Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory for use in end-stage renal disease patients
Objective. To validate the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for use in patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and to compare the outcome of both screening measures with each other. Design. Cross‐sectional and between‐subjects design. The inde...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of clinical psychology 2010-11, Vol.49 (4), p.507-516 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 516 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 507 |
| container_title | British journal of clinical psychology |
| container_volume | 49 |
| creator | Loosman, W. L. Siegert, C. E. H. Korzec, A. Honig, A. |
| description | Objective. To validate the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for use in patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and to compare the outcome of both screening measures with each other.
Design. Cross‐sectional and between‐subjects design. The independent variable was the diagnosis depression by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). The dependent variables were the HADS and BDI total score.
Methods. All 130 patients with ESRD who were treated with haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialyses in the Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital in Amsterdam were eligible for this study and were asked to fill out both HADS and BDI. The outcomes of both rating scales were compared with the diagnosis major depressive episode based on the MINI, which was seen as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to choose optimal cut‐off values.
Results. Of 62 enrolled subjects, 21 (34%) were diagnosed with a depressive disorder. Optimal cut‐off values were ≥12 (HADS) and ≥13 (BDI). Sensitivity was 81.0% (HADS) and 75.0% (BDI). Specificity was 90.2% for both.
Conclusions. Both HADS and BDI are valid screening instruments for the diagnosis depression in ESRD patients but there is no statistical difference found between both rating scales. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1348/014466509X477827 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919969728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>758837455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5422-db06ec41f23fe7f8abacbeebfea31396297f8e3e408b6e924fb7c4899fd093f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAUxC1ERZfCnRPyBZVLyvNH4vjYDdAWVSCVj3KznOQZTLPOYmehe-Yfx8suBXGgpyfN_GbeYQh5xOCICVk_AyZlVZWgP0qlaq7ukBkHKYuaV3CXzDZ2kX21T-6n9AWACQHiHtnnAJwpATPy44MdfO-nNR0dnT4jPR3T0k92oMfh2mPWbejpc1xGTMmPgb7t7IC_xA09x-7qb_csfMMwjXFN3RjpKiH1gWLoizTZT0gjhtzc-4Q2W0s7-UynB2TP2SHhw909IO9fvnjXnBbnb07OmuPzoisl50XfQoWdZI4Lh8rVtrVdi9g6tIIJXXGdRRQooW4r1Fy6VnWy1tr1oIUrxQE53PYu4_h1hWkyC586HAYbcFwlo5nWlVa8vpVUZV0LJctN59P_kgwYVGUmIaOwRbs4phTRmWX0CxvXGTKbOc2_c-bI4137ql1gfxP4vV8GnuwAm_IwLtrQ-fSHE0IxEFXm5Jb77gdc3_rYzF81kvEcK7Yxnya8vonZeGUqJVRpLl-fmPnF_OKyaYQB8RO4oMZ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010654550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory for use in end-stage renal disease patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Loosman, W. L. ; Siegert, C. E. H. ; Korzec, A. ; Honig, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Loosman, W. L. ; Siegert, C. E. H. ; Korzec, A. ; Honig, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To validate the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for use in patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and to compare the outcome of both screening measures with each other.
Design. Cross‐sectional and between‐subjects design. The independent variable was the diagnosis depression by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). The dependent variables were the HADS and BDI total score.
Methods. All 130 patients with ESRD who were treated with haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialyses in the Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital in Amsterdam were eligible for this study and were asked to fill out both HADS and BDI. The outcomes of both rating scales were compared with the diagnosis major depressive episode based on the MINI, which was seen as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to choose optimal cut‐off values.
Results. Of 62 enrolled subjects, 21 (34%) were diagnosed with a depressive disorder. Optimal cut‐off values were ≥12 (HADS) and ≥13 (BDI). Sensitivity was 81.0% (HADS) and 75.0% (BDI). Specificity was 90.2% for both.
Conclusions. Both HADS and BDI are valid screening instruments for the diagnosis depression in ESRD patients but there is no statistical difference found between both rating scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-6657</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1348/014466509X477827</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20021730</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJCPDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anxiety ; Anxiety-Depression ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical assessment ; Comparative analysis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depression ; Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis ; Depressive Disorder, Major - epidemiology ; Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Diseases ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Kidney diseases ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - psychology ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Measurement ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Patients ; Peritoneal Dialysis - psychology ; Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Renal Dialysis - psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Screening ; Sick Role ; Statistical analysis ; Techniques and methods ; Validity</subject><ispartof>British journal of clinical psychology, 2010-11, Vol.49 (4), p.507-516</ispartof><rights>2010 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5422-db06ec41f23fe7f8abacbeebfea31396297f8e3e408b6e924fb7c4899fd093f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5422-db06ec41f23fe7f8abacbeebfea31396297f8e3e408b6e924fb7c4899fd093f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348%2F014466509X477827$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348%2F014466509X477827$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,31009,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23371036$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20021730$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loosman, W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegert, C. E. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korzec, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honig, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory for use in end-stage renal disease patients</title><title>British journal of clinical psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Clin Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective. To validate the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for use in patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and to compare the outcome of both screening measures with each other.
Design. Cross‐sectional and between‐subjects design. The independent variable was the diagnosis depression by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). The dependent variables were the HADS and BDI total score.
Methods. All 130 patients with ESRD who were treated with haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialyses in the Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital in Amsterdam were eligible for this study and were asked to fill out both HADS and BDI. The outcomes of both rating scales were compared with the diagnosis major depressive episode based on the MINI, which was seen as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to choose optimal cut‐off values.
Results. Of 62 enrolled subjects, 21 (34%) were diagnosed with a depressive disorder. Optimal cut‐off values were ≥12 (HADS) and ≥13 (BDI). Sensitivity was 81.0% (HADS) and 75.0% (BDI). Specificity was 90.2% for both.
Conclusions. Both HADS and BDI are valid screening instruments for the diagnosis depression in ESRD patients but there is no statistical difference found between both rating scales.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety-Depression</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - epidemiology</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - psychology</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis - psychology</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sick Role</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0144-6657</issn><issn>2044-8260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAUxC1ERZfCnRPyBZVLyvNH4vjYDdAWVSCVj3KznOQZTLPOYmehe-Yfx8suBXGgpyfN_GbeYQh5xOCICVk_AyZlVZWgP0qlaq7ukBkHKYuaV3CXzDZ2kX21T-6n9AWACQHiHtnnAJwpATPy44MdfO-nNR0dnT4jPR3T0k92oMfh2mPWbejpc1xGTMmPgb7t7IC_xA09x-7qb_csfMMwjXFN3RjpKiH1gWLoizTZT0gjhtzc-4Q2W0s7-UynB2TP2SHhw909IO9fvnjXnBbnb07OmuPzoisl50XfQoWdZI4Lh8rVtrVdi9g6tIIJXXGdRRQooW4r1Fy6VnWy1tr1oIUrxQE53PYu4_h1hWkyC586HAYbcFwlo5nWlVa8vpVUZV0LJctN59P_kgwYVGUmIaOwRbs4phTRmWX0CxvXGTKbOc2_c-bI4137ql1gfxP4vV8GnuwAm_IwLtrQ-fSHE0IxEFXm5Jb77gdc3_rYzF81kvEcK7Yxnya8vonZeGUqJVRpLl-fmPnF_OKyaYQB8RO4oMZ0</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Loosman, W. L.</creator><creator>Siegert, C. E. H.</creator><creator>Korzec, A.</creator><creator>Honig, A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory for use in end-stage renal disease patients</title><author>Loosman, W. L. ; Siegert, C. E. H. ; Korzec, A. ; Honig, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5422-db06ec41f23fe7f8abacbeebfea31396297f8e3e408b6e924fb7c4899fd093f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety-Depression</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - epidemiology</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - psychology</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis - psychology</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sick Role</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loosman, W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegert, C. E. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korzec, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honig, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>British journal of clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loosman, W. L.</au><au>Siegert, C. E. H.</au><au>Korzec, A.</au><au>Honig, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory for use in end-stage renal disease patients</atitle><jtitle>British journal of clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Clin Psychol</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>507-516</pages><issn>0144-6657</issn><eissn>2044-8260</eissn><coden>BJCPDW</coden><abstract>Objective. To validate the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for use in patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and to compare the outcome of both screening measures with each other.
Design. Cross‐sectional and between‐subjects design. The independent variable was the diagnosis depression by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). The dependent variables were the HADS and BDI total score.
Methods. All 130 patients with ESRD who were treated with haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialyses in the Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital in Amsterdam were eligible for this study and were asked to fill out both HADS and BDI. The outcomes of both rating scales were compared with the diagnosis major depressive episode based on the MINI, which was seen as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to choose optimal cut‐off values.
Results. Of 62 enrolled subjects, 21 (34%) were diagnosed with a depressive disorder. Optimal cut‐off values were ≥12 (HADS) and ≥13 (BDI). Sensitivity was 81.0% (HADS) and 75.0% (BDI). Specificity was 90.2% for both.
Conclusions. Both HADS and BDI are valid screening instruments for the diagnosis depression in ESRD patients but there is no statistical difference found between both rating scales.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20021730</pmid><doi>10.1348/014466509X477827</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-6657 |
| ispartof | British journal of clinical psychology, 2010-11, Vol.49 (4), p.507-516 |
| issn | 0144-6657 2044-8260 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919969728 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Aged Anxiety Anxiety-Depression Biological and medical sciences Clinical assessment Comparative analysis Cross-Sectional Studies Depression Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis Depressive Disorder, Major - epidemiology Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology Diagnosis Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Diseases Female Hospitals Humans Kidney diseases Kidney Failure, Chronic - psychology Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy Male Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Measurement Medical sciences Middle Aged Netherlands Patients Peritoneal Dialysis - psychology Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data Psychiatry Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Renal Dialysis - psychology Reproducibility of Results ROC Curve Screening Sick Role Statistical analysis Techniques and methods Validity |
| title | Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory for use in end-stage renal disease patients |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T13%3A36%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20the%20Hospital%20Anxiety%20and%20Depression%20Scale%20and%20the%20Beck%20Depression%20Inventory%20for%20use%20in%20end-stage%20renal%20disease%20patients&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Loosman,%20W.%20L.&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=507-516&rft.issn=0144-6657&rft.eissn=2044-8260&rft.coden=BJCPDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1348/014466509X477827&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E758837455%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010654550&rft_id=info:pmid/20021730&rfr_iscdi=true |