Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems

The global decline in biodiversity as a result of urbanization remains poorly understood. Whereas habitat destruction accounts for losses at the species level, it may not explain diversity loss at the community level, because urban centers also attract synanthropic species that do not necessarily ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioscience 2010-03, Vol.60 (3), p.199-208
Hauptverfasser: Shochat, Eyal, Lerman, Susannah B, Anderies, John M, Warren, Paige S, Faeth, Stanley H, Nilon, Charles H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 208
container_issue 3
container_start_page 199
container_title Bioscience
container_volume 60
creator Shochat, Eyal
Lerman, Susannah B
Anderies, John M
Warren, Paige S
Faeth, Stanley H
Nilon, Charles H
description The global decline in biodiversity as a result of urbanization remains poorly understood. Whereas habitat destruction accounts for losses at the species level, it may not explain diversity loss at the community level, because urban centers also attract synanthropic species that do not necessarily exist in wildlands. Here we suggest an alternative framework for understanding this phenomenon: the competitive exclusion of native, nonsynanthropic species by invasive species. We use data from two urban centers (Phoenix and Baltimore) and two taxa (birds and spiders) to link diversity loss with reduced community evenness among species in urban communities. This reduction in evenness may be caused by a minority of invasive species dominating the majority of the resources, consequently excluding nonsynanthropic species that could otherwise adapt to urban conditions. We use foraging efficiency as a mechanism to explain the loss of diversity. Thus, to understand the effects of habitat conversion on biodiversity, and to sustain species-rich communities, future research should give more attention to interspecific interactions in urban settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_915379067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A224863162</galeid><jstor_id>10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A224863162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b818t-126b02cb3f2e160342ad1270ff32298c7d2913277535d9d24df258d936c555083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0s9r2zAUB3AxNliW7bzjzHYYHbWr37Zva0OXBcJ66HIWsi0bBUfKJLks__3kujAywhp8ME98vg899AB4j2CGGGZXlbYZhrHiMCMZfwFm43FKMKUvwQxCyFPCePEavPF-G0tESTkDX1fmQXptzWWysLu9Cjo8FtI0yY22jX5QzutwSNbW-0SbZOMqaZLb2vqDD2rn34JXrey9evf0n4PNt9ufi-_p-m65Wlyv06pARUgR5hXEdUVarBCHhGLZIJzDtiUYl0WdN7hEBOc5I6wpG0ybFrOiKQmvGWOwIHPweeq7d_bXoHwQO-1r1ffSKDt4USJG8hLy_FlZlCWiiMZLzMHHf-TWDs7EMQRGnPB4lxF9mlAneyW0aW1wsh5bimuMacEJ4jiq9ITqlFFO9taoVsfjI5-d8PFr1E7XJwMXR4FogvodOjl4L1b3P863N8uzbbFc_2_IJ1vbvledEvG9F3fH_mrytYvb41Qr9k7vpDsIBMW4nSIurRiXVnAoiOAx8WVK2GF_Br6c8NYH687gHybeSitk57QXm_sICEQFhZjyv_PFaHyCZzv-AbolCW8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216365350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Shochat, Eyal ; Lerman, Susannah B ; Anderies, John M ; Warren, Paige S ; Faeth, Stanley H ; Nilon, Charles H</creator><creatorcontrib>Shochat, Eyal ; Lerman, Susannah B ; Anderies, John M ; Warren, Paige S ; Faeth, Stanley H ; Nilon, Charles H</creatorcontrib><description>The global decline in biodiversity as a result of urbanization remains poorly understood. Whereas habitat destruction accounts for losses at the species level, it may not explain diversity loss at the community level, because urban centers also attract synanthropic species that do not necessarily exist in wildlands. Here we suggest an alternative framework for understanding this phenomenon: the competitive exclusion of native, nonsynanthropic species by invasive species. We use data from two urban centers (Phoenix and Baltimore) and two taxa (birds and spiders) to link diversity loss with reduced community evenness among species in urban communities. This reduction in evenness may be caused by a minority of invasive species dominating the majority of the resources, consequently excluding nonsynanthropic species that could otherwise adapt to urban conditions. We use foraging efficiency as a mechanism to explain the loss of diversity. Thus, to understand the effects of habitat conversion on biodiversity, and to sustain species-rich communities, future research should give more attention to interspecific interactions in urban settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BISNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA: University of California Press</publisher><subject>agricultural land ; Agroecosystems ; Animal communities ; Araneae ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; Biological diversity ; Biological invasions ; Birds ; Carrying capacity (Ecology) ; coexistence ; Columba livia ; Community Relations ; Competition ; Competition (Biology) ; Correlation ; ecological competition ; Ecology ; ecosystems ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental degradation ; evenness ; Extinct species ; foraging ; Forecasts and trends ; Forest habitats ; giving-up density ; Habitat destruction ; Habitat loss ; Habitats ; Holistic Approach ; Indigenous species ; Invasive species ; Long term ecological research ; Market trend/market analysis ; Mathematical optimization ; Measurement ; Observations ; optimal foraging ; Optimization theory ; OVERVIEW ARTICLES ; Passer domesticus ; predators ; rank distribution ; Species ; Species diversity ; Suburban areas ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Urban areas ; Urban habitats ; Urbanization ; wild birds ; wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Bioscience, 2010-03, Vol.60 (3), p.199-208</ispartof><rights>2010 by American Institute of Biological Sciences. All rights reserved. Request permission to photocopy or reproduce article content at the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions Web site at www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintinfo.asp.</rights><rights>2010 by American Institute of Biological Sciences.</rights><rights>2010 by American Institute of Biological Sciences 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 University of California Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 University of California Press</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Mar 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b818t-126b02cb3f2e160342ad1270ff32298c7d2913277535d9d24df258d936c555083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b818t-126b02cb3f2e160342ad1270ff32298c7d2913277535d9d24df258d936c555083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shochat, Eyal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerman, Susannah B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderies, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Paige S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faeth, Stanley H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilon, Charles H</creatorcontrib><title>Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems</title><title>Bioscience</title><addtitle>BioScience</addtitle><description>The global decline in biodiversity as a result of urbanization remains poorly understood. Whereas habitat destruction accounts for losses at the species level, it may not explain diversity loss at the community level, because urban centers also attract synanthropic species that do not necessarily exist in wildlands. Here we suggest an alternative framework for understanding this phenomenon: the competitive exclusion of native, nonsynanthropic species by invasive species. We use data from two urban centers (Phoenix and Baltimore) and two taxa (birds and spiders) to link diversity loss with reduced community evenness among species in urban communities. This reduction in evenness may be caused by a minority of invasive species dominating the majority of the resources, consequently excluding nonsynanthropic species that could otherwise adapt to urban conditions. We use foraging efficiency as a mechanism to explain the loss of diversity. Thus, to understand the effects of habitat conversion on biodiversity, and to sustain species-rich communities, future research should give more attention to interspecific interactions in urban settings.</description><subject>agricultural land</subject><subject>Agroecosystems</subject><subject>Animal communities</subject><subject>Araneae</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Biological invasions</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Carrying capacity (Ecology)</subject><subject>coexistence</subject><subject>Columba livia</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competition (Biology)</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>ecological competition</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>evenness</subject><subject>Extinct species</subject><subject>foraging</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>giving-up density</subject><subject>Habitat destruction</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Holistic Approach</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Long term ecological research</subject><subject>Market trend/market analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical optimization</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>optimal foraging</subject><subject>Optimization theory</subject><subject>OVERVIEW ARTICLES</subject><subject>Passer domesticus</subject><subject>predators</subject><subject>rank distribution</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Suburban areas</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban habitats</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0006-3568</issn><issn>1525-3244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0s9r2zAUB3AxNliW7bzjzHYYHbWr37Zva0OXBcJ66HIWsi0bBUfKJLks__3kujAywhp8ME98vg899AB4j2CGGGZXlbYZhrHiMCMZfwFm43FKMKUvwQxCyFPCePEavPF-G0tESTkDX1fmQXptzWWysLu9Cjo8FtI0yY22jX5QzutwSNbW-0SbZOMqaZLb2vqDD2rn34JXrey9evf0n4PNt9ufi-_p-m65Wlyv06pARUgR5hXEdUVarBCHhGLZIJzDtiUYl0WdN7hEBOc5I6wpG0ybFrOiKQmvGWOwIHPweeq7d_bXoHwQO-1r1ffSKDt4USJG8hLy_FlZlCWiiMZLzMHHf-TWDs7EMQRGnPB4lxF9mlAneyW0aW1wsh5bimuMacEJ4jiq9ITqlFFO9taoVsfjI5-d8PFr1E7XJwMXR4FogvodOjl4L1b3P863N8uzbbFc_2_IJ1vbvledEvG9F3fH_mrytYvb41Qr9k7vpDsIBMW4nSIurRiXVnAoiOAx8WVK2GF_Br6c8NYH687gHybeSitk57QXm_sICEQFhZjyv_PFaHyCZzv-AbolCW8</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Shochat, Eyal</creator><creator>Lerman, Susannah B</creator><creator>Anderies, John M</creator><creator>Warren, Paige S</creator><creator>Faeth, Stanley H</creator><creator>Nilon, Charles H</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>American Institute of Biological Sciences</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems</title><author>Shochat, Eyal ; Lerman, Susannah B ; Anderies, John M ; Warren, Paige S ; Faeth, Stanley H ; Nilon, Charles H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b818t-126b02cb3f2e160342ad1270ff32298c7d2913277535d9d24df258d936c555083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>agricultural land</topic><topic>Agroecosystems</topic><topic>Animal communities</topic><topic>Araneae</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Biological invasions</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Carrying capacity (Ecology)</topic><topic>coexistence</topic><topic>Columba livia</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competition (Biology)</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>ecological competition</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>evenness</topic><topic>Extinct species</topic><topic>foraging</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>giving-up density</topic><topic>Habitat destruction</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Holistic Approach</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Long term ecological research</topic><topic>Market trend/market analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical optimization</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>optimal foraging</topic><topic>Optimization theory</topic><topic>OVERVIEW ARTICLES</topic><topic>Passer domesticus</topic><topic>predators</topic><topic>rank distribution</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Suburban areas</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban habitats</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shochat, Eyal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerman, Susannah B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderies, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Paige S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faeth, Stanley H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilon, Charles H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shochat, Eyal</au><au>Lerman, Susannah B</au><au>Anderies, John M</au><au>Warren, Paige S</au><au>Faeth, Stanley H</au><au>Nilon, Charles H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems</atitle><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle><addtitle>BioScience</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>199-208</pages><issn>0006-3568</issn><eissn>1525-3244</eissn><coden>BISNAS</coden><abstract>The global decline in biodiversity as a result of urbanization remains poorly understood. Whereas habitat destruction accounts for losses at the species level, it may not explain diversity loss at the community level, because urban centers also attract synanthropic species that do not necessarily exist in wildlands. Here we suggest an alternative framework for understanding this phenomenon: the competitive exclusion of native, nonsynanthropic species by invasive species. We use data from two urban centers (Phoenix and Baltimore) and two taxa (birds and spiders) to link diversity loss with reduced community evenness among species in urban communities. This reduction in evenness may be caused by a minority of invasive species dominating the majority of the resources, consequently excluding nonsynanthropic species that could otherwise adapt to urban conditions. We use foraging efficiency as a mechanism to explain the loss of diversity. Thus, to understand the effects of habitat conversion on biodiversity, and to sustain species-rich communities, future research should give more attention to interspecific interactions in urban settings.</abstract><cop>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3568
ispartof Bioscience, 2010-03, Vol.60 (3), p.199-208
issn 0006-3568
1525-3244
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_915379067
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); BioOne Complete
subjects agricultural land
Agroecosystems
Animal communities
Araneae
Biodiversity
Biodiversity loss
Biological diversity
Biological invasions
Birds
Carrying capacity (Ecology)
coexistence
Columba livia
Community Relations
Competition
Competition (Biology)
Correlation
ecological competition
Ecology
ecosystems
Environmental aspects
Environmental degradation
evenness
Extinct species
foraging
Forecasts and trends
Forest habitats
giving-up density
Habitat destruction
Habitat loss
Habitats
Holistic Approach
Indigenous species
Invasive species
Long term ecological research
Market trend/market analysis
Mathematical optimization
Measurement
Observations
optimal foraging
Optimization theory
OVERVIEW ARTICLES
Passer domesticus
predators
rank distribution
Species
Species diversity
Suburban areas
Terrestrial ecosystems
Urban areas
Urban habitats
Urbanization
wild birds
wildlife habitats
title Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T14%3A09%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invasion,%20Competition,%20and%20Biodiversity%20Loss%20in%20Urban%20Ecosystems&rft.jtitle=Bioscience&rft.au=Shochat,%20Eyal&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=199-208&rft.issn=0006-3568&rft.eissn=1525-3244&rft.coden=BISNAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA224863162%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216365350&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A224863162&rft_jstor_id=10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6&rft_oup_id=10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6&rfr_iscdi=true