Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older People with Dementia in Care Homes: A Retrospective Analysis

Background: Older people in general and care home residents in particular are at high risk of suboptimal or inappropriate prescribing. To date, research into potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has not focused on care home residents and/or has not utilized the recently developed and validate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drugs & aging 2012-02, Vol.29 (2), p.143-155
Hauptverfasser: Parsons, Carole, Johnston, Sarah, Mathie, Elspeth, Baron, Natasha, Machen, Ina, Amador, Sarah, Goodman, Claire
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 155
container_issue 2
container_start_page 143
container_title Drugs & aging
container_volume 29
creator Parsons, Carole
Johnston, Sarah
Mathie, Elspeth
Baron, Natasha
Machen, Ina
Amador, Sarah
Goodman, Claire
description Background: Older people in general and care home residents in particular are at high risk of suboptimal or inappropriate prescribing. To date, research into potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has not focused on care home residents and/or has not utilized the recently developed and validated Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of PIP in older people with dementia living in six residential care homes in England, using the STOPP criteria. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using medication data collected for older people with dementia in six residential care homes in England who participated in the prospective, longitudinal EVIDEM — End of Life (EoL) study. Of the 133 residents recruited to the study, medication administration records were available for and reviewed at two timepoints (approximately 16 weeks apart) for 119 residents and 110 residents, respectively. The prevalence of PIP at these timepoints was determined using 31 of the 65 STOPP criteria applicable when there is no access to residents’ medical records. Results: At the first timepoint, 68 potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were identified. Fifty-five residents (46.2%) were prescribed one or more PIM(s), eleven (9.2%) were prescribed two or more PIMs and two (1.7%) were prescribed three PIMs. Thirteen of the 31 STOPP criteria utilized in this study (41.9%) were used to identify PIP. Long-term (i.e. >1 month) neuroleptics (antipsychotics) were the most frequently prescribed PIMs (n = 25; 21.0%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for >3 months, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at maximum therapeutic dosage for >8 weeks, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in patients with dementia and long-term (i.e. >1 month), long-acting benzodiazepines. At the second timepoint, 57 PIMs were identified; 45 residents (40.9%) were prescribed one or more PIM(s) and 10 (9.1%) were prescribed two or more PIMs, but only one resident (0.9%) was prescribed three PIMs. Of the 31 STOPP criteria utilized in this study, ten (32.3%) were used to identify PIP. Long-term (i.e. >1 month) antipsychotics were again the most frequently prescribed PIMs (n = 21; 19.1%), followed by PPIs at maximum therapeutic dosage for >8 weeks, NSAIDS for >3 months and TCAs in patients with dementia. A significant correlation was found at both timepoints between the number of med
doi_str_mv 10.2165/11598560-000000000-00000
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918573822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>918573822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-9569475fa38127b265ac490bb20eb0a560110af63e5b67abac5890398f25b0673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoVqt_QXIRT6tJtskmR6kfLRRaQcFbSLazdct-mewi_fem3bYezWVemOfNzLwIYUruGRX8gVKuJBckIofXqxN0QWmiIqqEOt1pEjGmPgfo0vt1AARj9BwNGGNkJIS6QG-LuoWqzU1RbPC0Mk3j6sblpgW8cOBTl9u8WuG8wvNiCQ4voG4KwD95-4WfoNxZt92xcYAndQn-Cp1lpvBwva9D9PHy_D6eRLP563T8OIvSOFZtpLhQo4RnJpaUJZYJbtKRItYyApaYcBylxGQiBm5FYqxJuVQkVjJj3BKRxEN01_8bNv7uwLe6zH0KRWEqqDuvFZU8iSVjgZQ9mbraeweZDheWxm00JXqbpz7kqY959ipYb_ZDOlvC8mg8BBiA2z1gfGqKzJkqzf0fxzmhksnAqZ7zoVWtwOl13bkqBPT_Er_6Z4yq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>918573822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older People with Dementia in Care Homes: A Retrospective Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Parsons, Carole ; Johnston, Sarah ; Mathie, Elspeth ; Baron, Natasha ; Machen, Ina ; Amador, Sarah ; Goodman, Claire</creator><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Carole ; Johnston, Sarah ; Mathie, Elspeth ; Baron, Natasha ; Machen, Ina ; Amador, Sarah ; Goodman, Claire</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Older people in general and care home residents in particular are at high risk of suboptimal or inappropriate prescribing. To date, research into potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has not focused on care home residents and/or has not utilized the recently developed and validated Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of PIP in older people with dementia living in six residential care homes in England, using the STOPP criteria. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using medication data collected for older people with dementia in six residential care homes in England who participated in the prospective, longitudinal EVIDEM — End of Life (EoL) study. Of the 133 residents recruited to the study, medication administration records were available for and reviewed at two timepoints (approximately 16 weeks apart) for 119 residents and 110 residents, respectively. The prevalence of PIP at these timepoints was determined using 31 of the 65 STOPP criteria applicable when there is no access to residents’ medical records. Results: At the first timepoint, 68 potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were identified. Fifty-five residents (46.2%) were prescribed one or more PIM(s), eleven (9.2%) were prescribed two or more PIMs and two (1.7%) were prescribed three PIMs. Thirteen of the 31 STOPP criteria utilized in this study (41.9%) were used to identify PIP. Long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month) neuroleptics (antipsychotics) were the most frequently prescribed PIMs (n = 25; 21.0%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for &gt;3 months, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at maximum therapeutic dosage for &gt;8 weeks, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in patients with dementia and long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month), long-acting benzodiazepines. At the second timepoint, 57 PIMs were identified; 45 residents (40.9%) were prescribed one or more PIM(s) and 10 (9.1%) were prescribed two or more PIMs, but only one resident (0.9%) was prescribed three PIMs. Of the 31 STOPP criteria utilized in this study, ten (32.3%) were used to identify PIP. Long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month) antipsychotics were again the most frequently prescribed PIMs (n = 21; 19.1%), followed by PPIs at maximum therapeutic dosage for &gt;8 weeks, NSAIDS for &gt;3 months and TCAs in patients with dementia. A significant correlation was found at both timepoints between the number of medicines prescribed and occurrence of PIP. Conclusions: This study found that over two-fifths of older people with dementia residing in six residential care homes in England were prescribed at least one PIM at each timepoint. Long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month) antipsychotics, NSAID use for &gt;3 months and PPI use at maximum therapeutic dosage for &gt;8 weeks were the most prevalent PIMs. Regular medication review that targets, but is not limited to, these medications is required to reduce PIP in the residential care home setting. The STOPP criteria represent a useful tool to facilitate such review in this patient population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1170-229X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2165/11598560-000000000-00000</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22204669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dementia - drug therapy ; Drug Prescriptions - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Geriatrics/Gerontology ; Humans ; Inappropriate Prescribing - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Research Article ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Pharmacotherapy ; Residential Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Sex Factors</subject><ispartof>Drugs &amp; aging, 2012-02, Vol.29 (2), p.143-155</ispartof><rights>Adis Data Information BV 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-9569475fa38127b265ac490bb20eb0a560110af63e5b67abac5890398f25b0673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.2165/11598560-000000000-00000$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.2165/11598560-000000000-00000$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25501828$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22204669$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathie, Elspeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machen, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amador, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Claire</creatorcontrib><title>Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older People with Dementia in Care Homes: A Retrospective Analysis</title><title>Drugs &amp; aging</title><addtitle>Drugs Aging</addtitle><addtitle>Drugs Aging</addtitle><description>Background: Older people in general and care home residents in particular are at high risk of suboptimal or inappropriate prescribing. To date, research into potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has not focused on care home residents and/or has not utilized the recently developed and validated Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of PIP in older people with dementia living in six residential care homes in England, using the STOPP criteria. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using medication data collected for older people with dementia in six residential care homes in England who participated in the prospective, longitudinal EVIDEM — End of Life (EoL) study. Of the 133 residents recruited to the study, medication administration records were available for and reviewed at two timepoints (approximately 16 weeks apart) for 119 residents and 110 residents, respectively. The prevalence of PIP at these timepoints was determined using 31 of the 65 STOPP criteria applicable when there is no access to residents’ medical records. Results: At the first timepoint, 68 potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were identified. Fifty-five residents (46.2%) were prescribed one or more PIM(s), eleven (9.2%) were prescribed two or more PIMs and two (1.7%) were prescribed three PIMs. Thirteen of the 31 STOPP criteria utilized in this study (41.9%) were used to identify PIP. Long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month) neuroleptics (antipsychotics) were the most frequently prescribed PIMs (n = 25; 21.0%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for &gt;3 months, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at maximum therapeutic dosage for &gt;8 weeks, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in patients with dementia and long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month), long-acting benzodiazepines. At the second timepoint, 57 PIMs were identified; 45 residents (40.9%) were prescribed one or more PIM(s) and 10 (9.1%) were prescribed two or more PIMs, but only one resident (0.9%) was prescribed three PIMs. Of the 31 STOPP criteria utilized in this study, ten (32.3%) were used to identify PIP. Long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month) antipsychotics were again the most frequently prescribed PIMs (n = 21; 19.1%), followed by PPIs at maximum therapeutic dosage for &gt;8 weeks, NSAIDS for &gt;3 months and TCAs in patients with dementia. A significant correlation was found at both timepoints between the number of medicines prescribed and occurrence of PIP. Conclusions: This study found that over two-fifths of older people with dementia residing in six residential care homes in England were prescribed at least one PIM at each timepoint. Long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month) antipsychotics, NSAID use for &gt;3 months and PPI use at maximum therapeutic dosage for &gt;8 weeks were the most prevalent PIMs. Regular medication review that targets, but is not limited to, these medications is required to reduce PIP in the residential care home setting. The STOPP criteria represent a useful tool to facilitate such review in this patient population.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dementia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Drug Prescriptions - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatrics/Gerontology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inappropriate Prescribing - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Pharmacotherapy</subject><subject>Residential Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><issn>1170-229X</issn><issn>1179-1969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoVqt_QXIRT6tJtskmR6kfLRRaQcFbSLazdct-mewi_fem3bYezWVemOfNzLwIYUruGRX8gVKuJBckIofXqxN0QWmiIqqEOt1pEjGmPgfo0vt1AARj9BwNGGNkJIS6QG-LuoWqzU1RbPC0Mk3j6sblpgW8cOBTl9u8WuG8wvNiCQ4voG4KwD95-4WfoNxZt92xcYAndQn-Cp1lpvBwva9D9PHy_D6eRLP563T8OIvSOFZtpLhQo4RnJpaUJZYJbtKRItYyApaYcBylxGQiBm5FYqxJuVQkVjJj3BKRxEN01_8bNv7uwLe6zH0KRWEqqDuvFZU8iSVjgZQ9mbraeweZDheWxm00JXqbpz7kqY959ipYb_ZDOlvC8mg8BBiA2z1gfGqKzJkqzf0fxzmhksnAqZ7zoVWtwOl13bkqBPT_Er_6Z4yq</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Parsons, Carole</creator><creator>Johnston, Sarah</creator><creator>Mathie, Elspeth</creator><creator>Baron, Natasha</creator><creator>Machen, Ina</creator><creator>Amador, Sarah</creator><creator>Goodman, Claire</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Adis International</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older People with Dementia in Care Homes</title><author>Parsons, Carole ; Johnston, Sarah ; Mathie, Elspeth ; Baron, Natasha ; Machen, Ina ; Amador, Sarah ; Goodman, Claire</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-9569475fa38127b265ac490bb20eb0a560110af63e5b67abac5890398f25b0673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dementia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Drug Prescriptions - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatrics/Gerontology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inappropriate Prescribing - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Pharmacotherapy</topic><topic>Residential Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathie, Elspeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machen, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amador, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Claire</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Drugs &amp; aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parsons, Carole</au><au>Johnston, Sarah</au><au>Mathie, Elspeth</au><au>Baron, Natasha</au><au>Machen, Ina</au><au>Amador, Sarah</au><au>Goodman, Claire</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older People with Dementia in Care Homes: A Retrospective Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Drugs &amp; aging</jtitle><stitle>Drugs Aging</stitle><addtitle>Drugs Aging</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>143-155</pages><issn>1170-229X</issn><eissn>1179-1969</eissn><abstract>Background: Older people in general and care home residents in particular are at high risk of suboptimal or inappropriate prescribing. To date, research into potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has not focused on care home residents and/or has not utilized the recently developed and validated Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of PIP in older people with dementia living in six residential care homes in England, using the STOPP criteria. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using medication data collected for older people with dementia in six residential care homes in England who participated in the prospective, longitudinal EVIDEM — End of Life (EoL) study. Of the 133 residents recruited to the study, medication administration records were available for and reviewed at two timepoints (approximately 16 weeks apart) for 119 residents and 110 residents, respectively. The prevalence of PIP at these timepoints was determined using 31 of the 65 STOPP criteria applicable when there is no access to residents’ medical records. Results: At the first timepoint, 68 potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were identified. Fifty-five residents (46.2%) were prescribed one or more PIM(s), eleven (9.2%) were prescribed two or more PIMs and two (1.7%) were prescribed three PIMs. Thirteen of the 31 STOPP criteria utilized in this study (41.9%) were used to identify PIP. Long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month) neuroleptics (antipsychotics) were the most frequently prescribed PIMs (n = 25; 21.0%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for &gt;3 months, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at maximum therapeutic dosage for &gt;8 weeks, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in patients with dementia and long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month), long-acting benzodiazepines. At the second timepoint, 57 PIMs were identified; 45 residents (40.9%) were prescribed one or more PIM(s) and 10 (9.1%) were prescribed two or more PIMs, but only one resident (0.9%) was prescribed three PIMs. Of the 31 STOPP criteria utilized in this study, ten (32.3%) were used to identify PIP. Long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month) antipsychotics were again the most frequently prescribed PIMs (n = 21; 19.1%), followed by PPIs at maximum therapeutic dosage for &gt;8 weeks, NSAIDS for &gt;3 months and TCAs in patients with dementia. A significant correlation was found at both timepoints between the number of medicines prescribed and occurrence of PIP. Conclusions: This study found that over two-fifths of older people with dementia residing in six residential care homes in England were prescribed at least one PIM at each timepoint. Long-term (i.e. &gt;1 month) antipsychotics, NSAID use for &gt;3 months and PPI use at maximum therapeutic dosage for &gt;8 weeks were the most prevalent PIMs. Regular medication review that targets, but is not limited to, these medications is required to reduce PIP in the residential care home setting. The STOPP criteria represent a useful tool to facilitate such review in this patient population.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>22204669</pmid><doi>10.2165/11598560-000000000-00000</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1170-229X
ispartof Drugs & aging, 2012-02, Vol.29 (2), p.143-155
issn 1170-229X
1179-1969
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918573822
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Age Factors
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Dementia - drug therapy
Drug Prescriptions - statistics & numerical data
Female
Geriatrics/Gerontology
Humans
Inappropriate Prescribing - statistics & numerical data
Internal Medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Research Article
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Pharmacotherapy
Residential Facilities - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Sex Factors
title Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older People with Dementia in Care Homes: A Retrospective Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potentially%20Inappropriate%20Prescribing%20in%20Older%20People%20with%20Dementia%20in%20Care%20Homes:%20A%20Retrospective%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Drugs%20&%20aging&rft.au=Parsons,%20Carole&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=143-155&rft.issn=1170-229X&rft.eissn=1179-1969&rft_id=info:doi/10.2165/11598560-000000000-00000&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E918573822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=918573822&rft_id=info:pmid/22204669&rfr_iscdi=true