Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements

Background This study aimed to review the authors’ 16-year experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were assessed. New indications and technical improvements are presented. Methods From November 1991 to August 2008, 123 pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2012-02, Vol.26 (2), p.312-322
Hauptverfasser: Léonard, Daniel, Colin, Jean-François, Remue, Christophe, Jamart, Jacques, Kartheuser, Alex
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 322
container_issue 2
container_start_page 312
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 26
creator Léonard, Daniel
Colin, Jean-François
Remue, Christophe
Jamart, Jacques
Kartheuser, Alex
description Background This study aimed to review the authors’ 16-year experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were assessed. New indications and technical improvements are presented. Methods From November 1991 to August 2008, 123 patients (72 men and 51 women; median age, 68 years; range, 21–91 years) underwent TEM for excision of 105 adenomas with low- or high-grade dysplasia, 9 invasive adenocarcinomas (5 curative and 4 palliative resections), 2 neuroendocrine tumors, and 2 extramucosal lesions. Five additional patients had excisional biopsies, allowing staging after previous endoscopic resection. Most of the resections were full-thickness rectal resections using electrocautery or, more recently, the Harmonic scalpel. The latest mucosectomies were performed using the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique. In addition, nontumoral indications included pelvic abscess (7 patients) and rectal strictures, which were either anastomotic or chemical. Pelvic abscesses were drained transrectally, whereas rectal stenoses were treated by strictureplasty. Foreign object retrieval and collagen plug placement for anal fistulas were performed using TEM in three patients. Results No mortality occurred. One intraoperative rectal perforation required conversion to laparotomy. The postoperative complications included one pneumoperitoneum, which was treated medically, and one rectal perforation requiring Hartmann’s procedure. In the polyp subgroup, six patients (6/91, 7%) experienced local recurrence. Pelvic abscesses were successfully treated, and stenosis did not recur after strictureplasty. Anorectal manometry showed functional alterations without significant clinical impact. Conclusions The findings showed TEM to be a safe and effective procedure for local excision of rectal lesions with a low recurrence rate and minimal consequences in terms of anorectal function. In addition, TEM proved to be feasible and effective for pelvic abscess drainage and rectal stenosis treatment. New technologies such as the Harmonic scalpel and ESD increase the precision already offered by this approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917159484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2564344931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c1bb37c852b7c6818c199496b71defb90f67e93bfc94b6e53bc980f113da924c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxS1E1V1oPwAXFCFVXNbF4zh_zK1Cpa2E1AucLduZLF4lzmIniP32dbpbkJB6suX5zbzxe4ScAfsKjFVXkTFRCsoAKNSlpPKILEHknHIO9TFZMpkzyispFuQkxg1LuITiI1mksqwZL5bE3Qfto_a6y9A3Q7TD1tmsdzYMcQprDLvrrBv8mo4Y-gxfthgceourzPnGWT26wc_PaUi6rTLtm2xE--hTrctcvw3DM_box_iJfGh1F_Hz4TwlD7ff729-0rvfP37dfLujVjA2UgvG5JWtC24qW9ZQW5BSyNJU0GBrJGvLCmVuWiuFKbHIjU1faQHyRksubH5KLvdzk_TThHFUvYsWu057HKaoJFRQSFGLRF68IzfDFJIVM1RWnEE-Q7CHZkdiwFZtg-t12Clgak5B7VNQKQU1p6Bk6jk_DJ5Mj81rxz_bE_DlAOiYfGpTBtbFN64ouGB_xfmei6nkUxpvG_5f_Q9cKaCq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916720134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Léonard, Daniel ; Colin, Jean-François ; Remue, Christophe ; Jamart, Jacques ; Kartheuser, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Léonard, Daniel ; Colin, Jean-François ; Remue, Christophe ; Jamart, Jacques ; Kartheuser, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>Background This study aimed to review the authors’ 16-year experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were assessed. New indications and technical improvements are presented. Methods From November 1991 to August 2008, 123 patients (72 men and 51 women; median age, 68 years; range, 21–91 years) underwent TEM for excision of 105 adenomas with low- or high-grade dysplasia, 9 invasive adenocarcinomas (5 curative and 4 palliative resections), 2 neuroendocrine tumors, and 2 extramucosal lesions. Five additional patients had excisional biopsies, allowing staging after previous endoscopic resection. Most of the resections were full-thickness rectal resections using electrocautery or, more recently, the Harmonic scalpel. The latest mucosectomies were performed using the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique. In addition, nontumoral indications included pelvic abscess (7 patients) and rectal strictures, which were either anastomotic or chemical. Pelvic abscesses were drained transrectally, whereas rectal stenoses were treated by strictureplasty. Foreign object retrieval and collagen plug placement for anal fistulas were performed using TEM in three patients. Results No mortality occurred. One intraoperative rectal perforation required conversion to laparotomy. The postoperative complications included one pneumoperitoneum, which was treated medically, and one rectal perforation requiring Hartmann’s procedure. In the polyp subgroup, six patients (6/91, 7%) experienced local recurrence. Pelvic abscesses were successfully treated, and stenosis did not recur after strictureplasty. Anorectal manometry showed functional alterations without significant clinical impact. Conclusions The findings showed TEM to be a safe and effective procedure for local excision of rectal lesions with a low recurrence rate and minimal consequences in terms of anorectal function. In addition, TEM proved to be feasible and effective for pelvic abscess drainage and rectal stenosis treatment. New technologies such as the Harmonic scalpel and ESD increase the precision already offered by this approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21898025</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SUREEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Abscess - surgery ; Abscesses ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal surgery ; Dissection ; Drainage - methods ; Endoscopy ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Foreign Bodies - surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; General aspects ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Male ; Manometry ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Microsurgery ; Microsurgery - methods ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods ; Patients ; Pelvic Infection - surgery ; Proctology ; Proctoscopy - methods ; Rectal Diseases - surgery ; Rectal Fistula - surgery ; Rectum - surgery ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2012-02, Vol.26 (2), p.312-322</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c1bb37c852b7c6818c199496b71defb90f67e93bfc94b6e53bc980f113da924c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c1bb37c852b7c6818c199496b71defb90f67e93bfc94b6e53bc980f113da924c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25524034$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21898025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Léonard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colin, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remue, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamart, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartheuser, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background This study aimed to review the authors’ 16-year experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were assessed. New indications and technical improvements are presented. Methods From November 1991 to August 2008, 123 patients (72 men and 51 women; median age, 68 years; range, 21–91 years) underwent TEM for excision of 105 adenomas with low- or high-grade dysplasia, 9 invasive adenocarcinomas (5 curative and 4 palliative resections), 2 neuroendocrine tumors, and 2 extramucosal lesions. Five additional patients had excisional biopsies, allowing staging after previous endoscopic resection. Most of the resections were full-thickness rectal resections using electrocautery or, more recently, the Harmonic scalpel. The latest mucosectomies were performed using the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique. In addition, nontumoral indications included pelvic abscess (7 patients) and rectal strictures, which were either anastomotic or chemical. Pelvic abscesses were drained transrectally, whereas rectal stenoses were treated by strictureplasty. Foreign object retrieval and collagen plug placement for anal fistulas were performed using TEM in three patients. Results No mortality occurred. One intraoperative rectal perforation required conversion to laparotomy. The postoperative complications included one pneumoperitoneum, which was treated medically, and one rectal perforation requiring Hartmann’s procedure. In the polyp subgroup, six patients (6/91, 7%) experienced local recurrence. Pelvic abscesses were successfully treated, and stenosis did not recur after strictureplasty. Anorectal manometry showed functional alterations without significant clinical impact. Conclusions The findings showed TEM to be a safe and effective procedure for local excision of rectal lesions with a low recurrence rate and minimal consequences in terms of anorectal function. In addition, TEM proved to be feasible and effective for pelvic abscess drainage and rectal stenosis treatment. New technologies such as the Harmonic scalpel and ESD increase the precision already offered by this approach.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Abscess - surgery</subject><subject>Abscesses</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal surgery</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Drainage - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manometry</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Microsurgery - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pelvic Infection - surgery</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Proctoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Rectal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Rectal Fistula - surgery</subject><subject>Rectum - surgery</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxS1E1V1oPwAXFCFVXNbF4zh_zK1Cpa2E1AucLduZLF4lzmIniP32dbpbkJB6suX5zbzxe4ScAfsKjFVXkTFRCsoAKNSlpPKILEHknHIO9TFZMpkzyispFuQkxg1LuITiI1mksqwZL5bE3Qfto_a6y9A3Q7TD1tmsdzYMcQprDLvrrBv8mo4Y-gxfthgceourzPnGWT26wc_PaUi6rTLtm2xE--hTrctcvw3DM_box_iJfGh1F_Hz4TwlD7ff729-0rvfP37dfLujVjA2UgvG5JWtC24qW9ZQW5BSyNJU0GBrJGvLCmVuWiuFKbHIjU1faQHyRksubH5KLvdzk_TThHFUvYsWu057HKaoJFRQSFGLRF68IzfDFJIVM1RWnEE-Q7CHZkdiwFZtg-t12Clgak5B7VNQKQU1p6Bk6jk_DJ5Mj81rxz_bE_DlAOiYfGpTBtbFN64ouGB_xfmei6nkUxpvG_5f_Q9cKaCq</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Léonard, Daniel</creator><creator>Colin, Jean-François</creator><creator>Remue, Christophe</creator><creator>Jamart, Jacques</creator><creator>Kartheuser, Alex</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements</title><author>Léonard, Daniel ; Colin, Jean-François ; Remue, Christophe ; Jamart, Jacques ; Kartheuser, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c1bb37c852b7c6818c199496b71defb90f67e93bfc94b6e53bc980f113da924c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Abscess - surgery</topic><topic>Abscesses</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal surgery</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Drainage - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manometry</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Microsurgery - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pelvic Infection - surgery</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Proctoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Rectal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Rectal Fistula - surgery</topic><topic>Rectum - surgery</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Léonard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colin, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remue, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamart, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartheuser, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Léonard, Daniel</au><au>Colin, Jean-François</au><au>Remue, Christophe</au><au>Jamart, Jacques</au><au>Kartheuser, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>312-322</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><coden>SUREEX</coden><abstract>Background This study aimed to review the authors’ 16-year experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were assessed. New indications and technical improvements are presented. Methods From November 1991 to August 2008, 123 patients (72 men and 51 women; median age, 68 years; range, 21–91 years) underwent TEM for excision of 105 adenomas with low- or high-grade dysplasia, 9 invasive adenocarcinomas (5 curative and 4 palliative resections), 2 neuroendocrine tumors, and 2 extramucosal lesions. Five additional patients had excisional biopsies, allowing staging after previous endoscopic resection. Most of the resections were full-thickness rectal resections using electrocautery or, more recently, the Harmonic scalpel. The latest mucosectomies were performed using the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique. In addition, nontumoral indications included pelvic abscess (7 patients) and rectal strictures, which were either anastomotic or chemical. Pelvic abscesses were drained transrectally, whereas rectal stenoses were treated by strictureplasty. Foreign object retrieval and collagen plug placement for anal fistulas were performed using TEM in three patients. Results No mortality occurred. One intraoperative rectal perforation required conversion to laparotomy. The postoperative complications included one pneumoperitoneum, which was treated medically, and one rectal perforation requiring Hartmann’s procedure. In the polyp subgroup, six patients (6/91, 7%) experienced local recurrence. Pelvic abscesses were successfully treated, and stenosis did not recur after strictureplasty. Anorectal manometry showed functional alterations without significant clinical impact. Conclusions The findings showed TEM to be a safe and effective procedure for local excision of rectal lesions with a low recurrence rate and minimal consequences in terms of anorectal function. In addition, TEM proved to be feasible and effective for pelvic abscess drainage and rectal stenosis treatment. New technologies such as the Harmonic scalpel and ESD increase the precision already offered by this approach.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21898025</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2012-02, Vol.26 (2), p.312-322
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917159484
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Abscess - surgery
Abscesses
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal surgery
Dissection
Drainage - methods
Endoscopy
Feasibility Studies
Female
Foreign Bodies - surgery
Gastroenterology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
General aspects
Gynecology
Hepatology
Humans
Male
Manometry
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Microsurgery
Microsurgery - methods
Middle Aged
Mortality
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods
Patients
Pelvic Infection - surgery
Proctology
Proctoscopy - methods
Rectal Diseases - surgery
Rectal Fistula - surgery
Rectum - surgery
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
Young Adult
title Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A09%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transanal%20endoscopic%20microsurgery:%20long-term%20experience,%20indication%20expansion,%20and%20technical%20improvements&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=L%C3%A9onard,%20Daniel&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=312-322&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft.coden=SUREEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-011-1869-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2564344931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916720134&rft_id=info:pmid/21898025&rfr_iscdi=true