The role of spin–orbit potential in nuclear prolate-shape dominance
It is confirmed, in terms of the Woods–Saxon–Strutinsky method, that the spin–orbit potential plays a decisive role in the predominance of prolate deformation, which has been a long standing problem in nuclear physics. It is originated from the combined effects of the spin–orbit coupling and the dif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physics letters. B 2011-08, Vol.702 (5), p.429-432 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 432 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 429 |
container_title | Physics letters. B |
container_volume | 702 |
creator | Takahara, Satoshi Onishi, Naoki Shimizu, Yoshifumi R. Tajima, Naoki |
description | It is confirmed, in terms of the Woods–Saxon–Strutinsky method, that the spin–orbit potential plays a decisive role in the predominance of prolate deformation, which has been a long standing problem in nuclear physics. It is originated from the combined effects of the spin–orbit coupling and the diffused surface of the potential, in agreement with the previous work based on a more schematic Nilsson–Strutinsky method. The degree of prolate-shape dominance exhibits an oscillatory behavior with respect to the strength of spin–orbit potential and, the prolate-shape dominance is realized at the proper strength of the spin–orbit potential together with the standard surface diffuseness; this oscillatory behavior disappears in case of small diffuseness corresponding to ellipsoidal cavity. The calculated energy differences between oblate and prolate minima in this Letter are consistent with those of our extensive self-consistent calculations of the Hartree–Fock+BCS method with the Skyrme interaction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.07.030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919929948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0370269311008082</els_id><sourcerecordid>919929948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-68f8482134ec9738638e8621c248c6c61d700b0db1e5d0a3ef74a2c238e0361e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCygbxCph_Kjj7EBVeUiV2JS15ToT1ZWbBDtF6o5_4A_5Ely1sGU1m3PnzhxCrikUFKi8Wxf9ahc9DsuCAaUFlAVwOCEjqkqeMyEmp2QEvIScyYqfk4sY1wBAJyBHZLZYYRY6j1nXZLF37ffnVxeWbsj6bsB2cMZnrs3arfVoQtYn1AyYx5XpMau7jWtNa_GSnDXGR7w6zjF5e5wtps_5_PXpZfowz60QMORSNUooRrlAW5VcSa5QSUYtE8pKK2ldAiyhXlKc1GA4NqUwzLKEAZcU-ZjcHvamO963GAe9cdGi96bFbht1RauKVZVQiZQH0oYuxoCN7oPbmLDTFPRem17rX216r01DqZO2FLw5VphojW9C-s_Fv_RepwAhE3d_4DD9--Ew6GgdJhe1C2gHXXfuv6ofOraHFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919929948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of spin–orbit potential in nuclear prolate-shape dominance</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Takahara, Satoshi ; Onishi, Naoki ; Shimizu, Yoshifumi R. ; Tajima, Naoki</creator><creatorcontrib>Takahara, Satoshi ; Onishi, Naoki ; Shimizu, Yoshifumi R. ; Tajima, Naoki</creatorcontrib><description>It is confirmed, in terms of the Woods–Saxon–Strutinsky method, that the spin–orbit potential plays a decisive role in the predominance of prolate deformation, which has been a long standing problem in nuclear physics. It is originated from the combined effects of the spin–orbit coupling and the diffused surface of the potential, in agreement with the previous work based on a more schematic Nilsson–Strutinsky method. The degree of prolate-shape dominance exhibits an oscillatory behavior with respect to the strength of spin–orbit potential and, the prolate-shape dominance is realized at the proper strength of the spin–orbit potential together with the standard surface diffuseness; this oscillatory behavior disappears in case of small diffuseness corresponding to ellipsoidal cavity. The calculated energy differences between oblate and prolate minima in this Letter are consistent with those of our extensive self-consistent calculations of the Hartree–Fock+BCS method with the Skyrme interaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0370-2693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2445</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.07.030</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PYLBAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Diffusion ; Dominance ; Elementary particles ; Exact sciences and technology ; Holes ; Mathematical analysis ; Nuclear physics ; Physics ; Strength ; The physics of elementary particles and fields</subject><ispartof>Physics letters. B, 2011-08, Vol.702 (5), p.429-432</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-68f8482134ec9738638e8621c248c6c61d700b0db1e5d0a3ef74a2c238e0361e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-68f8482134ec9738638e8621c248c6c61d700b0db1e5d0a3ef74a2c238e0361e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.07.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24454046$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takahara, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onishi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Yoshifumi R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajima, Naoki</creatorcontrib><title>The role of spin–orbit potential in nuclear prolate-shape dominance</title><title>Physics letters. B</title><description>It is confirmed, in terms of the Woods–Saxon–Strutinsky method, that the spin–orbit potential plays a decisive role in the predominance of prolate deformation, which has been a long standing problem in nuclear physics. It is originated from the combined effects of the spin–orbit coupling and the diffused surface of the potential, in agreement with the previous work based on a more schematic Nilsson–Strutinsky method. The degree of prolate-shape dominance exhibits an oscillatory behavior with respect to the strength of spin–orbit potential and, the prolate-shape dominance is realized at the proper strength of the spin–orbit potential together with the standard surface diffuseness; this oscillatory behavior disappears in case of small diffuseness corresponding to ellipsoidal cavity. The calculated energy differences between oblate and prolate minima in this Letter are consistent with those of our extensive self-consistent calculations of the Hartree–Fock+BCS method with the Skyrme interaction.</description><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Elementary particles</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Holes</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Nuclear physics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>The physics of elementary particles and fields</subject><issn>0370-2693</issn><issn>1873-2445</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCygbxCph_Kjj7EBVeUiV2JS15ToT1ZWbBDtF6o5_4A_5Ely1sGU1m3PnzhxCrikUFKi8Wxf9ahc9DsuCAaUFlAVwOCEjqkqeMyEmp2QEvIScyYqfk4sY1wBAJyBHZLZYYRY6j1nXZLF37ffnVxeWbsj6bsB2cMZnrs3arfVoQtYn1AyYx5XpMau7jWtNa_GSnDXGR7w6zjF5e5wtps_5_PXpZfowz60QMORSNUooRrlAW5VcSa5QSUYtE8pKK2ldAiyhXlKc1GA4NqUwzLKEAZcU-ZjcHvamO963GAe9cdGi96bFbht1RauKVZVQiZQH0oYuxoCN7oPbmLDTFPRem17rX216r01DqZO2FLw5VphojW9C-s_Fv_RepwAhE3d_4DD9--Ew6GgdJhe1C2gHXXfuv6ofOraHFQ</recordid><startdate>20110826</startdate><enddate>20110826</enddate><creator>Takahara, Satoshi</creator><creator>Onishi, Naoki</creator><creator>Shimizu, Yoshifumi R.</creator><creator>Tajima, Naoki</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110826</creationdate><title>The role of spin–orbit potential in nuclear prolate-shape dominance</title><author>Takahara, Satoshi ; Onishi, Naoki ; Shimizu, Yoshifumi R. ; Tajima, Naoki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-68f8482134ec9738638e8621c248c6c61d700b0db1e5d0a3ef74a2c238e0361e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Elementary particles</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Holes</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Nuclear physics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>The physics of elementary particles and fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takahara, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onishi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Yoshifumi R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajima, Naoki</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physics letters. B</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takahara, Satoshi</au><au>Onishi, Naoki</au><au>Shimizu, Yoshifumi R.</au><au>Tajima, Naoki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of spin–orbit potential in nuclear prolate-shape dominance</atitle><jtitle>Physics letters. B</jtitle><date>2011-08-26</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>702</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>432</epage><pages>429-432</pages><issn>0370-2693</issn><eissn>1873-2445</eissn><coden>PYLBAJ</coden><abstract>It is confirmed, in terms of the Woods–Saxon–Strutinsky method, that the spin–orbit potential plays a decisive role in the predominance of prolate deformation, which has been a long standing problem in nuclear physics. It is originated from the combined effects of the spin–orbit coupling and the diffused surface of the potential, in agreement with the previous work based on a more schematic Nilsson–Strutinsky method. The degree of prolate-shape dominance exhibits an oscillatory behavior with respect to the strength of spin–orbit potential and, the prolate-shape dominance is realized at the proper strength of the spin–orbit potential together with the standard surface diffuseness; this oscillatory behavior disappears in case of small diffuseness corresponding to ellipsoidal cavity. The calculated energy differences between oblate and prolate minima in this Letter are consistent with those of our extensive self-consistent calculations of the Hartree–Fock+BCS method with the Skyrme interaction.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.physletb.2011.07.030</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0370-2693 |
ispartof | Physics letters. B, 2011-08, Vol.702 (5), p.429-432 |
issn | 0370-2693 1873-2445 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919929948 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Diffusion Dominance Elementary particles Exact sciences and technology Holes Mathematical analysis Nuclear physics Physics Strength The physics of elementary particles and fields |
title | The role of spin–orbit potential in nuclear prolate-shape dominance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A14%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20spin%E2%80%93orbit%20potential%20in%20nuclear%20prolate-shape%20dominance&rft.jtitle=Physics%20letters.%20B&rft.au=Takahara,%20Satoshi&rft.date=2011-08-26&rft.volume=702&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=432&rft.pages=429-432&rft.issn=0370-2693&rft.eissn=1873-2445&rft.coden=PYLBAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.07.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E919929948%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919929948&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0370269311008082&rfr_iscdi=true |