Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?

In industrialized countries, the idea of degrowth has emerged as a response to environmental, social, and economic crises. Realizing environmental limits to and failures of more than half a century of continual economic growth in terms of social progress and environmental sustainability, the degrowt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2012-02, Vol.14 (1), p.85-109
Hauptverfasser: Xue, Jin, Arler, Finn, Næss, Petter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title Environment, development and sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Xue, Jin
Arler, Finn
Næss, Petter
description In industrialized countries, the idea of degrowth has emerged as a response to environmental, social, and economic crises. Realizing environmental limits to and failures of more than half a century of continual economic growth in terms of social progress and environmental sustainability, the degrowth paradigm calls for a downscaling of consumption and production for social equity and ecological sustainability. The call for economic degrowth is generally considered to be delimited to rich countries, where reduced consumption can save “ecological space” enabling people in poor countries to enjoy the benefits of economic growth. China, as one of the economically most expanding countries in the world, has dramatically improved its living standards, particularly along the Eastern coast, over the latest 30 years. However, China is absent from the international debates on growth. This article discusses the implications of the Western degrowth debates for China. Given the distinctive features of China’s development, the paper aims to enrich the degrowth debates, which have hitherto been dominated by Western perspectives. Based upon reflections on social, environmental, and moral dimensions of economic growth, the paper argues that limited natural resources may not continuously support universal affluence at the current level of the rich countries, a level that China is likely to reach within a few decades. Priority for growth in China should therefore be given to the poor regions of the country, and future growth should be beneficial to social and environmental development.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914770088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>914770088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320z-d6c6b460efe43d381f55548a06155598312ddf3b5352fd4b2376195b335b28b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhoMoWKs_wJMBD-phdWY3-3USKX4UBA9a8LZskk2b0iZ1N1Xsr3dLPIigp3kPzzPMvElyjHCJAPIqIAihCCASzRDIZicZIJeMUC35bsxMScIVf91PDkKYA1DQVAySi3FIu5lLSzf17Uc3iyG3nUu9W7h323Rp16ajWd3Y68Nkr7KL4I6-5zCZ3N2-jB7I49P9eHTzSApGYUNKUYg8E-Aql7GSKaw455myIDAGrRjSsqxYzhmnVZnllEmBmueM8ZyqXLJhctbvXfn2be1CZ5Z1KNxiYRvXroPRmEkJoFQkz_8lEVBqqYQWET39hc7btW_iH1uKxhO4ziKFPVX4NgTvKrPy9dL6zwiZbc2mr9nEms22ZrOJDu2dENlm6vzPzX9LJ71U2dbYqa-DmTxTwAwAuaJCsi_ddIWF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1012761594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Xue, Jin ; Arler, Finn ; Næss, Petter</creator><creatorcontrib>Xue, Jin ; Arler, Finn ; Næss, Petter</creatorcontrib><description>In industrialized countries, the idea of degrowth has emerged as a response to environmental, social, and economic crises. Realizing environmental limits to and failures of more than half a century of continual economic growth in terms of social progress and environmental sustainability, the degrowth paradigm calls for a downscaling of consumption and production for social equity and ecological sustainability. The call for economic degrowth is generally considered to be delimited to rich countries, where reduced consumption can save “ecological space” enabling people in poor countries to enjoy the benefits of economic growth. China, as one of the economically most expanding countries in the world, has dramatically improved its living standards, particularly along the Eastern coast, over the latest 30 years. However, China is absent from the international debates on growth. This article discusses the implications of the Western degrowth debates for China. Given the distinctive features of China’s development, the paper aims to enrich the degrowth debates, which have hitherto been dominated by Western perspectives. Based upon reflections on social, environmental, and moral dimensions of economic growth, the paper argues that limited natural resources may not continuously support universal affluence at the current level of the rich countries, a level that China is likely to reach within a few decades. Priority for growth in China should therefore be given to the poor regions of the country, and future growth should be beneficial to social and environmental development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-585X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>China ; Consumption ; Debates ; developed countries ; Developing countries ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economic crisis ; Economic Geology ; Economic Growth ; Economic policy ; Economic reform ; Economics ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Environmental protection ; environmental sustainability ; Ideology ; LDCs ; Morality ; Natural resources ; people ; Political parties ; Social development ; social environment ; Society ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Sustainable Development</subject><ispartof>Environment, development and sustainability, 2012-02, Vol.14 (1), p.85-109</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320z-d6c6b460efe43d381f55548a06155598312ddf3b5352fd4b2376195b335b28b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320z-d6c6b460efe43d381f55548a06155598312ddf3b5352fd4b2376195b335b28b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xue, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arler, Finn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Næss, Petter</creatorcontrib><title>Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?</title><title>Environment, development and sustainability</title><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><description>In industrialized countries, the idea of degrowth has emerged as a response to environmental, social, and economic crises. Realizing environmental limits to and failures of more than half a century of continual economic growth in terms of social progress and environmental sustainability, the degrowth paradigm calls for a downscaling of consumption and production for social equity and ecological sustainability. The call for economic degrowth is generally considered to be delimited to rich countries, where reduced consumption can save “ecological space” enabling people in poor countries to enjoy the benefits of economic growth. China, as one of the economically most expanding countries in the world, has dramatically improved its living standards, particularly along the Eastern coast, over the latest 30 years. However, China is absent from the international debates on growth. This article discusses the implications of the Western degrowth debates for China. Given the distinctive features of China’s development, the paper aims to enrich the degrowth debates, which have hitherto been dominated by Western perspectives. Based upon reflections on social, environmental, and moral dimensions of economic growth, the paper argues that limited natural resources may not continuously support universal affluence at the current level of the rich countries, a level that China is likely to reach within a few decades. Priority for growth in China should therefore be given to the poor regions of the country, and future growth should be beneficial to social and environmental development.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>developed countries</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic Geology</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>environmental sustainability</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>people</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Social development</subject><subject>social environment</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhoMoWKs_wJMBD-phdWY3-3USKX4UBA9a8LZskk2b0iZ1N1Xsr3dLPIigp3kPzzPMvElyjHCJAPIqIAihCCASzRDIZicZIJeMUC35bsxMScIVf91PDkKYA1DQVAySi3FIu5lLSzf17Uc3iyG3nUu9W7h323Rp16ajWd3Y68Nkr7KL4I6-5zCZ3N2-jB7I49P9eHTzSApGYUNKUYg8E-Aql7GSKaw455myIDAGrRjSsqxYzhmnVZnllEmBmueM8ZyqXLJhctbvXfn2be1CZ5Z1KNxiYRvXroPRmEkJoFQkz_8lEVBqqYQWET39hc7btW_iH1uKxhO4ziKFPVX4NgTvKrPy9dL6zwiZbc2mr9nEms22ZrOJDu2dENlm6vzPzX9LJ71U2dbYqa-DmTxTwAwAuaJCsi_ddIWF</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>Xue, Jin</creator><creator>Arler, Finn</creator><creator>Næss, Petter</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?</title><author>Xue, Jin ; Arler, Finn ; Næss, Petter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320z-d6c6b460efe43d381f55548a06155598312ddf3b5352fd4b2376195b335b28b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>developed countries</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic Geology</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>environmental sustainability</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>people</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Social development</topic><topic>social environment</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xue, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arler, Finn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Næss, Petter</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xue, Jin</au><au>Arler, Finn</au><au>Næss, Petter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?</atitle><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Environ Dev Sustain</stitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>85-109</pages><issn>1387-585X</issn><eissn>1573-2975</eissn><abstract>In industrialized countries, the idea of degrowth has emerged as a response to environmental, social, and economic crises. Realizing environmental limits to and failures of more than half a century of continual economic growth in terms of social progress and environmental sustainability, the degrowth paradigm calls for a downscaling of consumption and production for social equity and ecological sustainability. The call for economic degrowth is generally considered to be delimited to rich countries, where reduced consumption can save “ecological space” enabling people in poor countries to enjoy the benefits of economic growth. China, as one of the economically most expanding countries in the world, has dramatically improved its living standards, particularly along the Eastern coast, over the latest 30 years. However, China is absent from the international debates on growth. This article discusses the implications of the Western degrowth debates for China. Given the distinctive features of China’s development, the paper aims to enrich the degrowth debates, which have hitherto been dominated by Western perspectives. Based upon reflections on social, environmental, and moral dimensions of economic growth, the paper argues that limited natural resources may not continuously support universal affluence at the current level of the rich countries, a level that China is likely to reach within a few decades. Priority for growth in China should therefore be given to the poor regions of the country, and future growth should be beneficial to social and environmental development.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-585X
ispartof Environment, development and sustainability, 2012-02, Vol.14 (1), p.85-109
issn 1387-585X
1573-2975
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914770088
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects China
Consumption
Debates
developed countries
Developing countries
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Economic crisis
Economic Geology
Economic Growth
Economic policy
Economic reform
Economics
Environment
Environmental Economics
Environmental impact
Environmental Management
Environmental protection
environmental sustainability
Ideology
LDCs
Morality
Natural resources
people
Political parties
Social development
social environment
Society
Studies
Sustainability
Sustainable Development
title Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A03%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20degrowth%20debate%20relevant%20to%20China?&rft.jtitle=Environment,%20development%20and%20sustainability&rft.au=Xue,%20Jin&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=85-109&rft.issn=1387-585X&rft.eissn=1573-2975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E914770088%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1012761594&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true