Freely Disposable Time: A Time and Money Integrated Measure of Poverty and Freedom
This paper develops, tests, and discusses a metric for livelihood assessment that integrates cash flow and time use households. It expresses how much time the household adults have left after satisfying the household’s basic needs (e.g., for food, sleep, care, consumables, and leisure). This “freely...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World development 2011-12, Vol.39 (12), p.2055-2068 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2068 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2055 |
container_title | World development |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Hobbes, Marieke De Groot, Wouter T. Van Der Voet, Ester Sarkhel, Sukanya |
description | This paper develops, tests, and discusses a metric for livelihood assessment that integrates cash flow and time use households. It expresses how much time the household adults have left after satisfying the household’s basic needs (e.g., for food, sleep, care, consumables, and leisure). This “freely disposable time” (
FDT) may be put to any use available and allowed in the local context, such as above-basic leisure, work to acquire above-basic consumer goods, or investments in the future such as education or soil conservation. Thus,
FDT represents people’s freedoms and a key condition for any out-of-poverty strategy. The
FDT methodology is illustrated with a number of characteristic livelihood strategies and tested on peri-urban farming livelihoods in India and some typical Dutch households. The
FDT outcomes, methodology, strengths, and limitations are compared with those of an allied, “Discretionary Time” indicator, paired time/money indicators and purely monetary (e.g., income or expenditure) indicators of poverty and welfare. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918741933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305750X11000751</els_id><sourcerecordid>2517124901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-bf622ddf7f6c264f4cf880dfa45db1f71e0ad6635972004d554d7284ee47f2c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EEmngL6AVl_ay27HXH-ueqEq_pCIQKhI3y7HHaKPNOtiboPz7OglcegBOrzR65pFmXkLeUWgoUHm-bH7FNHiP24YBpQ3wBkC8IDPaqbYWWtOXZAYtiFoJ-P6anOS8hEK0Ws3I15uEOOyqj31ex2wXA1aP_QovqstDVnb01ac44q66Hyf8keyEZYA2bxJWMVRf4hbTtDtwe5WPqzfkVbBDxre_c06-3Vw_Xt3VD59v768uH2oneDfViyAZ8z6oIB2TPHAXug58sFz4BQ2KIlgvZSu0YgDcC8G9Yh1H5Cow17Vzcnr0rlP8ucE8mVWfHQ6DHTFustHlfk512xby7K9keSNITpXU_4e2TFMo6Ptn6DJu0lhONhoE41QcIHmEXIo5JwxmnfqVTbti2sukWZo_9Zl9fQa42ZczJx-Oi1heuO0xmex6HB36PqGbjI_9vxRPV2Ck0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>905241510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Freely Disposable Time: A Time and Money Integrated Measure of Poverty and Freedom</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hobbes, Marieke ; De Groot, Wouter T. ; Van Der Voet, Ester ; Sarkhel, Sukanya</creator><creatorcontrib>Hobbes, Marieke ; De Groot, Wouter T. ; Van Der Voet, Ester ; Sarkhel, Sukanya</creatorcontrib><description>This paper develops, tests, and discusses a metric for livelihood assessment that integrates cash flow and time use households. It expresses how much time the household adults have left after satisfying the household’s basic needs (e.g., for food, sleep, care, consumables, and leisure). This “freely disposable time” (
FDT) may be put to any use available and allowed in the local context, such as above-basic leisure, work to acquire above-basic consumer goods, or investments in the future such as education or soil conservation. Thus,
FDT represents people’s freedoms and a key condition for any out-of-poverty strategy. The
FDT methodology is illustrated with a number of characteristic livelihood strategies and tested on peri-urban farming livelihoods in India and some typical Dutch households. The
FDT outcomes, methodology, strengths, and limitations are compared with those of an allied, “Discretionary Time” indicator, paired time/money indicators and purely monetary (e.g., income or expenditure) indicators of poverty and welfare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WODEDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adults ; Appropriations and expenditures ; Basic needs ; Cash flow ; Consumer goods ; discretionary time ; Education ; Food ; Freedom ; Freedoms ; Household economics ; Households ; Income ; India ; Investment ; Investments ; Leisure ; Leisure time ; Liberty ; Livelihood ; livelihoods approach ; Nature conservation ; Netherlands ; Poverty ; poverty assessment ; poverty line ; Products ; Resource allocation ; Sleep ; social indicator ; Social indicators ; Soil conservation ; Studies ; Sustainable development ; Time ; time poverty ; Urban agriculture ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>World development, 2011-12, Vol.39 (12), p.2055-2068</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Dec 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-bf622ddf7f6c264f4cf880dfa45db1f71e0ad6635972004d554d7284ee47f2c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-bf622ddf7f6c264f4cf880dfa45db1f71e0ad6635972004d554d7284ee47f2c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27864,27865,27923,27924,33774,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hobbes, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Groot, Wouter T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Voet, Ester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkhel, Sukanya</creatorcontrib><title>Freely Disposable Time: A Time and Money Integrated Measure of Poverty and Freedom</title><title>World development</title><description>This paper develops, tests, and discusses a metric for livelihood assessment that integrates cash flow and time use households. It expresses how much time the household adults have left after satisfying the household’s basic needs (e.g., for food, sleep, care, consumables, and leisure). This “freely disposable time” (
FDT) may be put to any use available and allowed in the local context, such as above-basic leisure, work to acquire above-basic consumer goods, or investments in the future such as education or soil conservation. Thus,
FDT represents people’s freedoms and a key condition for any out-of-poverty strategy. The
FDT methodology is illustrated with a number of characteristic livelihood strategies and tested on peri-urban farming livelihoods in India and some typical Dutch households. The
FDT outcomes, methodology, strengths, and limitations are compared with those of an allied, “Discretionary Time” indicator, paired time/money indicators and purely monetary (e.g., income or expenditure) indicators of poverty and welfare.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Appropriations and expenditures</subject><subject>Basic needs</subject><subject>Cash flow</subject><subject>Consumer goods</subject><subject>discretionary time</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Freedom</subject><subject>Freedoms</subject><subject>Household economics</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Leisure</subject><subject>Leisure time</subject><subject>Liberty</subject><subject>Livelihood</subject><subject>livelihoods approach</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>poverty assessment</subject><subject>poverty line</subject><subject>Products</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>social indicator</subject><subject>Social indicators</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>time poverty</subject><subject>Urban agriculture</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EEmngL6AVl_ay27HXH-ueqEq_pCIQKhI3y7HHaKPNOtiboPz7OglcegBOrzR65pFmXkLeUWgoUHm-bH7FNHiP24YBpQ3wBkC8IDPaqbYWWtOXZAYtiFoJ-P6anOS8hEK0Ws3I15uEOOyqj31ex2wXA1aP_QovqstDVnb01ac44q66Hyf8keyEZYA2bxJWMVRf4hbTtDtwe5WPqzfkVbBDxre_c06-3Vw_Xt3VD59v768uH2oneDfViyAZ8z6oIB2TPHAXug58sFz4BQ2KIlgvZSu0YgDcC8G9Yh1H5Cow17Vzcnr0rlP8ucE8mVWfHQ6DHTFustHlfk512xby7K9keSNITpXU_4e2TFMo6Ptn6DJu0lhONhoE41QcIHmEXIo5JwxmnfqVTbti2sukWZo_9Zl9fQa42ZczJx-Oi1heuO0xmex6HB36PqGbjI_9vxRPV2Ck0A</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Hobbes, Marieke</creator><creator>De Groot, Wouter T.</creator><creator>Van Der Voet, Ester</creator><creator>Sarkhel, Sukanya</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Freely Disposable Time: A Time and Money Integrated Measure of Poverty and Freedom</title><author>Hobbes, Marieke ; De Groot, Wouter T. ; Van Der Voet, Ester ; Sarkhel, Sukanya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-bf622ddf7f6c264f4cf880dfa45db1f71e0ad6635972004d554d7284ee47f2c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Appropriations and expenditures</topic><topic>Basic needs</topic><topic>Cash flow</topic><topic>Consumer goods</topic><topic>discretionary time</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Freedom</topic><topic>Freedoms</topic><topic>Household economics</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Leisure</topic><topic>Leisure time</topic><topic>Liberty</topic><topic>Livelihood</topic><topic>livelihoods approach</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>poverty assessment</topic><topic>poverty line</topic><topic>Products</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>social indicator</topic><topic>Social indicators</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>time poverty</topic><topic>Urban agriculture</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hobbes, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Groot, Wouter T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Voet, Ester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkhel, Sukanya</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hobbes, Marieke</au><au>De Groot, Wouter T.</au><au>Van Der Voet, Ester</au><au>Sarkhel, Sukanya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Freely Disposable Time: A Time and Money Integrated Measure of Poverty and Freedom</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2055</spage><epage>2068</epage><pages>2055-2068</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><coden>WODEDW</coden><abstract>This paper develops, tests, and discusses a metric for livelihood assessment that integrates cash flow and time use households. It expresses how much time the household adults have left after satisfying the household’s basic needs (e.g., for food, sleep, care, consumables, and leisure). This “freely disposable time” (
FDT) may be put to any use available and allowed in the local context, such as above-basic leisure, work to acquire above-basic consumer goods, or investments in the future such as education or soil conservation. Thus,
FDT represents people’s freedoms and a key condition for any out-of-poverty strategy. The
FDT methodology is illustrated with a number of characteristic livelihood strategies and tested on peri-urban farming livelihoods in India and some typical Dutch households. The
FDT outcomes, methodology, strengths, and limitations are compared with those of an allied, “Discretionary Time” indicator, paired time/money indicators and purely monetary (e.g., income or expenditure) indicators of poverty and welfare.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.005</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-750X |
ispartof | World development, 2011-12, Vol.39 (12), p.2055-2068 |
issn | 0305-750X 1873-5991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918741933 |
source | PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adults Appropriations and expenditures Basic needs Cash flow Consumer goods discretionary time Education Food Freedom Freedoms Household economics Households Income India Investment Investments Leisure Leisure time Liberty Livelihood livelihoods approach Nature conservation Netherlands Poverty poverty assessment poverty line Products Resource allocation Sleep social indicator Social indicators Soil conservation Studies Sustainable development Time time poverty Urban agriculture Welfare |
title | Freely Disposable Time: A Time and Money Integrated Measure of Poverty and Freedom |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A14%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Freely%20Disposable%20Time:%20A%20Time%20and%20Money%20Integrated%20Measure%20of%20Poverty%20and%20Freedom&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Hobbes,%20Marieke&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2055&rft.epage=2068&rft.pages=2055-2068&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft.coden=WODEDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2517124901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=905241510&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0305750X11000751&rfr_iscdi=true |