Polarization of hydroxyapatite: Influence on osteoblast cell proliferation

Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been used clinically to treat bone defects. However, modifications of the surface properties of HA could improve and control bone matrix deposition and localized host tissue integration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of developing a surface charge on HA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta biomaterialia 2010-04, Vol.6 (4), p.1549-1554
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, D., Gittings, J.P., Turner, I.G., Bowen, C.R., Bastida-Hidalgo, A., Cartmell, S.H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1554
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1549
container_title Acta biomaterialia
container_volume 6
creator Kumar, D.
Gittings, J.P.
Turner, I.G.
Bowen, C.R.
Bastida-Hidalgo, A.
Cartmell, S.H.
description Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been used clinically to treat bone defects. However, modifications of the surface properties of HA could improve and control bone matrix deposition and localized host tissue integration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of developing a surface charge on HA discs with respect to osteoblast activity in vitro. HA discs (12 mm × 2 mm) were sintered in either air or water vapour. The HA discs were then electrically polarized (positive and negative surfaces) or non-polarized (controls) and seeded with MC3T3-E1 cells. Polarized HA sintered in water vapour was shown to retain six times more charge than polarized HA sintered in air. Picogreen analysis demonstrated that at 4 h cell number was significantly higher on the negatively and positively charged HA surface (water sintered) in comparison to the non-charged water and air-sintered HA controls. At 7 days there was a significant increase in cell number on the negatively charged HA (air sintered) sample in comparison to the negatively charged water vapour sintered HA sample and the non-charged water vapour sintered control sample. Also at 7 days, the picogreen data showed a significant increase in cell number on the positively charged water-treated HA sample in comparison to both the air- and water-treated HA non-charged control HA samples. An alamarBlue assay at 7 days demonstrated significant cell metabolic activity on the charged surfaces (both positive and negative) in comparison to the non-charged HA and the tissue culture plastic controls. This study demonstrated that all of the HA discs tested supported cell viability/attachment. However, cell attachment/proliferation/metabolic activity was significantly increased as a result of developing a charge on the HA surface.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918061464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1742706109005042</els_id><sourcerecordid>733113895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-327296179101454a80dab0b93ba4a3dec11d5d1194c3ad6da2f48cbe106eba3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PxCAURYnR-P0PjOnOVSuv0BZcmJiJnzHRha4JhdfIpDOM0DGOv17qTOJOVxA4l8s7hJwALYBCfT4ttBla54uSUlkAFJSKLbIPohF5U9ViO-0bXuYNrWGPHMQ4pZQJKMUu2QMpgXMq9snDs-91cF96cH6e-S57W9ngP1d6kU4GvMju512_xLnBbLyPA_q213HIDPZ9tgi-dx2Gn_QR2el0H_F4sx6S15vrl8ld_vh0ez-5eswNr-SQs7IpZQ2NTFPwimtBrW5pK1mruWYWDYCtLIDkhmlbW112XJgWgdbYaqbZITlbv5va35cYBzVzcfyOnqNfRiVBpJF5zf8lG8YAmJBVIvmaNMHHGLBTi-BmOqwUUDXqVlO11q1G3QpAJd0pdropWLYztL-hjd8EXK4BTEI-HAYVjRttWhfQDMp693fDN8UYk3E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733113895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Polarization of hydroxyapatite: Influence on osteoblast cell proliferation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kumar, D. ; Gittings, J.P. ; Turner, I.G. ; Bowen, C.R. ; Bastida-Hidalgo, A. ; Cartmell, S.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, D. ; Gittings, J.P. ; Turner, I.G. ; Bowen, C.R. ; Bastida-Hidalgo, A. ; Cartmell, S.H.</creatorcontrib><description>Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been used clinically to treat bone defects. However, modifications of the surface properties of HA could improve and control bone matrix deposition and localized host tissue integration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of developing a surface charge on HA discs with respect to osteoblast activity in vitro. HA discs (12 mm × 2 mm) were sintered in either air or water vapour. The HA discs were then electrically polarized (positive and negative surfaces) or non-polarized (controls) and seeded with MC3T3-E1 cells. Polarized HA sintered in water vapour was shown to retain six times more charge than polarized HA sintered in air. Picogreen analysis demonstrated that at 4 h cell number was significantly higher on the negatively and positively charged HA surface (water sintered) in comparison to the non-charged water and air-sintered HA controls. At 7 days there was a significant increase in cell number on the negatively charged HA (air sintered) sample in comparison to the negatively charged water vapour sintered HA sample and the non-charged water vapour sintered control sample. Also at 7 days, the picogreen data showed a significant increase in cell number on the positively charged water-treated HA sample in comparison to both the air- and water-treated HA non-charged control HA samples. An alamarBlue assay at 7 days demonstrated significant cell metabolic activity on the charged surfaces (both positive and negative) in comparison to the non-charged HA and the tissue culture plastic controls. This study demonstrated that all of the HA discs tested supported cell viability/attachment. However, cell attachment/proliferation/metabolic activity was significantly increased as a result of developing a charge on the HA surface.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19914408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology ; Cell Line ; Cell Proliferation - drug effects ; Cell Survival - drug effects ; DNA - metabolism ; Durapatite - chemistry ; Durapatite - pharmacology ; Electrical properties ; Hydroxyapatite ; Mice ; Osteoblasts ; Osteoblasts - cytology ; Osteoblasts - drug effects ; Polarization ; Steam ; Surface charge</subject><ispartof>Acta biomaterialia, 2010-04, Vol.6 (4), p.1549-1554</ispartof><rights>2009 Acta Materialia Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2009 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-327296179101454a80dab0b93ba4a3dec11d5d1194c3ad6da2f48cbe106eba3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-327296179101454a80dab0b93ba4a3dec11d5d1194c3ad6da2f48cbe106eba3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706109005042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19914408$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gittings, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, I.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, C.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastida-Hidalgo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartmell, S.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Polarization of hydroxyapatite: Influence on osteoblast cell proliferation</title><title>Acta biomaterialia</title><addtitle>Acta Biomater</addtitle><description>Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been used clinically to treat bone defects. However, modifications of the surface properties of HA could improve and control bone matrix deposition and localized host tissue integration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of developing a surface charge on HA discs with respect to osteoblast activity in vitro. HA discs (12 mm × 2 mm) were sintered in either air or water vapour. The HA discs were then electrically polarized (positive and negative surfaces) or non-polarized (controls) and seeded with MC3T3-E1 cells. Polarized HA sintered in water vapour was shown to retain six times more charge than polarized HA sintered in air. Picogreen analysis demonstrated that at 4 h cell number was significantly higher on the negatively and positively charged HA surface (water sintered) in comparison to the non-charged water and air-sintered HA controls. At 7 days there was a significant increase in cell number on the negatively charged HA (air sintered) sample in comparison to the negatively charged water vapour sintered HA sample and the non-charged water vapour sintered control sample. Also at 7 days, the picogreen data showed a significant increase in cell number on the positively charged water-treated HA sample in comparison to both the air- and water-treated HA non-charged control HA samples. An alamarBlue assay at 7 days demonstrated significant cell metabolic activity on the charged surfaces (both positive and negative) in comparison to the non-charged HA and the tissue culture plastic controls. This study demonstrated that all of the HA discs tested supported cell viability/attachment. However, cell attachment/proliferation/metabolic activity was significantly increased as a result of developing a charge on the HA surface.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation - drug effects</subject><subject>Cell Survival - drug effects</subject><subject>DNA - metabolism</subject><subject>Durapatite - chemistry</subject><subject>Durapatite - pharmacology</subject><subject>Electrical properties</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Osteoblasts</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - cytology</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - drug effects</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Steam</subject><subject>Surface charge</subject><issn>1742-7061</issn><issn>1878-7568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PxCAURYnR-P0PjOnOVSuv0BZcmJiJnzHRha4JhdfIpDOM0DGOv17qTOJOVxA4l8s7hJwALYBCfT4ttBla54uSUlkAFJSKLbIPohF5U9ViO-0bXuYNrWGPHMQ4pZQJKMUu2QMpgXMq9snDs-91cF96cH6e-S57W9ngP1d6kU4GvMju512_xLnBbLyPA_q213HIDPZ9tgi-dx2Gn_QR2el0H_F4sx6S15vrl8ld_vh0ez-5eswNr-SQs7IpZQ2NTFPwimtBrW5pK1mruWYWDYCtLIDkhmlbW112XJgWgdbYaqbZITlbv5va35cYBzVzcfyOnqNfRiVBpJF5zf8lG8YAmJBVIvmaNMHHGLBTi-BmOqwUUDXqVlO11q1G3QpAJd0pdropWLYztL-hjd8EXK4BTEI-HAYVjRttWhfQDMp693fDN8UYk3E</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Kumar, D.</creator><creator>Gittings, J.P.</creator><creator>Turner, I.G.</creator><creator>Bowen, C.R.</creator><creator>Bastida-Hidalgo, A.</creator><creator>Cartmell, S.H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Polarization of hydroxyapatite: Influence on osteoblast cell proliferation</title><author>Kumar, D. ; Gittings, J.P. ; Turner, I.G. ; Bowen, C.R. ; Bastida-Hidalgo, A. ; Cartmell, S.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-327296179101454a80dab0b93ba4a3dec11d5d1194c3ad6da2f48cbe106eba3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation - drug effects</topic><topic>Cell Survival - drug effects</topic><topic>DNA - metabolism</topic><topic>Durapatite - chemistry</topic><topic>Durapatite - pharmacology</topic><topic>Electrical properties</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Osteoblasts</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - cytology</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - drug effects</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Steam</topic><topic>Surface charge</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gittings, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, I.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, C.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastida-Hidalgo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartmell, S.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Acta biomaterialia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, D.</au><au>Gittings, J.P.</au><au>Turner, I.G.</au><au>Bowen, C.R.</au><au>Bastida-Hidalgo, A.</au><au>Cartmell, S.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Polarization of hydroxyapatite: Influence on osteoblast cell proliferation</atitle><jtitle>Acta biomaterialia</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Biomater</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1549</spage><epage>1554</epage><pages>1549-1554</pages><issn>1742-7061</issn><eissn>1878-7568</eissn><abstract>Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been used clinically to treat bone defects. However, modifications of the surface properties of HA could improve and control bone matrix deposition and localized host tissue integration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of developing a surface charge on HA discs with respect to osteoblast activity in vitro. HA discs (12 mm × 2 mm) were sintered in either air or water vapour. The HA discs were then electrically polarized (positive and negative surfaces) or non-polarized (controls) and seeded with MC3T3-E1 cells. Polarized HA sintered in water vapour was shown to retain six times more charge than polarized HA sintered in air. Picogreen analysis demonstrated that at 4 h cell number was significantly higher on the negatively and positively charged HA surface (water sintered) in comparison to the non-charged water and air-sintered HA controls. At 7 days there was a significant increase in cell number on the negatively charged HA (air sintered) sample in comparison to the negatively charged water vapour sintered HA sample and the non-charged water vapour sintered control sample. Also at 7 days, the picogreen data showed a significant increase in cell number on the positively charged water-treated HA sample in comparison to both the air- and water-treated HA non-charged control HA samples. An alamarBlue assay at 7 days demonstrated significant cell metabolic activity on the charged surfaces (both positive and negative) in comparison to the non-charged HA and the tissue culture plastic controls. This study demonstrated that all of the HA discs tested supported cell viability/attachment. However, cell attachment/proliferation/metabolic activity was significantly increased as a result of developing a charge on the HA surface.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19914408</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-7061
ispartof Acta biomaterialia, 2010-04, Vol.6 (4), p.1549-1554
issn 1742-7061
1878-7568
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918061464
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Animals
Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology
Cell Line
Cell Proliferation - drug effects
Cell Survival - drug effects
DNA - metabolism
Durapatite - chemistry
Durapatite - pharmacology
Electrical properties
Hydroxyapatite
Mice
Osteoblasts
Osteoblasts - cytology
Osteoblasts - drug effects
Polarization
Steam
Surface charge
title Polarization of hydroxyapatite: Influence on osteoblast cell proliferation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A39%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Polarization%20of%20hydroxyapatite:%20Influence%20on%20osteoblast%20cell%20proliferation&rft.jtitle=Acta%20biomaterialia&rft.au=Kumar,%20D.&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1549&rft.epage=1554&rft.pages=1549-1554&rft.issn=1742-7061&rft.eissn=1878-7568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733113895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733113895&rft_id=info:pmid/19914408&rft_els_id=S1742706109005042&rfr_iscdi=true