Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response

Abstract Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomaterials 2012-02, Vol.33 (6), p.1771-1781
Hauptverfasser: Keane, Timothy J, Londono, Ricardo, Turner, Neill J, Badylak, Stephen F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1781
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1771
container_title Biomaterials
container_volume 33
creator Keane, Timothy J
Londono, Ricardo
Turner, Neill J
Badylak, Stephen F
description Abstract Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result, the amount of retained cellular material varies widely among commercial products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of ineffective decellularization on the host response. Three different methods of decellularization were used to decellularize porcine small intestinal ECM (SIS-ECM). The amount of cell remnants was quantified by the amount and fragmentation of DNA within the scaffold materials. The M1/M2 phenotypic polarization profile of macrophages, activated in response to these ECM scaffolds, was assessed in vitro and in vivo using a rodent model of body wall repair. The results show that, in vitro , more aggressive decellularization is associated with a shift in macrophage phenotype predominance from M1 to M2. While this shift was not quantitatively apparent in vivo , notable differences were found in the distribution of M1 vs. M2 macrophages within the various scaffolds. A clear association between macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcome exists and effective decellularization remains an important component in the processing of ECM-based scaffolds.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918050130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0142961211012580</els_id><sourcerecordid>912106437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e541f4789056fd16ab2593c42425884acdb07262777865a65f59bb2296ece10e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUsFu1DAUtBCIbgu_gCIunLK859hOwgEJLVCQKnEAJG6W4zxTL9l4sZNK5euxtQUhTj1ZlmfmjWceY88RtgioXu63gw8Hs1D0ZkpbDoj5YQtSPGAb7Nqulj3Ih2wDKHjdK-Rn7DylPeQ7CP6YnXGOTYtcbdi3XZgT_VxptpSq4Co_k3NkF39D1UiWpmmdTPS_zOLDXAB59hS-e1sla5wL05hpc7VcU3Ud0lJFSsci-YQ9ctkdPb07L9jX9---7D7UV58uP-7eXNVWKLXUJAU60XbZsHIjKjNw2TdWcMFl1wljxwFarnjbtp2SRkkn-2HgvFfZGwI1F-zFSfcYQ_5GWvTBp2LbzBTWpHvsQAI2cA8kR1CiaTPy1QlpY0gpktPH6A8m3moEXSrQe_1vBbpUUN5yBZn87G7MOhxo_Ev9k3kGvD0BKMdy4ynqZH3Jf_QxB6_H4O835_V_Mnbys7dm-kG3lPZhjXPhoE5cg_5clqHsAmbhnC00vwGlXrNr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912106437</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Keane, Timothy J ; Londono, Ricardo ; Turner, Neill J ; Badylak, Stephen F</creator><creatorcontrib>Keane, Timothy J ; Londono, Ricardo ; Turner, Neill J ; Badylak, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result, the amount of retained cellular material varies widely among commercial products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of ineffective decellularization on the host response. Three different methods of decellularization were used to decellularize porcine small intestinal ECM (SIS-ECM). The amount of cell remnants was quantified by the amount and fragmentation of DNA within the scaffold materials. The M1/M2 phenotypic polarization profile of macrophages, activated in response to these ECM scaffolds, was assessed in vitro and in vivo using a rodent model of body wall repair. The results show that, in vitro , more aggressive decellularization is associated with a shift in macrophage phenotype predominance from M1 to M2. While this shift was not quantitatively apparent in vivo , notable differences were found in the distribution of M1 vs. M2 macrophages within the various scaffolds. A clear association between macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcome exists and effective decellularization remains an important component in the processing of ECM-based scaffolds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-9612</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22137126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advanced Basic Science ; Animals ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Decellularization ; Dentistry ; DNA - metabolism ; Extracellular matrix ; Extracellular Matrix - metabolism ; Immune response ; Immune System ; Intestine, Small - cytology ; Macrophage ; Macrophages - cytology ; Materials Testing ; Mice ; Models, Biological ; Peracetic Acid - chemistry ; Phenotype ; Scaffold ; Swine ; Time Factors ; Tissue Engineering - methods ; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>Biomaterials, 2012-02, Vol.33 (6), p.1771-1781</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e541f4789056fd16ab2593c42425884acdb07262777865a65f59bb2296ece10e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e541f4789056fd16ab2593c42425884acdb07262777865a65f59bb2296ece10e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22137126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keane, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londono, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Neill J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badylak, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><title>Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response</title><title>Biomaterials</title><addtitle>Biomaterials</addtitle><description>Abstract Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result, the amount of retained cellular material varies widely among commercial products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of ineffective decellularization on the host response. Three different methods of decellularization were used to decellularize porcine small intestinal ECM (SIS-ECM). The amount of cell remnants was quantified by the amount and fragmentation of DNA within the scaffold materials. The M1/M2 phenotypic polarization profile of macrophages, activated in response to these ECM scaffolds, was assessed in vitro and in vivo using a rodent model of body wall repair. The results show that, in vitro , more aggressive decellularization is associated with a shift in macrophage phenotype predominance from M1 to M2. While this shift was not quantitatively apparent in vivo , notable differences were found in the distribution of M1 vs. M2 macrophages within the various scaffolds. A clear association between macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcome exists and effective decellularization remains an important component in the processing of ECM-based scaffolds.</description><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Decellularization</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>DNA - metabolism</subject><subject>Extracellular matrix</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix - metabolism</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immune System</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - cytology</subject><subject>Macrophage</subject><subject>Macrophages - cytology</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Peracetic Acid - chemistry</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Scaffold</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0142-9612</issn><issn>1878-5905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUsFu1DAUtBCIbgu_gCIunLK859hOwgEJLVCQKnEAJG6W4zxTL9l4sZNK5euxtQUhTj1ZlmfmjWceY88RtgioXu63gw8Hs1D0ZkpbDoj5YQtSPGAb7Nqulj3Ih2wDKHjdK-Rn7DylPeQ7CP6YnXGOTYtcbdi3XZgT_VxptpSq4Co_k3NkF39D1UiWpmmdTPS_zOLDXAB59hS-e1sla5wL05hpc7VcU3Ud0lJFSsci-YQ9ctkdPb07L9jX9---7D7UV58uP-7eXNVWKLXUJAU60XbZsHIjKjNw2TdWcMFl1wljxwFarnjbtp2SRkkn-2HgvFfZGwI1F-zFSfcYQ_5GWvTBp2LbzBTWpHvsQAI2cA8kR1CiaTPy1QlpY0gpktPH6A8m3moEXSrQe_1vBbpUUN5yBZn87G7MOhxo_Ev9k3kGvD0BKMdy4ynqZH3Jf_QxB6_H4O835_V_Mnbys7dm-kG3lPZhjXPhoE5cg_5clqHsAmbhnC00vwGlXrNr</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Keane, Timothy J</creator><creator>Londono, Ricardo</creator><creator>Turner, Neill J</creator><creator>Badylak, Stephen F</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response</title><author>Keane, Timothy J ; Londono, Ricardo ; Turner, Neill J ; Badylak, Stephen F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e541f4789056fd16ab2593c42425884acdb07262777865a65f59bb2296ece10e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Decellularization</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>DNA - metabolism</topic><topic>Extracellular matrix</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix - metabolism</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immune System</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - cytology</topic><topic>Macrophage</topic><topic>Macrophages - cytology</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Peracetic Acid - chemistry</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Scaffold</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - methods</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keane, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londono, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Neill J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badylak, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keane, Timothy J</au><au>Londono, Ricardo</au><au>Turner, Neill J</au><au>Badylak, Stephen F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response</atitle><jtitle>Biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>Biomaterials</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1771</spage><epage>1781</epage><pages>1771-1781</pages><issn>0142-9612</issn><eissn>1878-5905</eissn><abstract>Abstract Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result, the amount of retained cellular material varies widely among commercial products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of ineffective decellularization on the host response. Three different methods of decellularization were used to decellularize porcine small intestinal ECM (SIS-ECM). The amount of cell remnants was quantified by the amount and fragmentation of DNA within the scaffold materials. The M1/M2 phenotypic polarization profile of macrophages, activated in response to these ECM scaffolds, was assessed in vitro and in vivo using a rodent model of body wall repair. The results show that, in vitro , more aggressive decellularization is associated with a shift in macrophage phenotype predominance from M1 to M2. While this shift was not quantitatively apparent in vivo , notable differences were found in the distribution of M1 vs. M2 macrophages within the various scaffolds. A clear association between macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcome exists and effective decellularization remains an important component in the processing of ECM-based scaffolds.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22137126</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-9612
ispartof Biomaterials, 2012-02, Vol.33 (6), p.1771-1781
issn 0142-9612
1878-5905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918050130
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Advanced Basic Science
Animals
Biocompatible Materials - chemistry
Decellularization
Dentistry
DNA - metabolism
Extracellular matrix
Extracellular Matrix - metabolism
Immune response
Immune System
Intestine, Small - cytology
Macrophage
Macrophages - cytology
Materials Testing
Mice
Models, Biological
Peracetic Acid - chemistry
Phenotype
Scaffold
Swine
Time Factors
Tissue Engineering - methods
Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry
Wound Healing
title Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A00%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consequences%20of%20ineffective%20decellularization%20of%20biologic%20scaffolds%20on%20the%20host%20response&rft.jtitle=Biomaterials&rft.au=Keane,%20Timothy%20J&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1771&rft.epage=1781&rft.pages=1771-1781&rft.issn=0142-9612&rft.eissn=1878-5905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E912106437%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912106437&rft_id=info:pmid/22137126&rft_els_id=S0142961211012580&rfr_iscdi=true