Ovulating induction methods in rabbit does: The pituitary and ovarian responses

The aim of this study was to compare the pituitary and ovarian responses in rabbit does subjected to different methods of ovulation induction. Forty-eight receptive females were randomly distributed into six groups (N = 8) and were inseminated with standard glass catheters. Buserelin intramuscular (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Theriogenology 2012-01, Vol.77 (2), p.292-298
Hauptverfasser: Rebollar, P.G, Dal Bosco, A, Millán, P, Cardinali, R, Brecchia, G, Sylla, L, Lorenzo, P.L, Castellini, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 298
container_issue 2
container_start_page 292
container_title Theriogenology
container_volume 77
creator Rebollar, P.G
Dal Bosco, A
Millán, P
Cardinali, R
Brecchia, G
Sylla, L
Lorenzo, P.L
Castellini, C
description The aim of this study was to compare the pituitary and ovarian responses in rabbit does subjected to different methods of ovulation induction. Forty-eight receptive females were randomly distributed into six groups (N = 8) and were inseminated with standard glass catheters. Buserelin intramuscular (BM) does were inseminated using a pool of fresh heterospermic semen and an intramuscular injection of 1 μg of buserelin acetate to induce ovulation. Buserelin intravaginal (BV) does were inseminated in a similar way, but ovulation was induced with the GnRH analogue (10 μg of buserelin acetate) combined with 0.5 mL of semen extender. The raw semen (R) and saline groups (S) were inseminated with undiluted semen or saline, respectively, without any inducer of ovulation. Another group (A) received lumbar anaesthesia (1.5 mL of 2% lidocaine), and only the empty catheter was introduced into the vagina. The AR does were treated the same way as group A but were inseminated with raw semen instead of an empty catheter. Blood samples were collected to determine the LH concentrations before and after AI (30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes). Ovulation, pregnancy, and conception rates were determined after euthanasia on day 14 post AI. Ovulating does had higher mean LH concentrations than nonovulating does (197.9 vs. 45.9 ng/mL; P < 0.05). The ovulation rates of buserelin intramuscular and intravaginal does were 100%, and the pregnancy rates were 87.5% and 100%, respectively. Rabbit does in groups A and AR did not ovulate and had similar mean plasma LH concentrations after 60 minutes compared with the S group (49.4 and 49.2 ng/mL vs. 41.6 ng/mL, respectively), which reached ovulation and pregnancy rates of 37.5%. Does inseminated only with raw semen had an ovulation rate of 75% and a pregnancy rate of 62.5%; they also demonstrated higher plasma LH concentrations than does of the S, A, and AR groups. In conclusion, ovulation in rabbit does can be induced by exogenous GnRH administration (im and intravaginal). The high plasma LH concentration and ovulation rate in the R group with respect to the S and A groups could weakly indicate the presence of some molecules in the seminal plasma that could act on or be absorbed by vaginal mucosa. Sensory stimulation and “seminal factors” probably exert a synergy on the ovulation response as demonstrated by the comparison of LH release and the ovulation response in the R, S, RA, and A groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_915378961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093691X11003906</els_id><sourcerecordid>915378961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-918710a23adb33b7c69dbf7698690c2f0fb5e288567835ace5450fe2b2f775043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1r3DAQhkVJaDZp_0LrQ6AnOxrLlqySSwlNUgjsoQn0JmRpvKvFa20leSH_vlo2LeQSehoYnnc-HkIugVZAgV9tqrTG4PwKJz_61XNVU4CKioo28I4soBOyZDWDE7KgVLKSS_h1Rs5j3FBKGefwnpzVINuON7Agy-V-HnVy06pwk51Ncn4qtpjW3sbcKYLue5cK6zF-LR7XWOxcml3S4bnQky38XgenM4Zx56eI8QM5HfQY8eNLvSBPt98fb-7Lh-Xdj5tvD6VpGEulzGcC1TXTtmesF4ZL2w-Cy45LauqBDn2Ldde1XHSs1QbbpqUD1n09CNHShl2QL8e5u-B_zxiT2rpocBz1hH6OSkLLRCc5ZPL6SJrgYww4qF1w2_yAAqoORtVGvTaqDkYVFSobzfFPL4vmfov2X_ivwgx8PgKD9kqvgovq6Wee0Bx0C9axNwmQ0By-uT0SmJXtHQYVjcPJoHUBTVLWu_-79g-azqMT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>915378961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ovulating induction methods in rabbit does: The pituitary and ovarian responses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rebollar, P.G ; Dal Bosco, A ; Millán, P ; Cardinali, R ; Brecchia, G ; Sylla, L ; Lorenzo, P.L ; Castellini, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Rebollar, P.G ; Dal Bosco, A ; Millán, P ; Cardinali, R ; Brecchia, G ; Sylla, L ; Lorenzo, P.L ; Castellini, C</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare the pituitary and ovarian responses in rabbit does subjected to different methods of ovulation induction. Forty-eight receptive females were randomly distributed into six groups (N = 8) and were inseminated with standard glass catheters. Buserelin intramuscular (BM) does were inseminated using a pool of fresh heterospermic semen and an intramuscular injection of 1 μg of buserelin acetate to induce ovulation. Buserelin intravaginal (BV) does were inseminated in a similar way, but ovulation was induced with the GnRH analogue (10 μg of buserelin acetate) combined with 0.5 mL of semen extender. The raw semen (R) and saline groups (S) were inseminated with undiluted semen or saline, respectively, without any inducer of ovulation. Another group (A) received lumbar anaesthesia (1.5 mL of 2% lidocaine), and only the empty catheter was introduced into the vagina. The AR does were treated the same way as group A but were inseminated with raw semen instead of an empty catheter. Blood samples were collected to determine the LH concentrations before and after AI (30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes). Ovulation, pregnancy, and conception rates were determined after euthanasia on day 14 post AI. Ovulating does had higher mean LH concentrations than nonovulating does (197.9 vs. 45.9 ng/mL; P &lt; 0.05). The ovulation rates of buserelin intramuscular and intravaginal does were 100%, and the pregnancy rates were 87.5% and 100%, respectively. Rabbit does in groups A and AR did not ovulate and had similar mean plasma LH concentrations after 60 minutes compared with the S group (49.4 and 49.2 ng/mL vs. 41.6 ng/mL, respectively), which reached ovulation and pregnancy rates of 37.5%. Does inseminated only with raw semen had an ovulation rate of 75% and a pregnancy rate of 62.5%; they also demonstrated higher plasma LH concentrations than does of the S, A, and AR groups. In conclusion, ovulation in rabbit does can be induced by exogenous GnRH administration (im and intravaginal). The high plasma LH concentration and ovulation rate in the R group with respect to the S and A groups could weakly indicate the presence of some molecules in the seminal plasma that could act on or be absorbed by vaginal mucosa. Sensory stimulation and “seminal factors” probably exert a synergy on the ovulation response as demonstrated by the comparison of LH release and the ovulation response in the R, S, RA, and A groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-691X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21958641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>acetates ; Administration, Intravaginal ; animal ovaries ; Animals ; blood ; Buserelin - administration &amp; dosage ; catheters ; conception ; Female ; females ; glass ; GnRH ; gonadotropin-releasing hormone ; Injections, Intramuscular - veterinary ; Insemination, Artificial - methods ; Insemination, Artificial - veterinary ; intramuscular injection ; lidocaine ; luteinizing hormone ; Luteinizing Hormone - blood ; Ovary - physiology ; Ovulation ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; Ovulation Induction - veterinary ; Pituitary Gland - physiology ; Pregnancy ; pregnancy rate ; Rabbit ; rabbits ; Rabbits - physiology ; seminal plasma ; vaginal mucosa</subject><ispartof>Theriogenology, 2012-01, Vol.77 (2), p.292-298</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-918710a23adb33b7c69dbf7698690c2f0fb5e288567835ace5450fe2b2f775043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-918710a23adb33b7c69dbf7698690c2f0fb5e288567835ace5450fe2b2f775043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21958641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rebollar, P.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal Bosco, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millán, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardinali, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brecchia, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sylla, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzo, P.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellini, C</creatorcontrib><title>Ovulating induction methods in rabbit does: The pituitary and ovarian responses</title><title>Theriogenology</title><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare the pituitary and ovarian responses in rabbit does subjected to different methods of ovulation induction. Forty-eight receptive females were randomly distributed into six groups (N = 8) and were inseminated with standard glass catheters. Buserelin intramuscular (BM) does were inseminated using a pool of fresh heterospermic semen and an intramuscular injection of 1 μg of buserelin acetate to induce ovulation. Buserelin intravaginal (BV) does were inseminated in a similar way, but ovulation was induced with the GnRH analogue (10 μg of buserelin acetate) combined with 0.5 mL of semen extender. The raw semen (R) and saline groups (S) were inseminated with undiluted semen or saline, respectively, without any inducer of ovulation. Another group (A) received lumbar anaesthesia (1.5 mL of 2% lidocaine), and only the empty catheter was introduced into the vagina. The AR does were treated the same way as group A but were inseminated with raw semen instead of an empty catheter. Blood samples were collected to determine the LH concentrations before and after AI (30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes). Ovulation, pregnancy, and conception rates were determined after euthanasia on day 14 post AI. Ovulating does had higher mean LH concentrations than nonovulating does (197.9 vs. 45.9 ng/mL; P &lt; 0.05). The ovulation rates of buserelin intramuscular and intravaginal does were 100%, and the pregnancy rates were 87.5% and 100%, respectively. Rabbit does in groups A and AR did not ovulate and had similar mean plasma LH concentrations after 60 minutes compared with the S group (49.4 and 49.2 ng/mL vs. 41.6 ng/mL, respectively), which reached ovulation and pregnancy rates of 37.5%. Does inseminated only with raw semen had an ovulation rate of 75% and a pregnancy rate of 62.5%; they also demonstrated higher plasma LH concentrations than does of the S, A, and AR groups. In conclusion, ovulation in rabbit does can be induced by exogenous GnRH administration (im and intravaginal). The high plasma LH concentration and ovulation rate in the R group with respect to the S and A groups could weakly indicate the presence of some molecules in the seminal plasma that could act on or be absorbed by vaginal mucosa. Sensory stimulation and “seminal factors” probably exert a synergy on the ovulation response as demonstrated by the comparison of LH release and the ovulation response in the R, S, RA, and A groups.</description><subject>acetates</subject><subject>Administration, Intravaginal</subject><subject>animal ovaries</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>blood</subject><subject>Buserelin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>catheters</subject><subject>conception</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>glass</subject><subject>GnRH</subject><subject>gonadotropin-releasing hormone</subject><subject>Injections, Intramuscular - veterinary</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</subject><subject>intramuscular injection</subject><subject>lidocaine</subject><subject>luteinizing hormone</subject><subject>Luteinizing Hormone - blood</subject><subject>Ovary - physiology</subject><subject>Ovulation</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - veterinary</subject><subject>Pituitary Gland - physiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>pregnancy rate</subject><subject>Rabbit</subject><subject>rabbits</subject><subject>Rabbits - physiology</subject><subject>seminal plasma</subject><subject>vaginal mucosa</subject><issn>0093-691X</issn><issn>1879-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1r3DAQhkVJaDZp_0LrQ6AnOxrLlqySSwlNUgjsoQn0JmRpvKvFa20leSH_vlo2LeQSehoYnnc-HkIugVZAgV9tqrTG4PwKJz_61XNVU4CKioo28I4soBOyZDWDE7KgVLKSS_h1Rs5j3FBKGefwnpzVINuON7Agy-V-HnVy06pwk51Ncn4qtpjW3sbcKYLue5cK6zF-LR7XWOxcml3S4bnQky38XgenM4Zx56eI8QM5HfQY8eNLvSBPt98fb-7Lh-Xdj5tvD6VpGEulzGcC1TXTtmesF4ZL2w-Cy45LauqBDn2Ldde1XHSs1QbbpqUD1n09CNHShl2QL8e5u-B_zxiT2rpocBz1hH6OSkLLRCc5ZPL6SJrgYww4qF1w2_yAAqoORtVGvTaqDkYVFSobzfFPL4vmfov2X_ivwgx8PgKD9kqvgovq6Wee0Bx0C9axNwmQ0By-uT0SmJXtHQYVjcPJoHUBTVLWu_-79g-azqMT</recordid><startdate>20120115</startdate><enddate>20120115</enddate><creator>Rebollar, P.G</creator><creator>Dal Bosco, A</creator><creator>Millán, P</creator><creator>Cardinali, R</creator><creator>Brecchia, G</creator><creator>Sylla, L</creator><creator>Lorenzo, P.L</creator><creator>Castellini, C</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120115</creationdate><title>Ovulating induction methods in rabbit does: The pituitary and ovarian responses</title><author>Rebollar, P.G ; Dal Bosco, A ; Millán, P ; Cardinali, R ; Brecchia, G ; Sylla, L ; Lorenzo, P.L ; Castellini, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-918710a23adb33b7c69dbf7698690c2f0fb5e288567835ace5450fe2b2f775043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>acetates</topic><topic>Administration, Intravaginal</topic><topic>animal ovaries</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>blood</topic><topic>Buserelin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>catheters</topic><topic>conception</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>glass</topic><topic>GnRH</topic><topic>gonadotropin-releasing hormone</topic><topic>Injections, Intramuscular - veterinary</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</topic><topic>intramuscular injection</topic><topic>lidocaine</topic><topic>luteinizing hormone</topic><topic>Luteinizing Hormone - blood</topic><topic>Ovary - physiology</topic><topic>Ovulation</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - veterinary</topic><topic>Pituitary Gland - physiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>pregnancy rate</topic><topic>Rabbit</topic><topic>rabbits</topic><topic>Rabbits - physiology</topic><topic>seminal plasma</topic><topic>vaginal mucosa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rebollar, P.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal Bosco, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millán, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardinali, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brecchia, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sylla, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzo, P.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellini, C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rebollar, P.G</au><au>Dal Bosco, A</au><au>Millán, P</au><au>Cardinali, R</au><au>Brecchia, G</au><au>Sylla, L</au><au>Lorenzo, P.L</au><au>Castellini, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ovulating induction methods in rabbit does: The pituitary and ovarian responses</atitle><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><date>2012-01-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>292</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>292-298</pages><issn>0093-691X</issn><eissn>1879-3231</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare the pituitary and ovarian responses in rabbit does subjected to different methods of ovulation induction. Forty-eight receptive females were randomly distributed into six groups (N = 8) and were inseminated with standard glass catheters. Buserelin intramuscular (BM) does were inseminated using a pool of fresh heterospermic semen and an intramuscular injection of 1 μg of buserelin acetate to induce ovulation. Buserelin intravaginal (BV) does were inseminated in a similar way, but ovulation was induced with the GnRH analogue (10 μg of buserelin acetate) combined with 0.5 mL of semen extender. The raw semen (R) and saline groups (S) were inseminated with undiluted semen or saline, respectively, without any inducer of ovulation. Another group (A) received lumbar anaesthesia (1.5 mL of 2% lidocaine), and only the empty catheter was introduced into the vagina. The AR does were treated the same way as group A but were inseminated with raw semen instead of an empty catheter. Blood samples were collected to determine the LH concentrations before and after AI (30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes). Ovulation, pregnancy, and conception rates were determined after euthanasia on day 14 post AI. Ovulating does had higher mean LH concentrations than nonovulating does (197.9 vs. 45.9 ng/mL; P &lt; 0.05). The ovulation rates of buserelin intramuscular and intravaginal does were 100%, and the pregnancy rates were 87.5% and 100%, respectively. Rabbit does in groups A and AR did not ovulate and had similar mean plasma LH concentrations after 60 minutes compared with the S group (49.4 and 49.2 ng/mL vs. 41.6 ng/mL, respectively), which reached ovulation and pregnancy rates of 37.5%. Does inseminated only with raw semen had an ovulation rate of 75% and a pregnancy rate of 62.5%; they also demonstrated higher plasma LH concentrations than does of the S, A, and AR groups. In conclusion, ovulation in rabbit does can be induced by exogenous GnRH administration (im and intravaginal). The high plasma LH concentration and ovulation rate in the R group with respect to the S and A groups could weakly indicate the presence of some molecules in the seminal plasma that could act on or be absorbed by vaginal mucosa. Sensory stimulation and “seminal factors” probably exert a synergy on the ovulation response as demonstrated by the comparison of LH release and the ovulation response in the R, S, RA, and A groups.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21958641</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.041</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-691X
ispartof Theriogenology, 2012-01, Vol.77 (2), p.292-298
issn 0093-691X
1879-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_915378961
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects acetates
Administration, Intravaginal
animal ovaries
Animals
blood
Buserelin - administration & dosage
catheters
conception
Female
females
glass
GnRH
gonadotropin-releasing hormone
Injections, Intramuscular - veterinary
Insemination, Artificial - methods
Insemination, Artificial - veterinary
intramuscular injection
lidocaine
luteinizing hormone
Luteinizing Hormone - blood
Ovary - physiology
Ovulation
Ovulation Induction - methods
Ovulation Induction - veterinary
Pituitary Gland - physiology
Pregnancy
pregnancy rate
Rabbit
rabbits
Rabbits - physiology
seminal plasma
vaginal mucosa
title Ovulating induction methods in rabbit does: The pituitary and ovarian responses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T07%3A51%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ovulating%20induction%20methods%20in%20rabbit%20does:%20The%20pituitary%20and%20ovarian%20responses&rft.jtitle=Theriogenology&rft.au=Rebollar,%20P.G&rft.date=2012-01-15&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=292&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=292-298&rft.issn=0093-691X&rft.eissn=1879-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E915378961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=915378961&rft_id=info:pmid/21958641&rft_els_id=S0093691X11003906&rfr_iscdi=true