Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection with diversity feature loss and arbitrary split systems
Arising in the context of biodiversity conservation, the Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection (BNRS) problem is to select, subject to budgetary constraints, a set of regions to conserve so that the phylogenetic diversity (PD) of the set of species contained within those regions is maximized. Here PD is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of mathematical biology 2012, Vol.64 (1-2), p.69-85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 85 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | Journal of mathematical biology |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Bordewich, Magnus Semple, Charles |
description | Arising in the context of biodiversity conservation, the Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection (BNRS) problem is to select, subject to budgetary constraints, a set of regions to conserve so that the phylogenetic diversity (PD) of the set of species contained within those regions is maximized. Here PD is measured across either a single rooted tree or a single unrooted tree. Nevertheless, in both settings, this problem is NP-hard. However, it was recently shown that, for each setting, there is a polynomial-time
-approximation algorithm for it and that this algorithm is tight. In the first part of the paper, we consider two extensions of BNRS. In the rooted setting we additionally allow for the disappearance of features, for varying survival probabilities across species, and for PD to be measured across multiple trees. In the unrooted setting, we extend to arbitrary split systems. We show that, despite these additional allowances, there remains a polynomial-time
-approximation algorithm for each extension. In the second part of the paper, we resolve a complexity problem on computing PD across an arbitrary split system left open by Spillner et al. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00285-011-0405-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_913442026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2550835671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7703ea086fee5947e5bf99333c46bb48efff3313dc48fdd6bc68265f71135e383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAQx4Mouj4-gBcJXjxVZ5o0bY8qvkAUfBw8hT4ma6Xbrkmq7Lc3S1cFwdMc5jf_mfkxto9wjADpiQOIsyQCxAgkJFG-xiYoRRyhRLXOJiBARCrDeIttO_cGgGmS4ybbilEAZjKfsJezoZ6Sp5rfFX6wxB_Ikf0g_kgtVb7pO_7Z-FdeNx9kXeMX3NAItr1zvOhqXtiy8bawC-7mbeO5WzhPM7fLNkzROtpb1R32fHnxdH4d3d5f3Zyf3kaVROGjNAVBBWTKECW5TCkpTZ4LISqpylJmZIwRAkVdyczUtSorlcUqMSmiSEhkYocdjblz278P5LyeNa6iti066gencxRSxhCrQB7-Id_6wXbhuCWEqVSQBghHqLLhQUtGz20zC99pBL20rkfrOljXS-s6DzMHq-ChnFH9M_GtOQDxCLjQ6qZkfzf_n_oFS3WNIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>913174607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection with diversity feature loss and arbitrary split systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Bordewich, Magnus ; Semple, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Bordewich, Magnus ; Semple, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Arising in the context of biodiversity conservation, the Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection (BNRS) problem is to select, subject to budgetary constraints, a set of regions to conserve so that the phylogenetic diversity (PD) of the set of species contained within those regions is maximized. Here PD is measured across either a single rooted tree or a single unrooted tree. Nevertheless, in both settings, this problem is NP-hard. However, it was recently shown that, for each setting, there is a polynomial-time
-approximation algorithm for it and that this algorithm is tight. In the first part of the paper, we consider two extensions of BNRS. In the rooted setting we additionally allow for the disappearance of features, for varying survival probabilities across species, and for PD to be measured across multiple trees. In the unrooted setting, we extend to arbitrary split systems. We show that, despite these additional allowances, there remains a polynomial-time
-approximation algorithm for each extension. In the second part of the paper, we resolve a complexity problem on computing PD across an arbitrary split system left open by Spillner et al.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-6812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00285-011-0405-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21301849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Applications of Mathematics ; Biodiversity ; Budgets ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Mathematical and Computational Biology ; Mathematics ; Mathematics and Statistics ; Models, Statistical ; Phylogeny</subject><ispartof>Journal of mathematical biology, 2012, Vol.64 (1-2), p.69-85</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7703ea086fee5947e5bf99333c46bb48efff3313dc48fdd6bc68265f71135e383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7703ea086fee5947e5bf99333c46bb48efff3313dc48fdd6bc68265f71135e383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00285-011-0405-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00285-011-0405-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21301849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bordewich, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semple, Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection with diversity feature loss and arbitrary split systems</title><title>Journal of mathematical biology</title><addtitle>J. Math. Biol</addtitle><addtitle>J Math Biol</addtitle><description>Arising in the context of biodiversity conservation, the Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection (BNRS) problem is to select, subject to budgetary constraints, a set of regions to conserve so that the phylogenetic diversity (PD) of the set of species contained within those regions is maximized. Here PD is measured across either a single rooted tree or a single unrooted tree. Nevertheless, in both settings, this problem is NP-hard. However, it was recently shown that, for each setting, there is a polynomial-time
-approximation algorithm for it and that this algorithm is tight. In the first part of the paper, we consider two extensions of BNRS. In the rooted setting we additionally allow for the disappearance of features, for varying survival probabilities across species, and for PD to be measured across multiple trees. In the unrooted setting, we extend to arbitrary split systems. We show that, despite these additional allowances, there remains a polynomial-time
-approximation algorithm for each extension. In the second part of the paper, we resolve a complexity problem on computing PD across an arbitrary split system left open by Spillner et al.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Applications of Mathematics</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Mathematical and Computational Biology</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics and Statistics</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><issn>0303-6812</issn><issn>1432-1416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAQx4Mouj4-gBcJXjxVZ5o0bY8qvkAUfBw8hT4ma6Xbrkmq7Lc3S1cFwdMc5jf_mfkxto9wjADpiQOIsyQCxAgkJFG-xiYoRRyhRLXOJiBARCrDeIttO_cGgGmS4ybbilEAZjKfsJezoZ6Sp5rfFX6wxB_Ikf0g_kgtVb7pO_7Z-FdeNx9kXeMX3NAItr1zvOhqXtiy8bawC-7mbeO5WzhPM7fLNkzROtpb1R32fHnxdH4d3d5f3Zyf3kaVROGjNAVBBWTKECW5TCkpTZ4LISqpylJmZIwRAkVdyczUtSorlcUqMSmiSEhkYocdjblz278P5LyeNa6iti066gencxRSxhCrQB7-Id_6wXbhuCWEqVSQBghHqLLhQUtGz20zC99pBL20rkfrOljXS-s6DzMHq-ChnFH9M_GtOQDxCLjQ6qZkfzf_n_oFS3WNIg</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Bordewich, Magnus</creator><creator>Semple, Charles</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection with diversity feature loss and arbitrary split systems</title><author>Bordewich, Magnus ; Semple, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7703ea086fee5947e5bf99333c46bb48efff3313dc48fdd6bc68265f71135e383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Applications of Mathematics</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Mathematical and Computational Biology</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics and Statistics</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bordewich, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semple, Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of mathematical biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bordewich, Magnus</au><au>Semple, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection with diversity feature loss and arbitrary split systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mathematical biology</jtitle><stitle>J. Math. Biol</stitle><addtitle>J Math Biol</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>69-85</pages><issn>0303-6812</issn><eissn>1432-1416</eissn><abstract>Arising in the context of biodiversity conservation, the Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection (BNRS) problem is to select, subject to budgetary constraints, a set of regions to conserve so that the phylogenetic diversity (PD) of the set of species contained within those regions is maximized. Here PD is measured across either a single rooted tree or a single unrooted tree. Nevertheless, in both settings, this problem is NP-hard. However, it was recently shown that, for each setting, there is a polynomial-time
-approximation algorithm for it and that this algorithm is tight. In the first part of the paper, we consider two extensions of BNRS. In the rooted setting we additionally allow for the disappearance of features, for varying survival probabilities across species, and for PD to be measured across multiple trees. In the unrooted setting, we extend to arbitrary split systems. We show that, despite these additional allowances, there remains a polynomial-time
-approximation algorithm for each extension. In the second part of the paper, we resolve a complexity problem on computing PD across an arbitrary split system left open by Spillner et al.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21301849</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00285-011-0405-9</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0303-6812 |
ispartof | Journal of mathematical biology, 2012, Vol.64 (1-2), p.69-85 |
issn | 0303-6812 1432-1416 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_913442026 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Complete Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Applications of Mathematics Biodiversity Budgets Conservation of Natural Resources - economics Mathematical and Computational Biology Mathematics Mathematics and Statistics Models, Statistical Phylogeny |
title | Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection with diversity feature loss and arbitrary split systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A01%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Budgeted%20Nature%20Reserve%20Selection%20with%20diversity%20feature%20loss%20and%20arbitrary%20split%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mathematical%20biology&rft.au=Bordewich,%20Magnus&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=69-85&rft.issn=0303-6812&rft.eissn=1432-1416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00285-011-0405-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2550835671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=913174607&rft_id=info:pmid/21301849&rfr_iscdi=true |