Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting

Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR. Background In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and pred...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012-01, Vol.59 (1), p.16-23
Hauptverfasser: Tosaka, Atsushi, MD, Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD, Iida, Osamu, MD, Ishihara, Takayuki, MD, Hirano, Keisuke, MD, Suzuki, Kenji, MD, Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD, Nanto, Shinsuke, MD, Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Journal of the American College of Cardiology
container_volume 59
creator Tosaka, Atsushi, MD
Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD
Iida, Osamu, MD
Ishihara, Takayuki, MD
Hirano, Keisuke, MD
Suzuki, Kenji, MD
Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD
Nanto, Shinsuke, MD
Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD
description Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR. Background In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and predictors of refractory restenosis remain unclear. Methods This study was a multicenter, retrospective observational study. From September 2000 to December 2009, 133 restenotic lesions after FP artery stenting were classified by angiographic pattern: class I included focal lesions (≤50 mm in length), class II included diffuse lesions (>50 mm in length), and class III included totally occluded ISR. All patients were treated by balloon angioplasty for at least 60 s. Recurrent ISR or occlusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after target lesion revascularization. Restenosis was defined as >2.4 of the peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex scan or >50% stenosis by angiography. Results Sixty-four percent of patients were male, 67% had diabetes mellitus, and 24% underwent hemodialysis. Class I pattern was found in 29% of the limbs, class II in 38%, and class III in 33%. Mean follow-up period was 24 ± 17 months. All-cause death occurred in 14 patients; bypass surgery was performed in 11 limbs, and major amputation was performed in 1 limb during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the rate of recurrent ISR at 2 years was 84.8% in class III patients compared with 49.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 53.3% in class II patients (p = 0.0003), and the rate of recurrent occlusion at 2 years was 64.6% in class III patients compared with 15.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 18.9% in class II patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Restenotic patterns after FP stenting are important predictors of recurrent ISR and occlusion.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912641437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0735109711044585</els_id><sourcerecordid>3243218251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ea2a3ed9a3a3df1f2019fc2509eebc65dc1bcad6728cfa5340e0a57afbd202fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYModq3-AR9kwAefZrxJJpkJiFAWWwuFgtXnkE1uJOPMZE1mC_33ZtjVQh98Cpd853DvOYS8pdBQoPLj0AzG2oYBpQ2oBrh8RjZUiL7mQnXPyQY6LmoKqjsjr3IeAED2VL0kZ4xRxaTkG3K7HU3OwQdrlhDnysyu2o5hLvNYXU97Y5cq-uob5gXnmEOuLvyCqbrEKaa4j_sxLFjQu_K9hPnna_LCmzHjm9N7Tn5cfvm-_Vrf3F5dby9uaiugXWo0zHB0ynDDnae-3KC8ZQIU4s5K4SzdWeNkx3rrjeAtIBjRGb9zDJh3_Jx8OPruU_x9KNvpKWSL42hmjIesFWWypS3vCvn-CTnEQ5rLcpoKkJz2VIpCsSNlU8w5odf7FCaTHjQFvaatB72mrde0NShd0i6idyfrw25C90_yN94CfDoCWKK4D5h0tgFniy4ktIt2Mfzf__MTuT1V8wsfMD_eoTPToO_Wvte6KYW2Fb3gfwBOjKX5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506318165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD ; Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD ; Iida, Osamu, MD ; Ishihara, Takayuki, MD ; Hirano, Keisuke, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD ; Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD ; Nanto, Shinsuke, MD ; Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD ; Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD ; Iida, Osamu, MD ; Ishihara, Takayuki, MD ; Hirano, Keisuke, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD ; Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD ; Nanto, Shinsuke, MD ; Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR. Background In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and predictors of refractory restenosis remain unclear. Methods This study was a multicenter, retrospective observational study. From September 2000 to December 2009, 133 restenotic lesions after FP artery stenting were classified by angiographic pattern: class I included focal lesions (≤50 mm in length), class II included diffuse lesions (&gt;50 mm in length), and class III included totally occluded ISR. All patients were treated by balloon angioplasty for at least 60 s. Recurrent ISR or occlusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after target lesion revascularization. Restenosis was defined as &gt;2.4 of the peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex scan or &gt;50% stenosis by angiography. Results Sixty-four percent of patients were male, 67% had diabetes mellitus, and 24% underwent hemodialysis. Class I pattern was found in 29% of the limbs, class II in 38%, and class III in 33%. Mean follow-up period was 24 ± 17 months. All-cause death occurred in 14 patients; bypass surgery was performed in 11 limbs, and major amputation was performed in 1 limb during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the rate of recurrent ISR at 2 years was 84.8% in class III patients compared with 49.9% in class I patients (p &lt; 0.0001) and 53.3% in class II patients (p = 0.0003), and the rate of recurrent occlusion at 2 years was 64.6% in class III patients compared with 15.9% in class I patients (p &lt; 0.0001) and 18.9% in class II patients (p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions Restenotic patterns after FP stenting are important predictors of recurrent ISR and occlusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22192663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis of Variance ; Angiography - methods ; Angioplasty ; Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects ; Angioplasty, Balloon - methods ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular ; Cohort Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Constriction, Pathologic - classification ; Constriction, Pathologic - therapy ; Coronary vessels ; endovascular therapy ; Female ; Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Femoral Artery - pathology ; femoropopliteal arterial disease ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart attacks ; Humans ; in-stent restenosis ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy ; Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Popliteal Artery - pathology ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prosthesis Failure ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stents ; Stents - adverse effects ; target vessel revascularization ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012-01, Vol.59 (1), p.16-23</ispartof><rights>American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 3, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ea2a3ed9a3a3df1f2019fc2509eebc65dc1bcad6728cfa5340e0a57afbd202fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ea2a3ed9a3a3df1f2019fc2509eebc65dc1bcad6728cfa5340e0a57afbd202fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109711044585$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22192663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Osamu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishihara, Takayuki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Keisuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanto, Shinsuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR. Background In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and predictors of refractory restenosis remain unclear. Methods This study was a multicenter, retrospective observational study. From September 2000 to December 2009, 133 restenotic lesions after FP artery stenting were classified by angiographic pattern: class I included focal lesions (≤50 mm in length), class II included diffuse lesions (&gt;50 mm in length), and class III included totally occluded ISR. All patients were treated by balloon angioplasty for at least 60 s. Recurrent ISR or occlusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after target lesion revascularization. Restenosis was defined as &gt;2.4 of the peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex scan or &gt;50% stenosis by angiography. Results Sixty-four percent of patients were male, 67% had diabetes mellitus, and 24% underwent hemodialysis. Class I pattern was found in 29% of the limbs, class II in 38%, and class III in 33%. Mean follow-up period was 24 ± 17 months. All-cause death occurred in 14 patients; bypass surgery was performed in 11 limbs, and major amputation was performed in 1 limb during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the rate of recurrent ISR at 2 years was 84.8% in class III patients compared with 49.9% in class I patients (p &lt; 0.0001) and 53.3% in class II patients (p = 0.0003), and the rate of recurrent occlusion at 2 years was 64.6% in class III patients compared with 15.9% in class I patients (p &lt; 0.0001) and 18.9% in class II patients (p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions Restenotic patterns after FP stenting are important predictors of recurrent ISR and occlusion.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - methods</subject><subject>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - classification</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - therapy</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>endovascular therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - pathology</subject><subject>femoropopliteal arterial disease</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>in-stent restenosis</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - pathology</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Stents - adverse effects</subject><subject>target vessel revascularization</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYModq3-AR9kwAefZrxJJpkJiFAWWwuFgtXnkE1uJOPMZE1mC_33ZtjVQh98Cpd853DvOYS8pdBQoPLj0AzG2oYBpQ2oBrh8RjZUiL7mQnXPyQY6LmoKqjsjr3IeAED2VL0kZ4xRxaTkG3K7HU3OwQdrlhDnysyu2o5hLvNYXU97Y5cq-uob5gXnmEOuLvyCqbrEKaa4j_sxLFjQu_K9hPnna_LCmzHjm9N7Tn5cfvm-_Vrf3F5dby9uaiugXWo0zHB0ynDDnae-3KC8ZQIU4s5K4SzdWeNkx3rrjeAtIBjRGb9zDJh3_Jx8OPruU_x9KNvpKWSL42hmjIesFWWypS3vCvn-CTnEQ5rLcpoKkJz2VIpCsSNlU8w5odf7FCaTHjQFvaatB72mrde0NShd0i6idyfrw25C90_yN94CfDoCWKK4D5h0tgFniy4ktIt2Mfzf__MTuT1V8wsfMD_eoTPToO_Wvte6KYW2Fb3gfwBOjKX5</recordid><startdate>20120103</startdate><enddate>20120103</enddate><creator>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD</creator><creator>Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD</creator><creator>Iida, Osamu, MD</creator><creator>Ishihara, Takayuki, MD</creator><creator>Hirano, Keisuke, MD</creator><creator>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creator><creator>Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD</creator><creator>Nanto, Shinsuke, MD</creator><creator>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120103</creationdate><title>Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting</title><author>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD ; Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD ; Iida, Osamu, MD ; Ishihara, Takayuki, MD ; Hirano, Keisuke, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD ; Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD ; Nanto, Shinsuke, MD ; Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ea2a3ed9a3a3df1f2019fc2509eebc65dc1bcad6728cfa5340e0a57afbd202fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - methods</topic><topic>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - classification</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - therapy</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>endovascular therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - pathology</topic><topic>femoropopliteal arterial disease</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>in-stent restenosis</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - pathology</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Stents - adverse effects</topic><topic>target vessel revascularization</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Osamu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishihara, Takayuki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Keisuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanto, Shinsuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD</au><au>Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD</au><au>Iida, Osamu, MD</au><au>Ishihara, Takayuki, MD</au><au>Hirano, Keisuke, MD</au><au>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</au><au>Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD</au><au>Nanto, Shinsuke, MD</au><au>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2012-01-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>16-23</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR. Background In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and predictors of refractory restenosis remain unclear. Methods This study was a multicenter, retrospective observational study. From September 2000 to December 2009, 133 restenotic lesions after FP artery stenting were classified by angiographic pattern: class I included focal lesions (≤50 mm in length), class II included diffuse lesions (&gt;50 mm in length), and class III included totally occluded ISR. All patients were treated by balloon angioplasty for at least 60 s. Recurrent ISR or occlusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after target lesion revascularization. Restenosis was defined as &gt;2.4 of the peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex scan or &gt;50% stenosis by angiography. Results Sixty-four percent of patients were male, 67% had diabetes mellitus, and 24% underwent hemodialysis. Class I pattern was found in 29% of the limbs, class II in 38%, and class III in 33%. Mean follow-up period was 24 ± 17 months. All-cause death occurred in 14 patients; bypass surgery was performed in 11 limbs, and major amputation was performed in 1 limb during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the rate of recurrent ISR at 2 years was 84.8% in class III patients compared with 49.9% in class I patients (p &lt; 0.0001) and 53.3% in class II patients (p = 0.0003), and the rate of recurrent occlusion at 2 years was 64.6% in class III patients compared with 15.9% in class I patients (p &lt; 0.0001) and 18.9% in class II patients (p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions Restenotic patterns after FP stenting are important predictors of recurrent ISR and occlusion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22192663</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012-01, Vol.59 (1), p.16-23
issn 0735-1097
1558-3597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912641437
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analysis of Variance
Angiography - methods
Angioplasty
Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects
Angioplasty, Balloon - methods
Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy
Cardiology
Cardiovascular
Cohort Studies
Confidence Intervals
Constriction, Pathologic - classification
Constriction, Pathologic - therapy
Coronary vessels
endovascular therapy
Female
Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging
Femoral Artery - pathology
femoropopliteal arterial disease
Follow-Up Studies
Heart attacks
Humans
in-stent restenosis
Internal Medicine
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging
Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy
Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging
Popliteal Artery - pathology
Proportional Hazards Models
Prosthesis Failure
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Stents
Stents - adverse effects
target vessel revascularization
Treatment Outcome
title Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification%20and%20Clinical%20Impact%20of%20Restenosis%20After%20Femoropopliteal%20Stenting&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Tosaka,%20Atsushi,%20MD&rft.date=2012-01-03&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=16-23&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3243218251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506318165&rft_id=info:pmid/22192663&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0735109711044585&rfr_iscdi=true