Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study
Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2012-02, Vol.108 (2), p.229-235 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 235 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Stiegler, M.P. Neelankavil, J.P. Canales, C. Dhillon, A. |
description | Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviation, and other medical specialities. We sought to identify which types of cognitive errors are most important in anaesthesiology.
This study consisted of two parts. First, we created a cognitive error catalogue specific to anaesthesiology practice using a literature review, modified Delphi method with experts, and a survey of academic faculty. In the second part, we observed for those cognitive errors during resident physician management of simulated anaesthesiology emergencies.
Of >30 described cognitive errors, the modified Delphi method yielded 14 key items experts felt were most important and prevalent in anaesthesiology practice (Table 1). Faculty survey responses narrowed this to a ‘top 10’ catalogue consisting of anchoring, availability bias, premature closure, feedback bias, framing effect, confirmation bias, omission bias, commission bias, overconfidence, and sunk costs (Table 2). Nine types of cognitive errors were selected for observation during simulated emergency management. Seven of those nine types of cognitive errors occurred in >50% of observed emergencies (Table 3).
Cognitive errors are thought to contribute significantly to medical mishaps. We identified cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology practice. Understanding the key types of cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology is the first step towards training in metacognition and de-biasing strategies, which may improve patient safety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bja/aer387 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916698985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bja/aer387</oup_id><els_id>S0007091217324789</els_id><sourcerecordid>916698985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-58a6d2238a77191f6f86553a0ea289ac257f335a58bb6044b17f2ef8c7549e5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c9rHCEUwHEpCc0m7aV_QPESCoFJ1BlH7S0s-QWBEGjP8sZ5kxpmx606W_a_j2W3yaXk5OXj8_GVkC-cnXNm6ovuGS4AY63VB7LgjeJVqxQ_IAvGmKqY4eKIHKf0zBhXwsiP5EgILpVu2gV5XIanyWe_QYoxhphojxldxp76icIEmPIvTD6M4Wn7nQIdfcYIeY5II248_imop2s_hkxTnvvtJ3I4wJjw8_48IT-vr34sb6v7h5u75eV95RqhciU1tL0QtYayq-FDO-hWyhoYgtAGnJBqqGsJUnddy5qm42oQOGinZGNQdvUJ-babu47h91zWtCufHI4jTBjmZA1vW6ONlkWe7aSLIaWIg11Hv4K4tZzZvwVtKWh3BQv-uh87dyvsX-m_ZAWc7gEkB-MQYXI-vTlZmFbyzYV5_f6Dzc5hiVWCRpucx8lh72P5CNsH_79rLzPYmPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916698985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stiegler, M.P. ; Neelankavil, J.P. ; Canales, C. ; Dhillon, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stiegler, M.P. ; Neelankavil, J.P. ; Canales, C. ; Dhillon, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviation, and other medical specialities. We sought to identify which types of cognitive errors are most important in anaesthesiology.
This study consisted of two parts. First, we created a cognitive error catalogue specific to anaesthesiology practice using a literature review, modified Delphi method with experts, and a survey of academic faculty. In the second part, we observed for those cognitive errors during resident physician management of simulated anaesthesiology emergencies.
Of >30 described cognitive errors, the modified Delphi method yielded 14 key items experts felt were most important and prevalent in anaesthesiology practice (Table 1). Faculty survey responses narrowed this to a ‘top 10’ catalogue consisting of anchoring, availability bias, premature closure, feedback bias, framing effect, confirmation bias, omission bias, commission bias, overconfidence, and sunk costs (Table 2). Nine types of cognitive errors were selected for observation during simulated emergency management. Seven of those nine types of cognitive errors occurred in >50% of observed emergencies (Table 3).
Cognitive errors are thought to contribute significantly to medical mishaps. We identified cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology practice. Understanding the key types of cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology is the first step towards training in metacognition and de-biasing strategies, which may improve patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer387</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22157846</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJANAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia - standards ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesiology - standards ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Clinical Competence ; Cognition ; Decision Making ; Delphi Technique ; diagnostic errors/prevention and control ; Emergencies ; Humans ; Medical Errors - prevention & control ; Medical Errors - psychology ; medical mistakes ; Medical sciences ; Patient Simulation ; physicians/psychology ; Pilot Projects</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2012-02, Vol.108 (2), p.229-235</ispartof><rights>2012 The Author(s)</rights><rights>The Author [2011]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-58a6d2238a77191f6f86553a0ea289ac257f335a58bb6044b17f2ef8c7549e5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-58a6d2238a77191f6f86553a0ea289ac257f335a58bb6044b17f2ef8c7549e5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25578875$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22157846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stiegler, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neelankavil, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canales, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviation, and other medical specialities. We sought to identify which types of cognitive errors are most important in anaesthesiology.
This study consisted of two parts. First, we created a cognitive error catalogue specific to anaesthesiology practice using a literature review, modified Delphi method with experts, and a survey of academic faculty. In the second part, we observed for those cognitive errors during resident physician management of simulated anaesthesiology emergencies.
Of >30 described cognitive errors, the modified Delphi method yielded 14 key items experts felt were most important and prevalent in anaesthesiology practice (Table 1). Faculty survey responses narrowed this to a ‘top 10’ catalogue consisting of anchoring, availability bias, premature closure, feedback bias, framing effect, confirmation bias, omission bias, commission bias, overconfidence, and sunk costs (Table 2). Nine types of cognitive errors were selected for observation during simulated emergency management. Seven of those nine types of cognitive errors occurred in >50% of observed emergencies (Table 3).
Cognitive errors are thought to contribute significantly to medical mishaps. We identified cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology practice. Understanding the key types of cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology is the first step towards training in metacognition and de-biasing strategies, which may improve patient safety.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia - standards</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesiology - standards</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>diagnostic errors/prevention and control</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Errors - prevention & control</subject><subject>Medical Errors - psychology</subject><subject>medical mistakes</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patient Simulation</subject><subject>physicians/psychology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c9rHCEUwHEpCc0m7aV_QPESCoFJ1BlH7S0s-QWBEGjP8sZ5kxpmx606W_a_j2W3yaXk5OXj8_GVkC-cnXNm6ovuGS4AY63VB7LgjeJVqxQ_IAvGmKqY4eKIHKf0zBhXwsiP5EgILpVu2gV5XIanyWe_QYoxhphojxldxp76icIEmPIvTD6M4Wn7nQIdfcYIeY5II248_imop2s_hkxTnvvtJ3I4wJjw8_48IT-vr34sb6v7h5u75eV95RqhciU1tL0QtYayq-FDO-hWyhoYgtAGnJBqqGsJUnddy5qm42oQOGinZGNQdvUJ-babu47h91zWtCufHI4jTBjmZA1vW6ONlkWe7aSLIaWIg11Hv4K4tZzZvwVtKWh3BQv-uh87dyvsX-m_ZAWc7gEkB-MQYXI-vTlZmFbyzYV5_f6Dzc5hiVWCRpucx8lh72P5CNsH_79rLzPYmPA</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Stiegler, M.P.</creator><creator>Neelankavil, J.P.</creator><creator>Canales, C.</creator><creator>Dhillon, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study</title><author>Stiegler, M.P. ; Neelankavil, J.P. ; Canales, C. ; Dhillon, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-58a6d2238a77191f6f86553a0ea289ac257f335a58bb6044b17f2ef8c7549e5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia - standards</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesiology - standards</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>diagnostic errors/prevention and control</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Errors - prevention & control</topic><topic>Medical Errors - psychology</topic><topic>medical mistakes</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patient Simulation</topic><topic>physicians/psychology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stiegler, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neelankavil, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canales, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stiegler, M.P.</au><au>Neelankavil, J.P.</au><au>Canales, C.</au><au>Dhillon, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><stitle>Br J Anaesth</stitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>229-235</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><coden>BJANAD</coden><abstract>Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviation, and other medical specialities. We sought to identify which types of cognitive errors are most important in anaesthesiology.
This study consisted of two parts. First, we created a cognitive error catalogue specific to anaesthesiology practice using a literature review, modified Delphi method with experts, and a survey of academic faculty. In the second part, we observed for those cognitive errors during resident physician management of simulated anaesthesiology emergencies.
Of >30 described cognitive errors, the modified Delphi method yielded 14 key items experts felt were most important and prevalent in anaesthesiology practice (Table 1). Faculty survey responses narrowed this to a ‘top 10’ catalogue consisting of anchoring, availability bias, premature closure, feedback bias, framing effect, confirmation bias, omission bias, commission bias, overconfidence, and sunk costs (Table 2). Nine types of cognitive errors were selected for observation during simulated emergency management. Seven of those nine types of cognitive errors occurred in >50% of observed emergencies (Table 3).
Cognitive errors are thought to contribute significantly to medical mishaps. We identified cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology practice. Understanding the key types of cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology is the first step towards training in metacognition and de-biasing strategies, which may improve patient safety.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22157846</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aer387</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0912 |
ispartof | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2012-02, Vol.108 (2), p.229-235 |
issn | 0007-0912 1471-6771 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916698985 |
source | MEDLINE; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anesthesia Anesthesia - standards Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthesiology - standards Biological and medical sciences California Clinical Competence Cognition Decision Making Delphi Technique diagnostic errors/prevention and control Emergencies Humans Medical Errors - prevention & control Medical Errors - psychology medical mistakes Medical sciences Patient Simulation physicians/psychology Pilot Projects |
title | Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A28%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20errors%20detected%20in%20anaesthesiology:%20a%20literature%20review%20and%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Stiegler,%20M.P.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=229-235&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft.coden=BJANAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aer387&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E916698985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916698985&rft_id=info:pmid/22157846&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bja/aer387&rft_els_id=S0007091217324789&rfr_iscdi=true |