The implementation of a global fund grant in Lesotho: Applying a framework on knowledge absorptive capacity

One of the biggest challenges in scaling up health interventions in sub-Saharan Africa for government recipients is to effectively manage the rapid influx of aid from different donors, each with its own requirements and conditions. However, there is little empirical evidence on how governments absor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science & medicine (1982) 2012-02, Vol.74 (3), p.381-389
Hauptverfasser: Biesma, Regien, Makoa, Elsie, Mpemi, Regina, Tsekoa, Lineo, Odonkor, Philip, Brugha, Ruairi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 389
container_issue 3
container_start_page 381
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 74
creator Biesma, Regien
Makoa, Elsie
Mpemi, Regina
Tsekoa, Lineo
Odonkor, Philip
Brugha, Ruairi
description One of the biggest challenges in scaling up health interventions in sub-Saharan Africa for government recipients is to effectively manage the rapid influx of aid from different donors, each with its own requirements and conditions. However, there is little empirical evidence on how governments absorb knowledge from new donors in order to satisfy their requirements. This case study applies Cuellar and Gallivan’s (2006) framework on knowledge absorptive capacity (AC) to illustrate how recipient government organisations in Lesotho identified, assimilated and utilised knowledge on how to meet the disbursement and reporting requirements of Lesotho’s Round 5 grant from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria (Global Fund). In-depth topic guided interviews with 22 respondents and document reviews were conducted between July 2008 and February 2009. Analysis focused on six organisational determinants that affect an organisation’s absorptive capacity: prior-related knowledge, combinative capabilities, motivation, organisational structure, cultural match, and communication channels. Absorptive capacity was mostly evident at the level of the Principal Recipient, the Ministry of Finance, who established a new organisational unit to meet the requirements of Global Fund Grants, while the level of AC was less advanced among the Ministry of Health (Sub-Recipient) and district level implementers. Recipient organisations can increase their absorptive capacity, not only through prior knowledge of donor requirements, but also by deliberately changing their organisational form and through combinative capabilities. The study also revealed how vulnerable African governments are to loss of staff capacity. The application of organisational theory to analyse the interactions of donor agencies with public and non-public country stakeholders illustrates the complexity of the environment that aid recipient governments have to manage. ▸ Knowledge absorptive capacity frameworks can help explain how recipient governments manage donor aid requirements and conditions. ▸ Organisational determinants moderate the of recipient organisations to effectively deliver donor-funded health programmes. ▸ Principal recipients, sub-recipients and sub-sub recipients in Lesotho differed in their capacity to absorb knowledge needed to meet the requirements related to the implementation of Global Fund Grants. ▸ Government ministries, when confronted with new and complex donor requirements, need to deve
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917856846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953611004850</els_id><sourcerecordid>917856846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-7a226d19bbcafdef1c7bae9318d123e592c356042698714646250543691d0a9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0k1vEzEQBuAVAtFQ-AtgISG4JPjb696iii8pEpdytrze2dTJrr3Yu63y73GUFCQO0JMPfua1NTNV9YbgFcFEftytcnTZ-QHaFcWErLBaYYqfVAtSK7YUjKun1QJTpZZaMHlRvch5hzEmuGbPqwtKNFZc8UW1v7kF5IexhwHCZCcfA4odsmjbx8b2qJtDi7bJhgn5gDaQ43Qbr9B6HPuDD9sCu2QHuI9pj0rpPsT7HtotINvkmMbJ3wFydrTOT4eX1bPO9hlenc_L6sfnTzfXX5eb71--Xa83SyeonJbKUipbopvG2a6FjjjVWNCM1C2hDISmjgmJOZW6VoRLLqnAgjOpSYutduyyen_KHVP8OUOezOCzg763AeKcjSaqFrLmssgP_5SEKcZpzah4JJWaPYJiIriUmOFC3_5Fd3FOoXTHaEoYI4qTgtQJuRRzTtCZMfnBpkNJOoZJszO_18Ec18FgZco6lMrX5_i5Od491D3Mv4B3Z2Czs32ZZXA-_3GCa03p0a1PDsrc7jwkU16D4KD1Cdxk2uj_-5lfdRfVTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921331741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The implementation of a global fund grant in Lesotho: Applying a framework on knowledge absorptive capacity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Biesma, Regien ; Makoa, Elsie ; Mpemi, Regina ; Tsekoa, Lineo ; Odonkor, Philip ; Brugha, Ruairi</creator><creatorcontrib>Biesma, Regien ; Makoa, Elsie ; Mpemi, Regina ; Tsekoa, Lineo ; Odonkor, Philip ; Brugha, Ruairi</creatorcontrib><description>One of the biggest challenges in scaling up health interventions in sub-Saharan Africa for government recipients is to effectively manage the rapid influx of aid from different donors, each with its own requirements and conditions. However, there is little empirical evidence on how governments absorb knowledge from new donors in order to satisfy their requirements. This case study applies Cuellar and Gallivan’s (2006) framework on knowledge absorptive capacity (AC) to illustrate how recipient government organisations in Lesotho identified, assimilated and utilised knowledge on how to meet the disbursement and reporting requirements of Lesotho’s Round 5 grant from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria (Global Fund). In-depth topic guided interviews with 22 respondents and document reviews were conducted between July 2008 and February 2009. Analysis focused on six organisational determinants that affect an organisation’s absorptive capacity: prior-related knowledge, combinative capabilities, motivation, organisational structure, cultural match, and communication channels. Absorptive capacity was mostly evident at the level of the Principal Recipient, the Ministry of Finance, who established a new organisational unit to meet the requirements of Global Fund Grants, while the level of AC was less advanced among the Ministry of Health (Sub-Recipient) and district level implementers. Recipient organisations can increase their absorptive capacity, not only through prior knowledge of donor requirements, but also by deliberately changing their organisational form and through combinative capabilities. The study also revealed how vulnerable African governments are to loss of staff capacity. The application of organisational theory to analyse the interactions of donor agencies with public and non-public country stakeholders illustrates the complexity of the environment that aid recipient governments have to manage. ▸ Knowledge absorptive capacity frameworks can help explain how recipient governments manage donor aid requirements and conditions. ▸ Organisational determinants moderate the of recipient organisations to effectively deliver donor-funded health programmes. ▸ Principal recipients, sub-recipients and sub-sub recipients in Lesotho differed in their capacity to absorb knowledge needed to meet the requirements related to the implementation of Global Fund Grants. ▸ Government ministries, when confronted with new and complex donor requirements, need to develop flexible organisational forms and coordination capabilities. ▸ African governments are particularly vulnerable to loss of trained staff, undermining organisational knowledge and capacity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21907474</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Absorptive capacity ; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - economics ; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - prevention &amp; control ; Aid donors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Financing, Organized - organization &amp; administration ; Funds ; Global health ; Governance ; Government Agencies ; Government aid ; Grants ; Health Care Costs ; Health Care Services ; Health Care Services Policy ; Health policy ; HIV ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Immunodeficiencies ; Immunodeficiencies. Immunoglobulinopathies ; Immunopathology ; Implementation ; Infectious diseases ; International Cooperation ; Intervention ; Knowledge ; Lesotho ; Malaria - economics ; Malaria - prevention &amp; control ; Medical sciences ; Methodology (Data Collection) ; Miscellaneous ; Models, Theoretical ; Organisation science ; Organization theory ; Organizational structure ; Policy implementation ; Public Health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Qualitative Research ; Scale up health interventions ; Sub-Saharan Africa ; Tuberculosis - economics ; Tuberculosis - prevention &amp; control ; United States ; Viral diseases ; Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 2012-02, Vol.74 (3), p.381-389</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Feb 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-7a226d19bbcafdef1c7bae9318d123e592c356042698714646250543691d0a9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-7a226d19bbcafdef1c7bae9318d123e592c356042698714646250543691d0a9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953611004850$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,33751,33752,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25499224$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biesma, Regien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makoa, Elsie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mpemi, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsekoa, Lineo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odonkor, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugha, Ruairi</creatorcontrib><title>The implementation of a global fund grant in Lesotho: Applying a framework on knowledge absorptive capacity</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>One of the biggest challenges in scaling up health interventions in sub-Saharan Africa for government recipients is to effectively manage the rapid influx of aid from different donors, each with its own requirements and conditions. However, there is little empirical evidence on how governments absorb knowledge from new donors in order to satisfy their requirements. This case study applies Cuellar and Gallivan’s (2006) framework on knowledge absorptive capacity (AC) to illustrate how recipient government organisations in Lesotho identified, assimilated and utilised knowledge on how to meet the disbursement and reporting requirements of Lesotho’s Round 5 grant from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria (Global Fund). In-depth topic guided interviews with 22 respondents and document reviews were conducted between July 2008 and February 2009. Analysis focused on six organisational determinants that affect an organisation’s absorptive capacity: prior-related knowledge, combinative capabilities, motivation, organisational structure, cultural match, and communication channels. Absorptive capacity was mostly evident at the level of the Principal Recipient, the Ministry of Finance, who established a new organisational unit to meet the requirements of Global Fund Grants, while the level of AC was less advanced among the Ministry of Health (Sub-Recipient) and district level implementers. Recipient organisations can increase their absorptive capacity, not only through prior knowledge of donor requirements, but also by deliberately changing their organisational form and through combinative capabilities. The study also revealed how vulnerable African governments are to loss of staff capacity. The application of organisational theory to analyse the interactions of donor agencies with public and non-public country stakeholders illustrates the complexity of the environment that aid recipient governments have to manage. ▸ Knowledge absorptive capacity frameworks can help explain how recipient governments manage donor aid requirements and conditions. ▸ Organisational determinants moderate the of recipient organisations to effectively deliver donor-funded health programmes. ▸ Principal recipients, sub-recipients and sub-sub recipients in Lesotho differed in their capacity to absorb knowledge needed to meet the requirements related to the implementation of Global Fund Grants. ▸ Government ministries, when confronted with new and complex donor requirements, need to develop flexible organisational forms and coordination capabilities. ▸ African governments are particularly vulnerable to loss of trained staff, undermining organisational knowledge and capacity.</description><subject>Absorptive capacity</subject><subject>Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - economics</subject><subject>Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Aid donors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Financing, Organized - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Funds</subject><subject>Global health</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government Agencies</subject><subject>Government aid</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Health Care Services Policy</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunodeficiencies</subject><subject>Immunodeficiencies. Immunoglobulinopathies</subject><subject>Immunopathology</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Lesotho</subject><subject>Malaria - economics</subject><subject>Malaria - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Collection)</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Organisation science</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Scale up health interventions</subject><subject>Sub-Saharan Africa</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - economics</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0k1vEzEQBuAVAtFQ-AtgISG4JPjb696iii8pEpdytrze2dTJrr3Yu63y73GUFCQO0JMPfua1NTNV9YbgFcFEftytcnTZ-QHaFcWErLBaYYqfVAtSK7YUjKun1QJTpZZaMHlRvch5hzEmuGbPqwtKNFZc8UW1v7kF5IexhwHCZCcfA4odsmjbx8b2qJtDi7bJhgn5gDaQ43Qbr9B6HPuDD9sCu2QHuI9pj0rpPsT7HtotINvkmMbJ3wFydrTOT4eX1bPO9hlenc_L6sfnTzfXX5eb71--Xa83SyeonJbKUipbopvG2a6FjjjVWNCM1C2hDISmjgmJOZW6VoRLLqnAgjOpSYutduyyen_KHVP8OUOezOCzg763AeKcjSaqFrLmssgP_5SEKcZpzah4JJWaPYJiIriUmOFC3_5Fd3FOoXTHaEoYI4qTgtQJuRRzTtCZMfnBpkNJOoZJszO_18Ec18FgZco6lMrX5_i5Od491D3Mv4B3Z2Czs32ZZXA-_3GCa03p0a1PDsrc7jwkU16D4KD1Cdxk2uj_-5lfdRfVTg</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Biesma, Regien</creator><creator>Makoa, Elsie</creator><creator>Mpemi, Regina</creator><creator>Tsekoa, Lineo</creator><creator>Odonkor, Philip</creator><creator>Brugha, Ruairi</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>The implementation of a global fund grant in Lesotho: Applying a framework on knowledge absorptive capacity</title><author>Biesma, Regien ; Makoa, Elsie ; Mpemi, Regina ; Tsekoa, Lineo ; Odonkor, Philip ; Brugha, Ruairi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-7a226d19bbcafdef1c7bae9318d123e592c356042698714646250543691d0a9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Absorptive capacity</topic><topic>Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - economics</topic><topic>Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Aid donors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Financing, Organized - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Funds</topic><topic>Global health</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government Agencies</topic><topic>Government aid</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Health Care Services Policy</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunodeficiencies</topic><topic>Immunodeficiencies. Immunoglobulinopathies</topic><topic>Immunopathology</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Lesotho</topic><topic>Malaria - economics</topic><topic>Malaria - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Collection)</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Organisation science</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Scale up health interventions</topic><topic>Sub-Saharan Africa</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - economics</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biesma, Regien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makoa, Elsie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mpemi, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsekoa, Lineo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odonkor, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugha, Ruairi</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biesma, Regien</au><au>Makoa, Elsie</au><au>Mpemi, Regina</au><au>Tsekoa, Lineo</au><au>Odonkor, Philip</au><au>Brugha, Ruairi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The implementation of a global fund grant in Lesotho: Applying a framework on knowledge absorptive capacity</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>381-389</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>One of the biggest challenges in scaling up health interventions in sub-Saharan Africa for government recipients is to effectively manage the rapid influx of aid from different donors, each with its own requirements and conditions. However, there is little empirical evidence on how governments absorb knowledge from new donors in order to satisfy their requirements. This case study applies Cuellar and Gallivan’s (2006) framework on knowledge absorptive capacity (AC) to illustrate how recipient government organisations in Lesotho identified, assimilated and utilised knowledge on how to meet the disbursement and reporting requirements of Lesotho’s Round 5 grant from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria (Global Fund). In-depth topic guided interviews with 22 respondents and document reviews were conducted between July 2008 and February 2009. Analysis focused on six organisational determinants that affect an organisation’s absorptive capacity: prior-related knowledge, combinative capabilities, motivation, organisational structure, cultural match, and communication channels. Absorptive capacity was mostly evident at the level of the Principal Recipient, the Ministry of Finance, who established a new organisational unit to meet the requirements of Global Fund Grants, while the level of AC was less advanced among the Ministry of Health (Sub-Recipient) and district level implementers. Recipient organisations can increase their absorptive capacity, not only through prior knowledge of donor requirements, but also by deliberately changing their organisational form and through combinative capabilities. The study also revealed how vulnerable African governments are to loss of staff capacity. The application of organisational theory to analyse the interactions of donor agencies with public and non-public country stakeholders illustrates the complexity of the environment that aid recipient governments have to manage. ▸ Knowledge absorptive capacity frameworks can help explain how recipient governments manage donor aid requirements and conditions. ▸ Organisational determinants moderate the of recipient organisations to effectively deliver donor-funded health programmes. ▸ Principal recipients, sub-recipients and sub-sub recipients in Lesotho differed in their capacity to absorb knowledge needed to meet the requirements related to the implementation of Global Fund Grants. ▸ Government ministries, when confronted with new and complex donor requirements, need to develop flexible organisational forms and coordination capabilities. ▸ African governments are particularly vulnerable to loss of trained staff, undermining organisational knowledge and capacity.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21907474</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.020</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 2012-02, Vol.74 (3), p.381-389
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917856846
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Absorptive capacity
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - economics
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - prevention & control
Aid donors
Biological and medical sciences
Financing, Organized - organization & administration
Funds
Global health
Governance
Government Agencies
Government aid
Grants
Health Care Costs
Health Care Services
Health Care Services Policy
Health policy
HIV
Human viral diseases
Humans
Immunodeficiencies
Immunodeficiencies. Immunoglobulinopathies
Immunopathology
Implementation
Infectious diseases
International Cooperation
Intervention
Knowledge
Lesotho
Malaria - economics
Malaria - prevention & control
Medical sciences
Methodology (Data Collection)
Miscellaneous
Models, Theoretical
Organisation science
Organization theory
Organizational structure
Policy implementation
Public Health
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Qualitative Research
Scale up health interventions
Sub-Saharan Africa
Tuberculosis - economics
Tuberculosis - prevention & control
United States
Viral diseases
Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids
title The implementation of a global fund grant in Lesotho: Applying a framework on knowledge absorptive capacity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T18%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20implementation%20of%20a%20global%20fund%20grant%20in%20Lesotho:%20Applying%20a%20framework%20on%20knowledge%20absorptive%20capacity&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Biesma,%20Regien&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=381-389&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E917856846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921331741&rft_id=info:pmid/21907474&rft_els_id=S0277953611004850&rfr_iscdi=true