Identifying priority areas for reducing species vulnerability to climate change

Aim: The dimensions of species vulnerability to climate change are complex, and this impedes efforts to provide clear advice for conservation planning. In this study, we used a formal framework to assess species vulnerability to climate change quantifying exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2012-01, Vol.18 (1), p.60-72
Hauptverfasser: Crossman, Neville D., Bryan, Brett A., Summers, David M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 72
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 18
creator Crossman, Neville D.
Bryan, Brett A.
Summers, David M
description Aim: The dimensions of species vulnerability to climate change are complex, and this impedes efforts to provide clear advice for conservation planning. In this study, we used a formal framework to assess species vulnerability to climate change quantifying exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity and then used this information to target areas for reducing vulnerability at a regional scale. Location: The 6500-km 2 Mount Lofty Ranges region in South Australia. Methods: We quantified the vulnerability of 171 plant species in a fragmented yet biologically important agro-ecological landscape, typical of many temperate zones globally. We specified exposure, using three climate change scenarios; sensitivity, as the adverse impact of climate change on species' spatial distribution; and adaptive capacity, as the ability of species to migrate calculated using dispersal kernels. Priority areas for reducing vulnerability were then identified by incorporating these various components into a single priority index. Results: Climate change had a variable impact on species distributions. Those species whose range decreased or shifted geographically were attributed higher sensitivity than those species that increased geographic range or remained unchanged. The ability to adapt to range changes in response to shifting climates varies both spatially and between species. Areas of highest priority for reducing vulnerability were found at higher altitudes and lower latitudes with increasing severity of climate change. Main conclusions: Our study demonstrates the use of a single spatially explicit index that identifies areas in the landscape for targeting specific conservation and restoration actions to reduce species vulnerability to climate change. Our index can be transferred to other regions around the world in which climate change poses an increasing threat to native species.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00851.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_915484390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41420095</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41420095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5111-4f9e3f35927b3a7d713f163eb96e6d2e6ea5ede5a13d57de8263e965f3cc53ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFq3DAQhk1oIWnaRwiYQOnJrqSxZAtyKZsmWZo0l5aWXIRWHiVyvPZWspPdt69chz30FF008H__MHxJklKS0_g-NzktSpYVomA5I5TmhFSc5tuD5GgfvIkzCJFJTsVh8i6EhhACwNlRcrussRuc3bnuPt1413s37FLtUYfU9j71WI9mysIGjcOQPo1th16vXDuBQ5-a1q31gKl50N09vk_eWt0G_PDyHyc_L77-WFxl17eXy8WX68zweHVWWIlggUtWrkCXdUnBUgG4kgJFzVCg5lgj1xRqXtZYsRhKwS0Yw0HXcJx8mvdufP9nxDCotQsG21Z32I9BScqLqgBJInn6H9n0o-_icUpGVQyA0QhVM2R8H4JHq6KLtfY7RYmaPKtGTTrVpFNNntU_z2obqx9f9utgdGu97owL-z7jIDmTLHJnM_fsWty9er86P1_GIdZP5noTht7v6wUtGCGSxzybcxcG3O5z7R-VKKHk6tf3S8XZt9_l4uZOVfAXiZepSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>908523321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying priority areas for reducing species vulnerability to climate change</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><creator>Crossman, Neville D. ; Bryan, Brett A. ; Summers, David M</creator><creatorcontrib>Crossman, Neville D. ; Bryan, Brett A. ; Summers, David M</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: The dimensions of species vulnerability to climate change are complex, and this impedes efforts to provide clear advice for conservation planning. In this study, we used a formal framework to assess species vulnerability to climate change quantifying exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity and then used this information to target areas for reducing vulnerability at a regional scale. Location: The 6500-km 2 Mount Lofty Ranges region in South Australia. Methods: We quantified the vulnerability of 171 plant species in a fragmented yet biologically important agro-ecological landscape, typical of many temperate zones globally. We specified exposure, using three climate change scenarios; sensitivity, as the adverse impact of climate change on species' spatial distribution; and adaptive capacity, as the ability of species to migrate calculated using dispersal kernels. Priority areas for reducing vulnerability were then identified by incorporating these various components into a single priority index. Results: Climate change had a variable impact on species distributions. Those species whose range decreased or shifted geographically were attributed higher sensitivity than those species that increased geographic range or remained unchanged. The ability to adapt to range changes in response to shifting climates varies both spatially and between species. Areas of highest priority for reducing vulnerability were found at higher altitudes and lower latitudes with increasing severity of climate change. Main conclusions: Our study demonstrates the use of a single spatially explicit index that identifies areas in the landscape for targeting specific conservation and restoration actions to reduce species vulnerability to climate change. Our index can be transferred to other regions around the world in which climate change poses an increasing threat to native species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00851.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity conservation ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Biological and medical sciences ; Climate adaptation ; Climate change ; Climate change adaptation ; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change ; Conservation ; Conservation biology ; conservation planning ; Dispersal ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecological modeling ; ecological restoration ; ensemble forecast ; Environmental conservation ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat conservation ; Meteorology ; Plants ; resilience ; Species ; species distribution modelling ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2012-01, Vol.18 (1), p.60-72</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5111-4f9e3f35927b3a7d713f163eb96e6d2e6ea5ede5a13d57de8263e965f3cc53ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5111-4f9e3f35927b3a7d713f163eb96e6d2e6ea5ede5a13d57de8263e965f3cc53ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41420095$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41420095$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,4024,11562,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1472-4642.2011.00851.x$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25395292$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crossman, Neville D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryan, Brett A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, David M</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying priority areas for reducing species vulnerability to climate change</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><description>Aim: The dimensions of species vulnerability to climate change are complex, and this impedes efforts to provide clear advice for conservation planning. In this study, we used a formal framework to assess species vulnerability to climate change quantifying exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity and then used this information to target areas for reducing vulnerability at a regional scale. Location: The 6500-km 2 Mount Lofty Ranges region in South Australia. Methods: We quantified the vulnerability of 171 plant species in a fragmented yet biologically important agro-ecological landscape, typical of many temperate zones globally. We specified exposure, using three climate change scenarios; sensitivity, as the adverse impact of climate change on species' spatial distribution; and adaptive capacity, as the ability of species to migrate calculated using dispersal kernels. Priority areas for reducing vulnerability were then identified by incorporating these various components into a single priority index. Results: Climate change had a variable impact on species distributions. Those species whose range decreased or shifted geographically were attributed higher sensitivity than those species that increased geographic range or remained unchanged. The ability to adapt to range changes in response to shifting climates varies both spatially and between species. Areas of highest priority for reducing vulnerability were found at higher altitudes and lower latitudes with increasing severity of climate change. Main conclusions: Our study demonstrates the use of a single spatially explicit index that identifies areas in the landscape for targeting specific conservation and restoration actions to reduce species vulnerability to climate change. Our index can be transferred to other regions around the world in which climate change poses an increasing threat to native species.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Climate adaptation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change adaptation</subject><subject>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>conservation planning</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>ecological restoration</subject><subject>ensemble forecast</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>resilience</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species distribution modelling</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFq3DAQhk1oIWnaRwiYQOnJrqSxZAtyKZsmWZo0l5aWXIRWHiVyvPZWspPdt69chz30FF008H__MHxJklKS0_g-NzktSpYVomA5I5TmhFSc5tuD5GgfvIkzCJFJTsVh8i6EhhACwNlRcrussRuc3bnuPt1413s37FLtUYfU9j71WI9mysIGjcOQPo1th16vXDuBQ5-a1q31gKl50N09vk_eWt0G_PDyHyc_L77-WFxl17eXy8WX68zweHVWWIlggUtWrkCXdUnBUgG4kgJFzVCg5lgj1xRqXtZYsRhKwS0Yw0HXcJx8mvdufP9nxDCotQsG21Z32I9BScqLqgBJInn6H9n0o-_icUpGVQyA0QhVM2R8H4JHq6KLtfY7RYmaPKtGTTrVpFNNntU_z2obqx9f9utgdGu97owL-z7jIDmTLHJnM_fsWty9er86P1_GIdZP5noTht7v6wUtGCGSxzybcxcG3O5z7R-VKKHk6tf3S8XZt9_l4uZOVfAXiZepSA</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Crossman, Neville D.</creator><creator>Bryan, Brett A.</creator><creator>Summers, David M</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Identifying priority areas for reducing species vulnerability to climate change</title><author>Crossman, Neville D. ; Bryan, Brett A. ; Summers, David M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5111-4f9e3f35927b3a7d713f163eb96e6d2e6ea5ede5a13d57de8263e965f3cc53ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Climate adaptation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change adaptation</topic><topic>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>conservation planning</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>ecological restoration</topic><topic>ensemble forecast</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>resilience</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species distribution modelling</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crossman, Neville D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryan, Brett A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, David M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crossman, Neville D.</au><au>Bryan, Brett A.</au><au>Summers, David M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying priority areas for reducing species vulnerability to climate change</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>60-72</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim: The dimensions of species vulnerability to climate change are complex, and this impedes efforts to provide clear advice for conservation planning. In this study, we used a formal framework to assess species vulnerability to climate change quantifying exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity and then used this information to target areas for reducing vulnerability at a regional scale. Location: The 6500-km 2 Mount Lofty Ranges region in South Australia. Methods: We quantified the vulnerability of 171 plant species in a fragmented yet biologically important agro-ecological landscape, typical of many temperate zones globally. We specified exposure, using three climate change scenarios; sensitivity, as the adverse impact of climate change on species' spatial distribution; and adaptive capacity, as the ability of species to migrate calculated using dispersal kernels. Priority areas for reducing vulnerability were then identified by incorporating these various components into a single priority index. Results: Climate change had a variable impact on species distributions. Those species whose range decreased or shifted geographically were attributed higher sensitivity than those species that increased geographic range or remained unchanged. The ability to adapt to range changes in response to shifting climates varies both spatially and between species. Areas of highest priority for reducing vulnerability were found at higher altitudes and lower latitudes with increasing severity of climate change. Main conclusions: Our study demonstrates the use of a single spatially explicit index that identifies areas in the landscape for targeting specific conservation and restoration actions to reduce species vulnerability to climate change. Our index can be transferred to other regions around the world in which climate change poses an increasing threat to native species.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00851.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2012-01, Vol.18 (1), p.60-72
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_915484390
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biodiversity
Biodiversity conservation
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH
Biological and medical sciences
Climate adaptation
Climate change
Climate change adaptation
Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change
Conservation
Conservation biology
conservation planning
Dispersal
Earth, ocean, space
Ecological modeling
ecological restoration
ensemble forecast
Environmental conservation
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Flowers & plants
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Habitat conservation
Meteorology
Plants
resilience
Species
species distribution modelling
Wildlife conservation
title Identifying priority areas for reducing species vulnerability to climate change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A54%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20priority%20areas%20for%20reducing%20species%20vulnerability%20to%20climate%20change&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Crossman,%20Neville%20D.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=60-72&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00851.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E41420095%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=908523321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41420095&rfr_iscdi=true