Comparison between ozone and ultrasound disintegration on sludge anaerobic digestion

This paper deals with the comparison of ultrasound (mechanical) and ozone (chemical) pre-treatment on the performances of excess sludge semi-continuous digestion. Sludge solubilisation has been investigated by varying specific energy input. For each pre-treatment, long anaerobic digestion tests were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2012-03, Vol.95, p.S139-S143
Hauptverfasser: Braguglia, C.M., Gianico, A., Mininni, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S143
container_issue
container_start_page S139
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 95
creator Braguglia, C.M.
Gianico, A.
Mininni, G.
description This paper deals with the comparison of ultrasound (mechanical) and ozone (chemical) pre-treatment on the performances of excess sludge semi-continuous digestion. Sludge solubilisation has been investigated by varying specific energy input. For each pre-treatment, long anaerobic digestion tests were carried out by two parallel digesters: one reactor, as control unit, was fed with untreated waste activated sludge, and the other one was fed with disintegrated sludge. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of both pre-treatments, the specific energy was maintained approximately the same. The digestion tests were carried out to investigate the feasibility of anaerobic digestion performance (total biogas production, volatile solids removal, sludge dewaterability) and to assess the heat balance. Results obtained from the digestion of sonicated sludge at 4% disintegration degree (∼2500 kJ/kg TS) showed that the ultrasound pre-treatment may be effective both in increasing VS destruction (+19%) and cumulative biogas production (+26%). On the contrary, the digestion test with ozonized sludge (ozone dose of 0.05 g O3/g TS corresponding to ∼2000 kJ/kg TS) did not indicate a significant improvement on the digestion performances. By doubling the ozone dose an improvement in the organics removal and cumulative biogas production was observed. Relevant differences in terms of colloidal charge and filterability were discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919224313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479710002264</els_id><sourcerecordid>919224313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-87bfb342f7f3af5b5d16919873a43c7c6645554bd6716b4df3286b49d4503b803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EotuWnwDsjVO249iOkxNCK6BIlTi0PVv-mKy8SuLFToraX8-sduGKZGms8TPzWg9j7zlsOPDmZr_Z4_Q02mlTA_VAb0DAK7bi0KmqbQS8Zivq8ErqTl-wy1L2ACBqrt-yixo072StV-xhm8aDzbGkae1w_o04rdNLmnBtp7Behjnbkha6hljiNOMu2zkSS6cMS9gdOYs5uegJ2WE5vl6zN70dCr471yv2-O3rw_a2uvv5_cf2y13lRdvOVatd74Sse90L2yunAm863rVaWCm89k0jlVLShUbzxsnQi7ql2gWpQLgWxBX7dNp7yOnXQtlmjMXjMNgJ01IMLatrKbggUp1In1MpGXtzyHG0-dlwMEefZm_OPs3RpwFtyB7NfTgnLG7E8G_qr0ACPp6A3iZjdyTSPN7TBglA4Uq0RHw-EUgmniJmU3zEyWOIGf1sQor_-cQfYlyTIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919224313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between ozone and ultrasound disintegration on sludge anaerobic digestion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Braguglia, C.M. ; Gianico, A. ; Mininni, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Braguglia, C.M. ; Gianico, A. ; Mininni, G.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper deals with the comparison of ultrasound (mechanical) and ozone (chemical) pre-treatment on the performances of excess sludge semi-continuous digestion. Sludge solubilisation has been investigated by varying specific energy input. For each pre-treatment, long anaerobic digestion tests were carried out by two parallel digesters: one reactor, as control unit, was fed with untreated waste activated sludge, and the other one was fed with disintegrated sludge. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of both pre-treatments, the specific energy was maintained approximately the same. The digestion tests were carried out to investigate the feasibility of anaerobic digestion performance (total biogas production, volatile solids removal, sludge dewaterability) and to assess the heat balance. Results obtained from the digestion of sonicated sludge at 4% disintegration degree (∼2500 kJ/kg TS) showed that the ultrasound pre-treatment may be effective both in increasing VS destruction (+19%) and cumulative biogas production (+26%). On the contrary, the digestion test with ozonized sludge (ozone dose of 0.05 g O3/g TS corresponding to ∼2000 kJ/kg TS) did not indicate a significant improvement on the digestion performances. By doubling the ozone dose an improvement in the organics removal and cumulative biogas production was observed. Relevant differences in terms of colloidal charge and filterability were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20719427</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobic digestion ; Anaerobiosis ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biofuels ; biogas ; Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis ; Dewaterability ; digestion ; filterability ; heat ; Ozone ; pretreatment ; Sewage - chemistry ; Sewage sludge ; sludge ; solubilization ; Sonication ; specific energy ; Temperature ; ultrasonics ; Ultrasonics - methods ; Ultrasound ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2012-03, Vol.95, p.S139-S143</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-87bfb342f7f3af5b5d16919873a43c7c6645554bd6716b4df3286b49d4503b803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-87bfb342f7f3af5b5d16919873a43c7c6645554bd6716b4df3286b49d4503b803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479710002264$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20719427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Braguglia, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianico, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mininni, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between ozone and ultrasound disintegration on sludge anaerobic digestion</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>This paper deals with the comparison of ultrasound (mechanical) and ozone (chemical) pre-treatment on the performances of excess sludge semi-continuous digestion. Sludge solubilisation has been investigated by varying specific energy input. For each pre-treatment, long anaerobic digestion tests were carried out by two parallel digesters: one reactor, as control unit, was fed with untreated waste activated sludge, and the other one was fed with disintegrated sludge. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of both pre-treatments, the specific energy was maintained approximately the same. The digestion tests were carried out to investigate the feasibility of anaerobic digestion performance (total biogas production, volatile solids removal, sludge dewaterability) and to assess the heat balance. Results obtained from the digestion of sonicated sludge at 4% disintegration degree (∼2500 kJ/kg TS) showed that the ultrasound pre-treatment may be effective both in increasing VS destruction (+19%) and cumulative biogas production (+26%). On the contrary, the digestion test with ozonized sludge (ozone dose of 0.05 g O3/g TS corresponding to ∼2000 kJ/kg TS) did not indicate a significant improvement on the digestion performances. By doubling the ozone dose an improvement in the organics removal and cumulative biogas production was observed. Relevant differences in terms of colloidal charge and filterability were discussed.</description><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>biogas</subject><subject>Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis</subject><subject>Dewaterability</subject><subject>digestion</subject><subject>filterability</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>pretreatment</subject><subject>Sewage - chemistry</subject><subject>Sewage sludge</subject><subject>sludge</subject><subject>solubilization</subject><subject>Sonication</subject><subject>specific energy</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>ultrasonics</subject><subject>Ultrasonics - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EotuWnwDsjVO249iOkxNCK6BIlTi0PVv-mKy8SuLFToraX8-sduGKZGms8TPzWg9j7zlsOPDmZr_Z4_Q02mlTA_VAb0DAK7bi0KmqbQS8Zivq8ErqTl-wy1L2ACBqrt-yixo072StV-xhm8aDzbGkae1w_o04rdNLmnBtp7Behjnbkha6hljiNOMu2zkSS6cMS9gdOYs5uegJ2WE5vl6zN70dCr471yv2-O3rw_a2uvv5_cf2y13lRdvOVatd74Sse90L2yunAm863rVaWCm89k0jlVLShUbzxsnQi7ql2gWpQLgWxBX7dNp7yOnXQtlmjMXjMNgJ01IMLatrKbggUp1In1MpGXtzyHG0-dlwMEefZm_OPs3RpwFtyB7NfTgnLG7E8G_qr0ACPp6A3iZjdyTSPN7TBglA4Uq0RHw-EUgmniJmU3zEyWOIGf1sQor_-cQfYlyTIA</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Braguglia, C.M.</creator><creator>Gianico, A.</creator><creator>Mininni, G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Comparison between ozone and ultrasound disintegration on sludge anaerobic digestion</title><author>Braguglia, C.M. ; Gianico, A. ; Mininni, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-87bfb342f7f3af5b5d16919873a43c7c6645554bd6716b4df3286b49d4503b803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>biogas</topic><topic>Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis</topic><topic>Dewaterability</topic><topic>digestion</topic><topic>filterability</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>pretreatment</topic><topic>Sewage - chemistry</topic><topic>Sewage sludge</topic><topic>sludge</topic><topic>solubilization</topic><topic>Sonication</topic><topic>specific energy</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>ultrasonics</topic><topic>Ultrasonics - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braguglia, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianico, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mininni, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braguglia, C.M.</au><au>Gianico, A.</au><au>Mininni, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between ozone and ultrasound disintegration on sludge anaerobic digestion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>95</volume><spage>S139</spage><epage>S143</epage><pages>S139-S143</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>This paper deals with the comparison of ultrasound (mechanical) and ozone (chemical) pre-treatment on the performances of excess sludge semi-continuous digestion. Sludge solubilisation has been investigated by varying specific energy input. For each pre-treatment, long anaerobic digestion tests were carried out by two parallel digesters: one reactor, as control unit, was fed with untreated waste activated sludge, and the other one was fed with disintegrated sludge. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of both pre-treatments, the specific energy was maintained approximately the same. The digestion tests were carried out to investigate the feasibility of anaerobic digestion performance (total biogas production, volatile solids removal, sludge dewaterability) and to assess the heat balance. Results obtained from the digestion of sonicated sludge at 4% disintegration degree (∼2500 kJ/kg TS) showed that the ultrasound pre-treatment may be effective both in increasing VS destruction (+19%) and cumulative biogas production (+26%). On the contrary, the digestion test with ozonized sludge (ozone dose of 0.05 g O3/g TS corresponding to ∼2000 kJ/kg TS) did not indicate a significant improvement on the digestion performances. By doubling the ozone dose an improvement in the organics removal and cumulative biogas production was observed. Relevant differences in terms of colloidal charge and filterability were discussed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20719427</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.030</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2012-03, Vol.95, p.S139-S143
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919224313
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anaerobic digestion
Anaerobiosis
Biodegradation, Environmental
Biofuels
biogas
Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis
Dewaterability
digestion
filterability
heat
Ozone
pretreatment
Sewage - chemistry
Sewage sludge
sludge
solubilization
Sonication
specific energy
Temperature
ultrasonics
Ultrasonics - methods
Ultrasound
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
title Comparison between ozone and ultrasound disintegration on sludge anaerobic digestion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T23%3A04%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20ozone%20and%20ultrasound%20disintegration%20on%20sludge%20anaerobic%20digestion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Braguglia,%20C.M.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=95&rft.spage=S139&rft.epage=S143&rft.pages=S139-S143&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E919224313%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919224313&rft_id=info:pmid/20719427&rft_els_id=S0301479710002264&rfr_iscdi=true