Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response
Abstract Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biomaterials 2012-02, Vol.33 (6), p.1771-1781 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1781 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1771 |
container_title | Biomaterials |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Keane, Timothy J Londono, Ricardo Turner, Neill J Badylak, Stephen F |
description | Abstract Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result, the amount of retained cellular material varies widely among commercial products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of ineffective decellularization on the host response. Three different methods of decellularization were used to decellularize porcine small intestinal ECM (SIS-ECM). The amount of cell remnants was quantified by the amount and fragmentation of DNA within the scaffold materials. The M1/M2 phenotypic polarization profile of macrophages, activated in response to these ECM scaffolds, was assessed in vitro and in vivo using a rodent model of body wall repair. The results show that, in vitro , more aggressive decellularization is associated with a shift in macrophage phenotype predominance from M1 to M2. While this shift was not quantitatively apparent in vivo , notable differences were found in the distribution of M1 vs. M2 macrophages within the various scaffolds. A clear association between macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcome exists and effective decellularization remains an important component in the processing of ECM-based scaffolds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918050130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0142961211012580</els_id><sourcerecordid>912106437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e541f4789056fd16ab2593c42425884acdb07262777865a65f59bb2296ece10e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUsFu1DAUtBCIbgu_gCIunLK859hOwgEJLVCQKnEAJG6W4zxTL9l4sZNK5euxtQUhTj1ZlmfmjWceY88RtgioXu63gw8Hs1D0ZkpbDoj5YQtSPGAb7Nqulj3Ih2wDKHjdK-Rn7DylPeQ7CP6YnXGOTYtcbdi3XZgT_VxptpSq4Co_k3NkF39D1UiWpmmdTPS_zOLDXAB59hS-e1sla5wL05hpc7VcU3Ud0lJFSsci-YQ9ctkdPb07L9jX9---7D7UV58uP-7eXNVWKLXUJAU60XbZsHIjKjNw2TdWcMFl1wljxwFarnjbtp2SRkkn-2HgvFfZGwI1F-zFSfcYQ_5GWvTBp2LbzBTWpHvsQAI2cA8kR1CiaTPy1QlpY0gpktPH6A8m3moEXSrQe_1vBbpUUN5yBZn87G7MOhxo_Ev9k3kGvD0BKMdy4ynqZH3Jf_QxB6_H4O835_V_Mnbys7dm-kG3lPZhjXPhoE5cg_5clqHsAmbhnC00vwGlXrNr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912106437</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Keane, Timothy J ; Londono, Ricardo ; Turner, Neill J ; Badylak, Stephen F</creator><creatorcontrib>Keane, Timothy J ; Londono, Ricardo ; Turner, Neill J ; Badylak, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result, the amount of retained cellular material varies widely among commercial products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of ineffective decellularization on the host response. Three different methods of decellularization were used to decellularize porcine small intestinal ECM (SIS-ECM). The amount of cell remnants was quantified by the amount and fragmentation of DNA within the scaffold materials. The M1/M2 phenotypic polarization profile of macrophages, activated in response to these ECM scaffolds, was assessed in vitro and in vivo using a rodent model of body wall repair. The results show that, in vitro , more aggressive decellularization is associated with a shift in macrophage phenotype predominance from M1 to M2. While this shift was not quantitatively apparent in vivo , notable differences were found in the distribution of M1 vs. M2 macrophages within the various scaffolds. A clear association between macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcome exists and effective decellularization remains an important component in the processing of ECM-based scaffolds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-9612</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22137126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advanced Basic Science ; Animals ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Decellularization ; Dentistry ; DNA - metabolism ; Extracellular matrix ; Extracellular Matrix - metabolism ; Immune response ; Immune System ; Intestine, Small - cytology ; Macrophage ; Macrophages - cytology ; Materials Testing ; Mice ; Models, Biological ; Peracetic Acid - chemistry ; Phenotype ; Scaffold ; Swine ; Time Factors ; Tissue Engineering - methods ; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>Biomaterials, 2012-02, Vol.33 (6), p.1771-1781</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e541f4789056fd16ab2593c42425884acdb07262777865a65f59bb2296ece10e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e541f4789056fd16ab2593c42425884acdb07262777865a65f59bb2296ece10e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22137126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keane, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londono, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Neill J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badylak, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><title>Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response</title><title>Biomaterials</title><addtitle>Biomaterials</addtitle><description>Abstract Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result, the amount of retained cellular material varies widely among commercial products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of ineffective decellularization on the host response. Three different methods of decellularization were used to decellularize porcine small intestinal ECM (SIS-ECM). The amount of cell remnants was quantified by the amount and fragmentation of DNA within the scaffold materials. The M1/M2 phenotypic polarization profile of macrophages, activated in response to these ECM scaffolds, was assessed in vitro and in vivo using a rodent model of body wall repair. The results show that, in vitro , more aggressive decellularization is associated with a shift in macrophage phenotype predominance from M1 to M2. While this shift was not quantitatively apparent in vivo , notable differences were found in the distribution of M1 vs. M2 macrophages within the various scaffolds. A clear association between macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcome exists and effective decellularization remains an important component in the processing of ECM-based scaffolds.</description><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Decellularization</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>DNA - metabolism</subject><subject>Extracellular matrix</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix - metabolism</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immune System</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - cytology</subject><subject>Macrophage</subject><subject>Macrophages - cytology</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Peracetic Acid - chemistry</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Scaffold</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0142-9612</issn><issn>1878-5905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUsFu1DAUtBCIbgu_gCIunLK859hOwgEJLVCQKnEAJG6W4zxTL9l4sZNK5euxtQUhTj1ZlmfmjWceY88RtgioXu63gw8Hs1D0ZkpbDoj5YQtSPGAb7Nqulj3Ih2wDKHjdK-Rn7DylPeQ7CP6YnXGOTYtcbdi3XZgT_VxptpSq4Co_k3NkF39D1UiWpmmdTPS_zOLDXAB59hS-e1sla5wL05hpc7VcU3Ud0lJFSsci-YQ9ctkdPb07L9jX9---7D7UV58uP-7eXNVWKLXUJAU60XbZsHIjKjNw2TdWcMFl1wljxwFarnjbtp2SRkkn-2HgvFfZGwI1F-zFSfcYQ_5GWvTBp2LbzBTWpHvsQAI2cA8kR1CiaTPy1QlpY0gpktPH6A8m3moEXSrQe_1vBbpUUN5yBZn87G7MOhxo_Ev9k3kGvD0BKMdy4ynqZH3Jf_QxB6_H4O835_V_Mnbys7dm-kG3lPZhjXPhoE5cg_5clqHsAmbhnC00vwGlXrNr</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Keane, Timothy J</creator><creator>Londono, Ricardo</creator><creator>Turner, Neill J</creator><creator>Badylak, Stephen F</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response</title><author>Keane, Timothy J ; Londono, Ricardo ; Turner, Neill J ; Badylak, Stephen F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e541f4789056fd16ab2593c42425884acdb07262777865a65f59bb2296ece10e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Decellularization</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>DNA - metabolism</topic><topic>Extracellular matrix</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix - metabolism</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immune System</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - cytology</topic><topic>Macrophage</topic><topic>Macrophages - cytology</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Peracetic Acid - chemistry</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Scaffold</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - methods</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keane, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londono, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Neill J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badylak, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keane, Timothy J</au><au>Londono, Ricardo</au><au>Turner, Neill J</au><au>Badylak, Stephen F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response</atitle><jtitle>Biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>Biomaterials</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1771</spage><epage>1781</epage><pages>1771-1781</pages><issn>0142-9612</issn><eissn>1878-5905</eissn><abstract>Abstract Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result, the amount of retained cellular material varies widely among commercial products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of ineffective decellularization on the host response. Three different methods of decellularization were used to decellularize porcine small intestinal ECM (SIS-ECM). The amount of cell remnants was quantified by the amount and fragmentation of DNA within the scaffold materials. The M1/M2 phenotypic polarization profile of macrophages, activated in response to these ECM scaffolds, was assessed in vitro and in vivo using a rodent model of body wall repair. The results show that, in vitro , more aggressive decellularization is associated with a shift in macrophage phenotype predominance from M1 to M2. While this shift was not quantitatively apparent in vivo , notable differences were found in the distribution of M1 vs. M2 macrophages within the various scaffolds. A clear association between macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcome exists and effective decellularization remains an important component in the processing of ECM-based scaffolds.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22137126</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-9612 |
ispartof | Biomaterials, 2012-02, Vol.33 (6), p.1771-1781 |
issn | 0142-9612 1878-5905 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918050130 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Advanced Basic Science Animals Biocompatible Materials - chemistry Decellularization Dentistry DNA - metabolism Extracellular matrix Extracellular Matrix - metabolism Immune response Immune System Intestine, Small - cytology Macrophage Macrophages - cytology Materials Testing Mice Models, Biological Peracetic Acid - chemistry Phenotype Scaffold Swine Time Factors Tissue Engineering - methods Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry Wound Healing |
title | Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A00%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consequences%20of%20ineffective%20decellularization%20of%20biologic%20scaffolds%20on%20the%20host%20response&rft.jtitle=Biomaterials&rft.au=Keane,%20Timothy%20J&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1771&rft.epage=1781&rft.pages=1771-1781&rft.issn=0142-9612&rft.eissn=1878-5905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E912106437%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912106437&rft_id=info:pmid/22137126&rft_els_id=S0142961211012580&rfr_iscdi=true |