Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements
Background This study aimed to review the authors’ 16-year experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were assessed. New indications and technical improvements are presented. Methods From November 1991 to August 2008, 123 pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2012-02, Vol.26 (2), p.312-322 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 322 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 312 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Léonard, Daniel Colin, Jean-François Remue, Christophe Jamart, Jacques Kartheuser, Alex |
description | Background
This study aimed to review the authors’ 16-year experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were assessed. New indications and technical improvements are presented.
Methods
From November 1991 to August 2008, 123 patients (72 men and 51 women; median age, 68 years; range, 21–91 years) underwent TEM for excision of 105 adenomas with low- or high-grade dysplasia, 9 invasive adenocarcinomas (5 curative and 4 palliative resections), 2 neuroendocrine tumors, and 2 extramucosal lesions. Five additional patients had excisional biopsies, allowing staging after previous endoscopic resection. Most of the resections were full-thickness rectal resections using electrocautery or, more recently, the Harmonic scalpel. The latest mucosectomies were performed using the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique. In addition, nontumoral indications included pelvic abscess (7 patients) and rectal strictures, which were either anastomotic or chemical. Pelvic abscesses were drained transrectally, whereas rectal stenoses were treated by strictureplasty. Foreign object retrieval and collagen plug placement for anal fistulas were performed using TEM in three patients.
Results
No mortality occurred. One intraoperative rectal perforation required conversion to laparotomy. The postoperative complications included one pneumoperitoneum, which was treated medically, and one rectal perforation requiring Hartmann’s procedure. In the polyp subgroup, six patients (6/91, 7%) experienced local recurrence. Pelvic abscesses were successfully treated, and stenosis did not recur after strictureplasty. Anorectal manometry showed functional alterations without significant clinical impact.
Conclusions
The findings showed TEM to be a safe and effective procedure for local excision of rectal lesions with a low recurrence rate and minimal consequences in terms of anorectal function. In addition, TEM proved to be feasible and effective for pelvic abscess drainage and rectal stenosis treatment. New technologies such as the Harmonic scalpel and ESD increase the precision already offered by this approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917159484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2564344931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c1bb37c852b7c6818c199496b71defb90f67e93bfc94b6e53bc980f113da924c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxS1E1V1oPwAXFCFVXNbF4zh_zK1Cpa2E1AucLduZLF4lzmIniP32dbpbkJB6suX5zbzxe4ScAfsKjFVXkTFRCsoAKNSlpPKILEHknHIO9TFZMpkzyispFuQkxg1LuITiI1mksqwZL5bE3Qfto_a6y9A3Q7TD1tmsdzYMcQprDLvrrBv8mo4Y-gxfthgceourzPnGWT26wc_PaUi6rTLtm2xE--hTrctcvw3DM_box_iJfGh1F_Hz4TwlD7ff729-0rvfP37dfLujVjA2UgvG5JWtC24qW9ZQW5BSyNJU0GBrJGvLCmVuWiuFKbHIjU1faQHyRksubH5KLvdzk_TThHFUvYsWu057HKaoJFRQSFGLRF68IzfDFJIVM1RWnEE-Q7CHZkdiwFZtg-t12Clgak5B7VNQKQU1p6Bk6jk_DJ5Mj81rxz_bE_DlAOiYfGpTBtbFN64ouGB_xfmei6nkUxpvG_5f_Q9cKaCq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916720134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Léonard, Daniel ; Colin, Jean-François ; Remue, Christophe ; Jamart, Jacques ; Kartheuser, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Léonard, Daniel ; Colin, Jean-François ; Remue, Christophe ; Jamart, Jacques ; Kartheuser, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>Background
This study aimed to review the authors’ 16-year experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were assessed. New indications and technical improvements are presented.
Methods
From November 1991 to August 2008, 123 patients (72 men and 51 women; median age, 68 years; range, 21–91 years) underwent TEM for excision of 105 adenomas with low- or high-grade dysplasia, 9 invasive adenocarcinomas (5 curative and 4 palliative resections), 2 neuroendocrine tumors, and 2 extramucosal lesions. Five additional patients had excisional biopsies, allowing staging after previous endoscopic resection. Most of the resections were full-thickness rectal resections using electrocautery or, more recently, the Harmonic scalpel. The latest mucosectomies were performed using the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique. In addition, nontumoral indications included pelvic abscess (7 patients) and rectal strictures, which were either anastomotic or chemical. Pelvic abscesses were drained transrectally, whereas rectal stenoses were treated by strictureplasty. Foreign object retrieval and collagen plug placement for anal fistulas were performed using TEM in three patients.
Results
No mortality occurred. One intraoperative rectal perforation required conversion to laparotomy. The postoperative complications included one pneumoperitoneum, which was treated medically, and one rectal perforation requiring Hartmann’s procedure. In the polyp subgroup, six patients (6/91, 7%) experienced local recurrence. Pelvic abscesses were successfully treated, and stenosis did not recur after strictureplasty. Anorectal manometry showed functional alterations without significant clinical impact.
Conclusions
The findings showed TEM to be a safe and effective procedure for local excision of rectal lesions with a low recurrence rate and minimal consequences in terms of anorectal function. In addition, TEM proved to be feasible and effective for pelvic abscess drainage and rectal stenosis treatment. New technologies such as the Harmonic scalpel and ESD increase the precision already offered by this approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21898025</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SUREEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Abscess - surgery ; Abscesses ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal surgery ; Dissection ; Drainage - methods ; Endoscopy ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Foreign Bodies - surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; General aspects ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Male ; Manometry ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Microsurgery ; Microsurgery - methods ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods ; Patients ; Pelvic Infection - surgery ; Proctology ; Proctoscopy - methods ; Rectal Diseases - surgery ; Rectal Fistula - surgery ; Rectum - surgery ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2012-02, Vol.26 (2), p.312-322</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c1bb37c852b7c6818c199496b71defb90f67e93bfc94b6e53bc980f113da924c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c1bb37c852b7c6818c199496b71defb90f67e93bfc94b6e53bc980f113da924c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25524034$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21898025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Léonard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colin, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remue, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamart, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartheuser, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
This study aimed to review the authors’ 16-year experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were assessed. New indications and technical improvements are presented.
Methods
From November 1991 to August 2008, 123 patients (72 men and 51 women; median age, 68 years; range, 21–91 years) underwent TEM for excision of 105 adenomas with low- or high-grade dysplasia, 9 invasive adenocarcinomas (5 curative and 4 palliative resections), 2 neuroendocrine tumors, and 2 extramucosal lesions. Five additional patients had excisional biopsies, allowing staging after previous endoscopic resection. Most of the resections were full-thickness rectal resections using electrocautery or, more recently, the Harmonic scalpel. The latest mucosectomies were performed using the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique. In addition, nontumoral indications included pelvic abscess (7 patients) and rectal strictures, which were either anastomotic or chemical. Pelvic abscesses were drained transrectally, whereas rectal stenoses were treated by strictureplasty. Foreign object retrieval and collagen plug placement for anal fistulas were performed using TEM in three patients.
Results
No mortality occurred. One intraoperative rectal perforation required conversion to laparotomy. The postoperative complications included one pneumoperitoneum, which was treated medically, and one rectal perforation requiring Hartmann’s procedure. In the polyp subgroup, six patients (6/91, 7%) experienced local recurrence. Pelvic abscesses were successfully treated, and stenosis did not recur after strictureplasty. Anorectal manometry showed functional alterations without significant clinical impact.
Conclusions
The findings showed TEM to be a safe and effective procedure for local excision of rectal lesions with a low recurrence rate and minimal consequences in terms of anorectal function. In addition, TEM proved to be feasible and effective for pelvic abscess drainage and rectal stenosis treatment. New technologies such as the Harmonic scalpel and ESD increase the precision already offered by this approach.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Abscess - surgery</subject><subject>Abscesses</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal surgery</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Drainage - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manometry</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Microsurgery - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pelvic Infection - surgery</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Proctoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Rectal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Rectal Fistula - surgery</subject><subject>Rectum - surgery</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxS1E1V1oPwAXFCFVXNbF4zh_zK1Cpa2E1AucLduZLF4lzmIniP32dbpbkJB6suX5zbzxe4ScAfsKjFVXkTFRCsoAKNSlpPKILEHknHIO9TFZMpkzyispFuQkxg1LuITiI1mksqwZL5bE3Qfto_a6y9A3Q7TD1tmsdzYMcQprDLvrrBv8mo4Y-gxfthgceourzPnGWT26wc_PaUi6rTLtm2xE--hTrctcvw3DM_box_iJfGh1F_Hz4TwlD7ff729-0rvfP37dfLujVjA2UgvG5JWtC24qW9ZQW5BSyNJU0GBrJGvLCmVuWiuFKbHIjU1faQHyRksubH5KLvdzk_TThHFUvYsWu057HKaoJFRQSFGLRF68IzfDFJIVM1RWnEE-Q7CHZkdiwFZtg-t12Clgak5B7VNQKQU1p6Bk6jk_DJ5Mj81rxz_bE_DlAOiYfGpTBtbFN64ouGB_xfmei6nkUxpvG_5f_Q9cKaCq</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Léonard, Daniel</creator><creator>Colin, Jean-François</creator><creator>Remue, Christophe</creator><creator>Jamart, Jacques</creator><creator>Kartheuser, Alex</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements</title><author>Léonard, Daniel ; Colin, Jean-François ; Remue, Christophe ; Jamart, Jacques ; Kartheuser, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c1bb37c852b7c6818c199496b71defb90f67e93bfc94b6e53bc980f113da924c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Abscess - surgery</topic><topic>Abscesses</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal surgery</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Drainage - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manometry</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Microsurgery - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pelvic Infection - surgery</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Proctoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Rectal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Rectal Fistula - surgery</topic><topic>Rectum - surgery</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Léonard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colin, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remue, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamart, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartheuser, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Léonard, Daniel</au><au>Colin, Jean-François</au><au>Remue, Christophe</au><au>Jamart, Jacques</au><au>Kartheuser, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>312-322</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><coden>SUREEX</coden><abstract>Background
This study aimed to review the authors’ 16-year experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were assessed. New indications and technical improvements are presented.
Methods
From November 1991 to August 2008, 123 patients (72 men and 51 women; median age, 68 years; range, 21–91 years) underwent TEM for excision of 105 adenomas with low- or high-grade dysplasia, 9 invasive adenocarcinomas (5 curative and 4 palliative resections), 2 neuroendocrine tumors, and 2 extramucosal lesions. Five additional patients had excisional biopsies, allowing staging after previous endoscopic resection. Most of the resections were full-thickness rectal resections using electrocautery or, more recently, the Harmonic scalpel. The latest mucosectomies were performed using the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique. In addition, nontumoral indications included pelvic abscess (7 patients) and rectal strictures, which were either anastomotic or chemical. Pelvic abscesses were drained transrectally, whereas rectal stenoses were treated by strictureplasty. Foreign object retrieval and collagen plug placement for anal fistulas were performed using TEM in three patients.
Results
No mortality occurred. One intraoperative rectal perforation required conversion to laparotomy. The postoperative complications included one pneumoperitoneum, which was treated medically, and one rectal perforation requiring Hartmann’s procedure. In the polyp subgroup, six patients (6/91, 7%) experienced local recurrence. Pelvic abscesses were successfully treated, and stenosis did not recur after strictureplasty. Anorectal manometry showed functional alterations without significant clinical impact.
Conclusions
The findings showed TEM to be a safe and effective procedure for local excision of rectal lesions with a low recurrence rate and minimal consequences in terms of anorectal function. In addition, TEM proved to be feasible and effective for pelvic abscess drainage and rectal stenosis treatment. New technologies such as the Harmonic scalpel and ESD increase the precision already offered by this approach.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21898025</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2012-02, Vol.26 (2), p.312-322 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917159484 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Abscess - surgery Abscesses Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Colorectal cancer Colorectal surgery Dissection Drainage - methods Endoscopy Feasibility Studies Female Foreign Bodies - surgery Gastroenterology Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen General aspects Gynecology Hepatology Humans Male Manometry Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Microsurgery Microsurgery - methods Middle Aged Mortality Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods Patients Pelvic Infection - surgery Proctology Proctoscopy - methods Rectal Diseases - surgery Rectal Fistula - surgery Rectum - surgery Recurrence Retrospective Studies Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Surgery Treatment Outcome Tumors Young Adult |
title | Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A09%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transanal%20endoscopic%20microsurgery:%20long-term%20experience,%20indication%20expansion,%20and%20technical%20improvements&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=L%C3%A9onard,%20Daniel&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=312-322&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft.coden=SUREEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2564344931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916720134&rft_id=info:pmid/21898025&rfr_iscdi=true |