Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?
In industrialized countries, the idea of degrowth has emerged as a response to environmental, social, and economic crises. Realizing environmental limits to and failures of more than half a century of continual economic growth in terms of social progress and environmental sustainability, the degrowt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2012-02, Vol.14 (1), p.85-109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Environment, development and sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Xue, Jin Arler, Finn Næss, Petter |
description | In industrialized countries, the idea of degrowth has emerged as a response to environmental, social, and economic crises. Realizing environmental limits to and failures of more than half a century of continual economic growth in terms of social progress and environmental sustainability, the degrowth paradigm calls for a downscaling of consumption and production for social equity and ecological sustainability. The call for economic degrowth is generally considered to be delimited to rich countries, where reduced consumption can save “ecological space” enabling people in poor countries to enjoy the benefits of economic growth. China, as one of the economically most expanding countries in the world, has dramatically improved its living standards, particularly along the Eastern coast, over the latest 30 years. However, China is absent from the international debates on growth. This article discusses the implications of the Western degrowth debates for China. Given the distinctive features of China’s development, the paper aims to enrich the degrowth debates, which have hitherto been dominated by Western perspectives. Based upon reflections on social, environmental, and moral dimensions of economic growth, the paper argues that limited natural resources may not continuously support universal affluence at the current level of the rich countries, a level that China is likely to reach within a few decades. Priority for growth in China should therefore be given to the poor regions of the country, and future growth should be beneficial to social and environmental development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914770088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>914770088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320z-d6c6b460efe43d381f55548a06155598312ddf3b5352fd4b2376195b335b28b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhoMoWKs_wJMBD-phdWY3-3USKX4UBA9a8LZskk2b0iZ1N1Xsr3dLPIigp3kPzzPMvElyjHCJAPIqIAihCCASzRDIZicZIJeMUC35bsxMScIVf91PDkKYA1DQVAySi3FIu5lLSzf17Uc3iyG3nUu9W7h323Rp16ajWd3Y68Nkr7KL4I6-5zCZ3N2-jB7I49P9eHTzSApGYUNKUYg8E-Aql7GSKaw455myIDAGrRjSsqxYzhmnVZnllEmBmueM8ZyqXLJhctbvXfn2be1CZ5Z1KNxiYRvXroPRmEkJoFQkz_8lEVBqqYQWET39hc7btW_iH1uKxhO4ziKFPVX4NgTvKrPy9dL6zwiZbc2mr9nEms22ZrOJDu2dENlm6vzPzX9LJ71U2dbYqa-DmTxTwAwAuaJCsi_ddIWF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1012761594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Xue, Jin ; Arler, Finn ; Næss, Petter</creator><creatorcontrib>Xue, Jin ; Arler, Finn ; Næss, Petter</creatorcontrib><description>In industrialized countries, the idea of degrowth has emerged as a response to environmental, social, and economic crises. Realizing environmental limits to and failures of more than half a century of continual economic growth in terms of social progress and environmental sustainability, the degrowth paradigm calls for a downscaling of consumption and production for social equity and ecological sustainability. The call for economic degrowth is generally considered to be delimited to rich countries, where reduced consumption can save “ecological space” enabling people in poor countries to enjoy the benefits of economic growth. China, as one of the economically most expanding countries in the world, has dramatically improved its living standards, particularly along the Eastern coast, over the latest 30 years. However, China is absent from the international debates on growth. This article discusses the implications of the Western degrowth debates for China. Given the distinctive features of China’s development, the paper aims to enrich the degrowth debates, which have hitherto been dominated by Western perspectives. Based upon reflections on social, environmental, and moral dimensions of economic growth, the paper argues that limited natural resources may not continuously support universal affluence at the current level of the rich countries, a level that China is likely to reach within a few decades. Priority for growth in China should therefore be given to the poor regions of the country, and future growth should be beneficial to social and environmental development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-585X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>China ; Consumption ; Debates ; developed countries ; Developing countries ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economic crisis ; Economic Geology ; Economic Growth ; Economic policy ; Economic reform ; Economics ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Environmental protection ; environmental sustainability ; Ideology ; LDCs ; Morality ; Natural resources ; people ; Political parties ; Social development ; social environment ; Society ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Sustainable Development</subject><ispartof>Environment, development and sustainability, 2012-02, Vol.14 (1), p.85-109</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320z-d6c6b460efe43d381f55548a06155598312ddf3b5352fd4b2376195b335b28b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320z-d6c6b460efe43d381f55548a06155598312ddf3b5352fd4b2376195b335b28b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xue, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arler, Finn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Næss, Petter</creatorcontrib><title>Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?</title><title>Environment, development and sustainability</title><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><description>In industrialized countries, the idea of degrowth has emerged as a response to environmental, social, and economic crises. Realizing environmental limits to and failures of more than half a century of continual economic growth in terms of social progress and environmental sustainability, the degrowth paradigm calls for a downscaling of consumption and production for social equity and ecological sustainability. The call for economic degrowth is generally considered to be delimited to rich countries, where reduced consumption can save “ecological space” enabling people in poor countries to enjoy the benefits of economic growth. China, as one of the economically most expanding countries in the world, has dramatically improved its living standards, particularly along the Eastern coast, over the latest 30 years. However, China is absent from the international debates on growth. This article discusses the implications of the Western degrowth debates for China. Given the distinctive features of China’s development, the paper aims to enrich the degrowth debates, which have hitherto been dominated by Western perspectives. Based upon reflections on social, environmental, and moral dimensions of economic growth, the paper argues that limited natural resources may not continuously support universal affluence at the current level of the rich countries, a level that China is likely to reach within a few decades. Priority for growth in China should therefore be given to the poor regions of the country, and future growth should be beneficial to social and environmental development.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>developed countries</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic Geology</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>environmental sustainability</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>people</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Social development</subject><subject>social environment</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhoMoWKs_wJMBD-phdWY3-3USKX4UBA9a8LZskk2b0iZ1N1Xsr3dLPIigp3kPzzPMvElyjHCJAPIqIAihCCASzRDIZicZIJeMUC35bsxMScIVf91PDkKYA1DQVAySi3FIu5lLSzf17Uc3iyG3nUu9W7h323Rp16ajWd3Y68Nkr7KL4I6-5zCZ3N2-jB7I49P9eHTzSApGYUNKUYg8E-Aql7GSKaw455myIDAGrRjSsqxYzhmnVZnllEmBmueM8ZyqXLJhctbvXfn2be1CZ5Z1KNxiYRvXroPRmEkJoFQkz_8lEVBqqYQWET39hc7btW_iH1uKxhO4ziKFPVX4NgTvKrPy9dL6zwiZbc2mr9nEms22ZrOJDu2dENlm6vzPzX9LJ71U2dbYqa-DmTxTwAwAuaJCsi_ddIWF</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>Xue, Jin</creator><creator>Arler, Finn</creator><creator>Næss, Petter</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?</title><author>Xue, Jin ; Arler, Finn ; Næss, Petter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320z-d6c6b460efe43d381f55548a06155598312ddf3b5352fd4b2376195b335b28b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>developed countries</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic Geology</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>environmental sustainability</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>people</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Social development</topic><topic>social environment</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xue, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arler, Finn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Næss, Petter</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xue, Jin</au><au>Arler, Finn</au><au>Næss, Petter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?</atitle><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Environ Dev Sustain</stitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>85-109</pages><issn>1387-585X</issn><eissn>1573-2975</eissn><abstract>In industrialized countries, the idea of degrowth has emerged as a response to environmental, social, and economic crises. Realizing environmental limits to and failures of more than half a century of continual economic growth in terms of social progress and environmental sustainability, the degrowth paradigm calls for a downscaling of consumption and production for social equity and ecological sustainability. The call for economic degrowth is generally considered to be delimited to rich countries, where reduced consumption can save “ecological space” enabling people in poor countries to enjoy the benefits of economic growth. China, as one of the economically most expanding countries in the world, has dramatically improved its living standards, particularly along the Eastern coast, over the latest 30 years. However, China is absent from the international debates on growth. This article discusses the implications of the Western degrowth debates for China. Given the distinctive features of China’s development, the paper aims to enrich the degrowth debates, which have hitherto been dominated by Western perspectives. Based upon reflections on social, environmental, and moral dimensions of economic growth, the paper argues that limited natural resources may not continuously support universal affluence at the current level of the rich countries, a level that China is likely to reach within a few decades. Priority for growth in China should therefore be given to the poor regions of the country, and future growth should be beneficial to social and environmental development.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-585X |
ispartof | Environment, development and sustainability, 2012-02, Vol.14 (1), p.85-109 |
issn | 1387-585X 1573-2975 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914770088 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | China Consumption Debates developed countries Developing countries Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Economic crisis Economic Geology Economic Growth Economic policy Economic reform Economics Environment Environmental Economics Environmental impact Environmental Management Environmental protection environmental sustainability Ideology LDCs Morality Natural resources people Political parties Social development social environment Society Studies Sustainability Sustainable Development |
title | Is the degrowth debate relevant to China? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A03%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20degrowth%20debate%20relevant%20to%20China?&rft.jtitle=Environment,%20development%20and%20sustainability&rft.au=Xue,%20Jin&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=85-109&rft.issn=1387-585X&rft.eissn=1573-2975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10668-011-9310-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E914770088%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1012761594&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |