Lessons Learned from Principled Negotiation in International Construction Projects
Compared with other dispute resolution approaches, negotiation is still the easiest, most efficient, and most time- and cost-saving approach, if conducted appropriately. However, dispute resolution in international construction projects faces many unique challenges. This requires effective negotiati...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction 2011-08, Vol.3 (3), p.123-132 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 132 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 123 |
| container_title | Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Ren, Z Shen, G. Q Xue, X. L Hu, W. F |
| description | Compared with other dispute resolution approaches, negotiation is still the easiest, most efficient, and most time- and cost-saving approach, if conducted appropriately. However, dispute resolution in international construction projects faces many unique challenges. This requires effective negotiation approaches, principles, and strategies. Although principled negotiation has been developed for more than two decades and is widely accepted by academics as an effective approach to solving conflicts and disputes, its applications in industries are still very limited. Practitioners need applicable guidelines and lessons learned. This paper, by reviewing and analyzing the negotiation processes in two international projects, discusses the key challenges facing construction dispute negotiation and the applications and limitations of principled negotiation in dispute resolution. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000055 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919950657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671267221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a304t-2be584c37fb77417bf5f755a0f455ced943869c62288472b6f11e558e7680b573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwyAYx4nRxDn9Do0X56ETaIHWW9PMl6TRxZczoQxMlw4m0IPfXrotuykXeOD_e_LwA-AawTmCFN3Nqvd6cdtUc1TmWZojBudwXIScgMnx7vR4pvgcXHi_hpASmuUT8NYo763xSaOEM2qVaGc3ydJ1RnbbPtYv6suGToTOmqQzybMJypldKfqkjmRwg9y9Lp1dKxn8JTjTovfq6rBPwefD4qN-SpvXx-e6alKRwTykuFWkyGXGdMtYnLLVRDNCBNQ5IVKt4sAFLSXFuChyhluqEVKEFIrRAraEZVNws--7dfZ7UD7wTeel6nthlB08L1FZkvjPMTn7N4koQ5gyjFGM3u-j0lnvndJ867qNcD8cQT4q53xUzpuKj0r5qJcflEeY7mERu_O1HaKp3h_Jv8FfIhSE9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671267221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons Learned from Principled Negotiation in International Construction Projects</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Ren, Z ; Shen, G. Q ; Xue, X. L ; Hu, W. F</creator><creatorcontrib>Ren, Z ; Shen, G. Q ; Xue, X. L ; Hu, W. F</creatorcontrib><description>Compared with other dispute resolution approaches, negotiation is still the easiest, most efficient, and most time- and cost-saving approach, if conducted appropriately. However, dispute resolution in international construction projects faces many unique challenges. This requires effective negotiation approaches, principles, and strategies. Although principled negotiation has been developed for more than two decades and is widely accepted by academics as an effective approach to solving conflicts and disputes, its applications in industries are still very limited. Practitioners need applicable guidelines and lessons learned. This paper, by reviewing and analyzing the negotiation processes in two international projects, discusses the key challenges facing construction dispute negotiation and the applications and limitations of principled negotiation in dispute resolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-4162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000055</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>CASE STUDIES ; Construction ; Construction costs ; Construction industry ; Guidelines ; Legal ; Negotiations ; Reviewing ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2011-08, Vol.3 (3), p.123-132</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a304t-2be584c37fb77417bf5f755a0f455ced943869c62288472b6f11e558e7680b573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a304t-2be584c37fb77417bf5f755a0f455ced943869c62288472b6f11e558e7680b573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000055$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75935,75943</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ren, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, G. Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, X. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, W. F</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons Learned from Principled Negotiation in International Construction Projects</title><title>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</title><description>Compared with other dispute resolution approaches, negotiation is still the easiest, most efficient, and most time- and cost-saving approach, if conducted appropriately. However, dispute resolution in international construction projects faces many unique challenges. This requires effective negotiation approaches, principles, and strategies. Although principled negotiation has been developed for more than two decades and is widely accepted by academics as an effective approach to solving conflicts and disputes, its applications in industries are still very limited. Practitioners need applicable guidelines and lessons learned. This paper, by reviewing and analyzing the negotiation processes in two international projects, discusses the key challenges facing construction dispute negotiation and the applications and limitations of principled negotiation in dispute resolution.</description><subject>CASE STUDIES</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Legal</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Reviewing</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>1943-4162</issn><issn>1943-4170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwyAYx4nRxDn9Do0X56ETaIHWW9PMl6TRxZczoQxMlw4m0IPfXrotuykXeOD_e_LwA-AawTmCFN3Nqvd6cdtUc1TmWZojBudwXIScgMnx7vR4pvgcXHi_hpASmuUT8NYo763xSaOEM2qVaGc3ydJ1RnbbPtYv6suGToTOmqQzybMJypldKfqkjmRwg9y9Lp1dKxn8JTjTovfq6rBPwefD4qN-SpvXx-e6alKRwTykuFWkyGXGdMtYnLLVRDNCBNQ5IVKt4sAFLSXFuChyhluqEVKEFIrRAraEZVNws--7dfZ7UD7wTeel6nthlB08L1FZkvjPMTn7N4koQ5gyjFGM3u-j0lnvndJ867qNcD8cQT4q53xUzpuKj0r5qJcflEeY7mERu_O1HaKp3h_Jv8FfIhSE9Q</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Ren, Z</creator><creator>Shen, G. Q</creator><creator>Xue, X. L</creator><creator>Hu, W. F</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Lessons Learned from Principled Negotiation in International Construction Projects</title><author>Ren, Z ; Shen, G. Q ; Xue, X. L ; Hu, W. F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a304t-2be584c37fb77417bf5f755a0f455ced943869c62288472b6f11e558e7680b573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>CASE STUDIES</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Legal</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Reviewing</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ren, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, G. Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, X. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, W. F</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ren, Z</au><au>Shen, G. Q</au><au>Xue, X. L</au><au>Hu, W. F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons Learned from Principled Negotiation in International Construction Projects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>123-132</pages><issn>1943-4162</issn><eissn>1943-4170</eissn><abstract>Compared with other dispute resolution approaches, negotiation is still the easiest, most efficient, and most time- and cost-saving approach, if conducted appropriately. However, dispute resolution in international construction projects faces many unique challenges. This requires effective negotiation approaches, principles, and strategies. Although principled negotiation has been developed for more than two decades and is widely accepted by academics as an effective approach to solving conflicts and disputes, its applications in industries are still very limited. Practitioners need applicable guidelines and lessons learned. This paper, by reviewing and analyzing the negotiation processes in two international projects, discusses the key challenges facing construction dispute negotiation and the applications and limitations of principled negotiation in dispute resolution.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000055</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1943-4162 |
| ispartof | Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2011-08, Vol.3 (3), p.123-132 |
| issn | 1943-4162 1943-4170 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919950657 |
| source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
| subjects | CASE STUDIES Construction Construction costs Construction industry Guidelines Legal Negotiations Reviewing Strategy |
| title | Lessons Learned from Principled Negotiation in International Construction Projects |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T20%3A48%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20Learned%20from%20Principled%20Negotiation%20in%20International%20Construction%20Projects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20legal%20affairs%20and%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20engineering%20and%20construction&rft.au=Ren,%20Z&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=123-132&rft.issn=1943-4162&rft.eissn=1943-4170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671267221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671267221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |