Attribution of the discrepancy between ELISA and LC-MS/MS assay results of a PEGylated scaffold protein in post-dose monkey plasma samples due to the presence of anti-drug antibodies
High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were developed for the quantification of a PEGylated scaffold protein drug in monkey plasma samples. The LC-MS/MS method was based on the extraction of the therapeutic pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 2012-01, Vol.402 (3), p.1229-1239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1239 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1229 |
container_title | Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry |
container_volume | 402 |
creator | Wang, Shujie J. Wu, Steven T. Gokemeijer, Jochem Fura, Aberra Krishna, Murli Morin, Paul Chen, Guodong Price, Karen Wang-Iverson, David Olah, Timothy Weiner, Russell Tymiak, Adrienne Jemal, Mohammed |
description | High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were developed for the quantification of a PEGylated scaffold protein drug in monkey plasma samples. The LC-MS/MS method was based on the extraction of the therapeutic protein with a water-miscible organic solvent and the subsequent trypsin digestion of the extract followed by the detection of a surrogate peptide. The assay was linear over a range of 10–3,000 ng/mL. The ELISA method utilized a therapeutic target-binding format in which the recombinant target antigen was used to capture the drug in the sample, followed by detection with an anti-PEG monoclonal antibody. The assay range was 30–2,000 ng/mL. A correlation study between the two methods was performed by measuring the drug concentrations in plasma samples from a single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) study in cynomolgus monkeys following a 5-mg/kg subcutaneous administration (
n
= 4). In the early time points of the PK profile, the drug concentrations obtained by the LC-MS/MS method agreed very well with those obtained by the ELISA method. However, at later time points, the drug concentrations measured by the LC-MS/MS method were consistently higher than those measured by the ELISA method. The PK parameters calculated based on the concentration data showed that the two methods gave equivalent peak exposure (
C
max
) at 24–48 h. However, the LC-MS/MS results exhibited about 1.53-fold higher total exposure (AUC
tot
) than the ELISA results. The discrepancy between the LC-MS/MS and ELISA results was investigated by conducting immunogenicity testing, anti-drug antibody (ADA) epitope mapping, and Western blot analysis of the drug concentrations coupled with Protein G separation. The results demonstrated the presence of ADA specific to the engineered antigen-binding region of the scaffold protein drug that interfered with the ability of the drug to bind to the target antigen used in the ELISA method. In the presence of the ADAs, the ELISA method measured only the active circulating drug (target-binding), while the LC-MS/MS method measured the total circulating drug. The work presented here indicates that the bioanalysis of protein drugs may be complicated owing to the presence of drug-binding endogenous components or ADAs in the post-dose (incurred) samples. The clear understanding of the behavior of different bioanalytical techniques vis-à-vis the potentially interfering component |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00216-011-5527-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_913439395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A430143295</galeid><sourcerecordid>A430143295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-798fc881133df1638ad444d7aba46818d8567c05599123fdbbb5e670c01966b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktFqFDEUhgdRbK0-gDcS8MLeTJuTZDKZy2VZa2GLwur1kJmcWafOJGOSQfbFfL5md2tBkFoSSEi-_09O8mfZW6AXQGl5GShlIHMKkBcFK_PqWXYKElTOZEGfP8wFO8lehXBLKRQK5MvshDHgtGT0NPu9iNH3zRx7Z4nrSPyOxPSh9Thp2-5Ig_EXoiWr9fVmQbQ1ZL3MbzaXNxuiQ9A74jHMQwx7rSZfVle7QUc0JLS669xgyORdxN6S1CcXYm5cQDI6-wN3ZBp0GDUJepwGDMTMSKI7XGFKtmhbPNja2OfGz9vDrHGmx_A6e9HpIeCb-_Es-_Zx9XX5KV9_vrpeLtZ5K6mKeVmprlUKgHPTgeRKGyGEKXWjhVSgjCpk2dKiqCpgvDNN0xQoS9pSqKRsOD_LPhx9Uxk_ZwyxHtPj4DBoi24OdQVc8IpXRSLPHyWhFCK9eDroaShQAer_aPpJJQUUT3ClijGWaqUJfX9Et3rAuredi163e7xeCE5BcHao6OIfVGoGx751Frs-rf8lgKOg9S4Ej109-X7UfpfOrveBrY-BrVNg631g6ypp3t3fem5GNA-KPwlNADsCIW3ZLfr61s3epk9_xPUOUeLzMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1082220550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attribution of the discrepancy between ELISA and LC-MS/MS assay results of a PEGylated scaffold protein in post-dose monkey plasma samples due to the presence of anti-drug antibodies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Wang, Shujie J. ; Wu, Steven T. ; Gokemeijer, Jochem ; Fura, Aberra ; Krishna, Murli ; Morin, Paul ; Chen, Guodong ; Price, Karen ; Wang-Iverson, David ; Olah, Timothy ; Weiner, Russell ; Tymiak, Adrienne ; Jemal, Mohammed</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shujie J. ; Wu, Steven T. ; Gokemeijer, Jochem ; Fura, Aberra ; Krishna, Murli ; Morin, Paul ; Chen, Guodong ; Price, Karen ; Wang-Iverson, David ; Olah, Timothy ; Weiner, Russell ; Tymiak, Adrienne ; Jemal, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><description>High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were developed for the quantification of a PEGylated scaffold protein drug in monkey plasma samples. The LC-MS/MS method was based on the extraction of the therapeutic protein with a water-miscible organic solvent and the subsequent trypsin digestion of the extract followed by the detection of a surrogate peptide. The assay was linear over a range of 10–3,000 ng/mL. The ELISA method utilized a therapeutic target-binding format in which the recombinant target antigen was used to capture the drug in the sample, followed by detection with an anti-PEG monoclonal antibody. The assay range was 30–2,000 ng/mL. A correlation study between the two methods was performed by measuring the drug concentrations in plasma samples from a single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) study in cynomolgus monkeys following a 5-mg/kg subcutaneous administration (
n
= 4). In the early time points of the PK profile, the drug concentrations obtained by the LC-MS/MS method agreed very well with those obtained by the ELISA method. However, at later time points, the drug concentrations measured by the LC-MS/MS method were consistently higher than those measured by the ELISA method. The PK parameters calculated based on the concentration data showed that the two methods gave equivalent peak exposure (
C
max
) at 24–48 h. However, the LC-MS/MS results exhibited about 1.53-fold higher total exposure (AUC
tot
) than the ELISA results. The discrepancy between the LC-MS/MS and ELISA results was investigated by conducting immunogenicity testing, anti-drug antibody (ADA) epitope mapping, and Western blot analysis of the drug concentrations coupled with Protein G separation. The results demonstrated the presence of ADA specific to the engineered antigen-binding region of the scaffold protein drug that interfered with the ability of the drug to bind to the target antigen used in the ELISA method. In the presence of the ADAs, the ELISA method measured only the active circulating drug (target-binding), while the LC-MS/MS method measured the total circulating drug. The work presented here indicates that the bioanalysis of protein drugs may be complicated owing to the presence of drug-binding endogenous components or ADAs in the post-dose (incurred) samples. The clear understanding of the behavior of different bioanalytical techniques vis-à-vis the potentially interfering components found in incurred samples is critical in selecting bioanalytical strategies for measuring protein drugs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-2642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-5527-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22130720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Ada (programming language) ; Analytical Chemistry ; Animals ; Antibodies ; Antibodies - blood ; Antibodies - immunology ; Antigen-Antibody Complex - analysis ; Antigen-Antibody Complex - immunology ; Assaying ; Biochemistry ; Biopharmaceuticals ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Circulating ; Drugs ; ELISA ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; Food Science ; Haplorhini ; Health aspects ; Laboratory Medicine ; Liquid chromatography ; Mass spectrometry ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Monkeys ; Original Paper ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - blood ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry ; Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry ; Protein binding ; Proteins ; Proteins - chemistry ; Proteins - immunology ; Scaffolds ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><ispartof>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2012-01, Vol.402 (3), p.1229-1239</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-798fc881133df1638ad444d7aba46818d8567c05599123fdbbb5e670c01966b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-798fc881133df1638ad444d7aba46818d8567c05599123fdbbb5e670c01966b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00216-011-5527-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00216-011-5527-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22130720$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shujie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Steven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokemeijer, Jochem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fura, Aberra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Murli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morin, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang-Iverson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olah, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymiak, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jemal, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><title>Attribution of the discrepancy between ELISA and LC-MS/MS assay results of a PEGylated scaffold protein in post-dose monkey plasma samples due to the presence of anti-drug antibodies</title><title>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</title><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><description>High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were developed for the quantification of a PEGylated scaffold protein drug in monkey plasma samples. The LC-MS/MS method was based on the extraction of the therapeutic protein with a water-miscible organic solvent and the subsequent trypsin digestion of the extract followed by the detection of a surrogate peptide. The assay was linear over a range of 10–3,000 ng/mL. The ELISA method utilized a therapeutic target-binding format in which the recombinant target antigen was used to capture the drug in the sample, followed by detection with an anti-PEG monoclonal antibody. The assay range was 30–2,000 ng/mL. A correlation study between the two methods was performed by measuring the drug concentrations in plasma samples from a single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) study in cynomolgus monkeys following a 5-mg/kg subcutaneous administration (
n
= 4). In the early time points of the PK profile, the drug concentrations obtained by the LC-MS/MS method agreed very well with those obtained by the ELISA method. However, at later time points, the drug concentrations measured by the LC-MS/MS method were consistently higher than those measured by the ELISA method. The PK parameters calculated based on the concentration data showed that the two methods gave equivalent peak exposure (
C
max
) at 24–48 h. However, the LC-MS/MS results exhibited about 1.53-fold higher total exposure (AUC
tot
) than the ELISA results. The discrepancy between the LC-MS/MS and ELISA results was investigated by conducting immunogenicity testing, anti-drug antibody (ADA) epitope mapping, and Western blot analysis of the drug concentrations coupled with Protein G separation. The results demonstrated the presence of ADA specific to the engineered antigen-binding region of the scaffold protein drug that interfered with the ability of the drug to bind to the target antigen used in the ELISA method. In the presence of the ADAs, the ELISA method measured only the active circulating drug (target-binding), while the LC-MS/MS method measured the total circulating drug. The work presented here indicates that the bioanalysis of protein drugs may be complicated owing to the presence of drug-binding endogenous components or ADAs in the post-dose (incurred) samples. The clear understanding of the behavior of different bioanalytical techniques vis-à-vis the potentially interfering components found in incurred samples is critical in selecting bioanalytical strategies for measuring protein drugs.</description><subject>Ada (programming language)</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>Antibodies - immunology</subject><subject>Antigen-Antibody Complex - analysis</subject><subject>Antigen-Antibody Complex - immunology</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Circulating</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Haplorhini</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Monkeys</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - blood</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry</subject><subject>Protein binding</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><issn>1618-2642</issn><issn>1618-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktFqFDEUhgdRbK0-gDcS8MLeTJuTZDKZy2VZa2GLwur1kJmcWafOJGOSQfbFfL5md2tBkFoSSEi-_09O8mfZW6AXQGl5GShlIHMKkBcFK_PqWXYKElTOZEGfP8wFO8lehXBLKRQK5MvshDHgtGT0NPu9iNH3zRx7Z4nrSPyOxPSh9Thp2-5Ig_EXoiWr9fVmQbQ1ZL3MbzaXNxuiQ9A74jHMQwx7rSZfVle7QUc0JLS669xgyORdxN6S1CcXYm5cQDI6-wN3ZBp0GDUJepwGDMTMSKI7XGFKtmhbPNja2OfGz9vDrHGmx_A6e9HpIeCb-_Es-_Zx9XX5KV9_vrpeLtZ5K6mKeVmprlUKgHPTgeRKGyGEKXWjhVSgjCpk2dKiqCpgvDNN0xQoS9pSqKRsOD_LPhx9Uxk_ZwyxHtPj4DBoi24OdQVc8IpXRSLPHyWhFCK9eDroaShQAer_aPpJJQUUT3ClijGWaqUJfX9Et3rAuredi163e7xeCE5BcHao6OIfVGoGx751Frs-rf8lgKOg9S4Ej109-X7UfpfOrveBrY-BrVNg631g6ypp3t3fem5GNA-KPwlNADsCIW3ZLfr61s3epk9_xPUOUeLzMw</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Wang, Shujie J.</creator><creator>Wu, Steven T.</creator><creator>Gokemeijer, Jochem</creator><creator>Fura, Aberra</creator><creator>Krishna, Murli</creator><creator>Morin, Paul</creator><creator>Chen, Guodong</creator><creator>Price, Karen</creator><creator>Wang-Iverson, David</creator><creator>Olah, Timothy</creator><creator>Weiner, Russell</creator><creator>Tymiak, Adrienne</creator><creator>Jemal, Mohammed</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Attribution of the discrepancy between ELISA and LC-MS/MS assay results of a PEGylated scaffold protein in post-dose monkey plasma samples due to the presence of anti-drug antibodies</title><author>Wang, Shujie J. ; Wu, Steven T. ; Gokemeijer, Jochem ; Fura, Aberra ; Krishna, Murli ; Morin, Paul ; Chen, Guodong ; Price, Karen ; Wang-Iverson, David ; Olah, Timothy ; Weiner, Russell ; Tymiak, Adrienne ; Jemal, Mohammed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-798fc881133df1638ad444d7aba46818d8567c05599123fdbbb5e670c01966b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Ada (programming language)</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>Antibodies - immunology</topic><topic>Antigen-Antibody Complex - analysis</topic><topic>Antigen-Antibody Complex - immunology</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Circulating</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Haplorhini</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Monkeys</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - blood</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry</topic><topic>Protein binding</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shujie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Steven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokemeijer, Jochem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fura, Aberra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Murli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morin, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang-Iverson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olah, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymiak, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jemal, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Shujie J.</au><au>Wu, Steven T.</au><au>Gokemeijer, Jochem</au><au>Fura, Aberra</au><au>Krishna, Murli</au><au>Morin, Paul</au><au>Chen, Guodong</au><au>Price, Karen</au><au>Wang-Iverson, David</au><au>Olah, Timothy</au><au>Weiner, Russell</au><au>Tymiak, Adrienne</au><au>Jemal, Mohammed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attribution of the discrepancy between ELISA and LC-MS/MS assay results of a PEGylated scaffold protein in post-dose monkey plasma samples due to the presence of anti-drug antibodies</atitle><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle><stitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</stitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>402</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1229</spage><epage>1239</epage><pages>1229-1239</pages><issn>1618-2642</issn><eissn>1618-2650</eissn><abstract>High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were developed for the quantification of a PEGylated scaffold protein drug in monkey plasma samples. The LC-MS/MS method was based on the extraction of the therapeutic protein with a water-miscible organic solvent and the subsequent trypsin digestion of the extract followed by the detection of a surrogate peptide. The assay was linear over a range of 10–3,000 ng/mL. The ELISA method utilized a therapeutic target-binding format in which the recombinant target antigen was used to capture the drug in the sample, followed by detection with an anti-PEG monoclonal antibody. The assay range was 30–2,000 ng/mL. A correlation study between the two methods was performed by measuring the drug concentrations in plasma samples from a single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) study in cynomolgus monkeys following a 5-mg/kg subcutaneous administration (
n
= 4). In the early time points of the PK profile, the drug concentrations obtained by the LC-MS/MS method agreed very well with those obtained by the ELISA method. However, at later time points, the drug concentrations measured by the LC-MS/MS method were consistently higher than those measured by the ELISA method. The PK parameters calculated based on the concentration data showed that the two methods gave equivalent peak exposure (
C
max
) at 24–48 h. However, the LC-MS/MS results exhibited about 1.53-fold higher total exposure (AUC
tot
) than the ELISA results. The discrepancy between the LC-MS/MS and ELISA results was investigated by conducting immunogenicity testing, anti-drug antibody (ADA) epitope mapping, and Western blot analysis of the drug concentrations coupled with Protein G separation. The results demonstrated the presence of ADA specific to the engineered antigen-binding region of the scaffold protein drug that interfered with the ability of the drug to bind to the target antigen used in the ELISA method. In the presence of the ADAs, the ELISA method measured only the active circulating drug (target-binding), while the LC-MS/MS method measured the total circulating drug. The work presented here indicates that the bioanalysis of protein drugs may be complicated owing to the presence of drug-binding endogenous components or ADAs in the post-dose (incurred) samples. The clear understanding of the behavior of different bioanalytical techniques vis-à-vis the potentially interfering components found in incurred samples is critical in selecting bioanalytical strategies for measuring protein drugs.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22130720</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00216-011-5527-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-2642 |
ispartof | Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2012-01, Vol.402 (3), p.1229-1239 |
issn | 1618-2642 1618-2650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_913439395 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Ada (programming language) Analytical Chemistry Animals Antibodies Antibodies - blood Antibodies - immunology Antigen-Antibody Complex - analysis Antigen-Antibody Complex - immunology Assaying Biochemistry Biopharmaceuticals Characterization and Evaluation of Materials Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Circulating Drugs ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods Food Science Haplorhini Health aspects Laboratory Medicine Liquid chromatography Mass spectrometry Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Monkeys Original Paper Pharmaceutical Preparations - blood Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry Protein binding Proteins Proteins - chemistry Proteins - immunology Scaffolds Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods |
title | Attribution of the discrepancy between ELISA and LC-MS/MS assay results of a PEGylated scaffold protein in post-dose monkey plasma samples due to the presence of anti-drug antibodies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A07%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attribution%20of%20the%20discrepancy%20between%20ELISA%20and%20LC-MS/MS%20assay%20results%20of%20a%20PEGylated%20scaffold%20protein%20in%20post-dose%20monkey%20plasma%20samples%20due%20to%20the%20presence%20of%20anti-drug%20antibodies&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20and%20bioanalytical%20chemistry&rft.au=Wang,%20Shujie%20J.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=402&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1229&rft.epage=1239&rft.pages=1229-1239&rft.issn=1618-2642&rft.eissn=1618-2650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00216-011-5527-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA430143295%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1082220550&rft_id=info:pmid/22130720&rft_galeid=A430143295&rfr_iscdi=true |