Are the benefits of a high‐intensity progressive resistance training program sustained in rheumatoid arthritis patients? A 3‐year followup study

Objective Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were reassessed for body composition and physical function mean ± SD 39 ± 6 months after commencing a randomized controlled trial involving 24 weeks of either high‐intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) or low‐intensity range of movement exercise...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis care & research (2010) 2012-01, Vol.64 (1), p.71-75
Hauptverfasser: Lemmey, Andrew B., Williams, Sarah L., Marcora, Samuele M., Jones, Jerry, Maddison, Peter J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 75
container_issue 1
container_start_page 71
container_title Arthritis care & research (2010)
container_volume 64
creator Lemmey, Andrew B.
Williams, Sarah L.
Marcora, Samuele M.
Jones, Jerry
Maddison, Peter J.
description Objective Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were reassessed for body composition and physical function mean ± SD 39 ± 6 months after commencing a randomized controlled trial involving 24 weeks of either high‐intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) or low‐intensity range of movement exercise (control) to determine whether the benefits of PRT (i.e., reduced fat mass [FM], increased lean mass [LM], and improved function) were retained. Methods Nine PRT and 9 control subjects were reassessed for body composition (dual x‐ray absorptiometry) and function (knee extensor strength, chair test, arm curl test, 50‐foot walk) approximately 3 years after resuming normal activity following the exercise intervention. Results At followup, PRT subjects remained significantly leaner than control subjects (P = 0.03), who conversely had accumulated considerable FM during the study period (approximately −1.0 kg versus +2.4 kg, PRT versus controls). PRT subjects also retained most of the improvement in walking speed gained from training (P = 0.03 versus controls at followup). In contrast, the PRT‐induced gains in LM and strength‐related function were completely lost. Data from the controls suggest that established and stable RA patients have similar rates of LM loss but elevated rates of FM accretion relative to age‐matched sedentary non‐RA controls. Conclusion We found that long‐term resumption of normal activity resulted in loss of PRT‐induced improvements in LM and strength‐related function, but substantial retention of the benefits in FM reduction and walking ability. The relatively long‐term benefit of reduced adiposity, in particular, is likely to be clinically significant, as obesity is very prevalent among RA patients and is associated with their disability and exacerbated cardiovascular disease risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acr.20523
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_913718216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>913718216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-4e0b467157672b9b498c583d16bf72083d32b09dd5ee76184b08dcbb77e34723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctq3TAQhkVpaUKaRV-gaBe6OIkutmWvyuHQSyAQKFl0ZyR7fDzBlk80coJ3fYQu-oR5kqpxml1nMwPzzT_S_Iy9l-JcCqEubBPOlciVfsWOlczlJivy8vVLnf04YqdEtyKFVmWpq7fsSMnCyEzqY_Z7G4DHHrgDDx1G4lPHLe9x3z_-_IU-gieMCz-EaR-ACO-Bp4wUrW_SZLDo0e_Xvh05zamDHlqOnoce5tHGCVtuQ-wDRiR-sBHBR_rEt1ynHQvYwLtpGKaH-cApzu3yjr3p7EBw-pxP2M2Xzze7b5ur66-Xu-3VptGV0JsMhMvSR3JTGOUql1Vlk5e6lYXrjBKp0sqJqm1zAFPIMnOibBvnjAGdGaVP2Nkqmx5_NwPFekRqYBish2mmupLayDLdKpEfV7IJE1GArj4EHG1Yainqvy7UyYX6yYXEfnhWnd0I7Qv57-YJuFiBBxxg-b9Svd19XyX_ALAKlXE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>913718216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are the benefits of a high‐intensity progressive resistance training program sustained in rheumatoid arthritis patients? A 3‐year followup study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lemmey, Andrew B. ; Williams, Sarah L. ; Marcora, Samuele M. ; Jones, Jerry ; Maddison, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lemmey, Andrew B. ; Williams, Sarah L. ; Marcora, Samuele M. ; Jones, Jerry ; Maddison, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were reassessed for body composition and physical function mean ± SD 39 ± 6 months after commencing a randomized controlled trial involving 24 weeks of either high‐intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) or low‐intensity range of movement exercise (control) to determine whether the benefits of PRT (i.e., reduced fat mass [FM], increased lean mass [LM], and improved function) were retained. Methods Nine PRT and 9 control subjects were reassessed for body composition (dual x‐ray absorptiometry) and function (knee extensor strength, chair test, arm curl test, 50‐foot walk) approximately 3 years after resuming normal activity following the exercise intervention. Results At followup, PRT subjects remained significantly leaner than control subjects (P = 0.03), who conversely had accumulated considerable FM during the study period (approximately −1.0 kg versus +2.4 kg, PRT versus controls). PRT subjects also retained most of the improvement in walking speed gained from training (P = 0.03 versus controls at followup). In contrast, the PRT‐induced gains in LM and strength‐related function were completely lost. Data from the controls suggest that established and stable RA patients have similar rates of LM loss but elevated rates of FM accretion relative to age‐matched sedentary non‐RA controls. Conclusion We found that long‐term resumption of normal activity resulted in loss of PRT‐induced improvements in LM and strength‐related function, but substantial retention of the benefits in FM reduction and walking ability. The relatively long‐term benefit of reduced adiposity, in particular, is likely to be clinically significant, as obesity is very prevalent among RA patients and is associated with their disability and exacerbated cardiovascular disease risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acr.20523</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21671413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Adiposity ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnosis ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Strength ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Recovery of Function ; Resistance Training ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Wales ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010), 2012-01, Vol.64 (1), p.71-75</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-4e0b467157672b9b498c583d16bf72083d32b09dd5ee76184b08dcbb77e34723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-4e0b467157672b9b498c583d16bf72083d32b09dd5ee76184b08dcbb77e34723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facr.20523$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facr.20523$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21671413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lemmey, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcora, Samuele M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddison, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>Are the benefits of a high‐intensity progressive resistance training program sustained in rheumatoid arthritis patients? A 3‐year followup study</title><title>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</title><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><description>Objective Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were reassessed for body composition and physical function mean ± SD 39 ± 6 months after commencing a randomized controlled trial involving 24 weeks of either high‐intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) or low‐intensity range of movement exercise (control) to determine whether the benefits of PRT (i.e., reduced fat mass [FM], increased lean mass [LM], and improved function) were retained. Methods Nine PRT and 9 control subjects were reassessed for body composition (dual x‐ray absorptiometry) and function (knee extensor strength, chair test, arm curl test, 50‐foot walk) approximately 3 years after resuming normal activity following the exercise intervention. Results At followup, PRT subjects remained significantly leaner than control subjects (P = 0.03), who conversely had accumulated considerable FM during the study period (approximately −1.0 kg versus +2.4 kg, PRT versus controls). PRT subjects also retained most of the improvement in walking speed gained from training (P = 0.03 versus controls at followup). In contrast, the PRT‐induced gains in LM and strength‐related function were completely lost. Data from the controls suggest that established and stable RA patients have similar rates of LM loss but elevated rates of FM accretion relative to age‐matched sedentary non‐RA controls. Conclusion We found that long‐term resumption of normal activity resulted in loss of PRT‐induced improvements in LM and strength‐related function, but substantial retention of the benefits in FM reduction and walking ability. The relatively long‐term benefit of reduced adiposity, in particular, is likely to be clinically significant, as obesity is very prevalent among RA patients and is associated with their disability and exacerbated cardiovascular disease risk.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Adiposity</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnosis</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Resistance Training</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wales</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctq3TAQhkVpaUKaRV-gaBe6OIkutmWvyuHQSyAQKFl0ZyR7fDzBlk80coJ3fYQu-oR5kqpxml1nMwPzzT_S_Iy9l-JcCqEubBPOlciVfsWOlczlJivy8vVLnf04YqdEtyKFVmWpq7fsSMnCyEzqY_Z7G4DHHrgDDx1G4lPHLe9x3z_-_IU-gieMCz-EaR-ACO-Bp4wUrW_SZLDo0e_Xvh05zamDHlqOnoce5tHGCVtuQ-wDRiR-sBHBR_rEt1ynHQvYwLtpGKaH-cApzu3yjr3p7EBw-pxP2M2Xzze7b5ur66-Xu-3VptGV0JsMhMvSR3JTGOUql1Vlk5e6lYXrjBKp0sqJqm1zAFPIMnOibBvnjAGdGaVP2Nkqmx5_NwPFekRqYBish2mmupLayDLdKpEfV7IJE1GArj4EHG1Yainqvy7UyYX6yYXEfnhWnd0I7Qv57-YJuFiBBxxg-b9Svd19XyX_ALAKlXE</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Lemmey, Andrew B.</creator><creator>Williams, Sarah L.</creator><creator>Marcora, Samuele M.</creator><creator>Jones, Jerry</creator><creator>Maddison, Peter J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Are the benefits of a high‐intensity progressive resistance training program sustained in rheumatoid arthritis patients? A 3‐year followup study</title><author>Lemmey, Andrew B. ; Williams, Sarah L. ; Marcora, Samuele M. ; Jones, Jerry ; Maddison, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-4e0b467157672b9b498c583d16bf72083d32b09dd5ee76184b08dcbb77e34723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Adiposity</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnosis</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Resistance Training</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wales</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lemmey, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcora, Samuele M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddison, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lemmey, Andrew B.</au><au>Williams, Sarah L.</au><au>Marcora, Samuele M.</au><au>Jones, Jerry</au><au>Maddison, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are the benefits of a high‐intensity progressive resistance training program sustained in rheumatoid arthritis patients? A 3‐year followup study</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>71-75</pages><issn>2151-464X</issn><eissn>2151-4658</eissn><abstract>Objective Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were reassessed for body composition and physical function mean ± SD 39 ± 6 months after commencing a randomized controlled trial involving 24 weeks of either high‐intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) or low‐intensity range of movement exercise (control) to determine whether the benefits of PRT (i.e., reduced fat mass [FM], increased lean mass [LM], and improved function) were retained. Methods Nine PRT and 9 control subjects were reassessed for body composition (dual x‐ray absorptiometry) and function (knee extensor strength, chair test, arm curl test, 50‐foot walk) approximately 3 years after resuming normal activity following the exercise intervention. Results At followup, PRT subjects remained significantly leaner than control subjects (P = 0.03), who conversely had accumulated considerable FM during the study period (approximately −1.0 kg versus +2.4 kg, PRT versus controls). PRT subjects also retained most of the improvement in walking speed gained from training (P = 0.03 versus controls at followup). In contrast, the PRT‐induced gains in LM and strength‐related function were completely lost. Data from the controls suggest that established and stable RA patients have similar rates of LM loss but elevated rates of FM accretion relative to age‐matched sedentary non‐RA controls. Conclusion We found that long‐term resumption of normal activity resulted in loss of PRT‐induced improvements in LM and strength‐related function, but substantial retention of the benefits in FM reduction and walking ability. The relatively long‐term benefit of reduced adiposity, in particular, is likely to be clinically significant, as obesity is very prevalent among RA patients and is associated with their disability and exacerbated cardiovascular disease risk.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>21671413</pmid><doi>10.1002/acr.20523</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2151-464X
ispartof Arthritis care & research (2010), 2012-01, Vol.64 (1), p.71-75
issn 2151-464X
2151-4658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_913718216
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Adiposity
Aged
Analysis of Variance
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnosis
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy
Disability Evaluation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Strength
Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Recovery of Function
Resistance Training
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Wales
Walking
title Are the benefits of a high‐intensity progressive resistance training program sustained in rheumatoid arthritis patients? A 3‐year followup study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A14%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20the%20benefits%20of%20a%20high%E2%80%90intensity%20progressive%20resistance%20training%20program%20sustained%20in%20rheumatoid%20arthritis%20patients?%20A%203%E2%80%90year%20followup%20study&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20care%20&%20research%20(2010)&rft.au=Lemmey,%20Andrew%20B.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=71-75&rft.issn=2151-464X&rft.eissn=2151-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acr.20523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E913718216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=913718216&rft_id=info:pmid/21671413&rfr_iscdi=true