Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation

Several analysis methods are available for long-term voltage stability. The V-Q curve power flow method is widely used by Western Systems Coordinating Council utilities, and has some advantages. Long-term dynamic simulation with proper modeling, however, is clearly the most accurate simulation metho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on power systems 2000, Vol.15 (4), p.1354-1359
Hauptverfasser: Chowdhury, B.H., Taylor, C.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1359
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1354
container_title IEEE transactions on power systems
container_volume 15
creator Chowdhury, B.H.
Taylor, C.W.
description Several analysis methods are available for long-term voltage stability. The V-Q curve power flow method is widely used by Western Systems Coordinating Council utilities, and has some advantages. Long-term dynamic simulation with proper modeling, however, is clearly the most accurate simulation method. The authors compare the two methods for wintertime voltage stability problems in the Portland, Oregon, USA, load area. Results from the V-Q method can be misleading. The same is true of other power flow program based analysis employing conventional modeling. Results from these power flow methods may be pessimistic, causing overdesign or overly conservative operation.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/59.898112
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914639933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>898112</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>914639933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c2d71986f34ba2e2ae5caed3d676fe5301bb880aad8c806f309dce7eae680143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M1LwzAYBvAgCs7pwaun4EU8VJNmSRNvMvyCwRB015CmbyUjXWbSOvrfW-kQ8fQenh8PvA9C55TcUErULVc3UklK8wM0oZzLjIhCHaIJkZJnUnFyjE5SWhNCxBBM0HIVfGs-AKfWlM67tsdmY3yfXLrDq-wVb8MOIq592OHkms6b1oUN_oKYuoSrfmMaZ_8kp-ioNj7B2f5O0fvjw9v8OVssn17m94vMsoK2WW7zqqBKiprNSpNDboBbAxWrRCFq4IzQspSSGFNJK8nAiKosFGBASEJnbIquxt5tDJ8dpFY3Llnw3mwgdEkrOhNMKcYGeflPrkMXhx-THjYhlAkhBnQ9IhtDShFqvY2uMbHXlOifYTVXehx2sBejdQDw6_bhN2wKc7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>885013666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Chowdhury, B.H. ; Taylor, C.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, B.H. ; Taylor, C.W.</creatorcontrib><description>Several analysis methods are available for long-term voltage stability. The V-Q curve power flow method is widely used by Western Systems Coordinating Council utilities, and has some advantages. Long-term dynamic simulation with proper modeling, however, is clearly the most accurate simulation method. The authors compare the two methods for wintertime voltage stability problems in the Portland, Oregon, USA, load area. Results from the V-Q method can be misleading. The same is true of other power flow program based analysis employing conventional modeling. Results from these power flow methods may be pessimistic, causing overdesign or overly conservative operation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/59.898112</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Analytical models ; Computer simulation ; Convergence ; Councils ; Dynamic tests ; Dynamical systems ; Dynamics ; Load flow ; Mathematical models ; Power flow ; Power generation ; Power system simulation ; Reactive power ; Stability analysis ; Static VAr compensators ; Utilities ; Voltage ; Voltage stability</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2000, Vol.15 (4), p.1354-1359</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c2d71986f34ba2e2ae5caed3d676fe5301bb880aad8c806f309dce7eae680143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c2d71986f34ba2e2ae5caed3d676fe5301bb880aad8c806f309dce7eae680143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/898112$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,4024,27923,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/898112$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, B.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, C.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>Several analysis methods are available for long-term voltage stability. The V-Q curve power flow method is widely used by Western Systems Coordinating Council utilities, and has some advantages. Long-term dynamic simulation with proper modeling, however, is clearly the most accurate simulation method. The authors compare the two methods for wintertime voltage stability problems in the Portland, Oregon, USA, load area. Results from the V-Q method can be misleading. The same is true of other power flow program based analysis employing conventional modeling. Results from these power flow methods may be pessimistic, causing overdesign or overly conservative operation.</description><subject>Analytical models</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Convergence</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Dynamic tests</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Load flow</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Power flow</subject><subject>Power generation</subject><subject>Power system simulation</subject><subject>Reactive power</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Static VAr compensators</subject><subject>Utilities</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><subject>Voltage stability</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M1LwzAYBvAgCs7pwaun4EU8VJNmSRNvMvyCwRB015CmbyUjXWbSOvrfW-kQ8fQenh8PvA9C55TcUErULVc3UklK8wM0oZzLjIhCHaIJkZJnUnFyjE5SWhNCxBBM0HIVfGs-AKfWlM67tsdmY3yfXLrDq-wVb8MOIq592OHkms6b1oUN_oKYuoSrfmMaZ_8kp-ioNj7B2f5O0fvjw9v8OVssn17m94vMsoK2WW7zqqBKiprNSpNDboBbAxWrRCFq4IzQspSSGFNJK8nAiKosFGBASEJnbIquxt5tDJ8dpFY3Llnw3mwgdEkrOhNMKcYGeflPrkMXhx-THjYhlAkhBnQ9IhtDShFqvY2uMbHXlOifYTVXehx2sBejdQDw6_bhN2wKc7A</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Chowdhury, B.H.</creator><creator>Taylor, C.W.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation</title><author>Chowdhury, B.H. ; Taylor, C.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-2c2d71986f34ba2e2ae5caed3d676fe5301bb880aad8c806f309dce7eae680143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Analytical models</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Convergence</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Dynamic tests</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Load flow</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Power flow</topic><topic>Power generation</topic><topic>Power system simulation</topic><topic>Reactive power</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Static VAr compensators</topic><topic>Utilities</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><topic>Voltage stability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, B.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, C.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chowdhury, B.H.</au><au>Taylor, C.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1354</spage><epage>1359</epage><pages>1354-1359</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>Several analysis methods are available for long-term voltage stability. The V-Q curve power flow method is widely used by Western Systems Coordinating Council utilities, and has some advantages. Long-term dynamic simulation with proper modeling, however, is clearly the most accurate simulation method. The authors compare the two methods for wintertime voltage stability problems in the Portland, Oregon, USA, load area. Results from the V-Q method can be misleading. The same is true of other power flow program based analysis employing conventional modeling. Results from these power flow methods may be pessimistic, causing overdesign or overly conservative operation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/59.898112</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0885-8950
ispartof IEEE transactions on power systems, 2000, Vol.15 (4), p.1354-1359
issn 0885-8950
1558-0679
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914639933
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Analytical models
Computer simulation
Convergence
Councils
Dynamic tests
Dynamical systems
Dynamics
Load flow
Mathematical models
Power flow
Power generation
Power system simulation
Reactive power
Stability analysis
Static VAr compensators
Utilities
Voltage
Voltage stability
title Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voltage%20stability%20analysis:%20V-Q%20power%20flow%20simulation%20versus%20dynamic%20simulation&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Chowdhury,%20B.H.&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1354&rft.epage=1359&rft.pages=1354-1359&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/59.898112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E914639933%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=885013666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=898112&rfr_iscdi=true