Perspectives of Canadian Oocyte Donors and Recipients on Donor Compensation and the Establishment of a Personal Health Information Registry
Abstract We report the views of 33 women who were involved in an altruistic oocyte donation program about provisions under Canada’s Assisted Human Reproduction Act 2004 to prohibit donor compensation and to establish a Personal Health Information Registry. The participants had been either donors of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada 2012, Vol.34 (1), p.72-79 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 79 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Blyth, Eric, PhD Yee, Samantha, MSW Ka Tat Tsang, A., PhD |
description | Abstract We report the views of 33 women who were involved in an altruistic oocyte donation program about provisions under Canada’s Assisted Human Reproduction Act 2004 to prohibit donor compensation and to establish a Personal Health Information Registry. The participants had been either donors of oocytes to a recipient known to them (15) or recipients of such donation (18) through services provided by a clinic in a large Canadian city, and they each participated in a semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interview. Among the 15 donor participants, seven were friends of the recipient, six were sisters, one was a niece of the recipient, and one donor donated twice, once to her sister and once to a friend. In eight cases the donor and recipient participated in interviews independently. At the time of interview, 11 of the 25 separate cases had resulted in a live birth and one in an ongoing pregnancy, so that “successful” and “unsuccessful” donations were equally represented among participants. While divergent views were reported among and between donors and recipients on an altruistic model versus a compensated model of donation, most participants largely endorsed the establishment of a personal health information registry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35137-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917161615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1701216316351374</els_id><sourcerecordid>917161615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-4480b343b7153967852bd222ef800a42d48206d9ee6382064bfd55bd98d1b4113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9uFSEQxrnQ2Nr6CBru1Iu1sLD_bjTmWG2TJjVVrwkLsx7qLmwZTpPzDL60bLf2ojcNJAzDN99kfhDymrMPnPH65AdvGC9KXot3vH4vKi6aQj4jhw_pA_IS8ZqxqhFN94IclGVZs6ZuDsnf7xBxBpPcLSANA91or63Tnl4Gs09AvwQfIlLtLb0C42YHPmWhXx_oJkwzeNTJ5dQiSlugp5h0PzrcTlm8mGq6tAlej_QM9Ji29NwPIU5r2RX8dpji_pg8H_SI8Or-PCK_vp7-3JwVF5ffzjefLwojeZcKKVvWCyn6hleiq5u2KnubJ4KhZUzL0sq2ZLXtAGqxRLIfbFX1tmst7yXn4oi8XX3nGG52gElNDg2Mo_YQdqg63vA6ryorq1VpYkCMMKg5uknHveJMLejVHXq1MFb5dodeyVz35r7Drp_APlT9554Fn1YB5DlvHUSFJpM1YF3Mn6FscE-2-PjIwYzOO6PHP7AHvA67mHGj4gpLxVaTxSPvxUGKf4w5qwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>917161615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perspectives of Canadian Oocyte Donors and Recipients on Donor Compensation and the Establishment of a Personal Health Information Registry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Blyth, Eric, PhD ; Yee, Samantha, MSW ; Ka Tat Tsang, A., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Blyth, Eric, PhD ; Yee, Samantha, MSW ; Ka Tat Tsang, A., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We report the views of 33 women who were involved in an altruistic oocyte donation program about provisions under Canada’s Assisted Human Reproduction Act 2004 to prohibit donor compensation and to establish a Personal Health Information Registry. The participants had been either donors of oocytes to a recipient known to them (15) or recipients of such donation (18) through services provided by a clinic in a large Canadian city, and they each participated in a semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interview. Among the 15 donor participants, seven were friends of the recipient, six were sisters, one was a niece of the recipient, and one donor donated twice, once to her sister and once to a friend. In eight cases the donor and recipient participated in interviews independently. At the time of interview, 11 of the 25 separate cases had resulted in a live birth and one in an ongoing pregnancy, so that “successful” and “unsuccessful” donations were equally represented among participants. While divergent views were reported among and between donors and recipients on an altruistic model versus a compensated model of donation, most participants largely endorsed the establishment of a personal health information registry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1701-2163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35137-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22260767</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Altruism ; altruistic donation ; Canada ; Compensation and Redress ; donor compensation ; Female ; Health Records, Personal ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; known donation ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Oocyte Donation ; personal health information registry ; Pregnancy ; Public Opinion ; Registries ; Tissue Donors</subject><ispartof>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada, 2012, Vol.34 (1), p.72-79</ispartof><rights>Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada</rights><rights>2012 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-4480b343b7153967852bd222ef800a42d48206d9ee6382064bfd55bd98d1b4113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-4480b343b7153967852bd222ef800a42d48206d9ee6382064bfd55bd98d1b4113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22260767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blyth, Eric, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Samantha, MSW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ka Tat Tsang, A., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Perspectives of Canadian Oocyte Donors and Recipients on Donor Compensation and the Establishment of a Personal Health Information Registry</title><title>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Can</addtitle><description>Abstract We report the views of 33 women who were involved in an altruistic oocyte donation program about provisions under Canada’s Assisted Human Reproduction Act 2004 to prohibit donor compensation and to establish a Personal Health Information Registry. The participants had been either donors of oocytes to a recipient known to them (15) or recipients of such donation (18) through services provided by a clinic in a large Canadian city, and they each participated in a semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interview. Among the 15 donor participants, seven were friends of the recipient, six were sisters, one was a niece of the recipient, and one donor donated twice, once to her sister and once to a friend. In eight cases the donor and recipient participated in interviews independently. At the time of interview, 11 of the 25 separate cases had resulted in a live birth and one in an ongoing pregnancy, so that “successful” and “unsuccessful” donations were equally represented among participants. While divergent views were reported among and between donors and recipients on an altruistic model versus a compensated model of donation, most participants largely endorsed the establishment of a personal health information registry.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>altruistic donation</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Compensation and Redress</subject><subject>donor compensation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Records, Personal</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>known donation</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Oocyte Donation</subject><subject>personal health information registry</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><issn>1701-2163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9uFSEQxrnQ2Nr6CBru1Iu1sLD_bjTmWG2TJjVVrwkLsx7qLmwZTpPzDL60bLf2ojcNJAzDN99kfhDymrMPnPH65AdvGC9KXot3vH4vKi6aQj4jhw_pA_IS8ZqxqhFN94IclGVZs6ZuDsnf7xBxBpPcLSANA91or63Tnl4Gs09AvwQfIlLtLb0C42YHPmWhXx_oJkwzeNTJ5dQiSlugp5h0PzrcTlm8mGq6tAlej_QM9Ji29NwPIU5r2RX8dpji_pg8H_SI8Or-PCK_vp7-3JwVF5ffzjefLwojeZcKKVvWCyn6hleiq5u2KnubJ4KhZUzL0sq2ZLXtAGqxRLIfbFX1tmst7yXn4oi8XX3nGG52gElNDg2Mo_YQdqg63vA6ryorq1VpYkCMMKg5uknHveJMLejVHXq1MFb5dodeyVz35r7Drp_APlT9554Fn1YB5DlvHUSFJpM1YF3Mn6FscE-2-PjIwYzOO6PHP7AHvA67mHGj4gpLxVaTxSPvxUGKf4w5qwA</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Blyth, Eric, PhD</creator><creator>Yee, Samantha, MSW</creator><creator>Ka Tat Tsang, A., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Perspectives of Canadian Oocyte Donors and Recipients on Donor Compensation and the Establishment of a Personal Health Information Registry</title><author>Blyth, Eric, PhD ; Yee, Samantha, MSW ; Ka Tat Tsang, A., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-4480b343b7153967852bd222ef800a42d48206d9ee6382064bfd55bd98d1b4113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>altruistic donation</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Compensation and Redress</topic><topic>donor compensation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Records, Personal</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>known donation</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Oocyte Donation</topic><topic>personal health information registry</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blyth, Eric, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Samantha, MSW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ka Tat Tsang, A., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blyth, Eric, PhD</au><au>Yee, Samantha, MSW</au><au>Ka Tat Tsang, A., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perspectives of Canadian Oocyte Donors and Recipients on Donor Compensation and the Establishment of a Personal Health Information Registry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada</jtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Can</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>72-79</pages><issn>1701-2163</issn><abstract>Abstract We report the views of 33 women who were involved in an altruistic oocyte donation program about provisions under Canada’s Assisted Human Reproduction Act 2004 to prohibit donor compensation and to establish a Personal Health Information Registry. The participants had been either donors of oocytes to a recipient known to them (15) or recipients of such donation (18) through services provided by a clinic in a large Canadian city, and they each participated in a semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interview. Among the 15 donor participants, seven were friends of the recipient, six were sisters, one was a niece of the recipient, and one donor donated twice, once to her sister and once to a friend. In eight cases the donor and recipient participated in interviews independently. At the time of interview, 11 of the 25 separate cases had resulted in a live birth and one in an ongoing pregnancy, so that “successful” and “unsuccessful” donations were equally represented among participants. While divergent views were reported among and between donors and recipients on an altruistic model versus a compensated model of donation, most participants largely endorsed the establishment of a personal health information registry.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22260767</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35137-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1701-2163 |
ispartof | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada, 2012, Vol.34 (1), p.72-79 |
issn | 1701-2163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917161615 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Altruism altruistic donation Canada Compensation and Redress donor compensation Female Health Records, Personal Humans Interviews as Topic known donation Obstetrics and Gynecology Oocyte Donation personal health information registry Pregnancy Public Opinion Registries Tissue Donors |
title | Perspectives of Canadian Oocyte Donors and Recipients on Donor Compensation and the Establishment of a Personal Health Information Registry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A38%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perspectives%20of%20Canadian%20Oocyte%20Donors%20and%20Recipients%20on%20Donor%20Compensation%20and%20the%20Establishment%20of%20a%20Personal%20Health%20Information%20Registry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology%20Canada&rft.au=Blyth,%20Eric,%20PhD&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=72-79&rft.issn=1701-2163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35137-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E917161615%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=917161615&rft_id=info:pmid/22260767&rft_els_id=S1701216316351374&rfr_iscdi=true |