Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study

Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2012-02, Vol.108 (2), p.229-235
Hauptverfasser: Stiegler, M.P., Neelankavil, J.P., Canales, C., Dhillon, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 235
container_issue 2
container_start_page 229
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 108
creator Stiegler, M.P.
Neelankavil, J.P.
Canales, C.
Dhillon, A.
description Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviation, and other medical specialities. We sought to identify which types of cognitive errors are most important in anaesthesiology. This study consisted of two parts. First, we created a cognitive error catalogue specific to anaesthesiology practice using a literature review, modified Delphi method with experts, and a survey of academic faculty. In the second part, we observed for those cognitive errors during resident physician management of simulated anaesthesiology emergencies. Of >30 described cognitive errors, the modified Delphi method yielded 14 key items experts felt were most important and prevalent in anaesthesiology practice (Table 1). Faculty survey responses narrowed this to a ‘top 10’ catalogue consisting of anchoring, availability bias, premature closure, feedback bias, framing effect, confirmation bias, omission bias, commission bias, overconfidence, and sunk costs (Table 2). Nine types of cognitive errors were selected for observation during simulated emergency management. Seven of those nine types of cognitive errors occurred in >50% of observed emergencies (Table 3). Cognitive errors are thought to contribute significantly to medical mishaps. We identified cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology practice. Understanding the key types of cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology is the first step towards training in metacognition and de-biasing strategies, which may improve patient safety.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bja/aer387
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916698985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bja/aer387</oup_id><els_id>S0007091217324789</els_id><sourcerecordid>916698985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-58a6d2238a77191f6f86553a0ea289ac257f335a58bb6044b17f2ef8c7549e5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c9rHCEUwHEpCc0m7aV_QPESCoFJ1BlH7S0s-QWBEGjP8sZ5kxpmx606W_a_j2W3yaXk5OXj8_GVkC-cnXNm6ovuGS4AY63VB7LgjeJVqxQ_IAvGmKqY4eKIHKf0zBhXwsiP5EgILpVu2gV5XIanyWe_QYoxhphojxldxp76icIEmPIvTD6M4Wn7nQIdfcYIeY5II248_imop2s_hkxTnvvtJ3I4wJjw8_48IT-vr34sb6v7h5u75eV95RqhciU1tL0QtYayq-FDO-hWyhoYgtAGnJBqqGsJUnddy5qm42oQOGinZGNQdvUJ-babu47h91zWtCufHI4jTBjmZA1vW6ONlkWe7aSLIaWIg11Hv4K4tZzZvwVtKWh3BQv-uh87dyvsX-m_ZAWc7gEkB-MQYXI-vTlZmFbyzYV5_f6Dzc5hiVWCRpucx8lh72P5CNsH_79rLzPYmPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916698985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stiegler, M.P. ; Neelankavil, J.P. ; Canales, C. ; Dhillon, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stiegler, M.P. ; Neelankavil, J.P. ; Canales, C. ; Dhillon, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviation, and other medical specialities. We sought to identify which types of cognitive errors are most important in anaesthesiology. This study consisted of two parts. First, we created a cognitive error catalogue specific to anaesthesiology practice using a literature review, modified Delphi method with experts, and a survey of academic faculty. In the second part, we observed for those cognitive errors during resident physician management of simulated anaesthesiology emergencies. Of &gt;30 described cognitive errors, the modified Delphi method yielded 14 key items experts felt were most important and prevalent in anaesthesiology practice (Table 1). Faculty survey responses narrowed this to a ‘top 10’ catalogue consisting of anchoring, availability bias, premature closure, feedback bias, framing effect, confirmation bias, omission bias, commission bias, overconfidence, and sunk costs (Table 2). Nine types of cognitive errors were selected for observation during simulated emergency management. Seven of those nine types of cognitive errors occurred in &gt;50% of observed emergencies (Table 3). Cognitive errors are thought to contribute significantly to medical mishaps. We identified cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology practice. Understanding the key types of cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology is the first step towards training in metacognition and de-biasing strategies, which may improve patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer387</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22157846</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJANAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia - standards ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesiology - standards ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Clinical Competence ; Cognition ; Decision Making ; Delphi Technique ; diagnostic errors/prevention and control ; Emergencies ; Humans ; Medical Errors - prevention &amp; control ; Medical Errors - psychology ; medical mistakes ; Medical sciences ; Patient Simulation ; physicians/psychology ; Pilot Projects</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2012-02, Vol.108 (2), p.229-235</ispartof><rights>2012 The Author(s)</rights><rights>The Author [2011]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-58a6d2238a77191f6f86553a0ea289ac257f335a58bb6044b17f2ef8c7549e5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-58a6d2238a77191f6f86553a0ea289ac257f335a58bb6044b17f2ef8c7549e5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25578875$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22157846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stiegler, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neelankavil, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canales, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviation, and other medical specialities. We sought to identify which types of cognitive errors are most important in anaesthesiology. This study consisted of two parts. First, we created a cognitive error catalogue specific to anaesthesiology practice using a literature review, modified Delphi method with experts, and a survey of academic faculty. In the second part, we observed for those cognitive errors during resident physician management of simulated anaesthesiology emergencies. Of &gt;30 described cognitive errors, the modified Delphi method yielded 14 key items experts felt were most important and prevalent in anaesthesiology practice (Table 1). Faculty survey responses narrowed this to a ‘top 10’ catalogue consisting of anchoring, availability bias, premature closure, feedback bias, framing effect, confirmation bias, omission bias, commission bias, overconfidence, and sunk costs (Table 2). Nine types of cognitive errors were selected for observation during simulated emergency management. Seven of those nine types of cognitive errors occurred in &gt;50% of observed emergencies (Table 3). Cognitive errors are thought to contribute significantly to medical mishaps. We identified cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology practice. Understanding the key types of cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology is the first step towards training in metacognition and de-biasing strategies, which may improve patient safety.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia - standards</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesiology - standards</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>diagnostic errors/prevention and control</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Errors - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Medical Errors - psychology</subject><subject>medical mistakes</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patient Simulation</subject><subject>physicians/psychology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c9rHCEUwHEpCc0m7aV_QPESCoFJ1BlH7S0s-QWBEGjP8sZ5kxpmx606W_a_j2W3yaXk5OXj8_GVkC-cnXNm6ovuGS4AY63VB7LgjeJVqxQ_IAvGmKqY4eKIHKf0zBhXwsiP5EgILpVu2gV5XIanyWe_QYoxhphojxldxp76icIEmPIvTD6M4Wn7nQIdfcYIeY5II248_imop2s_hkxTnvvtJ3I4wJjw8_48IT-vr34sb6v7h5u75eV95RqhciU1tL0QtYayq-FDO-hWyhoYgtAGnJBqqGsJUnddy5qm42oQOGinZGNQdvUJ-babu47h91zWtCufHI4jTBjmZA1vW6ONlkWe7aSLIaWIg11Hv4K4tZzZvwVtKWh3BQv-uh87dyvsX-m_ZAWc7gEkB-MQYXI-vTlZmFbyzYV5_f6Dzc5hiVWCRpucx8lh72P5CNsH_79rLzPYmPA</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Stiegler, M.P.</creator><creator>Neelankavil, J.P.</creator><creator>Canales, C.</creator><creator>Dhillon, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study</title><author>Stiegler, M.P. ; Neelankavil, J.P. ; Canales, C. ; Dhillon, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-58a6d2238a77191f6f86553a0ea289ac257f335a58bb6044b17f2ef8c7549e5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia - standards</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesiology - standards</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>diagnostic errors/prevention and control</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Errors - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Medical Errors - psychology</topic><topic>medical mistakes</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patient Simulation</topic><topic>physicians/psychology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stiegler, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neelankavil, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canales, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stiegler, M.P.</au><au>Neelankavil, J.P.</au><au>Canales, C.</au><au>Dhillon, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><stitle>Br J Anaesth</stitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>229-235</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><coden>BJANAD</coden><abstract>Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviation, and other medical specialities. We sought to identify which types of cognitive errors are most important in anaesthesiology. This study consisted of two parts. First, we created a cognitive error catalogue specific to anaesthesiology practice using a literature review, modified Delphi method with experts, and a survey of academic faculty. In the second part, we observed for those cognitive errors during resident physician management of simulated anaesthesiology emergencies. Of &gt;30 described cognitive errors, the modified Delphi method yielded 14 key items experts felt were most important and prevalent in anaesthesiology practice (Table 1). Faculty survey responses narrowed this to a ‘top 10’ catalogue consisting of anchoring, availability bias, premature closure, feedback bias, framing effect, confirmation bias, omission bias, commission bias, overconfidence, and sunk costs (Table 2). Nine types of cognitive errors were selected for observation during simulated emergency management. Seven of those nine types of cognitive errors occurred in &gt;50% of observed emergencies (Table 3). Cognitive errors are thought to contribute significantly to medical mishaps. We identified cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology practice. Understanding the key types of cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology is the first step towards training in metacognition and de-biasing strategies, which may improve patient safety.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22157846</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aer387</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2012-02, Vol.108 (2), p.229-235
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916698985
source MEDLINE; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anesthesia
Anesthesia - standards
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthesiology - standards
Biological and medical sciences
California
Clinical Competence
Cognition
Decision Making
Delphi Technique
diagnostic errors/prevention and control
Emergencies
Humans
Medical Errors - prevention & control
Medical Errors - psychology
medical mistakes
Medical sciences
Patient Simulation
physicians/psychology
Pilot Projects
title Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A28%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20errors%20detected%20in%20anaesthesiology:%20a%20literature%20review%20and%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Stiegler,%20M.P.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=229-235&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft.coden=BJANAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aer387&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E916698985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916698985&rft_id=info:pmid/22157846&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bja/aer387&rft_els_id=S0007091217324789&rfr_iscdi=true