Parsing Public/Private Differences in Work Motivation and Performance: An Experimental Study
This article echoes recent calls for public management research to focus on core questions and utilize multiple methods to advance the state of knowledge in the field. In this article, we call for more experimental research on the public/private distinction, which is a core public management researc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of public administration research and theory 2011-07, Vol.21 (suppl_3), p.i347-i362 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | i362 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl_3 |
container_start_page | i347 |
container_title | Journal of public administration research and theory |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Brewer, Gene A. Brewer, Gene A. |
description | This article echoes recent calls for public management research to focus on core questions and utilize multiple methods to advance the state of knowledge in the field. In this article, we call for more experimental research on the public/private distinction, which is a core public management research topic. We then conduct a pilot experimental study that provides new insights—and what seem to be major implications—about this important topic. Specifically, we study individuals' vigilance when performing work in a government funded research project compared with a business funded research project. Our results show that individuals are significantly faster, more accurate, and more vigilant when their work is funded by a government agency rather than a private business firm. Two major implications are (1) government provision of goods and services that require faster, more accurate, and more vigilant workers (e.g., airport security or emergency responders) may be superior to private provision, ceteris paribus; and (2) our participants in this study, who are college students, seem to perform better when working for government rather than for the private sector. This is heartening because, with the "quiet crisis" looming over government, many seasoned public servants will soon be replaced by these younger workers. The strengths and limitations of the study are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jopart/mur030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920056878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25836127</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/jopart/mur030</oup_id><sourcerecordid>25836127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4f98c3ed142b0d631a97cf9f6f248c9c61c422f6d5b97f0e159d6941970594cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0aOQm17qkqZJE29jzh8wsaDiRShpmkhm19QkFfff21Hx6ru8B-_Dg_cF4BSjS4wEma1dJ32cbXqPCNoDE5zleSI4IvvDjChJMKf8EByFsEZDCYEn4K2QPtj2HRZ91Vg1K7z9klHDa2uM9rpVOkDbwlfnP-CDi7uldS2UbQ0L7Y3zGzmYKzhv4fK7095udBtlA59iX2-PwYGRTdAnv30KXm6Wz4u7ZPV4e7-YrxJFBI1JZgRXRNc4SytUM4KlyJURhpk040oohlWWpobVtBK5QRpTUTORYZEjKjJVkSk4H-923n32OsRyY4PSTSNb7fpQihQhynjO_5dDZowhwgaZjFJ5F4LXpuyG56TflhiVu7jLMe5yjHvwF6N3ffcvPRvpOkTn_3BKOWE4zckP-1aNFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>914766036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parsing Public/Private Differences in Work Motivation and Performance: An Experimental Study</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Brewer, Gene A. ; Brewer, Gene A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Gene A. ; Brewer, Gene A.</creatorcontrib><description>This article echoes recent calls for public management research to focus on core questions and utilize multiple methods to advance the state of knowledge in the field. In this article, we call for more experimental research on the public/private distinction, which is a core public management research topic. We then conduct a pilot experimental study that provides new insights—and what seem to be major implications—about this important topic. Specifically, we study individuals' vigilance when performing work in a government funded research project compared with a business funded research project. Our results show that individuals are significantly faster, more accurate, and more vigilant when their work is funded by a government agency rather than a private business firm. Two major implications are (1) government provision of goods and services that require faster, more accurate, and more vigilant workers (e.g., airport security or emergency responders) may be superior to private provision, ceteris paribus; and (2) our participants in this study, who are college students, seem to perform better when working for government rather than for the private sector. This is heartening because, with the "quiet crisis" looming over government, many seasoned public servants will soon be replaced by these younger workers. The strengths and limitations of the study are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9803</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur030</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPRTEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Civil servants ; College Students ; Emergencies ; Employee motivation ; Employment ; Experiment design ; Experimentation ; Funding ; Government ; Government Agencies ; Government bureaucracy ; Job performance ; Management ; Motivation ; Private Sector ; Public administration ; Public management ; Research design ; Research methods ; Security ; Services ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Journal of public administration research and theory, 2011-07, Vol.21 (suppl_3), p.i347-i362</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc.</rights><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4f98c3ed142b0d631a97cf9f6f248c9c61c422f6d5b97f0e159d6941970594cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4f98c3ed142b0d631a97cf9f6f248c9c61c422f6d5b97f0e159d6941970594cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25836127$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25836127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1579,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Gene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Gene A.</creatorcontrib><title>Parsing Public/Private Differences in Work Motivation and Performance: An Experimental Study</title><title>Journal of public administration research and theory</title><description>This article echoes recent calls for public management research to focus on core questions and utilize multiple methods to advance the state of knowledge in the field. In this article, we call for more experimental research on the public/private distinction, which is a core public management research topic. We then conduct a pilot experimental study that provides new insights—and what seem to be major implications—about this important topic. Specifically, we study individuals' vigilance when performing work in a government funded research project compared with a business funded research project. Our results show that individuals are significantly faster, more accurate, and more vigilant when their work is funded by a government agency rather than a private business firm. Two major implications are (1) government provision of goods and services that require faster, more accurate, and more vigilant workers (e.g., airport security or emergency responders) may be superior to private provision, ceteris paribus; and (2) our participants in this study, who are college students, seem to perform better when working for government rather than for the private sector. This is heartening because, with the "quiet crisis" looming over government, many seasoned public servants will soon be replaced by these younger workers. The strengths and limitations of the study are discussed.</description><subject>Civil servants</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Employee motivation</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Experiment design</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government Agencies</subject><subject>Government bureaucracy</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Private Sector</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public management</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>1053-1858</issn><issn>1477-9803</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0aOQm17qkqZJE29jzh8wsaDiRShpmkhm19QkFfff21Hx6ru8B-_Dg_cF4BSjS4wEma1dJ32cbXqPCNoDE5zleSI4IvvDjChJMKf8EByFsEZDCYEn4K2QPtj2HRZ91Vg1K7z9klHDa2uM9rpVOkDbwlfnP-CDi7uldS2UbQ0L7Y3zGzmYKzhv4fK7095udBtlA59iX2-PwYGRTdAnv30KXm6Wz4u7ZPV4e7-YrxJFBI1JZgRXRNc4SytUM4KlyJURhpk040oohlWWpobVtBK5QRpTUTORYZEjKjJVkSk4H-923n32OsRyY4PSTSNb7fpQihQhynjO_5dDZowhwgaZjFJ5F4LXpuyG56TflhiVu7jLMe5yjHvwF6N3ffcvPRvpOkTn_3BKOWE4zckP-1aNFQ</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Brewer, Gene A.</creator><creator>Brewer, Gene A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Parsing Public/Private Differences in Work Motivation and Performance: An Experimental Study</title><author>Brewer, Gene A. ; Brewer, Gene A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4f98c3ed142b0d631a97cf9f6f248c9c61c422f6d5b97f0e159d6941970594cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Civil servants</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Employee motivation</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Experiment design</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government Agencies</topic><topic>Government bureaucracy</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Private Sector</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public management</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Gene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Gene A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of public administration research and theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brewer, Gene A.</au><au>Brewer, Gene A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parsing Public/Private Differences in Work Motivation and Performance: An Experimental Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public administration research and theory</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>suppl_3</issue><spage>i347</spage><epage>i362</epage><pages>i347-i362</pages><issn>1053-1858</issn><eissn>1477-9803</eissn><coden>JPRTEC</coden><abstract>This article echoes recent calls for public management research to focus on core questions and utilize multiple methods to advance the state of knowledge in the field. In this article, we call for more experimental research on the public/private distinction, which is a core public management research topic. We then conduct a pilot experimental study that provides new insights—and what seem to be major implications—about this important topic. Specifically, we study individuals' vigilance when performing work in a government funded research project compared with a business funded research project. Our results show that individuals are significantly faster, more accurate, and more vigilant when their work is funded by a government agency rather than a private business firm. Two major implications are (1) government provision of goods and services that require faster, more accurate, and more vigilant workers (e.g., airport security or emergency responders) may be superior to private provision, ceteris paribus; and (2) our participants in this study, who are college students, seem to perform better when working for government rather than for the private sector. This is heartening because, with the "quiet crisis" looming over government, many seasoned public servants will soon be replaced by these younger workers. The strengths and limitations of the study are discussed.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jopart/mur030</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1858 |
ispartof | Journal of public administration research and theory, 2011-07, Vol.21 (suppl_3), p.i347-i362 |
issn | 1053-1858 1477-9803 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920056878 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Political Science Complete |
subjects | Civil servants College Students Emergencies Employee motivation Employment Experiment design Experimentation Funding Government Government Agencies Government bureaucracy Job performance Management Motivation Private Sector Public administration Public management Research design Research methods Security Services Workers |
title | Parsing Public/Private Differences in Work Motivation and Performance: An Experimental Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A01%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parsing%20Public/Private%20Differences%20in%20Work%20Motivation%20and%20Performance:%20An%20Experimental%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20administration%20research%20and%20theory&rft.au=Brewer,%20Gene%20A.&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=suppl_3&rft.spage=i347&rft.epage=i362&rft.pages=i347-i362&rft.issn=1053-1858&rft.eissn=1477-9803&rft.coden=JPRTEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jopart/mur030&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25836127%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=914766036&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25836127&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jopart/mur030&rfr_iscdi=true |