Biophysical Evaluation of Food Decontamination Effects on Tissue and Bacteria
Traditionally, the effects and efficiency of food surface decontamination processes, such as chlorine washing, radiation, or heating, have been evaluated by sensoric analysis and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts of surface swabs or carcass rinses. These methods suffice when determining probable cons...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food biophysics 2011-03, Vol.6 (1), p.170-182 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 182 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 170 |
container_title | Food biophysics |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Andersen, Ann Zahle Duelund, Lars Brewer, Jonathan Nielsen, Pia Kiil Birk, Tina Garde, Kristine Kallipolitis, Birgitte Krebs, Niels Bagatolli, Luis |
description | Traditionally, the effects and efficiency of food surface decontamination processes, such as chlorine washing, radiation, or heating, have been evaluated by sensoric analysis and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts of surface swabs or carcass rinses. These methods suffice when determining probable consumer responses or meeting legislative contamination limits. However, in the often very costly, optimization process of a new method, more quantitative and unbiased results are invaluable. In this study, we employed a biophysical approach for the investigation of qualitative and quantitative changes in both food surface and bacteria upon surface decontamination by SonoSteam®. SonoSteam® is a recently developed method of food surface decontamination, which employs steam and ultrasound for effective heat transfer and short treatment times, resulting in significant reduction in surface bacteria. We employ differential scanning calorimetry, second harmonics generation imaging microscopy, two-photon fluorescence microscopy, and green fluorescence protein-expressing bacteria and compare our results with those obtained by traditional methods of food quality and safety evaluations. Our results show that there are no contradictions between data obtained by either approach. However, the biophysical methods draw a much more nuanced picture of the effects and efficiency of the investigated decontamination method, revealing, e.g., an exponential dose/response relationship between SonoSteam® treatment time and changes in collagen I, and a depth dependency in bacterial reduction, which points toward CFU counts overestimating total bacterial reduction. In conclusion, the biophysical methods provide a less biased, reproducible, and highly detailed system description, allowing for focused optimization and method validation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11483-011-9205-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918047157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2260264831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-cb5a84a9570151c3ba11e243ca5fe9636359de5c97e94a7755af5cd7579bf5943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYso-PwBrixuXFVzm9ymWfoYH6C4cGYd7mQSjXSaMWmF-fd2qCi4cHUPl-8cDifLjoGdA2PyIgGImhcMoFAlw0JsZXuAKAuoq2r7R2O9m-2n9M6YEKJie9nTlQ-rt3Xyhpp88klNT50PbR5cfhvCIr-xJrQdLX07_ifOWdOlfJBTn1Jvc2oX-RWZzkZPh9mOoybZo-97kM1uJ9Pr--Lx-e7h-vKxMFxCV5g5Ui1IoWSAYPicAGwpuCF0VlW84qgWFo2SVgmSEpEcmoVEqeYOleAH2dmYu4rho7ep00ufjG0aam3ok1ZQMyEB5UCe_iHfQx_boZyuhapKXtc4QDBCJoaUonV6Ff2S4loD05t59TivHubVm3n1pkI5etLAtq82_gb_ZzoZTY6Cptfok569lAw4AyUAFONfnHeFOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>849623885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biophysical Evaluation of Food Decontamination Effects on Tissue and Bacteria</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Andersen, Ann Zahle ; Duelund, Lars ; Brewer, Jonathan ; Nielsen, Pia Kiil ; Birk, Tina ; Garde, Kristine ; Kallipolitis, Birgitte ; Krebs, Niels ; Bagatolli, Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Ann Zahle ; Duelund, Lars ; Brewer, Jonathan ; Nielsen, Pia Kiil ; Birk, Tina ; Garde, Kristine ; Kallipolitis, Birgitte ; Krebs, Niels ; Bagatolli, Luis</creatorcontrib><description>Traditionally, the effects and efficiency of food surface decontamination processes, such as chlorine washing, radiation, or heating, have been evaluated by sensoric analysis and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts of surface swabs or carcass rinses. These methods suffice when determining probable consumer responses or meeting legislative contamination limits. However, in the often very costly, optimization process of a new method, more quantitative and unbiased results are invaluable. In this study, we employed a biophysical approach for the investigation of qualitative and quantitative changes in both food surface and bacteria upon surface decontamination by SonoSteam®. SonoSteam® is a recently developed method of food surface decontamination, which employs steam and ultrasound for effective heat transfer and short treatment times, resulting in significant reduction in surface bacteria. We employ differential scanning calorimetry, second harmonics generation imaging microscopy, two-photon fluorescence microscopy, and green fluorescence protein-expressing bacteria and compare our results with those obtained by traditional methods of food quality and safety evaluations. Our results show that there are no contradictions between data obtained by either approach. However, the biophysical methods draw a much more nuanced picture of the effects and efficiency of the investigated decontamination method, revealing, e.g., an exponential dose/response relationship between SonoSteam® treatment time and changes in collagen I, and a depth dependency in bacterial reduction, which points toward CFU counts overestimating total bacterial reduction. In conclusion, the biophysical methods provide a less biased, reproducible, and highly detailed system description, allowing for focused optimization and method validation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1557-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-1866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11483-011-9205-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Boston : Springer US</publisher><subject>Analytical Chemistry ; Bacteria ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biophysics ; Calorimetry ; Campylobacter jejuni ; Carcasses ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chlorine ; collagen ; Collagen (type I) ; Colony-forming cells ; Consumers ; Data processing ; Decontamination ; Differential scanning calorimetry ; Escherichia coli ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescence microscopy ; Food ; Food analysis ; Food contamination ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Food processing ; Food quality ; Food safety ; Food Science ; Heat transfer ; imaging ; Listeria monocytogenes ; Microscopy ; Original Article ; Radiation ; Second-harmonic generation imaging microscopy ; Steam ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Food biophysics, 2011-03, Vol.6 (1), p.170-182</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-cb5a84a9570151c3ba11e243ca5fe9636359de5c97e94a7755af5cd7579bf5943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-cb5a84a9570151c3ba11e243ca5fe9636359de5c97e94a7755af5cd7579bf5943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11483-011-9205-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11483-011-9205-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Ann Zahle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duelund, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Pia Kiil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birk, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garde, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallipolitis, Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagatolli, Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Biophysical Evaluation of Food Decontamination Effects on Tissue and Bacteria</title><title>Food biophysics</title><addtitle>Food Biophysics</addtitle><description>Traditionally, the effects and efficiency of food surface decontamination processes, such as chlorine washing, radiation, or heating, have been evaluated by sensoric analysis and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts of surface swabs or carcass rinses. These methods suffice when determining probable consumer responses or meeting legislative contamination limits. However, in the often very costly, optimization process of a new method, more quantitative and unbiased results are invaluable. In this study, we employed a biophysical approach for the investigation of qualitative and quantitative changes in both food surface and bacteria upon surface decontamination by SonoSteam®. SonoSteam® is a recently developed method of food surface decontamination, which employs steam and ultrasound for effective heat transfer and short treatment times, resulting in significant reduction in surface bacteria. We employ differential scanning calorimetry, second harmonics generation imaging microscopy, two-photon fluorescence microscopy, and green fluorescence protein-expressing bacteria and compare our results with those obtained by traditional methods of food quality and safety evaluations. Our results show that there are no contradictions between data obtained by either approach. However, the biophysical methods draw a much more nuanced picture of the effects and efficiency of the investigated decontamination method, revealing, e.g., an exponential dose/response relationship between SonoSteam® treatment time and changes in collagen I, and a depth dependency in bacterial reduction, which points toward CFU counts overestimating total bacterial reduction. In conclusion, the biophysical methods provide a less biased, reproducible, and highly detailed system description, allowing for focused optimization and method validation.</description><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Calorimetry</subject><subject>Campylobacter jejuni</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>collagen</subject><subject>Collagen (type I)</subject><subject>Colony-forming cells</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Differential scanning calorimetry</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescence microscopy</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food analysis</subject><subject>Food contamination</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Food processing</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>imaging</subject><subject>Listeria monocytogenes</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Second-harmonic generation imaging microscopy</subject><subject>Steam</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1557-1858</issn><issn>1557-1866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYso-PwBrixuXFVzm9ymWfoYH6C4cGYd7mQSjXSaMWmF-fd2qCi4cHUPl-8cDifLjoGdA2PyIgGImhcMoFAlw0JsZXuAKAuoq2r7R2O9m-2n9M6YEKJie9nTlQ-rt3Xyhpp88klNT50PbR5cfhvCIr-xJrQdLX07_ifOWdOlfJBTn1Jvc2oX-RWZzkZPh9mOoybZo-97kM1uJ9Pr--Lx-e7h-vKxMFxCV5g5Ui1IoWSAYPicAGwpuCF0VlW84qgWFo2SVgmSEpEcmoVEqeYOleAH2dmYu4rho7ep00ufjG0aam3ok1ZQMyEB5UCe_iHfQx_boZyuhapKXtc4QDBCJoaUonV6Ff2S4loD05t59TivHubVm3n1pkI5etLAtq82_gb_ZzoZTY6Cptfok569lAw4AyUAFONfnHeFOQ</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Andersen, Ann Zahle</creator><creator>Duelund, Lars</creator><creator>Brewer, Jonathan</creator><creator>Nielsen, Pia Kiil</creator><creator>Birk, Tina</creator><creator>Garde, Kristine</creator><creator>Kallipolitis, Birgitte</creator><creator>Krebs, Niels</creator><creator>Bagatolli, Luis</creator><general>Boston : Springer US</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Biophysical Evaluation of Food Decontamination Effects on Tissue and Bacteria</title><author>Andersen, Ann Zahle ; Duelund, Lars ; Brewer, Jonathan ; Nielsen, Pia Kiil ; Birk, Tina ; Garde, Kristine ; Kallipolitis, Birgitte ; Krebs, Niels ; Bagatolli, Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-cb5a84a9570151c3ba11e243ca5fe9636359de5c97e94a7755af5cd7579bf5943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Calorimetry</topic><topic>Campylobacter jejuni</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>collagen</topic><topic>Collagen (type I)</topic><topic>Colony-forming cells</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Differential scanning calorimetry</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescence microscopy</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food analysis</topic><topic>Food contamination</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Food processing</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>imaging</topic><topic>Listeria monocytogenes</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Second-harmonic generation imaging microscopy</topic><topic>Steam</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Ann Zahle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duelund, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Pia Kiil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birk, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garde, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallipolitis, Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagatolli, Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><jtitle>Food biophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersen, Ann Zahle</au><au>Duelund, Lars</au><au>Brewer, Jonathan</au><au>Nielsen, Pia Kiil</au><au>Birk, Tina</au><au>Garde, Kristine</au><au>Kallipolitis, Birgitte</au><au>Krebs, Niels</au><au>Bagatolli, Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biophysical Evaluation of Food Decontamination Effects on Tissue and Bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Food biophysics</jtitle><stitle>Food Biophysics</stitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>170-182</pages><issn>1557-1858</issn><eissn>1557-1866</eissn><abstract>Traditionally, the effects and efficiency of food surface decontamination processes, such as chlorine washing, radiation, or heating, have been evaluated by sensoric analysis and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts of surface swabs or carcass rinses. These methods suffice when determining probable consumer responses or meeting legislative contamination limits. However, in the often very costly, optimization process of a new method, more quantitative and unbiased results are invaluable. In this study, we employed a biophysical approach for the investigation of qualitative and quantitative changes in both food surface and bacteria upon surface decontamination by SonoSteam®. SonoSteam® is a recently developed method of food surface decontamination, which employs steam and ultrasound for effective heat transfer and short treatment times, resulting in significant reduction in surface bacteria. We employ differential scanning calorimetry, second harmonics generation imaging microscopy, two-photon fluorescence microscopy, and green fluorescence protein-expressing bacteria and compare our results with those obtained by traditional methods of food quality and safety evaluations. Our results show that there are no contradictions between data obtained by either approach. However, the biophysical methods draw a much more nuanced picture of the effects and efficiency of the investigated decontamination method, revealing, e.g., an exponential dose/response relationship between SonoSteam® treatment time and changes in collagen I, and a depth dependency in bacterial reduction, which points toward CFU counts overestimating total bacterial reduction. In conclusion, the biophysical methods provide a less biased, reproducible, and highly detailed system description, allowing for focused optimization and method validation.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Boston : Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11483-011-9205-4</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1557-1858 |
ispartof | Food biophysics, 2011-03, Vol.6 (1), p.170-182 |
issn | 1557-1858 1557-1866 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918047157 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Analytical Chemistry Bacteria Biological and Medical Physics Biophysics Calorimetry Campylobacter jejuni Carcasses Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Chlorine collagen Collagen (type I) Colony-forming cells Consumers Data processing Decontamination Differential scanning calorimetry Escherichia coli Fluorescence Fluorescence microscopy Food Food analysis Food contamination Food contamination & poisoning Food processing Food quality Food safety Food Science Heat transfer imaging Listeria monocytogenes Microscopy Original Article Radiation Second-harmonic generation imaging microscopy Steam Ultrasound |
title | Biophysical Evaluation of Food Decontamination Effects on Tissue and Bacteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A32%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biophysical%20Evaluation%20of%20Food%20Decontamination%20Effects%20on%20Tissue%20and%20Bacteria&rft.jtitle=Food%20biophysics&rft.au=Andersen,%20Ann%20Zahle&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=170-182&rft.issn=1557-1858&rft.eissn=1557-1866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11483-011-9205-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2260264831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=849623885&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |