Time to change how we describe biodiversity

Taxonomists are arguably the most active annotators of the natural world, collecting and publishing millions of phenotype data annually through descriptions of new taxa. By formalizing these data, preferably as they are collected, taxonomists stand to contribute a data set with research potential th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2012-02, Vol.27 (2), p.78-84
Hauptverfasser: Deans, Andrew R., Yoder, Matthew J., Balhoff, James P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 2
container_start_page 78
container_title Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)
container_volume 27
creator Deans, Andrew R.
Yoder, Matthew J.
Balhoff, James P.
description Taxonomists are arguably the most active annotators of the natural world, collecting and publishing millions of phenotype data annually through descriptions of new taxa. By formalizing these data, preferably as they are collected, taxonomists stand to contribute a data set with research potential that rivals or even surpasses genomics. Over a decade of electronic innovation and debate has initiated a revolution in the way that the biodiversity is described. Here, we opine that a new generation of semantically based digital scaffolding, presently in various stages of completeness, and a commitment by taxonomists and their colleagues to undertake this transformation, are required to complete the taxonomic revolution and critically broaden the relevance of its products.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917857573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169534711003302</els_id><sourcerecordid>917857573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-f9788aa0244813ceb3681090e06cc3397b114280920eea0212c00de676a389b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gAfZmwfZdZLsbhLwIsUvKHip55DNTm1Kt6nJ1tJ_b0qrR4eBuTzvC_MQck2hoEDr-0XRB8SCAaVFWgBxQoZUCpZLLvkpGSZI5RUvxYBcxLiANKpU52TAGJWKV2pI7qauw6z3mZ2b1Sdmc7_Ntpi1GG1wDWaN8637xhBdv7skZzOzjHh1vCPy8fw0Hb_mk_eXt_HjJLdlXfX5TAkpjQFWlpJyiw2vJQUFCLW1nCvRUFoyCYoBYsIoswAt1qI2XKpG8BG5PfSug__aYOx156LF5dKs0G-iVlTISlSCJ5IdSBt8jAFneh1cZ8JOU9B7R3qh94703pFOmxyl0M2xftN02P5FfqUk4OEAYHry22HQ0TpcWWxdQNvr1rv_-n8AftR1cQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>917857573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Time to change how we describe biodiversity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Deans, Andrew R. ; Yoder, Matthew J. ; Balhoff, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Deans, Andrew R. ; Yoder, Matthew J. ; Balhoff, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>Taxonomists are arguably the most active annotators of the natural world, collecting and publishing millions of phenotype data annually through descriptions of new taxa. By formalizing these data, preferably as they are collected, taxonomists stand to contribute a data set with research potential that rivals or even surpasses genomics. Over a decade of electronic innovation and debate has initiated a revolution in the way that the biodiversity is described. Here, we opine that a new generation of semantically based digital scaffolding, presently in various stages of completeness, and a commitment by taxonomists and their colleagues to undertake this transformation, are required to complete the taxonomic revolution and critically broaden the relevance of its products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22189359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Classification - methods ; Phenotype ; Phylogeny ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam), 2012-02, Vol.27 (2), p.78-84</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-f9788aa0244813ceb3681090e06cc3397b114280920eea0212c00de676a389b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-f9788aa0244813ceb3681090e06cc3397b114280920eea0212c00de676a389b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534711003302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22189359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deans, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoder, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balhoff, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>Time to change how we describe biodiversity</title><title>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Taxonomists are arguably the most active annotators of the natural world, collecting and publishing millions of phenotype data annually through descriptions of new taxa. By formalizing these data, preferably as they are collected, taxonomists stand to contribute a data set with research potential that rivals or even surpasses genomics. Over a decade of electronic innovation and debate has initiated a revolution in the way that the biodiversity is described. Here, we opine that a new generation of semantically based digital scaffolding, presently in various stages of completeness, and a commitment by taxonomists and their colleagues to undertake this transformation, are required to complete the taxonomic revolution and critically broaden the relevance of its products.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Classification - methods</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>0169-5347</issn><issn>1872-8383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gAfZmwfZdZLsbhLwIsUvKHip55DNTm1Kt6nJ1tJ_b0qrR4eBuTzvC_MQck2hoEDr-0XRB8SCAaVFWgBxQoZUCpZLLvkpGSZI5RUvxYBcxLiANKpU52TAGJWKV2pI7qauw6z3mZ2b1Sdmc7_Ntpi1GG1wDWaN8637xhBdv7skZzOzjHh1vCPy8fw0Hb_mk_eXt_HjJLdlXfX5TAkpjQFWlpJyiw2vJQUFCLW1nCvRUFoyCYoBYsIoswAt1qI2XKpG8BG5PfSug__aYOx156LF5dKs0G-iVlTISlSCJ5IdSBt8jAFneh1cZ8JOU9B7R3qh94703pFOmxyl0M2xftN02P5FfqUk4OEAYHry22HQ0TpcWWxdQNvr1rv_-n8AftR1cQ</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Deans, Andrew R.</creator><creator>Yoder, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Balhoff, James P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Time to change how we describe biodiversity</title><author>Deans, Andrew R. ; Yoder, Matthew J. ; Balhoff, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-f9788aa0244813ceb3681090e06cc3397b114280920eea0212c00de676a389b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Classification - methods</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deans, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoder, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balhoff, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deans, Andrew R.</au><au>Yoder, Matthew J.</au><au>Balhoff, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Time to change how we describe biodiversity</atitle><jtitle>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>78-84</pages><issn>0169-5347</issn><eissn>1872-8383</eissn><abstract>Taxonomists are arguably the most active annotators of the natural world, collecting and publishing millions of phenotype data annually through descriptions of new taxa. By formalizing these data, preferably as they are collected, taxonomists stand to contribute a data set with research potential that rivals or even surpasses genomics. Over a decade of electronic innovation and debate has initiated a revolution in the way that the biodiversity is described. Here, we opine that a new generation of semantically based digital scaffolding, presently in various stages of completeness, and a commitment by taxonomists and their colleagues to undertake this transformation, are required to complete the taxonomic revolution and critically broaden the relevance of its products.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22189359</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-5347
ispartof Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2012-02, Vol.27 (2), p.78-84
issn 0169-5347
1872-8383
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917857573
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biodiversity
Classification - methods
Phenotype
Phylogeny
Species Specificity
title Time to change how we describe biodiversity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A09%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time%20to%20change%20how%20we%20describe%20biodiversity&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20ecology%20&%20evolution%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Deans,%20Andrew%20R.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=78-84&rft.issn=0169-5347&rft.eissn=1872-8383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E917857573%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=917857573&rft_id=info:pmid/22189359&rft_els_id=S0169534711003302&rfr_iscdi=true