Revision Stapes Surgery
Objectives. Surgery for otosclerosis has a highly satisfactory hearing outcome, for both the patient and the otologic surgeon. However, subsequent conductive hearing loss, dizziness/vertigo, or sound distortion could necessitate revision surgery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the surgi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2012-01, Vol.146 (1), p.109-113 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 113 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 109 |
| container_title | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery |
| container_volume | 146 |
| creator | Özüer, Mehmet Ziya Olgun, Levent Gültekin, Gürol |
| description | Objectives. Surgery for otosclerosis has a highly satisfactory hearing outcome, for both the patient and the otologic surgeon. However, subsequent conductive hearing loss, dizziness/vertigo, or sound distortion could necessitate revision surgery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the surgical findings and hearing outcomes of 84 revision stapes surgeries.
Study Design. Case series with chart review.
Setting. Tertiary referral center.
Subjects and Methods. At our institution, 84 revision cases were performed between 1998 and 2009. Conductive hearing loss was the revision indication in 69 cases, severe dizziness/vertigo in 8 patients, sound distortion in 5 cases, and progressive hearing loss with dizziness in 2 patients. Operative findings were noted in every case and evaluated separately.
Results. Surgical intervention revealed problems related to prosthesis in 51 cases, fibrotic bands in 26 cases, adhesions in 13 cases, incus necrosis in 15 cases, perilymphatic fistula in 3 cases, intact footplate in 5 cases, incus-malleus fixation in 2 cases, and reobliteration in 2 cases. Mean follow-up period was 19 months (range, 12-53 months). Successful hearing results (air-bone gap |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0194599811423523 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912799250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0194599811423523</sage_id><sourcerecordid>912799250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3859-d9224ff54f8b2ebcd74e2be98b8b2bdbba318f82c174db646c7ba28a29b6b0ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMobk7PepLdPFXz0rRJjjqcE4YDp-eQtK-jo1tnsk7235vS6UEQT4-83_d9vHyEXAG9BRDijoLiiVISgLM4YfER6QNVIkoliGPSb3HU8h45835JKU1TIU5JjwVAlYI-uXzFXenLej2cb80G_XDeuAW6_Tk5KUzl8eIwB-R9_Pg2mkTT2dPz6H4aZbFMVJQrxnhRJLyQlqHNcsGRWVTShrfNrTUxyEKyDATPbcrTTFjDpGHKppYGOiA3Xe7G1R8N-q1elT7DqjJrrBuvFTChFEtoUNJOmbnae4eF3rhyZdxeA9VtG_p3G8FyfQhv7ArzH8P394NAdoLPssL9v4F6Nnl5GEMSdsEadVZvFqiXdePWoae_b_kCku51wg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912799250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revision Stapes Surgery</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Özüer, Mehmet Ziya ; Olgun, Levent ; Gültekin, Gürol</creator><creatorcontrib>Özüer, Mehmet Ziya ; Olgun, Levent ; Gültekin, Gürol</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. Surgery for otosclerosis has a highly satisfactory hearing outcome, for both the patient and the otologic surgeon. However, subsequent conductive hearing loss, dizziness/vertigo, or sound distortion could necessitate revision surgery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the surgical findings and hearing outcomes of 84 revision stapes surgeries.
Study Design. Case series with chart review.
Setting. Tertiary referral center.
Subjects and Methods. At our institution, 84 revision cases were performed between 1998 and 2009. Conductive hearing loss was the revision indication in 69 cases, severe dizziness/vertigo in 8 patients, sound distortion in 5 cases, and progressive hearing loss with dizziness in 2 patients. Operative findings were noted in every case and evaluated separately.
Results. Surgical intervention revealed problems related to prosthesis in 51 cases, fibrotic bands in 26 cases, adhesions in 13 cases, incus necrosis in 15 cases, perilymphatic fistula in 3 cases, intact footplate in 5 cases, incus-malleus fixation in 2 cases, and reobliteration in 2 cases. Mean follow-up period was 19 months (range, 12-53 months). Successful hearing results (air-bone gap <10 dB) were reached in 58% of the cases, and satisfactory hearing results (air-bone gap <20 dB) were reached in 71% of the cases.
Conclusions. The ideal patient for revision stapes surgery is one who benefits from the initial surgery but complained of conductive hearing loss. In the present study, improvement in pure-tone average was 13.2 dB, and the mean air-bone gap was 9.6 dB.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0194599811423523</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21940991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Bone Conduction ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hearing Loss, Conductive - physiopathology ; Hearing Loss, Conductive - surgery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ossicular Prosthesis ; otosclerosis ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; revision stapes surgery ; stapes ; Stapes Surgery - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Turkey - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2012-01, Vol.146 (1), p.109-113</ispartof><rights>Official journal of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2012</rights><rights>2012 American Association of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3859-d9224ff54f8b2ebcd74e2be98b8b2bdbba318f82c174db646c7ba28a29b6b0ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3859-d9224ff54f8b2ebcd74e2be98b8b2bdbba318f82c174db646c7ba28a29b6b0ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0194599811423523$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0194599811423523$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21940991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Özüer, Mehmet Ziya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olgun, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gültekin, Gürol</creatorcontrib><title>Revision Stapes Surgery</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Objectives. Surgery for otosclerosis has a highly satisfactory hearing outcome, for both the patient and the otologic surgeon. However, subsequent conductive hearing loss, dizziness/vertigo, or sound distortion could necessitate revision surgery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the surgical findings and hearing outcomes of 84 revision stapes surgeries.
Study Design. Case series with chart review.
Setting. Tertiary referral center.
Subjects and Methods. At our institution, 84 revision cases were performed between 1998 and 2009. Conductive hearing loss was the revision indication in 69 cases, severe dizziness/vertigo in 8 patients, sound distortion in 5 cases, and progressive hearing loss with dizziness in 2 patients. Operative findings were noted in every case and evaluated separately.
Results. Surgical intervention revealed problems related to prosthesis in 51 cases, fibrotic bands in 26 cases, adhesions in 13 cases, incus necrosis in 15 cases, perilymphatic fistula in 3 cases, intact footplate in 5 cases, incus-malleus fixation in 2 cases, and reobliteration in 2 cases. Mean follow-up period was 19 months (range, 12-53 months). Successful hearing results (air-bone gap <10 dB) were reached in 58% of the cases, and satisfactory hearing results (air-bone gap <20 dB) were reached in 71% of the cases.
Conclusions. The ideal patient for revision stapes surgery is one who benefits from the initial surgery but complained of conductive hearing loss. In the present study, improvement in pure-tone average was 13.2 dB, and the mean air-bone gap was 9.6 dB.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Bone Conduction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Conductive - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Conductive - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ossicular Prosthesis</subject><subject>otosclerosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>revision stapes surgery</subject><subject>stapes</subject><subject>Stapes Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Turkey - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMobk7PepLdPFXz0rRJjjqcE4YDp-eQtK-jo1tnsk7235vS6UEQT4-83_d9vHyEXAG9BRDijoLiiVISgLM4YfER6QNVIkoliGPSb3HU8h45835JKU1TIU5JjwVAlYI-uXzFXenLej2cb80G_XDeuAW6_Tk5KUzl8eIwB-R9_Pg2mkTT2dPz6H4aZbFMVJQrxnhRJLyQlqHNcsGRWVTShrfNrTUxyEKyDATPbcrTTFjDpGHKppYGOiA3Xe7G1R8N-q1elT7DqjJrrBuvFTChFEtoUNJOmbnae4eF3rhyZdxeA9VtG_p3G8FyfQhv7ArzH8P394NAdoLPssL9v4F6Nnl5GEMSdsEadVZvFqiXdePWoae_b_kCku51wg</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Özüer, Mehmet Ziya</creator><creator>Olgun, Levent</creator><creator>Gültekin, Gürol</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Revision Stapes Surgery</title><author>Özüer, Mehmet Ziya ; Olgun, Levent ; Gültekin, Gürol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3859-d9224ff54f8b2ebcd74e2be98b8b2bdbba318f82c174db646c7ba28a29b6b0ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Bone Conduction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Conductive - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Conductive - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ossicular Prosthesis</topic><topic>otosclerosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>revision stapes surgery</topic><topic>stapes</topic><topic>Stapes Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Turkey - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Özüer, Mehmet Ziya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olgun, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gültekin, Gürol</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Özüer, Mehmet Ziya</au><au>Olgun, Levent</au><au>Gültekin, Gürol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revision Stapes Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>109-113</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Objectives. Surgery for otosclerosis has a highly satisfactory hearing outcome, for both the patient and the otologic surgeon. However, subsequent conductive hearing loss, dizziness/vertigo, or sound distortion could necessitate revision surgery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the surgical findings and hearing outcomes of 84 revision stapes surgeries.
Study Design. Case series with chart review.
Setting. Tertiary referral center.
Subjects and Methods. At our institution, 84 revision cases were performed between 1998 and 2009. Conductive hearing loss was the revision indication in 69 cases, severe dizziness/vertigo in 8 patients, sound distortion in 5 cases, and progressive hearing loss with dizziness in 2 patients. Operative findings were noted in every case and evaluated separately.
Results. Surgical intervention revealed problems related to prosthesis in 51 cases, fibrotic bands in 26 cases, adhesions in 13 cases, incus necrosis in 15 cases, perilymphatic fistula in 3 cases, intact footplate in 5 cases, incus-malleus fixation in 2 cases, and reobliteration in 2 cases. Mean follow-up period was 19 months (range, 12-53 months). Successful hearing results (air-bone gap <10 dB) were reached in 58% of the cases, and satisfactory hearing results (air-bone gap <20 dB) were reached in 71% of the cases.
Conclusions. The ideal patient for revision stapes surgery is one who benefits from the initial surgery but complained of conductive hearing loss. In the present study, improvement in pure-tone average was 13.2 dB, and the mean air-bone gap was 9.6 dB.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21940991</pmid><doi>10.1177/0194599811423523</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0194-5998 |
| ispartof | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2012-01, Vol.146 (1), p.109-113 |
| issn | 0194-5998 1097-6817 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912799250 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Audiometry, Pure-Tone Bone Conduction Female Follow-Up Studies Hearing Loss, Conductive - physiopathology Hearing Loss, Conductive - surgery Humans Incidence Male Middle Aged Ossicular Prosthesis otosclerosis Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - surgery Reoperation Retrospective Studies revision stapes surgery stapes Stapes Surgery - methods Treatment Outcome Turkey - epidemiology Young Adult |
| title | Revision Stapes Surgery |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A44%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revision%20Stapes%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=%C3%96z%C3%BCer,%20Mehmet%20Ziya&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=109-113&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0194599811423523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E912799250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912799250&rft_id=info:pmid/21940991&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0194599811423523&rfr_iscdi=true |