Symptomatic correlation variables in patients with pathological gastroesophageal reflux disease

INTRODUCTION. There are three indexes that correlate symptoms and reflux episodes in pHmetry tests. The utility of these indexes have been evaluated in prospective trials but their advantages and disadvantages remain controversial. To assess the clinical utility of the pHmetric symptomatic correlati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta gastroenterologica latinoamericana 2011-09, Vol.41 (3), p.208-213
Hauptverfasser: Sebastián Lasa, Juan, Peralta, Daniel, Dima, Guillermo, Soifer, Luis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 213
container_issue 3
container_start_page 208
container_title Acta gastroenterologica latinoamericana
container_volume 41
creator Sebastián Lasa, Juan
Peralta, Daniel
Dima, Guillermo
Soifer, Luis
description INTRODUCTION. There are three indexes that correlate symptoms and reflux episodes in pHmetry tests. The utility of these indexes have been evaluated in prospective trials but their advantages and disadvantages remain controversial. To assess the clinical utility of the pHmetric symptomatic correlation indexes in patients with pathological acid reflux. A sequential pilot study of pHmetry tests was performed between September 2008 and June 2010. Twenty patients with gastroesophageal reflux and a DeMeester score above 14.5 were included. For the analysis, a distinction was made between strong acid reflux episodes (pH < 4) and weak acid reflux episodes (pH < 7 and > 4). The following indexes were calculated for both groups mentioned before: symptom index (SI), symptom sensitivity index (SSI) and symptom association probability (SAP). The mean age was 54 and 55% of patients were male. There were 116 symptomatic episodes (mean 5.8 per patient), 1,634 strong acid reflux episodes and 555 weak acid reflux episodes. Twelve (60%) had positive SI for strong acid reflux. Twelve had positive SSI for strong acid reflux and 91.66% of them had positive SI. Only 4 patients had a positive SAP. Only 2 patients had a positive SI for weak acid reflux and none of them had either a positive SI for strong acid reflux or a positive SAP for weak acid reflux. Finally, 30% of patients had a positive SSI for weak acid reflux. Positive correlation was significantly higher in strong acid rather than in weak acid reflux. SAP was the index with the lowest percentage of positivity. On the other hand, there was a high concordance between SI and SSI. Thus, the PAS index does not seem to have enough clinical utility in this cohort of patients.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_915632216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>915632216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p558-27ced287655e7c38d61fe8486a7aee73b3f21a33373b2066aa3055c907f3a0443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UD1PwzAU9ACiVelfQN6YIjl-tZ2MqOJLqtSB7tGL89IaOXGwE6D_niDKLfeh0w13xZYChMhKAbBg65TexQwotVDmhi2klCDLsliy6u3cDWPocHSW2xAj-VmGnn9idFh7Stz1fJgz6sfEv9x4-nWn4MPRWfT8iGmMgVIYTnikOYjU-umbNy4RJrpl1y36ROsLr9jh6fGwfcl2--fX7cMuG5QqMmksNbIwWikyFopG5y0Vm0KjQSIDNbQyRwCYpRRaI4JQypbCtIBis4EVu_-bHWL4mCiNVeeSJe-xpzClqsyVBilzPTfvLs2p7qiphug6jOfq_xL4AfYEXoc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>915632216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Symptomatic correlation variables in patients with pathological gastroesophageal reflux disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sebastián Lasa, Juan ; Peralta, Daniel ; Dima, Guillermo ; Soifer, Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Sebastián Lasa, Juan ; Peralta, Daniel ; Dima, Guillermo ; Soifer, Luis</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTION. There are three indexes that correlate symptoms and reflux episodes in pHmetry tests. The utility of these indexes have been evaluated in prospective trials but their advantages and disadvantages remain controversial. To assess the clinical utility of the pHmetric symptomatic correlation indexes in patients with pathological acid reflux. A sequential pilot study of pHmetry tests was performed between September 2008 and June 2010. Twenty patients with gastroesophageal reflux and a DeMeester score above 14.5 were included. For the analysis, a distinction was made between strong acid reflux episodes (pH &lt; 4) and weak acid reflux episodes (pH &lt; 7 and &gt; 4). The following indexes were calculated for both groups mentioned before: symptom index (SI), symptom sensitivity index (SSI) and symptom association probability (SAP). The mean age was 54 and 55% of patients were male. There were 116 symptomatic episodes (mean 5.8 per patient), 1,634 strong acid reflux episodes and 555 weak acid reflux episodes. Twelve (60%) had positive SI for strong acid reflux. Twelve had positive SSI for strong acid reflux and 91.66% of them had positive SI. Only 4 patients had a positive SAP. Only 2 patients had a positive SI for weak acid reflux and none of them had either a positive SI for strong acid reflux or a positive SAP for weak acid reflux. Finally, 30% of patients had a positive SSI for weak acid reflux. Positive correlation was significantly higher in strong acid rather than in weak acid reflux. SAP was the index with the lowest percentage of positivity. On the other hand, there was a high concordance between SI and SSI. Thus, the PAS index does not seem to have enough clinical utility in this cohort of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22232998</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Argentina</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Female ; Gastric Acid - secretion ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pilot Projects ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severity of Illness Index ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta gastroenterologica latinoamericana, 2011-09, Vol.41 (3), p.208-213</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22232998$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sebastián Lasa, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peralta, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dima, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soifer, Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Symptomatic correlation variables in patients with pathological gastroesophageal reflux disease</title><title>Acta gastroenterologica latinoamericana</title><addtitle>Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam</addtitle><description>INTRODUCTION. There are three indexes that correlate symptoms and reflux episodes in pHmetry tests. The utility of these indexes have been evaluated in prospective trials but their advantages and disadvantages remain controversial. To assess the clinical utility of the pHmetric symptomatic correlation indexes in patients with pathological acid reflux. A sequential pilot study of pHmetry tests was performed between September 2008 and June 2010. Twenty patients with gastroesophageal reflux and a DeMeester score above 14.5 were included. For the analysis, a distinction was made between strong acid reflux episodes (pH &lt; 4) and weak acid reflux episodes (pH &lt; 7 and &gt; 4). The following indexes were calculated for both groups mentioned before: symptom index (SI), symptom sensitivity index (SSI) and symptom association probability (SAP). The mean age was 54 and 55% of patients were male. There were 116 symptomatic episodes (mean 5.8 per patient), 1,634 strong acid reflux episodes and 555 weak acid reflux episodes. Twelve (60%) had positive SI for strong acid reflux. Twelve had positive SSI for strong acid reflux and 91.66% of them had positive SI. Only 4 patients had a positive SAP. Only 2 patients had a positive SI for weak acid reflux and none of them had either a positive SI for strong acid reflux or a positive SAP for weak acid reflux. Finally, 30% of patients had a positive SSI for weak acid reflux. Positive correlation was significantly higher in strong acid rather than in weak acid reflux. SAP was the index with the lowest percentage of positivity. On the other hand, there was a high concordance between SI and SSI. Thus, the PAS index does not seem to have enough clinical utility in this cohort of patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Esophageal pH Monitoring</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastric Acid - secretion</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0300-9033</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UD1PwzAU9ACiVelfQN6YIjl-tZ2MqOJLqtSB7tGL89IaOXGwE6D_niDKLfeh0w13xZYChMhKAbBg65TexQwotVDmhi2klCDLsliy6u3cDWPocHSW2xAj-VmGnn9idFh7Stz1fJgz6sfEv9x4-nWn4MPRWfT8iGmMgVIYTnikOYjU-umbNy4RJrpl1y36ROsLr9jh6fGwfcl2--fX7cMuG5QqMmksNbIwWikyFopG5y0Vm0KjQSIDNbQyRwCYpRRaI4JQypbCtIBis4EVu_-bHWL4mCiNVeeSJe-xpzClqsyVBilzPTfvLs2p7qiphug6jOfq_xL4AfYEXoc</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Sebastián Lasa, Juan</creator><creator>Peralta, Daniel</creator><creator>Dima, Guillermo</creator><creator>Soifer, Luis</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Symptomatic correlation variables in patients with pathological gastroesophageal reflux disease</title><author>Sebastián Lasa, Juan ; Peralta, Daniel ; Dima, Guillermo ; Soifer, Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p558-27ced287655e7c38d61fe8486a7aee73b3f21a33373b2066aa3055c907f3a0443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Esophageal pH Monitoring</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastric Acid - secretion</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sebastián Lasa, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peralta, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dima, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soifer, Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta gastroenterologica latinoamericana</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sebastián Lasa, Juan</au><au>Peralta, Daniel</au><au>Dima, Guillermo</au><au>Soifer, Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Symptomatic correlation variables in patients with pathological gastroesophageal reflux disease</atitle><jtitle>Acta gastroenterologica latinoamericana</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>208-213</pages><issn>0300-9033</issn><abstract>INTRODUCTION. There are three indexes that correlate symptoms and reflux episodes in pHmetry tests. The utility of these indexes have been evaluated in prospective trials but their advantages and disadvantages remain controversial. To assess the clinical utility of the pHmetric symptomatic correlation indexes in patients with pathological acid reflux. A sequential pilot study of pHmetry tests was performed between September 2008 and June 2010. Twenty patients with gastroesophageal reflux and a DeMeester score above 14.5 were included. For the analysis, a distinction was made between strong acid reflux episodes (pH &lt; 4) and weak acid reflux episodes (pH &lt; 7 and &gt; 4). The following indexes were calculated for both groups mentioned before: symptom index (SI), symptom sensitivity index (SSI) and symptom association probability (SAP). The mean age was 54 and 55% of patients were male. There were 116 symptomatic episodes (mean 5.8 per patient), 1,634 strong acid reflux episodes and 555 weak acid reflux episodes. Twelve (60%) had positive SI for strong acid reflux. Twelve had positive SSI for strong acid reflux and 91.66% of them had positive SI. Only 4 patients had a positive SAP. Only 2 patients had a positive SI for weak acid reflux and none of them had either a positive SI for strong acid reflux or a positive SAP for weak acid reflux. Finally, 30% of patients had a positive SSI for weak acid reflux. Positive correlation was significantly higher in strong acid rather than in weak acid reflux. SAP was the index with the lowest percentage of positivity. On the other hand, there was a high concordance between SI and SSI. Thus, the PAS index does not seem to have enough clinical utility in this cohort of patients.</abstract><cop>Argentina</cop><pmid>22232998</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-9033
ispartof Acta gastroenterologica latinoamericana, 2011-09, Vol.41 (3), p.208-213
issn 0300-9033
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_915632216
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Cohort Studies
Esophageal pH Monitoring
Female
Gastric Acid - secretion
Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis
Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pilot Projects
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Severity of Illness Index
Young Adult
title Symptomatic correlation variables in patients with pathological gastroesophageal reflux disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A12%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Symptomatic%20correlation%20variables%20in%20patients%20with%20pathological%20gastroesophageal%20reflux%20disease&rft.jtitle=Acta%20gastroenterologica%20latinoamericana&rft.au=Sebasti%C3%A1n%20Lasa,%20Juan&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=208-213&rft.issn=0300-9033&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E915632216%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=915632216&rft_id=info:pmid/22232998&rfr_iscdi=true