To Read or Not to Read: A Meta-Analysis of Print Exposure From Infancy to Early Adulthood
This research synthesis examines whether the association between print exposure and components of reading grows stronger across development. We meta-analyzed 99 studies (N = 7,669) that focused on leisure time reading of (a) preschoolers and kindergartners, (b) children attending Grades 1-12, and (c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological bulletin 2011-03, Vol.137 (2), p.267-296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 296 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 267 |
container_title | Psychological bulletin |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | Mol, Suzanne E Bus, Adriana G |
description | This research synthesis examines whether the association between print exposure and components of reading grows stronger across development. We meta-analyzed 99 studies (N = 7,669) that focused on leisure time reading of (a) preschoolers and kindergartners, (b) children attending Grades 1-12, and (c) college and university students. For all measures in the outcome domains of reading comprehension and technical reading and spelling, moderate to strong correlations with print exposure were found. The outcomes support an upward spiral of causality: Children who are more proficient in comprehension and technical reading and spelling skills read more; because of more print exposure, their comprehension and technical reading and spelling skills improved more with each year of education. For example, in preschool and kindergarten print exposure explained 12% of the variance in oral language skills, in primary school 13%, in middle school 19%, in high school 30%, and in college and university 34%. Moderate associations of print exposure with academic achievement indicate that frequent readers are more successful students. Interestingly, poor readers also appear to benefit from independent leisure time reading. We conclude that shared book reading to preconventional readers may be part of a continuum of out-of-school reading experiences that facilitate children's language, reading, and spelling achievement throughout their development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0021890 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919961738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ933833</ericid><sourcerecordid>2314441331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a584t-d694cb9869990c3603e520945a39ea7d8a5a6c7eda5bfdfdefe264250e9eca1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ltr1EAUB_Agil2r4AcQGQTRB6NnrsnxbSlbrdQLUh98CmcnE0zJZtKZBJpv31l2W8EHu0_DcH5z5vbPsucc3nOQxQcCELxEeJAtOErMudL6YbYAkDIXCHiUPYnxEgAKbeTj7EhwwRG0WmS_Lzz76ahmPrBvfmTjbvqRLdlXN1K-7KmbYxuZb9iP0PYjW10PPk7BsdPgN-ysb6i383bdikI3s2U9deMf7-un2aOGuuie7cfj7Nfp6uLkc37-_dPZyfI8J12qMa8NKrvG0iAiWGlAOi0AlSaJjoq6JE3GFq4mvW7qpnaNE0YJDQ6dJW7lcfZm13cI_mpycaw2bbSu66h3fooVckTDC1neL8FICVyYA6RShSgP6FmmvVECHCBLRCHT1e6XWmlT6HIrX_0jL_0U0pclZAA5N6D-i5SWyKXcdnq7Qzb4GINrqiG0GwpzxaHaZqy6zViiL_f9pvXG1XfwNlQJvN4Dipa6JqSEtPGvS1saVerkXuycC629K6--oEwPK1P53a5MA1VDnC2FsbWdi3YKwfVjtZ66iqeTiUqYQt4AAQHsKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>845391332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To Read or Not to Read: A Meta-Analysis of Print Exposure From Infancy to Early Adulthood</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Mol, Suzanne E ; Bus, Adriana G</creator><contributor>Hinshaw, Stephen P</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mol, Suzanne E ; Bus, Adriana G ; Hinshaw, Stephen P</creatorcontrib><description>This research synthesis examines whether the association between print exposure and components of reading grows stronger across development. We meta-analyzed 99 studies (N = 7,669) that focused on leisure time reading of (a) preschoolers and kindergartners, (b) children attending Grades 1-12, and (c) college and university students. For all measures in the outcome domains of reading comprehension and technical reading and spelling, moderate to strong correlations with print exposure were found. The outcomes support an upward spiral of causality: Children who are more proficient in comprehension and technical reading and spelling skills read more; because of more print exposure, their comprehension and technical reading and spelling skills improved more with each year of education. For example, in preschool and kindergarten print exposure explained 12% of the variance in oral language skills, in primary school 13%, in middle school 19%, in high school 30%, and in college and university 34%. Moderate associations of print exposure with academic achievement indicate that frequent readers are more successful students. Interestingly, poor readers also appear to benefit from independent leisure time reading. We conclude that shared book reading to preconventional readers may be part of a continuum of out-of-school reading experiences that facilitate children's language, reading, and spelling achievement throughout their development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0021890</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21219054</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSBUAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Adolescent ; Alphabets ; Beginning Reading ; Biological and medical sciences ; Causality ; Checklist (Testing) ; Child ; Child Development ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; College Students ; Comprehension ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; Developmental psychology ; Educational Status ; Elementary School Students ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Graphemes ; High schools ; Home Environment ; Human ; Humans ; Independent Reading ; Individual Development ; Infancy ; Kindergarten ; Language ; Language Skills ; Leisure ; Leisure activities ; Leisure Time ; Literacy ; Meta Analysis ; Newborn. Infant ; Opportunities ; Oral Language ; Phonological Awareness ; Pre-school education ; Preschool Children ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading ; Reading Ability ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Development ; Reading Research ; Reading Skills ; Recreational Reading ; Secondary School Students ; Spelling ; Students ; Students - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Time Perspective ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 2011-03, Vol.137 (2), p.267-296</ispartof><rights>2011 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>2011, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a584t-d694cb9869990c3603e520945a39ea7d8a5a6c7eda5bfdfdefe264250e9eca1c3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-2836-176X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ933833$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23916485$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hinshaw, Stephen P</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mol, Suzanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bus, Adriana G</creatorcontrib><title>To Read or Not to Read: A Meta-Analysis of Print Exposure From Infancy to Early Adulthood</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>This research synthesis examines whether the association between print exposure and components of reading grows stronger across development. We meta-analyzed 99 studies (N = 7,669) that focused on leisure time reading of (a) preschoolers and kindergartners, (b) children attending Grades 1-12, and (c) college and university students. For all measures in the outcome domains of reading comprehension and technical reading and spelling, moderate to strong correlations with print exposure were found. The outcomes support an upward spiral of causality: Children who are more proficient in comprehension and technical reading and spelling skills read more; because of more print exposure, their comprehension and technical reading and spelling skills improved more with each year of education. For example, in preschool and kindergarten print exposure explained 12% of the variance in oral language skills, in primary school 13%, in middle school 19%, in high school 30%, and in college and university 34%. Moderate associations of print exposure with academic achievement indicate that frequent readers are more successful students. Interestingly, poor readers also appear to benefit from independent leisure time reading. We conclude that shared book reading to preconventional readers may be part of a continuum of out-of-school reading experiences that facilitate children's language, reading, and spelling achievement throughout their development.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Alphabets</subject><subject>Beginning Reading</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Checklist (Testing)</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Graphemes</subject><subject>High schools</subject><subject>Home Environment</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent Reading</subject><subject>Individual Development</subject><subject>Infancy</subject><subject>Kindergarten</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Leisure</subject><subject>Leisure activities</subject><subject>Leisure Time</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Newborn. Infant</subject><subject>Opportunities</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Phonological Awareness</subject><subject>Pre-school education</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Ability</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Development</subject><subject>Reading Research</subject><subject>Reading Skills</subject><subject>Recreational Reading</subject><subject>Secondary School Students</subject><subject>Spelling</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Time Perspective</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ltr1EAUB_Agil2r4AcQGQTRB6NnrsnxbSlbrdQLUh98CmcnE0zJZtKZBJpv31l2W8EHu0_DcH5z5vbPsucc3nOQxQcCELxEeJAtOErMudL6YbYAkDIXCHiUPYnxEgAKbeTj7EhwwRG0WmS_Lzz76ahmPrBvfmTjbvqRLdlXN1K-7KmbYxuZb9iP0PYjW10PPk7BsdPgN-ysb6i383bdikI3s2U9deMf7-un2aOGuuie7cfj7Nfp6uLkc37-_dPZyfI8J12qMa8NKrvG0iAiWGlAOi0AlSaJjoq6JE3GFq4mvW7qpnaNE0YJDQ6dJW7lcfZm13cI_mpycaw2bbSu66h3fooVckTDC1neL8FICVyYA6RShSgP6FmmvVECHCBLRCHT1e6XWmlT6HIrX_0jL_0U0pclZAA5N6D-i5SWyKXcdnq7Qzb4GINrqiG0GwpzxaHaZqy6zViiL_f9pvXG1XfwNlQJvN4Dipa6JqSEtPGvS1saVerkXuycC629K6--oEwPK1P53a5MA1VDnC2FsbWdi3YKwfVjtZ66iqeTiUqYQt4AAQHsKA</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Mol, Suzanne E</creator><creator>Bus, Adriana G</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-176X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>To Read or Not to Read: A Meta-Analysis of Print Exposure From Infancy to Early Adulthood</title><author>Mol, Suzanne E ; Bus, Adriana G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a584t-d694cb9869990c3603e520945a39ea7d8a5a6c7eda5bfdfdefe264250e9eca1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Alphabets</topic><topic>Beginning Reading</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Checklist (Testing)</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Graphemes</topic><topic>High schools</topic><topic>Home Environment</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent Reading</topic><topic>Individual Development</topic><topic>Infancy</topic><topic>Kindergarten</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Leisure</topic><topic>Leisure activities</topic><topic>Leisure Time</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Newborn. Infant</topic><topic>Opportunities</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Phonological Awareness</topic><topic>Pre-school education</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Ability</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Development</topic><topic>Reading Research</topic><topic>Reading Skills</topic><topic>Recreational Reading</topic><topic>Secondary School Students</topic><topic>Spelling</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Time Perspective</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mol, Suzanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bus, Adriana G</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mol, Suzanne E</au><au>Bus, Adriana G</au><au>Hinshaw, Stephen P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ933833</ericid><atitle>To Read or Not to Read: A Meta-Analysis of Print Exposure From Infancy to Early Adulthood</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>267-296</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><coden>PSBUAI</coden><abstract>This research synthesis examines whether the association between print exposure and components of reading grows stronger across development. We meta-analyzed 99 studies (N = 7,669) that focused on leisure time reading of (a) preschoolers and kindergartners, (b) children attending Grades 1-12, and (c) college and university students. For all measures in the outcome domains of reading comprehension and technical reading and spelling, moderate to strong correlations with print exposure were found. The outcomes support an upward spiral of causality: Children who are more proficient in comprehension and technical reading and spelling skills read more; because of more print exposure, their comprehension and technical reading and spelling skills improved more with each year of education. For example, in preschool and kindergarten print exposure explained 12% of the variance in oral language skills, in primary school 13%, in middle school 19%, in high school 30%, and in college and university 34%. Moderate associations of print exposure with academic achievement indicate that frequent readers are more successful students. Interestingly, poor readers also appear to benefit from independent leisure time reading. We conclude that shared book reading to preconventional readers may be part of a continuum of out-of-school reading experiences that facilitate children's language, reading, and spelling achievement throughout their development.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>21219054</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0021890</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-176X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2909 |
ispartof | Psychological bulletin, 2011-03, Vol.137 (2), p.267-296 |
issn | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919961738 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE |
subjects | Academic achievement Adolescent Alphabets Beginning Reading Biological and medical sciences Causality Checklist (Testing) Child Child Development Child, Preschool Children College Students Comprehension Correlation Correlation analysis Developmental psychology Educational Status Elementary School Students Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Graphemes High schools Home Environment Human Humans Independent Reading Individual Development Infancy Kindergarten Language Language Skills Leisure Leisure activities Leisure Time Literacy Meta Analysis Newborn. Infant Opportunities Oral Language Phonological Awareness Pre-school education Preschool Children Production and perception of written language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reading Reading Ability Reading Comprehension Reading Development Reading Research Reading Skills Recreational Reading Secondary School Students Spelling Students Students - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Systematic review Time Perspective Young Adult |
title | To Read or Not to Read: A Meta-Analysis of Print Exposure From Infancy to Early Adulthood |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T15%3A18%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20Read%20or%20Not%20to%20Read:%20A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Print%20Exposure%20From%20Infancy%20to%20Early%20Adulthood&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Mol,%20Suzanne%20E&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=267-296&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft.coden=PSBUAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0021890&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2314441331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=845391332&rft_id=info:pmid/21219054&rft_ericid=EJ933833&rfr_iscdi=true |