It's not fair: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of discourses of justice and fairness in chronic pain
Quantitative research suggests that perceiving injustice can impact negatively upon physical and psychological health in chronic pain. However, little is known about the experience and perceptions of injustice in this context. This study examines the phenomenology of justice and injustice in chronic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Health (London, England : 1997) England : 1997), 2011-09, Vol.15 (5), p.459-474 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 474 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 459 |
| container_title | Health (London, England : 1997) |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | McParland, Joanna L. Eccleston, Christopher Osborn, Mike Hezseltine, Louisa |
| description | Quantitative research suggests that perceiving injustice can impact negatively upon physical and psychological health in chronic pain. However, little is known about the experience and perceptions of injustice in this context. This study examines the phenomenology of justice and injustice in chronic pain. Fifteen chronic pain sufferers recruited from General Practices in upper, middle and lower socioeconomic areas participated in one of three focus group discussions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to interrogate justice-related conceptions. All discussions were observed, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The dominant theme of the upper socioeconomic group was 'seeking equality'. For the middle socioeconomic group the dominant theme was 'battle for quality of life' and for the lower socioeconomic group the dominant theme was 'the unfair advantage of others'. It is concluded that this group of chronic pain sufferers prioritize justice-related issues in terms of what is dominant to their social concerns and personal needs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1363459310383593 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919904245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26650068</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1363459310383593</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26650068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-1962b8c93d00234aa60bca77b36021cf4db57ec138ddd642823cc279a74536a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkslr3TAQh0VpadK0915aBDmkF6caSdbSWwhdHgTSQ3s2siwnevhJriQX8t9HL04XAl0OYiTmm99oFoReAjkFkPItMMF4qxkQpli1j9AhcAGNBC0e13t1N3v_AXqW85YQAkzqp-iAAghNiThE86acZBxiwaPx6R0-C3gTiktzcsUU_93hz9cuxF09U7zy1kwVMdNN9hnHEQ8-27ik7O5e2yUXbx02YbiTCy5n7AO21ykGb_FsfHiOnoxmyu7FvT1CXz-8_3L-qbm4_Lg5P7toLFesNLUA2iur2UAIZdwYQXprpOyZIBTsyIe-lc4CU8MwCE4VZdZSqY3kLROGsSN0surOKX5bXC7drv7VTZMJLi6506A14bTS_yKV0iA5V_AfZEsV4bAn3_yV3A-s1WRNf_wA3daO1h5XSte66tCUqBRZKZtizsmN3Zz8zqSbKtXtd6F7uAs15PW98NLv3PAz4MfwK9CsQDZX7resfxZ8tfLbXGL6pSdES4hQ7BbRR8MK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928200186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>It's not fair: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of discourses of justice and fairness in chronic pain</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>McParland, Joanna L. ; Eccleston, Christopher ; Osborn, Mike ; Hezseltine, Louisa</creator><creatorcontrib>McParland, Joanna L. ; Eccleston, Christopher ; Osborn, Mike ; Hezseltine, Louisa</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative research suggests that perceiving injustice can impact negatively upon physical and psychological health in chronic pain. However, little is known about the experience and perceptions of injustice in this context. This study examines the phenomenology of justice and injustice in chronic pain. Fifteen chronic pain sufferers recruited from General Practices in upper, middle and lower socioeconomic areas participated in one of three focus group discussions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to interrogate justice-related conceptions. All discussions were observed, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The dominant theme of the upper socioeconomic group was 'seeking equality'. For the middle socioeconomic group the dominant theme was 'battle for quality of life' and for the lower socioeconomic group the dominant theme was 'the unfair advantage of others'. It is concluded that this group of chronic pain sufferers prioritize justice-related issues in terms of what is dominant to their social concerns and personal needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-4593</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7196</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1363459310383593</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21169206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE</publisher><subject>Attitude ; Chronic Pain - physiopathology ; Chronic Pain - psychology ; Equality ; Equity ; Female ; Focus Groups ; General Practice ; Health ; Health care ; Humans ; Injustice ; Interviews as Topic ; Justice ; Male ; Medical sociology ; Middle Aged ; Needs ; Pain ; Phenomenology ; Psychological factors ; Quality of Life ; Quantitative analysis ; Social Class ; Social Justice ; Socioeconomic Status ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Health (London, England : 1997), 2011-09, Vol.15 (5), p.459-474</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 SAGE Publications Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-1962b8c93d00234aa60bca77b36021cf4db57ec138ddd642823cc279a74536a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-1962b8c93d00234aa60bca77b36021cf4db57ec138ddd642823cc279a74536a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26650068$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26650068$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,33751,33752,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21169206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McParland, Joanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccleston, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hezseltine, Louisa</creatorcontrib><title>It's not fair: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of discourses of justice and fairness in chronic pain</title><title>Health (London, England : 1997)</title><addtitle>Health (London)</addtitle><description>Quantitative research suggests that perceiving injustice can impact negatively upon physical and psychological health in chronic pain. However, little is known about the experience and perceptions of injustice in this context. This study examines the phenomenology of justice and injustice in chronic pain. Fifteen chronic pain sufferers recruited from General Practices in upper, middle and lower socioeconomic areas participated in one of three focus group discussions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to interrogate justice-related conceptions. All discussions were observed, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The dominant theme of the upper socioeconomic group was 'seeking equality'. For the middle socioeconomic group the dominant theme was 'battle for quality of life' and for the lower socioeconomic group the dominant theme was 'the unfair advantage of others'. It is concluded that this group of chronic pain sufferers prioritize justice-related issues in terms of what is dominant to their social concerns and personal needs.</description><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>General Practice</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injustice</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sociology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needs</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Psychological factors</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Status</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1363-4593</issn><issn>1461-7196</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkslr3TAQh0VpadK0915aBDmkF6caSdbSWwhdHgTSQ3s2siwnevhJriQX8t9HL04XAl0OYiTmm99oFoReAjkFkPItMMF4qxkQpli1j9AhcAGNBC0e13t1N3v_AXqW85YQAkzqp-iAAghNiThE86acZBxiwaPx6R0-C3gTiktzcsUU_93hz9cuxF09U7zy1kwVMdNN9hnHEQ8-27ik7O5e2yUXbx02YbiTCy5n7AO21ykGb_FsfHiOnoxmyu7FvT1CXz-8_3L-qbm4_Lg5P7toLFesNLUA2iur2UAIZdwYQXprpOyZIBTsyIe-lc4CU8MwCE4VZdZSqY3kLROGsSN0surOKX5bXC7drv7VTZMJLi6506A14bTS_yKV0iA5V_AfZEsV4bAn3_yV3A-s1WRNf_wA3daO1h5XSte66tCUqBRZKZtizsmN3Zz8zqSbKtXtd6F7uAs15PW98NLv3PAz4MfwK9CsQDZX7resfxZ8tfLbXGL6pSdES4hQ7BbRR8MK</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>McParland, Joanna L.</creator><creator>Eccleston, Christopher</creator><creator>Osborn, Mike</creator><creator>Hezseltine, Louisa</creator><general>SAGE</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>It's not fair: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of discourses of justice and fairness in chronic pain</title><author>McParland, Joanna L. ; Eccleston, Christopher ; Osborn, Mike ; Hezseltine, Louisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-1962b8c93d00234aa60bca77b36021cf4db57ec138ddd642823cc279a74536a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>General Practice</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injustice</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sociology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needs</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Psychological factors</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Status</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McParland, Joanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccleston, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hezseltine, Louisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Health (London, England : 1997)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McParland, Joanna L.</au><au>Eccleston, Christopher</au><au>Osborn, Mike</au><au>Hezseltine, Louisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>It's not fair: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of discourses of justice and fairness in chronic pain</atitle><jtitle>Health (London, England : 1997)</jtitle><addtitle>Health (London)</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>459-474</pages><issn>1363-4593</issn><eissn>1461-7196</eissn><abstract>Quantitative research suggests that perceiving injustice can impact negatively upon physical and psychological health in chronic pain. However, little is known about the experience and perceptions of injustice in this context. This study examines the phenomenology of justice and injustice in chronic pain. Fifteen chronic pain sufferers recruited from General Practices in upper, middle and lower socioeconomic areas participated in one of three focus group discussions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to interrogate justice-related conceptions. All discussions were observed, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The dominant theme of the upper socioeconomic group was 'seeking equality'. For the middle socioeconomic group the dominant theme was 'battle for quality of life' and for the lower socioeconomic group the dominant theme was 'the unfair advantage of others'. It is concluded that this group of chronic pain sufferers prioritize justice-related issues in terms of what is dominant to their social concerns and personal needs.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE</pub><pmid>21169206</pmid><doi>10.1177/1363459310383593</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1363-4593 |
| ispartof | Health (London, England : 1997), 2011-09, Vol.15 (5), p.459-474 |
| issn | 1363-4593 1461-7196 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919904245 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Attitude Chronic Pain - physiopathology Chronic Pain - psychology Equality Equity Female Focus Groups General Practice Health Health care Humans Injustice Interviews as Topic Justice Male Medical sociology Middle Aged Needs Pain Phenomenology Psychological factors Quality of Life Quantitative analysis Social Class Social Justice Socioeconomic Status United Kingdom |
| title | It's not fair: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of discourses of justice and fairness in chronic pain |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T17%3A48%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=It's%20not%20fair:%20An%20Interpretative%20Phenomenological%20Analysis%20of%20discourses%20of%20justice%20and%20fairness%20in%20chronic%20pain&rft.jtitle=Health%20(London,%20England%20:%201997)&rft.au=McParland,%20Joanna%20L.&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=459-474&rft.issn=1363-4593&rft.eissn=1461-7196&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1363459310383593&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26650068%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928200186&rft_id=info:pmid/21169206&rft_jstor_id=26650068&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1363459310383593&rfr_iscdi=true |