Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation
Several analysis methods are available for long-term voltage stability. The V-Q curve power flow method is widely used by Western Systems Coordinating Council utilities, and has some advantages. Long-term dynamic simulation with proper modeling, however, is clearly the most accurate simulation metho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on power systems 2000, Vol.15 (4), p.1354-1359 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1359 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1354 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on power systems |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Chowdhury, B.H. Taylor, C.W. |
description | Several analysis methods are available for long-term voltage stability. The V-Q curve power flow method is widely used by Western Systems Coordinating Council utilities, and has some advantages. Long-term dynamic simulation with proper modeling, however, is clearly the most accurate simulation method. The authors compare the two methods for wintertime voltage stability problems in the Portland, Oregon, USA, load area. Results from the V-Q method can be misleading. The same is true of other power flow program based analysis employing conventional modeling. Results from these power flow methods may be pessimistic, causing overdesign or overly conservative operation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/59.898112 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914639933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>898112</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>914639933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c2d71986f34ba2e2ae5caed3d676fe5301bb880aad8c806f309dce7eae680143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M1LwzAYBvAgCs7pwaun4EU8VJNmSRNvMvyCwRB015CmbyUjXWbSOvrfW-kQ8fQenh8PvA9C55TcUErULVc3UklK8wM0oZzLjIhCHaIJkZJnUnFyjE5SWhNCxBBM0HIVfGs-AKfWlM67tsdmY3yfXLrDq-wVb8MOIq592OHkms6b1oUN_oKYuoSrfmMaZ_8kp-ioNj7B2f5O0fvjw9v8OVssn17m94vMsoK2WW7zqqBKiprNSpNDboBbAxWrRCFq4IzQspSSGFNJK8nAiKosFGBASEJnbIquxt5tDJ8dpFY3Llnw3mwgdEkrOhNMKcYGeflPrkMXhx-THjYhlAkhBnQ9IhtDShFqvY2uMbHXlOifYTVXehx2sBejdQDw6_bhN2wKc7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>885013666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Chowdhury, B.H. ; Taylor, C.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, B.H. ; Taylor, C.W.</creatorcontrib><description>Several analysis methods are available for long-term voltage stability. The V-Q curve power flow method is widely used by Western Systems Coordinating Council utilities, and has some advantages. Long-term dynamic simulation with proper modeling, however, is clearly the most accurate simulation method. The authors compare the two methods for wintertime voltage stability problems in the Portland, Oregon, USA, load area. Results from the V-Q method can be misleading. The same is true of other power flow program based analysis employing conventional modeling. Results from these power flow methods may be pessimistic, causing overdesign or overly conservative operation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/59.898112</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Analytical models ; Computer simulation ; Convergence ; Councils ; Dynamic tests ; Dynamical systems ; Dynamics ; Load flow ; Mathematical models ; Power flow ; Power generation ; Power system simulation ; Reactive power ; Stability analysis ; Static VAr compensators ; Utilities ; Voltage ; Voltage stability</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2000, Vol.15 (4), p.1354-1359</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c2d71986f34ba2e2ae5caed3d676fe5301bb880aad8c806f309dce7eae680143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c2d71986f34ba2e2ae5caed3d676fe5301bb880aad8c806f309dce7eae680143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/898112$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,4024,27923,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/898112$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, B.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, C.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>Several analysis methods are available for long-term voltage stability. The V-Q curve power flow method is widely used by Western Systems Coordinating Council utilities, and has some advantages. Long-term dynamic simulation with proper modeling, however, is clearly the most accurate simulation method. The authors compare the two methods for wintertime voltage stability problems in the Portland, Oregon, USA, load area. Results from the V-Q method can be misleading. The same is true of other power flow program based analysis employing conventional modeling. Results from these power flow methods may be pessimistic, causing overdesign or overly conservative operation.</description><subject>Analytical models</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Convergence</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Dynamic tests</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Load flow</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Power flow</subject><subject>Power generation</subject><subject>Power system simulation</subject><subject>Reactive power</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Static VAr compensators</subject><subject>Utilities</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><subject>Voltage stability</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M1LwzAYBvAgCs7pwaun4EU8VJNmSRNvMvyCwRB015CmbyUjXWbSOvrfW-kQ8fQenh8PvA9C55TcUErULVc3UklK8wM0oZzLjIhCHaIJkZJnUnFyjE5SWhNCxBBM0HIVfGs-AKfWlM67tsdmY3yfXLrDq-wVb8MOIq592OHkms6b1oUN_oKYuoSrfmMaZ_8kp-ioNj7B2f5O0fvjw9v8OVssn17m94vMsoK2WW7zqqBKiprNSpNDboBbAxWrRCFq4IzQspSSGFNJK8nAiKosFGBASEJnbIquxt5tDJ8dpFY3Llnw3mwgdEkrOhNMKcYGeflPrkMXhx-THjYhlAkhBnQ9IhtDShFqvY2uMbHXlOifYTVXehx2sBejdQDw6_bhN2wKc7A</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Chowdhury, B.H.</creator><creator>Taylor, C.W.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation</title><author>Chowdhury, B.H. ; Taylor, C.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c2d71986f34ba2e2ae5caed3d676fe5301bb880aad8c806f309dce7eae680143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Analytical models</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Convergence</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Dynamic tests</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Load flow</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Power flow</topic><topic>Power generation</topic><topic>Power system simulation</topic><topic>Reactive power</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Static VAr compensators</topic><topic>Utilities</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><topic>Voltage stability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, B.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, C.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chowdhury, B.H.</au><au>Taylor, C.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1354</spage><epage>1359</epage><pages>1354-1359</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>Several analysis methods are available for long-term voltage stability. The V-Q curve power flow method is widely used by Western Systems Coordinating Council utilities, and has some advantages. Long-term dynamic simulation with proper modeling, however, is clearly the most accurate simulation method. The authors compare the two methods for wintertime voltage stability problems in the Portland, Oregon, USA, load area. Results from the V-Q method can be misleading. The same is true of other power flow program based analysis employing conventional modeling. Results from these power flow methods may be pessimistic, causing overdesign or overly conservative operation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/59.898112</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-8950 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on power systems, 2000, Vol.15 (4), p.1354-1359 |
issn | 0885-8950 1558-0679 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914639933 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Analytical models Computer simulation Convergence Councils Dynamic tests Dynamical systems Dynamics Load flow Mathematical models Power flow Power generation Power system simulation Reactive power Stability analysis Static VAr compensators Utilities Voltage Voltage stability |
title | Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voltage%20stability%20analysis:%20V-Q%20power%20flow%20simulation%20versus%20dynamic%20simulation&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Chowdhury,%20B.H.&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1354&rft.epage=1359&rft.pages=1354-1359&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/59.898112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E914639933%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=885013666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=898112&rfr_iscdi=true |