Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer

The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current urology reports 2012-02, Vol.13 (1), p.82-92
Hauptverfasser: Cornud, F., Delongchamps, N. B., Mozer, P., Beuvon, F., Schull, A., Muradyan, N., Peyromaure, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue 1
container_start_page 82
container_title Current urology reports
container_volume 13
creator Cornud, F.
Delongchamps, N. B.
Mozer, P.
Beuvon, F.
Schull, A.
Muradyan, N.
Peyromaure, M.
description The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate the actual tumor burden of a newly diagnosed prostate cancer more accurately than sextant biopsy protocols. Tumor risk, defined by the D’Amico criteria, hence can be re-evaluated by multiparametric MRI. As a result, there is increasing evidence that MRI before repeat or even initial biopsy can accurately select patients who require immediate biopsies and those in whom biopsy could be deferred. Also, a relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), calculated from DWI, and Gleason score was found. Thus, MRI before biopsy helps to detect high-grade tumors to target biopsies within areas of low ADC values. To achieve good targeting accuracy, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-MRI image registration is necessary. Three-dimensional deformable registration is sufficiently accurate to match TRUS and MRI volumes with a topographic precision of 1 mm. Real-time MRI-guided biopsy is another technique under evaluation. Both approaches will allow for increasing acceptance of focal therapies, should these techniques be validated in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916148748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>916148748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f14b940813b0c8b28534801aca71be5e1d256909d1f17b27abb628de06ce0523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQNiaDz3biZEFCFR-VWoFQBaNlOw6k5KPYyUB_PY5SGJnOOj_36u5B6BzIFRAirj1AxjgmAJhQBnh3gKYQh05C0_hweFOBqWBigk683xBCCUn5MZpQCixLKJ-im1dV9TZqi2jVV125VU7VtnOliVYvi6hsou7DRm-t-8T9dqCeXes71dlorhpj3Sk6KlTl7dm-ztD6_m49f8TLp4fF_HaJDeOswwVwnXGSAtPEpDpsx3hKQBklQNvYQk7jJCNZDgUITYXSOpyQW5IYS2LKZuhyjN269qu3vpN16Y2tKtXYtvcygwR4KngaSBhJExb1zhZy68pauW8JRA7S5ChNBmlykCZ3YeZin97r2uZ_E7-WAkBHwIev5t06uWl714SD_0n9AVDDdeU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916148748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Cornud, F. ; Delongchamps, N. B. ; Mozer, P. ; Beuvon, F. ; Schull, A. ; Muradyan, N. ; Peyromaure, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cornud, F. ; Delongchamps, N. B. ; Mozer, P. ; Beuvon, F. ; Schull, A. ; Muradyan, N. ; Peyromaure, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate the actual tumor burden of a newly diagnosed prostate cancer more accurately than sextant biopsy protocols. Tumor risk, defined by the D’Amico criteria, hence can be re-evaluated by multiparametric MRI. As a result, there is increasing evidence that MRI before repeat or even initial biopsy can accurately select patients who require immediate biopsies and those in whom biopsy could be deferred. Also, a relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), calculated from DWI, and Gleason score was found. Thus, MRI before biopsy helps to detect high-grade tumors to target biopsies within areas of low ADC values. To achieve good targeting accuracy, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-MRI image registration is necessary. Three-dimensional deformable registration is sufficiently accurate to match TRUS and MRI volumes with a topographic precision of 1 mm. Real-time MRI-guided biopsy is another technique under evaluation. Both approaches will allow for increasing acceptance of focal therapies, should these techniques be validated in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22139624</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Current Science Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neoplasm Grading - methods ; Nephrology ; New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Section Editor ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Current urology reports, 2012-02, Vol.13 (1), p.82-92</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f14b940813b0c8b28534801aca71be5e1d256909d1f17b27abb628de06ce0523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f14b940813b0c8b28534801aca71be5e1d256909d1f17b27abb628de06ce0523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22139624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cornud, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delongchamps, N. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozer, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beuvon, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schull, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muradyan, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyromaure, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer</title><title>Current urology reports</title><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><description>The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate the actual tumor burden of a newly diagnosed prostate cancer more accurately than sextant biopsy protocols. Tumor risk, defined by the D’Amico criteria, hence can be re-evaluated by multiparametric MRI. As a result, there is increasing evidence that MRI before repeat or even initial biopsy can accurately select patients who require immediate biopsies and those in whom biopsy could be deferred. Also, a relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), calculated from DWI, and Gleason score was found. Thus, MRI before biopsy helps to detect high-grade tumors to target biopsies within areas of low ADC values. To achieve good targeting accuracy, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-MRI image registration is necessary. Three-dimensional deformable registration is sufficiently accurate to match TRUS and MRI volumes with a topographic precision of 1 mm. Real-time MRI-guided biopsy is another technique under evaluation. Both approaches will allow for increasing acceptance of focal therapies, should these techniques be validated in the future.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading - methods</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Section Editor</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1527-2737</issn><issn>1534-6285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQNiaDz3biZEFCFR-VWoFQBaNlOw6k5KPYyUB_PY5SGJnOOj_36u5B6BzIFRAirj1AxjgmAJhQBnh3gKYQh05C0_hweFOBqWBigk683xBCCUn5MZpQCixLKJ-im1dV9TZqi2jVV125VU7VtnOliVYvi6hsou7DRm-t-8T9dqCeXes71dlorhpj3Sk6KlTl7dm-ztD6_m49f8TLp4fF_HaJDeOswwVwnXGSAtPEpDpsx3hKQBklQNvYQk7jJCNZDgUITYXSOpyQW5IYS2LKZuhyjN269qu3vpN16Y2tKtXYtvcygwR4KngaSBhJExb1zhZy68pauW8JRA7S5ChNBmlykCZ3YeZin97r2uZ_E7-WAkBHwIev5t06uWl714SD_0n9AVDDdeU</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Cornud, F.</creator><creator>Delongchamps, N. B.</creator><creator>Mozer, P.</creator><creator>Beuvon, F.</creator><creator>Schull, A.</creator><creator>Muradyan, N.</creator><creator>Peyromaure, M.</creator><general>Current Science Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer</title><author>Cornud, F. ; Delongchamps, N. B. ; Mozer, P. ; Beuvon, F. ; Schull, A. ; Muradyan, N. ; Peyromaure, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f14b940813b0c8b28534801aca71be5e1d256909d1f17b27abb628de06ce0523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading - methods</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Section Editor</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cornud, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delongchamps, N. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozer, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beuvon, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schull, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muradyan, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyromaure, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cornud, F.</au><au>Delongchamps, N. B.</au><au>Mozer, P.</au><au>Beuvon, F.</au><au>Schull, A.</au><au>Muradyan, N.</au><au>Peyromaure, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle><stitle>Curr Urol Rep</stitle><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>82-92</pages><issn>1527-2737</issn><eissn>1534-6285</eissn><abstract>The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate the actual tumor burden of a newly diagnosed prostate cancer more accurately than sextant biopsy protocols. Tumor risk, defined by the D’Amico criteria, hence can be re-evaluated by multiparametric MRI. As a result, there is increasing evidence that MRI before repeat or even initial biopsy can accurately select patients who require immediate biopsies and those in whom biopsy could be deferred. Also, a relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), calculated from DWI, and Gleason score was found. Thus, MRI before biopsy helps to detect high-grade tumors to target biopsies within areas of low ADC values. To achieve good targeting accuracy, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-MRI image registration is necessary. Three-dimensional deformable registration is sufficiently accurate to match TRUS and MRI volumes with a topographic precision of 1 mm. Real-time MRI-guided biopsy is another technique under evaluation. Both approaches will allow for increasing acceptance of focal therapies, should these techniques be validated in the future.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Current Science Inc</pub><pmid>22139624</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1527-2737
ispartof Current urology reports, 2012-02, Vol.13 (1), p.82-92
issn 1527-2737
1534-6285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916148748
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neoplasm Grading - methods
Nephrology
New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Section Editor
Sensitivity and Specificity
Urology
title Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A02%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20of%20Multiparametric%20MRI%20in%20the%20Work-up%20of%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Current%20urology%20reports&rft.au=Cornud,%20F.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=82-92&rft.issn=1527-2737&rft.eissn=1534-6285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E916148748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916148748&rft_id=info:pmid/22139624&rfr_iscdi=true