Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting
Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR. Background In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and pred...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012-01, Vol.59 (1), p.16-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Tosaka, Atsushi, MD Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD Iida, Osamu, MD Ishihara, Takayuki, MD Hirano, Keisuke, MD Suzuki, Kenji, MD Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD Nanto, Shinsuke, MD Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD |
description | Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR. Background In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and predictors of refractory restenosis remain unclear. Methods This study was a multicenter, retrospective observational study. From September 2000 to December 2009, 133 restenotic lesions after FP artery stenting were classified by angiographic pattern: class I included focal lesions (≤50 mm in length), class II included diffuse lesions (>50 mm in length), and class III included totally occluded ISR. All patients were treated by balloon angioplasty for at least 60 s. Recurrent ISR or occlusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after target lesion revascularization. Restenosis was defined as >2.4 of the peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex scan or >50% stenosis by angiography. Results Sixty-four percent of patients were male, 67% had diabetes mellitus, and 24% underwent hemodialysis. Class I pattern was found in 29% of the limbs, class II in 38%, and class III in 33%. Mean follow-up period was 24 ± 17 months. All-cause death occurred in 14 patients; bypass surgery was performed in 11 limbs, and major amputation was performed in 1 limb during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the rate of recurrent ISR at 2 years was 84.8% in class III patients compared with 49.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 53.3% in class II patients (p = 0.0003), and the rate of recurrent occlusion at 2 years was 64.6% in class III patients compared with 15.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 18.9% in class II patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Restenotic patterns after FP stenting are important predictors of recurrent ISR and occlusion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912641437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0735109711044585</els_id><sourcerecordid>3243218251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ea2a3ed9a3a3df1f2019fc2509eebc65dc1bcad6728cfa5340e0a57afbd202fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYModq3-AR9kwAefZrxJJpkJiFAWWwuFgtXnkE1uJOPMZE1mC_33ZtjVQh98Cpd853DvOYS8pdBQoPLj0AzG2oYBpQ2oBrh8RjZUiL7mQnXPyQY6LmoKqjsjr3IeAED2VL0kZ4xRxaTkG3K7HU3OwQdrlhDnysyu2o5hLvNYXU97Y5cq-uob5gXnmEOuLvyCqbrEKaa4j_sxLFjQu_K9hPnna_LCmzHjm9N7Tn5cfvm-_Vrf3F5dby9uaiugXWo0zHB0ynDDnae-3KC8ZQIU4s5K4SzdWeNkx3rrjeAtIBjRGb9zDJh3_Jx8OPruU_x9KNvpKWSL42hmjIesFWWypS3vCvn-CTnEQ5rLcpoKkJz2VIpCsSNlU8w5odf7FCaTHjQFvaatB72mrde0NShd0i6idyfrw25C90_yN94CfDoCWKK4D5h0tgFniy4ktIt2Mfzf__MTuT1V8wsfMD_eoTPToO_Wvte6KYW2Fb3gfwBOjKX5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506318165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD ; Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD ; Iida, Osamu, MD ; Ishihara, Takayuki, MD ; Hirano, Keisuke, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD ; Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD ; Nanto, Shinsuke, MD ; Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD ; Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD ; Iida, Osamu, MD ; Ishihara, Takayuki, MD ; Hirano, Keisuke, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD ; Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD ; Nanto, Shinsuke, MD ; Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR. Background In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and predictors of refractory restenosis remain unclear. Methods This study was a multicenter, retrospective observational study. From September 2000 to December 2009, 133 restenotic lesions after FP artery stenting were classified by angiographic pattern: class I included focal lesions (≤50 mm in length), class II included diffuse lesions (>50 mm in length), and class III included totally occluded ISR. All patients were treated by balloon angioplasty for at least 60 s. Recurrent ISR or occlusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after target lesion revascularization. Restenosis was defined as >2.4 of the peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex scan or >50% stenosis by angiography. Results Sixty-four percent of patients were male, 67% had diabetes mellitus, and 24% underwent hemodialysis. Class I pattern was found in 29% of the limbs, class II in 38%, and class III in 33%. Mean follow-up period was 24 ± 17 months. All-cause death occurred in 14 patients; bypass surgery was performed in 11 limbs, and major amputation was performed in 1 limb during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the rate of recurrent ISR at 2 years was 84.8% in class III patients compared with 49.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 53.3% in class II patients (p = 0.0003), and the rate of recurrent occlusion at 2 years was 64.6% in class III patients compared with 15.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 18.9% in class II patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Restenotic patterns after FP stenting are important predictors of recurrent ISR and occlusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22192663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis of Variance ; Angiography - methods ; Angioplasty ; Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects ; Angioplasty, Balloon - methods ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular ; Cohort Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Constriction, Pathologic - classification ; Constriction, Pathologic - therapy ; Coronary vessels ; endovascular therapy ; Female ; Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Femoral Artery - pathology ; femoropopliteal arterial disease ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart attacks ; Humans ; in-stent restenosis ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy ; Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Popliteal Artery - pathology ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prosthesis Failure ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stents ; Stents - adverse effects ; target vessel revascularization ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012-01, Vol.59 (1), p.16-23</ispartof><rights>American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 3, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ea2a3ed9a3a3df1f2019fc2509eebc65dc1bcad6728cfa5340e0a57afbd202fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ea2a3ed9a3a3df1f2019fc2509eebc65dc1bcad6728cfa5340e0a57afbd202fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109711044585$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22192663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Osamu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishihara, Takayuki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Keisuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanto, Shinsuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR. Background In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and predictors of refractory restenosis remain unclear. Methods This study was a multicenter, retrospective observational study. From September 2000 to December 2009, 133 restenotic lesions after FP artery stenting were classified by angiographic pattern: class I included focal lesions (≤50 mm in length), class II included diffuse lesions (>50 mm in length), and class III included totally occluded ISR. All patients were treated by balloon angioplasty for at least 60 s. Recurrent ISR or occlusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after target lesion revascularization. Restenosis was defined as >2.4 of the peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex scan or >50% stenosis by angiography. Results Sixty-four percent of patients were male, 67% had diabetes mellitus, and 24% underwent hemodialysis. Class I pattern was found in 29% of the limbs, class II in 38%, and class III in 33%. Mean follow-up period was 24 ± 17 months. All-cause death occurred in 14 patients; bypass surgery was performed in 11 limbs, and major amputation was performed in 1 limb during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the rate of recurrent ISR at 2 years was 84.8% in class III patients compared with 49.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 53.3% in class II patients (p = 0.0003), and the rate of recurrent occlusion at 2 years was 64.6% in class III patients compared with 15.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 18.9% in class II patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Restenotic patterns after FP stenting are important predictors of recurrent ISR and occlusion.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - methods</subject><subject>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - classification</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - therapy</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>endovascular therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - pathology</subject><subject>femoropopliteal arterial disease</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>in-stent restenosis</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - pathology</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Stents - adverse effects</subject><subject>target vessel revascularization</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYModq3-AR9kwAefZrxJJpkJiFAWWwuFgtXnkE1uJOPMZE1mC_33ZtjVQh98Cpd853DvOYS8pdBQoPLj0AzG2oYBpQ2oBrh8RjZUiL7mQnXPyQY6LmoKqjsjr3IeAED2VL0kZ4xRxaTkG3K7HU3OwQdrlhDnysyu2o5hLvNYXU97Y5cq-uob5gXnmEOuLvyCqbrEKaa4j_sxLFjQu_K9hPnna_LCmzHjm9N7Tn5cfvm-_Vrf3F5dby9uaiugXWo0zHB0ynDDnae-3KC8ZQIU4s5K4SzdWeNkx3rrjeAtIBjRGb9zDJh3_Jx8OPruU_x9KNvpKWSL42hmjIesFWWypS3vCvn-CTnEQ5rLcpoKkJz2VIpCsSNlU8w5odf7FCaTHjQFvaatB72mrde0NShd0i6idyfrw25C90_yN94CfDoCWKK4D5h0tgFniy4ktIt2Mfzf__MTuT1V8wsfMD_eoTPToO_Wvte6KYW2Fb3gfwBOjKX5</recordid><startdate>20120103</startdate><enddate>20120103</enddate><creator>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD</creator><creator>Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD</creator><creator>Iida, Osamu, MD</creator><creator>Ishihara, Takayuki, MD</creator><creator>Hirano, Keisuke, MD</creator><creator>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creator><creator>Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD</creator><creator>Nanto, Shinsuke, MD</creator><creator>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120103</creationdate><title>Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting</title><author>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD ; Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD ; Iida, Osamu, MD ; Ishihara, Takayuki, MD ; Hirano, Keisuke, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD ; Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD ; Nanto, Shinsuke, MD ; Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ea2a3ed9a3a3df1f2019fc2509eebc65dc1bcad6728cfa5340e0a57afbd202fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - methods</topic><topic>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - classification</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - therapy</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>endovascular therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - pathology</topic><topic>femoropopliteal arterial disease</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>in-stent restenosis</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - pathology</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Stents - adverse effects</topic><topic>target vessel revascularization</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Osamu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishihara, Takayuki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Keisuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanto, Shinsuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tosaka, Atsushi, MD</au><au>Soga, Yoshimitsu, MD</au><au>Iida, Osamu, MD</au><au>Ishihara, Takayuki, MD</au><au>Hirano, Keisuke, MD</au><au>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</au><au>Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, MD</au><au>Nanto, Shinsuke, MD</au><au>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2012-01-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>16-23</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR. Background In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and predictors of refractory restenosis remain unclear. Methods This study was a multicenter, retrospective observational study. From September 2000 to December 2009, 133 restenotic lesions after FP artery stenting were classified by angiographic pattern: class I included focal lesions (≤50 mm in length), class II included diffuse lesions (>50 mm in length), and class III included totally occluded ISR. All patients were treated by balloon angioplasty for at least 60 s. Recurrent ISR or occlusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after target lesion revascularization. Restenosis was defined as >2.4 of the peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex scan or >50% stenosis by angiography. Results Sixty-four percent of patients were male, 67% had diabetes mellitus, and 24% underwent hemodialysis. Class I pattern was found in 29% of the limbs, class II in 38%, and class III in 33%. Mean follow-up period was 24 ± 17 months. All-cause death occurred in 14 patients; bypass surgery was performed in 11 limbs, and major amputation was performed in 1 limb during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the rate of recurrent ISR at 2 years was 84.8% in class III patients compared with 49.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 53.3% in class II patients (p = 0.0003), and the rate of recurrent occlusion at 2 years was 64.6% in class III patients compared with 15.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 18.9% in class II patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Restenotic patterns after FP stenting are important predictors of recurrent ISR and occlusion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22192663</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-1097 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012-01, Vol.59 (1), p.16-23 |
issn | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912641437 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Analysis of Variance Angiography - methods Angioplasty Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects Angioplasty, Balloon - methods Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy Cardiology Cardiovascular Cohort Studies Confidence Intervals Constriction, Pathologic - classification Constriction, Pathologic - therapy Coronary vessels endovascular therapy Female Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging Femoral Artery - pathology femoropopliteal arterial disease Follow-Up Studies Heart attacks Humans in-stent restenosis Internal Medicine Male Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging Popliteal Artery - pathology Proportional Hazards Models Prosthesis Failure Recurrence Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Severity of Illness Index Stents Stents - adverse effects target vessel revascularization Treatment Outcome |
title | Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification%20and%20Clinical%20Impact%20of%20Restenosis%20After%20Femoropopliteal%20Stenting&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Tosaka,%20Atsushi,%20MD&rft.date=2012-01-03&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=16-23&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3243218251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506318165&rft_id=info:pmid/22192663&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0735109711044585&rfr_iscdi=true |