewQGZIxUiYVSKQzKPVScUs7cZOQnhA4AJrtUxmSEyUJThnFzc1e_1YJuls63v7TLU7djYoe62p-Sosk3wZ_tckNeH-5fVU7IuHp9X-TpxDNmQcKyQovPCagWWcx17mZVaU_AV55nCUnFOVekdimrjhZCAXJaWVcIpwdmCXE27u777HH0YTFsH55vGbn03BqMREJUEGeX1v5JGqEFIyiK9majruxB6X5ldX7e2_4rI_Nxm8sIIaqbbIr_cL49l6zd_-Pcn9g34J2SK</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Farrell, Joyce E</creator><creator>Catrysse, Peter B</creator><creator>Wandell, Brian A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Digital camera simulation</title><author>Farrell, Joyce E ; Catrysse, Peter B ; Wandell, Brian A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-42f212ce5a970a4492ceb8b9910ef44872b74417bec25fde5560246ba3f5c7543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Digital cameras</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Photography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Transducers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Joyce E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catrysse, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandell, Brian A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied optics (2004)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farrell, Joyce E</au><au>Catrysse, Peter B</au><au>Wandell, Brian A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digital camera simulation</atitle><jtitle>Applied optics (2004)</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Opt</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>A80</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>A80-90</pages><issn>1559-128X</issn><eissn>2155-3165</eissn><eissn>1539-4522</eissn><abstract>We describe a simulation of the complete image processing pipeline of a digital camera, beginning with a radiometric description of the scene captured by the camera and ending with a radiometric description of the image rendered on a display. We show that there is a good correspondence between measured and simulated sensor performance. Through the use of simulation, we can quantify the effects of individual digital camera components on system performance and image quality. This computational approach can be helpful for both camera design and image quality assessment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22307132</pmid><doi>10.1364/AO.51.000A80</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1559-128X |
| ispartof | Applied optics (2004), 2012-02, Vol.51 (4), p.A80-90 |
| issn | 1559-128X 2155-3165 1539-4522 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920227606 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Optica Publishing Group Journals |
| subjects | Assessments Cameras Computer Simulation Computer-Aided Design Design engineering Digital cameras Equipment Design Equipment Failure Analysis Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Image quality Models, Theoretical Photography - instrumentation Pipelines Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation Transducers |
| title | Digital camera simulation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A16%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digital%20camera%20simulation&rft.jtitle=Applied%20optics%20(2004)&rft.au=Farrell,%20Joyce%20E&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=A80&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=A80-90&rft.issn=1559-128X&rft.eissn=2155-3165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1364/AO.51.000A80&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E920227606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1022905613&rft_id=info:pmid/22307132&rfr_iscdi=true |