Are Urology Residents Ready to Treat Premature Ejaculation After Their Training?

The management of premature ejaculation (PE) among urology residents (URs) in the era of standard definition and new treatments is unknown. To determine how future urologists currently address PE and to review their adherence to guidelines. A specifically designed survey on the preferred approaches...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sexual medicine 2012-02, Vol.9 (2), p.404-410
Hauptverfasser: Luján, Saturnino, García‐Fadrique, Gonzalo, Morales, Gonzalo, Morera, Jose, Broseta, Enrique, Jiménez‐Cruz, J. Fernando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 410
container_issue 2
container_start_page 404
container_title Journal of sexual medicine
container_volume 9
creator Luján, Saturnino
García‐Fadrique, Gonzalo
Morales, Gonzalo
Morera, Jose
Broseta, Enrique
Jiménez‐Cruz, J. Fernando
description The management of premature ejaculation (PE) among urology residents (URs) in the era of standard definition and new treatments is unknown. To determine how future urologists currently address PE and to review their adherence to guidelines. A specifically designed survey on the preferred approaches to the treatment of PE was given to residents during the Eighth European Urology Education Programme. The results were tabled, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze differences in practice patterns. The responses are compared with clinical guidelines and recommendations. A total of 360 URs attended the recommendation course, and 140 answered the survey (response rate: 38.8%). Seventeen (12.1%) of the respondents considered PE to be a very common sexual dysfunction, 62 (44.3%) considered PE to be frequent, 33 (23.6%) considered this condition uncommon, and 28 (20%) did not consider PE to be a dysfunction. Regarding incidents, 67 residents (47.9%) treated one patient per week. To assess PE, 132 (94.3%) used sexual history, 37 (26.4%) used physical examination, 38 (27.1%) used questionnaires, and 4 (2.9%) used laboratory testing. The preferred initial management strategy for PE was psychological/behavioral therapy for 65 (46.4%) residents. Topical anesthetic, andrological referral, and prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on demand were favored by 34 (24.3%), 19 (13.6%), and 8 (12.9%) of the respondents, respectively. Other options were psychiatric referral, which was preferred by two (1.4%) respondents, and prescription of daily SSRIs, which was preferred by two (1.4%) respondents. The preferred secondary treatment for patients who did not improve initially was prescription of SSRIs for on demand, which was 46 (32.9%) respondents. In cases where patients had concomitant erectile dysfunction (ED), 16 (11.4%) URs treated only the ED and 60 (42.9%) treated both conditions. The majority of URs follow the established guidelines for diagnosis of PE, but not for treatment. The URs have an insufficient medical education in sexual medicine. Luján S, García‐Fadrique G, Morales G, Morera J, Broseta E, and Jiménez‐Cruz JF. Are urology residents ready to treat premature ejaculation after their training? J Sex Med 2012;9:404–410.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02571.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919950565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1743609515338492</els_id><sourcerecordid>919950565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-3c51f64b6c89bc5a8cfd9c02b936575d2d0570361ec2dd435badd0562ecb09f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhi0EoqXwCig3Tgm2EyfxAaHtqrSgFhbYiuPIsSfFSzYpttPuvj0OafcKc7BH9veP5Y-QhNGMxXq7yVhV5GnJqMw4ZSyjXFQs2z0hx4eLp489leKIvPB-Q2keiz8nR5yzupYFPyarhcPk2g3dcLNPvqG3BvvgY6fMPglDsnaoQrJyuFVhjOjZRumxU8EOfbJoA7pk_RNtXJ2yve1v3r8kz1rVeXz1sJ-Q6w9n6-VFevnl_ONycZnqohQszbVgbVk0pa5lo4WqdWukpryReSkqYbihoqJ5yVBzY4pcNMrEo5KjbqhsRX5C3sxzb93we0QfYGu9xq5TPQ6jB8mkFDEwkfVMajd477CFW2e3yu2BUZh0wgYmUzBZg0kn_NUJuxh9_fDI2GzRHIKP_iLwbgbubYf7_x4Mn75fTV3Mp3Pe-oC7Q165X1BWeSXgx-dzuPq6XDF6yuEi8qczj1HtnUUHXlvsNRrrUAcwg_33r_4A0I6nRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919950565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Urology Residents Ready to Treat Premature Ejaculation After Their Training?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Luján, Saturnino ; García‐Fadrique, Gonzalo ; Morales, Gonzalo ; Morera, Jose ; Broseta, Enrique ; Jiménez‐Cruz, J. Fernando</creator><creatorcontrib>Luján, Saturnino ; García‐Fadrique, Gonzalo ; Morales, Gonzalo ; Morera, Jose ; Broseta, Enrique ; Jiménez‐Cruz, J. Fernando</creatorcontrib><description>The management of premature ejaculation (PE) among urology residents (URs) in the era of standard definition and new treatments is unknown. To determine how future urologists currently address PE and to review their adherence to guidelines. A specifically designed survey on the preferred approaches to the treatment of PE was given to residents during the Eighth European Urology Education Programme. The results were tabled, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze differences in practice patterns. The responses are compared with clinical guidelines and recommendations. A total of 360 URs attended the recommendation course, and 140 answered the survey (response rate: 38.8%). Seventeen (12.1%) of the respondents considered PE to be a very common sexual dysfunction, 62 (44.3%) considered PE to be frequent, 33 (23.6%) considered this condition uncommon, and 28 (20%) did not consider PE to be a dysfunction. Regarding incidents, 67 residents (47.9%) treated one patient per week. To assess PE, 132 (94.3%) used sexual history, 37 (26.4%) used physical examination, 38 (27.1%) used questionnaires, and 4 (2.9%) used laboratory testing. The preferred initial management strategy for PE was psychological/behavioral therapy for 65 (46.4%) residents. Topical anesthetic, andrological referral, and prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on demand were favored by 34 (24.3%), 19 (13.6%), and 8 (12.9%) of the respondents, respectively. Other options were psychiatric referral, which was preferred by two (1.4%) respondents, and prescription of daily SSRIs, which was preferred by two (1.4%) respondents. The preferred secondary treatment for patients who did not improve initially was prescription of SSRIs for on demand, which was 46 (32.9%) respondents. In cases where patients had concomitant erectile dysfunction (ED), 16 (11.4%) URs treated only the ED and 60 (42.9%) treated both conditions. The majority of URs follow the established guidelines for diagnosis of PE, but not for treatment. The URs have an insufficient medical education in sexual medicine. Luján S, García‐Fadrique G, Morales G, Morera J, Broseta E, and Jiménez‐Cruz JF. Are urology residents ready to treat premature ejaculation after their training? J Sex Med 2012;9:404–410.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-6095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-6109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02571.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22188942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Data Collection ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Male ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Premature Ejaculation ; Premature Ejaculation - therapy ; Survey ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment ; Urology - education</subject><ispartof>Journal of sexual medicine, 2012-02, Vol.9 (2), p.404-410</ispartof><rights>2012 International Society for Sexual Medicine</rights><rights>2011 International Society for Sexual Medicine</rights><rights>2011 International Society for Sexual Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-3c51f64b6c89bc5a8cfd9c02b936575d2d0570361ec2dd435badd0562ecb09f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-3c51f64b6c89bc5a8cfd9c02b936575d2d0570361ec2dd435badd0562ecb09f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1743-6109.2011.02571.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1743-6109.2011.02571.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22188942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luján, Saturnino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Fadrique, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morera, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broseta, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez‐Cruz, J. Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>Are Urology Residents Ready to Treat Premature Ejaculation After Their Training?</title><title>Journal of sexual medicine</title><addtitle>J Sex Med</addtitle><description>The management of premature ejaculation (PE) among urology residents (URs) in the era of standard definition and new treatments is unknown. To determine how future urologists currently address PE and to review their adherence to guidelines. A specifically designed survey on the preferred approaches to the treatment of PE was given to residents during the Eighth European Urology Education Programme. The results were tabled, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze differences in practice patterns. The responses are compared with clinical guidelines and recommendations. A total of 360 URs attended the recommendation course, and 140 answered the survey (response rate: 38.8%). Seventeen (12.1%) of the respondents considered PE to be a very common sexual dysfunction, 62 (44.3%) considered PE to be frequent, 33 (23.6%) considered this condition uncommon, and 28 (20%) did not consider PE to be a dysfunction. Regarding incidents, 67 residents (47.9%) treated one patient per week. To assess PE, 132 (94.3%) used sexual history, 37 (26.4%) used physical examination, 38 (27.1%) used questionnaires, and 4 (2.9%) used laboratory testing. The preferred initial management strategy for PE was psychological/behavioral therapy for 65 (46.4%) residents. Topical anesthetic, andrological referral, and prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on demand were favored by 34 (24.3%), 19 (13.6%), and 8 (12.9%) of the respondents, respectively. Other options were psychiatric referral, which was preferred by two (1.4%) respondents, and prescription of daily SSRIs, which was preferred by two (1.4%) respondents. The preferred secondary treatment for patients who did not improve initially was prescription of SSRIs for on demand, which was 46 (32.9%) respondents. In cases where patients had concomitant erectile dysfunction (ED), 16 (11.4%) URs treated only the ED and 60 (42.9%) treated both conditions. The majority of URs follow the established guidelines for diagnosis of PE, but not for treatment. The URs have an insufficient medical education in sexual medicine. Luján S, García‐Fadrique G, Morales G, Morera J, Broseta E, and Jiménez‐Cruz JF. Are urology residents ready to treat premature ejaculation after their training? J Sex Med 2012;9:404–410.</description><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Premature Ejaculation</subject><subject>Premature Ejaculation - therapy</subject><subject>Survey</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Urology - education</subject><issn>1743-6095</issn><issn>1743-6109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhi0EoqXwCig3Tgm2EyfxAaHtqrSgFhbYiuPIsSfFSzYpttPuvj0OafcKc7BH9veP5Y-QhNGMxXq7yVhV5GnJqMw4ZSyjXFQs2z0hx4eLp489leKIvPB-Q2keiz8nR5yzupYFPyarhcPk2g3dcLNPvqG3BvvgY6fMPglDsnaoQrJyuFVhjOjZRumxU8EOfbJoA7pk_RNtXJ2yve1v3r8kz1rVeXz1sJ-Q6w9n6-VFevnl_ONycZnqohQszbVgbVk0pa5lo4WqdWukpryReSkqYbihoqJ5yVBzY4pcNMrEo5KjbqhsRX5C3sxzb93we0QfYGu9xq5TPQ6jB8mkFDEwkfVMajd477CFW2e3yu2BUZh0wgYmUzBZg0kn_NUJuxh9_fDI2GzRHIKP_iLwbgbubYf7_x4Mn75fTV3Mp3Pe-oC7Q165X1BWeSXgx-dzuPq6XDF6yuEi8qczj1HtnUUHXlvsNRrrUAcwg_33r_4A0I6nRA</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>Luján, Saturnino</creator><creator>García‐Fadrique, Gonzalo</creator><creator>Morales, Gonzalo</creator><creator>Morera, Jose</creator><creator>Broseta, Enrique</creator><creator>Jiménez‐Cruz, J. Fernando</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>Are Urology Residents Ready to Treat Premature Ejaculation After Their Training?</title><author>Luján, Saturnino ; García‐Fadrique, Gonzalo ; Morales, Gonzalo ; Morera, Jose ; Broseta, Enrique ; Jiménez‐Cruz, J. Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-3c51f64b6c89bc5a8cfd9c02b936575d2d0570361ec2dd435badd0562ecb09f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Premature Ejaculation</topic><topic>Premature Ejaculation - therapy</topic><topic>Survey</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Urology - education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luján, Saturnino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Fadrique, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morera, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broseta, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez‐Cruz, J. Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of sexual medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luján, Saturnino</au><au>García‐Fadrique, Gonzalo</au><au>Morales, Gonzalo</au><au>Morera, Jose</au><au>Broseta, Enrique</au><au>Jiménez‐Cruz, J. Fernando</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Urology Residents Ready to Treat Premature Ejaculation After Their Training?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sexual medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Sex Med</addtitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>404</spage><epage>410</epage><pages>404-410</pages><issn>1743-6095</issn><eissn>1743-6109</eissn><abstract>The management of premature ejaculation (PE) among urology residents (URs) in the era of standard definition and new treatments is unknown. To determine how future urologists currently address PE and to review their adherence to guidelines. A specifically designed survey on the preferred approaches to the treatment of PE was given to residents during the Eighth European Urology Education Programme. The results were tabled, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze differences in practice patterns. The responses are compared with clinical guidelines and recommendations. A total of 360 URs attended the recommendation course, and 140 answered the survey (response rate: 38.8%). Seventeen (12.1%) of the respondents considered PE to be a very common sexual dysfunction, 62 (44.3%) considered PE to be frequent, 33 (23.6%) considered this condition uncommon, and 28 (20%) did not consider PE to be a dysfunction. Regarding incidents, 67 residents (47.9%) treated one patient per week. To assess PE, 132 (94.3%) used sexual history, 37 (26.4%) used physical examination, 38 (27.1%) used questionnaires, and 4 (2.9%) used laboratory testing. The preferred initial management strategy for PE was psychological/behavioral therapy for 65 (46.4%) residents. Topical anesthetic, andrological referral, and prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on demand were favored by 34 (24.3%), 19 (13.6%), and 8 (12.9%) of the respondents, respectively. Other options were psychiatric referral, which was preferred by two (1.4%) respondents, and prescription of daily SSRIs, which was preferred by two (1.4%) respondents. The preferred secondary treatment for patients who did not improve initially was prescription of SSRIs for on demand, which was 46 (32.9%) respondents. In cases where patients had concomitant erectile dysfunction (ED), 16 (11.4%) URs treated only the ED and 60 (42.9%) treated both conditions. The majority of URs follow the established guidelines for diagnosis of PE, but not for treatment. The URs have an insufficient medical education in sexual medicine. Luján S, García‐Fadrique G, Morales G, Morera J, Broseta E, and Jiménez‐Cruz JF. Are urology residents ready to treat premature ejaculation after their training? J Sex Med 2012;9:404–410.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22188942</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02571.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-6095
ispartof Journal of sexual medicine, 2012-02, Vol.9 (2), p.404-410
issn 1743-6095
1743-6109
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919950565
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Data Collection
Diagnosis
Humans
Internship and Residency
Male
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Premature Ejaculation
Premature Ejaculation - therapy
Survey
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment
Urology - education
title Are Urology Residents Ready to Treat Premature Ejaculation After Their Training?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T10%3A50%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Urology%20Residents%20Ready%20to%20Treat%20Premature%20Ejaculation%20After%20Their%20Training?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sexual%20medicine&rft.au=Luj%C3%A1n,%20Saturnino&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=404&rft.epage=410&rft.pages=404-410&rft.issn=1743-6095&rft.eissn=1743-6109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02571.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E919950565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919950565&rft_id=info:pmid/22188942&rft_els_id=S1743609515338492&rfr_iscdi=true