Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer
The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current urology reports 2012-02, Vol.13 (1), p.82-92 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 92 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | Current urology reports |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Cornud, F. Delongchamps, N. B. Mozer, P. Beuvon, F. Schull, A. Muradyan, N. Peyromaure, M. |
description | The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate the actual tumor burden of a newly diagnosed prostate cancer more accurately than sextant biopsy protocols. Tumor risk, defined by the D’Amico criteria, hence can be re-evaluated by multiparametric MRI. As a result, there is increasing evidence that MRI before repeat or even initial biopsy can accurately select patients who require immediate biopsies and those in whom biopsy could be deferred. Also, a relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), calculated from DWI, and Gleason score was found. Thus, MRI before biopsy helps to detect high-grade tumors to target biopsies within areas of low ADC values. To achieve good targeting accuracy, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-MRI image registration is necessary. Three-dimensional deformable registration is sufficiently accurate to match TRUS and MRI volumes with a topographic precision of 1 mm. Real-time MRI-guided biopsy is another technique under evaluation. Both approaches will allow for increasing acceptance of focal therapies, should these techniques be validated in the future. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916148748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>916148748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f14b940813b0c8b28534801aca71be5e1d256909d1f17b27abb628de06ce0523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQNiaDz3biZEFCFR-VWoFQBaNlOw6k5KPYyUB_PY5SGJnOOj_36u5B6BzIFRAirj1AxjgmAJhQBnh3gKYQh05C0_hweFOBqWBigk683xBCCUn5MZpQCixLKJ-im1dV9TZqi2jVV125VU7VtnOliVYvi6hsou7DRm-t-8T9dqCeXes71dlorhpj3Sk6KlTl7dm-ztD6_m49f8TLp4fF_HaJDeOswwVwnXGSAtPEpDpsx3hKQBklQNvYQk7jJCNZDgUITYXSOpyQW5IYS2LKZuhyjN269qu3vpN16Y2tKtXYtvcygwR4KngaSBhJExb1zhZy68pauW8JRA7S5ChNBmlykCZ3YeZin97r2uZ_E7-WAkBHwIev5t06uWl714SD_0n9AVDDdeU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916148748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Cornud, F. ; Delongchamps, N. B. ; Mozer, P. ; Beuvon, F. ; Schull, A. ; Muradyan, N. ; Peyromaure, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cornud, F. ; Delongchamps, N. B. ; Mozer, P. ; Beuvon, F. ; Schull, A. ; Muradyan, N. ; Peyromaure, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate the actual tumor burden of a newly diagnosed prostate cancer more accurately than sextant biopsy protocols. Tumor risk, defined by the D’Amico criteria, hence can be re-evaluated by multiparametric MRI. As a result, there is increasing evidence that MRI before repeat or even initial biopsy can accurately select patients who require immediate biopsies and those in whom biopsy could be deferred. Also, a relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), calculated from DWI, and Gleason score was found. Thus, MRI before biopsy helps to detect high-grade tumors to target biopsies within areas of low ADC values. To achieve good targeting accuracy, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-MRI image registration is necessary. Three-dimensional deformable registration is sufficiently accurate to match TRUS and MRI volumes with a topographic precision of 1 mm. Real-time MRI-guided biopsy is another technique under evaluation. Both approaches will allow for increasing acceptance of focal therapies, should these techniques be validated in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22139624</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Current Science Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neoplasm Grading - methods ; Nephrology ; New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Section Editor ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Current urology reports, 2012-02, Vol.13 (1), p.82-92</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f14b940813b0c8b28534801aca71be5e1d256909d1f17b27abb628de06ce0523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f14b940813b0c8b28534801aca71be5e1d256909d1f17b27abb628de06ce0523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22139624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cornud, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delongchamps, N. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozer, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beuvon, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schull, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muradyan, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyromaure, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer</title><title>Current urology reports</title><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><description>The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate the actual tumor burden of a newly diagnosed prostate cancer more accurately than sextant biopsy protocols. Tumor risk, defined by the D’Amico criteria, hence can be re-evaluated by multiparametric MRI. As a result, there is increasing evidence that MRI before repeat or even initial biopsy can accurately select patients who require immediate biopsies and those in whom biopsy could be deferred. Also, a relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), calculated from DWI, and Gleason score was found. Thus, MRI before biopsy helps to detect high-grade tumors to target biopsies within areas of low ADC values. To achieve good targeting accuracy, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-MRI image registration is necessary. Three-dimensional deformable registration is sufficiently accurate to match TRUS and MRI volumes with a topographic precision of 1 mm. Real-time MRI-guided biopsy is another technique under evaluation. Both approaches will allow for increasing acceptance of focal therapies, should these techniques be validated in the future.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading - methods</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Section Editor</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1527-2737</issn><issn>1534-6285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQNiaDz3biZEFCFR-VWoFQBaNlOw6k5KPYyUB_PY5SGJnOOj_36u5B6BzIFRAirj1AxjgmAJhQBnh3gKYQh05C0_hweFOBqWBigk683xBCCUn5MZpQCixLKJ-im1dV9TZqi2jVV125VU7VtnOliVYvi6hsou7DRm-t-8T9dqCeXes71dlorhpj3Sk6KlTl7dm-ztD6_m49f8TLp4fF_HaJDeOswwVwnXGSAtPEpDpsx3hKQBklQNvYQk7jJCNZDgUITYXSOpyQW5IYS2LKZuhyjN269qu3vpN16Y2tKtXYtvcygwR4KngaSBhJExb1zhZy68pauW8JRA7S5ChNBmlykCZ3YeZin97r2uZ_E7-WAkBHwIev5t06uWl714SD_0n9AVDDdeU</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Cornud, F.</creator><creator>Delongchamps, N. B.</creator><creator>Mozer, P.</creator><creator>Beuvon, F.</creator><creator>Schull, A.</creator><creator>Muradyan, N.</creator><creator>Peyromaure, M.</creator><general>Current Science Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer</title><author>Cornud, F. ; Delongchamps, N. B. ; Mozer, P. ; Beuvon, F. ; Schull, A. ; Muradyan, N. ; Peyromaure, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f14b940813b0c8b28534801aca71be5e1d256909d1f17b27abb628de06ce0523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading - methods</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Section Editor</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cornud, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delongchamps, N. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozer, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beuvon, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schull, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muradyan, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyromaure, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cornud, F.</au><au>Delongchamps, N. B.</au><au>Mozer, P.</au><au>Beuvon, F.</au><au>Schull, A.</au><au>Muradyan, N.</au><au>Peyromaure, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle><stitle>Curr Urol Rep</stitle><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>82-92</pages><issn>1527-2737</issn><eissn>1534-6285</eissn><abstract>The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate the actual tumor burden of a newly diagnosed prostate cancer more accurately than sextant biopsy protocols. Tumor risk, defined by the D’Amico criteria, hence can be re-evaluated by multiparametric MRI. As a result, there is increasing evidence that MRI before repeat or even initial biopsy can accurately select patients who require immediate biopsies and those in whom biopsy could be deferred. Also, a relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), calculated from DWI, and Gleason score was found. Thus, MRI before biopsy helps to detect high-grade tumors to target biopsies within areas of low ADC values. To achieve good targeting accuracy, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-MRI image registration is necessary. Three-dimensional deformable registration is sufficiently accurate to match TRUS and MRI volumes with a topographic precision of 1 mm. Real-time MRI-guided biopsy is another technique under evaluation. Both approaches will allow for increasing acceptance of focal therapies, should these techniques be validated in the future.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Current Science Inc</pub><pmid>22139624</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1527-2737 |
ispartof | Current urology reports, 2012-02, Vol.13 (1), p.82-92 |
issn | 1527-2737 1534-6285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916148748 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neoplasm Grading - methods Nephrology New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Section Editor Sensitivity and Specificity Urology |
title | Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A02%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20of%20Multiparametric%20MRI%20in%20the%20Work-up%20of%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Current%20urology%20reports&rft.au=Cornud,%20F.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=82-92&rft.issn=1527-2737&rft.eissn=1534-6285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11934-011-0231-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E916148748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916148748&rft_id=info:pmid/22139624&rfr_iscdi=true |