Rank Hierarchies for Generalized Quantifiers
We show that for each n and m, there is an existential first order sentence that is NOT logically equivalent to a sentence of quantifier rank at most m in infinitary logic augmented with all generalized quantifiers of arity at most n. We use this to show the strictness of the quantifier rank hierarc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of logic and computation 2011-04, Vol.21 (2), p.287-306 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 306 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 287 |
container_title | Journal of logic and computation |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Keisler, H. J. Lotfallah, W. B. |
description | We show that for each n and m, there is an existential first order sentence that is NOT logically equivalent to a sentence of quantifier rank at most m in infinitary logic augmented with all generalized quantifiers of arity at most n. We use this to show the strictness of the quantifier rank hierarchies for various logics ranging from existential (or universal) fragments of first-order logic to infinitary logics augmented with arbitrary classes of generalized quantifiers of bounded arity.The sentence above is also shown to be equivalent to a first-order sentence with at most n+2 variables (free and bound). This gives the strictness of the quantifier rank hierarchies for various logics with only n+2 variables. The proofs use the bijective Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game and a modification of the building blocks of Hella. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/logcom/exq019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919918009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>919918009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-dfaade4bbbd7f145f4c795d553b808ae731b1b6132f921c71ab028e47c98f0803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAURYMoOFaX7rtzY533mqZtljLojDAgisLsQpK-aLUfM0kL6q-3UlcXLocL9zB2iXCDIPmy6d9s3y7p6wAoj9gCs1wkPOe7Y7YAKURSyHR3ys5C-ACANMdswa6fdfcZb2ry2tv3mkLseh-vqZuKpv6hKn4adTfUbiLCOTtxugl08Z8Re72_e1ltku3j-mF1u01smsshqZzWFWXGmKpwmAmX2UKKSghuSig1FRwNmhx56mSKtkBtIC0pK6wsHZTAI3Y17-59fxgpDKqtg6Wm0R31Y1ASpcQSps8RS2bS-j4ET07tfd1q_60Q1J8UNUtRsxT-C94sV1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919918009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rank Hierarchies for Generalized Quantifiers</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Keisler, H. J. ; Lotfallah, W. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keisler, H. J. ; Lotfallah, W. B.</creatorcontrib><description>We show that for each n and m, there is an existential first order sentence that is NOT logically equivalent to a sentence of quantifier rank at most m in infinitary logic augmented with all generalized quantifiers of arity at most n. We use this to show the strictness of the quantifier rank hierarchies for various logics ranging from existential (or universal) fragments of first-order logic to infinitary logics augmented with arbitrary classes of generalized quantifiers of bounded arity.The sentence above is also shown to be equivalent to a first-order sentence with at most n+2 variables (free and bound). This gives the strictness of the quantifier rank hierarchies for various logics with only n+2 variables. The proofs use the bijective Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game and a modification of the building blocks of Hella.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-792X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-363X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/logcom/exq019</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computation ; Equivalence ; Games ; Hierarchies ; Logic ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Sentences</subject><ispartof>Journal of logic and computation, 2011-04, Vol.21 (2), p.287-306</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-dfaade4bbbd7f145f4c795d553b808ae731b1b6132f921c71ab028e47c98f0803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-dfaade4bbbd7f145f4c795d553b808ae731b1b6132f921c71ab028e47c98f0803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keisler, H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfallah, W. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Rank Hierarchies for Generalized Quantifiers</title><title>Journal of logic and computation</title><description>We show that for each n and m, there is an existential first order sentence that is NOT logically equivalent to a sentence of quantifier rank at most m in infinitary logic augmented with all generalized quantifiers of arity at most n. We use this to show the strictness of the quantifier rank hierarchies for various logics ranging from existential (or universal) fragments of first-order logic to infinitary logics augmented with arbitrary classes of generalized quantifiers of bounded arity.The sentence above is also shown to be equivalent to a first-order sentence with at most n+2 variables (free and bound). This gives the strictness of the quantifier rank hierarchies for various logics with only n+2 variables. The proofs use the bijective Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game and a modification of the building blocks of Hella.</description><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><issn>0955-792X</issn><issn>1465-363X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAURYMoOFaX7rtzY533mqZtljLojDAgisLsQpK-aLUfM0kL6q-3UlcXLocL9zB2iXCDIPmy6d9s3y7p6wAoj9gCs1wkPOe7Y7YAKURSyHR3ys5C-ACANMdswa6fdfcZb2ry2tv3mkLseh-vqZuKpv6hKn4adTfUbiLCOTtxugl08Z8Re72_e1ltku3j-mF1u01smsshqZzWFWXGmKpwmAmX2UKKSghuSig1FRwNmhx56mSKtkBtIC0pK6wsHZTAI3Y17-59fxgpDKqtg6Wm0R31Y1ASpcQSps8RS2bS-j4ET07tfd1q_60Q1J8UNUtRsxT-C94sV1o</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Keisler, H. J.</creator><creator>Lotfallah, W. B.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Rank Hierarchies for Generalized Quantifiers</title><author>Keisler, H. J. ; Lotfallah, W. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-dfaade4bbbd7f145f4c795d553b808ae731b1b6132f921c71ab028e47c98f0803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keisler, H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfallah, W. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of logic and computation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keisler, H. J.</au><au>Lotfallah, W. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rank Hierarchies for Generalized Quantifiers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of logic and computation</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>287-306</pages><issn>0955-792X</issn><eissn>1465-363X</eissn><abstract>We show that for each n and m, there is an existential first order sentence that is NOT logically equivalent to a sentence of quantifier rank at most m in infinitary logic augmented with all generalized quantifiers of arity at most n. We use this to show the strictness of the quantifier rank hierarchies for various logics ranging from existential (or universal) fragments of first-order logic to infinitary logics augmented with arbitrary classes of generalized quantifiers of bounded arity.The sentence above is also shown to be equivalent to a first-order sentence with at most n+2 variables (free and bound). This gives the strictness of the quantifier rank hierarchies for various logics with only n+2 variables. The proofs use the bijective Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game and a modification of the building blocks of Hella.</abstract><doi>10.1093/logcom/exq019</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-792X |
ispartof | Journal of logic and computation, 2011-04, Vol.21 (2), p.287-306 |
issn | 0955-792X 1465-363X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919918009 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Computation Equivalence Games Hierarchies Logic Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Sentences |
title | Rank Hierarchies for Generalized Quantifiers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T23%3A10%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rank%20Hierarchies%20for%20Generalized%20Quantifiers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20logic%20and%20computation&rft.au=Keisler,%20H.%20J.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=287-306&rft.issn=0955-792X&rft.eissn=1465-363X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/logcom/exq019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E919918009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919918009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |