Reduction of Post-surgical Pericardial Adhesions Using a Pig Model
Background Post-surgical pericardial adhesions pose an increased risk of complications during redo sternotomies. Adhesive tissue formation is a normal response to tissue injury and involves complex patho-physiological processes including the actions of prostaglandins to cause plasma leakage and fibr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart, lung & circulation lung & circulation, 2012-01, Vol.21 (1), p.22-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 22 |
container_title | Heart, lung & circulation |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Alizzi, Ali M., MD Summers, Phillip, PhD Boon, Virginia H., BPharm (Hons) Tantiongco, John-Paul, BMBS Thompson, Teresa, BN Leslie, Belinda J., BVSc Williams, David, FRCPath Steele, Mike, PhD Bidstrup, Benjamin P., FRACS Diqer, Al-Mutazz A., FRACs |
description | Background Post-surgical pericardial adhesions pose an increased risk of complications during redo sternotomies. Adhesive tissue formation is a normal response to tissue injury and involves complex patho-physiological processes including the actions of prostaglandins to cause plasma leakage and fibrin formation. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (Indomethacin and Rofecoxib) and a barrier (Coseal, a polyethylene glycol) to limit adhesion formation following cardiac surgery in a pig model. Methods Forty-four piglets were allocated equally to four treatment groups: Group 1: Control, Group 2: intramuscular Indomethacin, Group 3: oral Rofecoxib and Group 4: Coseal sprayed on the heart. A full median sternotomy was performed on each animal and the heart exposed. Adhesions were induced by rubbing tissues with gauze, applying sutures and leaving blood in the pericardial sac before chest closure. Plasma inflammatory markers including prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 were measured preoperatively and on Days 2, 5 and 10 after surgery. Eight animals from each group were slaughtered after 12 weeks and 3 after 25 weeks. Adhesions were assessed macroscopically and microscopically. Results Compared to the Control group, the extent of adhesions was significantly less in all other groups whilst adhesion density was least in the Indomethacin and Coseal groups. Indomethacin and less so Rofecoxib, inhibited the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 but there were no significant changes in other inflammatory markers. Conclusions We conclude that systemic Indomethacin, and locally applied Coseal are suitable methods to markedly reduce pericardial and retrosternal adhesions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.hlc.2011.10.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916519031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1443950611012066</els_id><sourcerecordid>916519031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-f0501b515bc87104cb7bf6c4b6ef56c0b941714460fc3834f5efa48cd6b97dff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxa2qiD9bPkAvVW6csp1JHCdRJSS6aikSiBVlz1ZijxdvszHYCRLfvg675cChpxlb7z3N_IaxzwhzBBRfN_OHTs0zQIzvOUD2gR0j5zzNqjr7-NrnaV2AOGInIWwAsOR5fciOsgzKKsf8mH2_Iz2qwbo-cSZZujCkYfRrq5ouWZKP1Wsb-wv9QCGqQrIKtl8nTbK06-TGaeo-sQPTdIFO93XGVj9_3C9-pde3l1eLi-tUFSiG1EAB2BZYtKoqEbhqy9YIxVtBphAK2ppjGScWYFRe5dwUZBpeKS3autTG5DN2tst99O5ppDDIrQ2Kuq7pyY1B1igKrCGuNWO4UyrvQvBk5KO328a_SAQ5kZMbGcnJidz0FclFz5d9-thuSb85_qGKgm87AcUdny15GZSlXpG2ntQgtbP_jT9_51ad7SfMf-iFwsaNvo_wJMqQSZC_p9NNl8OYl4EQ-V_1L5IQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916519031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reduction of Post-surgical Pericardial Adhesions Using a Pig Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Alizzi, Ali M., MD ; Summers, Phillip, PhD ; Boon, Virginia H., BPharm (Hons) ; Tantiongco, John-Paul, BMBS ; Thompson, Teresa, BN ; Leslie, Belinda J., BVSc ; Williams, David, FRCPath ; Steele, Mike, PhD ; Bidstrup, Benjamin P., FRACS ; Diqer, Al-Mutazz A., FRACs</creator><creatorcontrib>Alizzi, Ali M., MD ; Summers, Phillip, PhD ; Boon, Virginia H., BPharm (Hons) ; Tantiongco, John-Paul, BMBS ; Thompson, Teresa, BN ; Leslie, Belinda J., BVSc ; Williams, David, FRCPath ; Steele, Mike, PhD ; Bidstrup, Benjamin P., FRACS ; Diqer, Al-Mutazz A., FRACs</creatorcontrib><description>Background Post-surgical pericardial adhesions pose an increased risk of complications during redo sternotomies. Adhesive tissue formation is a normal response to tissue injury and involves complex patho-physiological processes including the actions of prostaglandins to cause plasma leakage and fibrin formation. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (Indomethacin and Rofecoxib) and a barrier (Coseal, a polyethylene glycol) to limit adhesion formation following cardiac surgery in a pig model. Methods Forty-four piglets were allocated equally to four treatment groups: Group 1: Control, Group 2: intramuscular Indomethacin, Group 3: oral Rofecoxib and Group 4: Coseal sprayed on the heart. A full median sternotomy was performed on each animal and the heart exposed. Adhesions were induced by rubbing tissues with gauze, applying sutures and leaving blood in the pericardial sac before chest closure. Plasma inflammatory markers including prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 were measured preoperatively and on Days 2, 5 and 10 after surgery. Eight animals from each group were slaughtered after 12 weeks and 3 after 25 weeks. Adhesions were assessed macroscopically and microscopically. Results Compared to the Control group, the extent of adhesions was significantly less in all other groups whilst adhesion density was least in the Indomethacin and Coseal groups. Indomethacin and less so Rofecoxib, inhibited the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 but there were no significant changes in other inflammatory markers. Conclusions We conclude that systemic Indomethacin, and locally applied Coseal are suitable methods to markedly reduce pericardial and retrosternal adhesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1443-9506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1444-2892</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2011.10.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22078313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adhesions ; Animal model ; Animals ; Biological Availability ; Biomarkers ; Cardiovascular ; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - administration & dosage ; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics ; Dinoprostone - blood ; Disease Models, Animal ; Drug Monitoring ; Indomethacin - administration & dosage ; Indomethacin - pharmacokinetics ; Inflammation ; Inflammation - blood ; Lactones - administration & dosage ; Lactones - pharmacokinetics ; Pericardium ; Pericardium - drug effects ; Pericardium - pathology ; Perioperative Period - methods ; Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage ; Polyethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics ; Postoperative Complications - blood ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Prostaglandins ; Sternotomy - adverse effects ; Sternotomy - methods ; Sulfones - administration & dosage ; Sulfones - pharmacokinetics ; Surface-Active Agents - administration & dosage ; Surface-Active Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Swine ; Thromboxane B2 - blood ; Tissue Adhesions - blood ; Tissue Adhesions - etiology ; Tissue Adhesions - pathology ; Tissue Adhesions - prevention & control ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>Heart, lung & circulation, 2012-01, Vol.21 (1), p.22-29</ispartof><rights>Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand</rights><rights>2011 Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-f0501b515bc87104cb7bf6c4b6ef56c0b941714460fc3834f5efa48cd6b97dff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-f0501b515bc87104cb7bf6c4b6ef56c0b941714460fc3834f5efa48cd6b97dff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1443950611012066$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22078313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alizzi, Ali M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Phillip, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boon, Virginia H., BPharm (Hons)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tantiongco, John-Paul, BMBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Teresa, BN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leslie, Belinda J., BVSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David, FRCPath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, Mike, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bidstrup, Benjamin P., FRACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diqer, Al-Mutazz A., FRACs</creatorcontrib><title>Reduction of Post-surgical Pericardial Adhesions Using a Pig Model</title><title>Heart, lung & circulation</title><addtitle>Heart Lung Circ</addtitle><description>Background Post-surgical pericardial adhesions pose an increased risk of complications during redo sternotomies. Adhesive tissue formation is a normal response to tissue injury and involves complex patho-physiological processes including the actions of prostaglandins to cause plasma leakage and fibrin formation. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (Indomethacin and Rofecoxib) and a barrier (Coseal, a polyethylene glycol) to limit adhesion formation following cardiac surgery in a pig model. Methods Forty-four piglets were allocated equally to four treatment groups: Group 1: Control, Group 2: intramuscular Indomethacin, Group 3: oral Rofecoxib and Group 4: Coseal sprayed on the heart. A full median sternotomy was performed on each animal and the heart exposed. Adhesions were induced by rubbing tissues with gauze, applying sutures and leaving blood in the pericardial sac before chest closure. Plasma inflammatory markers including prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 were measured preoperatively and on Days 2, 5 and 10 after surgery. Eight animals from each group were slaughtered after 12 weeks and 3 after 25 weeks. Adhesions were assessed macroscopically and microscopically. Results Compared to the Control group, the extent of adhesions was significantly less in all other groups whilst adhesion density was least in the Indomethacin and Coseal groups. Indomethacin and less so Rofecoxib, inhibited the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 but there were no significant changes in other inflammatory markers. Conclusions We conclude that systemic Indomethacin, and locally applied Coseal are suitable methods to markedly reduce pericardial and retrosternal adhesions.</description><subject>Adhesions</subject><subject>Animal model</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Availability</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Dinoprostone - blood</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Drug Monitoring</subject><subject>Indomethacin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Indomethacin - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Inflammation - blood</subject><subject>Lactones - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Lactones - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pericardium</subject><subject>Pericardium - drug effects</subject><subject>Pericardium - pathology</subject><subject>Perioperative Period - methods</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - blood</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Prostaglandins</subject><subject>Sternotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sternotomy - methods</subject><subject>Sulfones - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Sulfones - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Surface-Active Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Surface-Active Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Thromboxane B2 - blood</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - blood</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - etiology</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - pathology</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - prevention & control</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1443-9506</issn><issn>1444-2892</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxa2qiD9bPkAvVW6csp1JHCdRJSS6aikSiBVlz1ZijxdvszHYCRLfvg675cChpxlb7z3N_IaxzwhzBBRfN_OHTs0zQIzvOUD2gR0j5zzNqjr7-NrnaV2AOGInIWwAsOR5fciOsgzKKsf8mH2_Iz2qwbo-cSZZujCkYfRrq5ouWZKP1Wsb-wv9QCGqQrIKtl8nTbK06-TGaeo-sQPTdIFO93XGVj9_3C9-pde3l1eLi-tUFSiG1EAB2BZYtKoqEbhqy9YIxVtBphAK2ppjGScWYFRe5dwUZBpeKS3autTG5DN2tst99O5ppDDIrQ2Kuq7pyY1B1igKrCGuNWO4UyrvQvBk5KO328a_SAQ5kZMbGcnJidz0FclFz5d9-thuSb85_qGKgm87AcUdny15GZSlXpG2ntQgtbP_jT9_51ad7SfMf-iFwsaNvo_wJMqQSZC_p9NNl8OYl4EQ-V_1L5IQ</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Alizzi, Ali M., MD</creator><creator>Summers, Phillip, PhD</creator><creator>Boon, Virginia H., BPharm (Hons)</creator><creator>Tantiongco, John-Paul, BMBS</creator><creator>Thompson, Teresa, BN</creator><creator>Leslie, Belinda J., BVSc</creator><creator>Williams, David, FRCPath</creator><creator>Steele, Mike, PhD</creator><creator>Bidstrup, Benjamin P., FRACS</creator><creator>Diqer, Al-Mutazz A., FRACs</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Reduction of Post-surgical Pericardial Adhesions Using a Pig Model</title><author>Alizzi, Ali M., MD ; Summers, Phillip, PhD ; Boon, Virginia H., BPharm (Hons) ; Tantiongco, John-Paul, BMBS ; Thompson, Teresa, BN ; Leslie, Belinda J., BVSc ; Williams, David, FRCPath ; Steele, Mike, PhD ; Bidstrup, Benjamin P., FRACS ; Diqer, Al-Mutazz A., FRACs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-f0501b515bc87104cb7bf6c4b6ef56c0b941714460fc3834f5efa48cd6b97dff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adhesions</topic><topic>Animal model</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Availability</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Dinoprostone - blood</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Drug Monitoring</topic><topic>Indomethacin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Indomethacin - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Inflammation - blood</topic><topic>Lactones - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Lactones - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pericardium</topic><topic>Pericardium - drug effects</topic><topic>Pericardium - pathology</topic><topic>Perioperative Period - methods</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - blood</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Prostaglandins</topic><topic>Sternotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sternotomy - methods</topic><topic>Sulfones - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Sulfones - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Surface-Active Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Surface-Active Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Thromboxane B2 - blood</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - blood</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - etiology</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - pathology</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - prevention & control</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alizzi, Ali M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Phillip, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boon, Virginia H., BPharm (Hons)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tantiongco, John-Paul, BMBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Teresa, BN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leslie, Belinda J., BVSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David, FRCPath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, Mike, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bidstrup, Benjamin P., FRACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diqer, Al-Mutazz A., FRACs</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart, lung & circulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alizzi, Ali M., MD</au><au>Summers, Phillip, PhD</au><au>Boon, Virginia H., BPharm (Hons)</au><au>Tantiongco, John-Paul, BMBS</au><au>Thompson, Teresa, BN</au><au>Leslie, Belinda J., BVSc</au><au>Williams, David, FRCPath</au><au>Steele, Mike, PhD</au><au>Bidstrup, Benjamin P., FRACS</au><au>Diqer, Al-Mutazz A., FRACs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reduction of Post-surgical Pericardial Adhesions Using a Pig Model</atitle><jtitle>Heart, lung & circulation</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Lung Circ</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>22-29</pages><issn>1443-9506</issn><eissn>1444-2892</eissn><abstract>Background Post-surgical pericardial adhesions pose an increased risk of complications during redo sternotomies. Adhesive tissue formation is a normal response to tissue injury and involves complex patho-physiological processes including the actions of prostaglandins to cause plasma leakage and fibrin formation. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (Indomethacin and Rofecoxib) and a barrier (Coseal, a polyethylene glycol) to limit adhesion formation following cardiac surgery in a pig model. Methods Forty-four piglets were allocated equally to four treatment groups: Group 1: Control, Group 2: intramuscular Indomethacin, Group 3: oral Rofecoxib and Group 4: Coseal sprayed on the heart. A full median sternotomy was performed on each animal and the heart exposed. Adhesions were induced by rubbing tissues with gauze, applying sutures and leaving blood in the pericardial sac before chest closure. Plasma inflammatory markers including prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 were measured preoperatively and on Days 2, 5 and 10 after surgery. Eight animals from each group were slaughtered after 12 weeks and 3 after 25 weeks. Adhesions were assessed macroscopically and microscopically. Results Compared to the Control group, the extent of adhesions was significantly less in all other groups whilst adhesion density was least in the Indomethacin and Coseal groups. Indomethacin and less so Rofecoxib, inhibited the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 but there were no significant changes in other inflammatory markers. Conclusions We conclude that systemic Indomethacin, and locally applied Coseal are suitable methods to markedly reduce pericardial and retrosternal adhesions.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22078313</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hlc.2011.10.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1443-9506 |
ispartof | Heart, lung & circulation, 2012-01, Vol.21 (1), p.22-29 |
issn | 1443-9506 1444-2892 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916519031 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adhesions Animal model Animals Biological Availability Biomarkers Cardiovascular Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - administration & dosage Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics Dinoprostone - blood Disease Models, Animal Drug Monitoring Indomethacin - administration & dosage Indomethacin - pharmacokinetics Inflammation Inflammation - blood Lactones - administration & dosage Lactones - pharmacokinetics Pericardium Pericardium - drug effects Pericardium - pathology Perioperative Period - methods Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage Polyethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics Postoperative Complications - blood Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Prostaglandins Sternotomy - adverse effects Sternotomy - methods Sulfones - administration & dosage Sulfones - pharmacokinetics Surface-Active Agents - administration & dosage Surface-Active Agents - pharmacokinetics Swine Thromboxane B2 - blood Tissue Adhesions - blood Tissue Adhesions - etiology Tissue Adhesions - pathology Tissue Adhesions - prevention & control Treatment Outcome |
title | Reduction of Post-surgical Pericardial Adhesions Using a Pig Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T20%3A39%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduction%20of%20Post-surgical%20Pericardial%20Adhesions%20Using%20a%20Pig%20Model&rft.jtitle=Heart,%20lung%20&%20circulation&rft.au=Alizzi,%20Ali%20M.,%20MD&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=22-29&rft.issn=1443-9506&rft.eissn=1444-2892&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hlc.2011.10.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E916519031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916519031&rft_id=info:pmid/22078313&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1443950611012066&rfr_iscdi=true |