Buttercup Squash Provides a Marketable Alternative to Blue Hubbard as a Trap Crop for Control of Striped Cucumber Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Winter squash is a vital agricultural commodity worldwide. In the Northeastern United States, the primary insect pest is the striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittatum F. Using a Blue Hubbard squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) perimeter trap crop system can reduce insecticide use by >90% in butte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental entomology 2010-12, Vol.39 (6), p.1953-1960
Hauptverfasser: Cavanagh, Andrew F, Adler, Lynn S, Hazzard, Ruth V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1960
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1953
container_title Environmental entomology
container_volume 39
creator Cavanagh, Andrew F
Adler, Lynn S
Hazzard, Ruth V
description Winter squash is a vital agricultural commodity worldwide. In the Northeastern United States, the primary insect pest is the striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittatum F. Using a Blue Hubbard squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) perimeter trap crop system can reduce insecticide use by >90% in butternut squash (C. moschata Poir), the primary winter squash grown in this region. Despite the savings in insecticide costs, growers may be reluctant to give up field space for a perimeter crop of Blue Hubbard squash, which comprises only 5% of the winter squash market in New England as compared with 19% for buttercup squash. Finding a more marketable trap crop would lower the barrier for adoption of this system. We tested eight varieties of three species of cucurbits for attractiveness to beetles relative to Blue Hubbard and butternut squash, and chose buttercup squash as the most promising replacement. We compared the effect of a buttercup border, Blue Hubbard border, or control (no border) on beetle numbers, herbivory, insecticide use, pollination, and pollen limitation in the main crop. We found that buttercup squash performed equally well as Blue Hubbard as a trap crop, with 97% reduction in total insecticide use compared with control fields. Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) and squash bees (Peponapis pruinosa Say) were the predominant pollinators, and border treatments did not affect visitation. Hand pollination did not increase reproduction or yield, indicating that natural pollination was sufficient for full yield. This study confirms the effectiveness of perimeter trap crop systems and offers growers a more marketable trap crop for managing cucumber beetle damage.
doi_str_mv 10.1603/EN10056
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912273759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>912273759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b429t-b8a36a13e1e6e66b2f6b6d2667ac2fe65c06b9e89ed3f0f7a0fdea48606098ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1u1DAUhmELgehQEHcA3iDKYsA_iWOz60SFIpUfaVqJXXScHNOAE6d2XKkX0vslVQdmhfDGm0evjvQR8pyzt1wx-e7kC2esVA_Iihup18JI9ZCsGCvUWojy-wF5ktJPtjwtqsfkQAiuRanEitxu8jxjbPNEt1cZ0iX9FsN132GiQD9D_IUzWI_02C9qhLm_RjoHuvEZ6Wm2FmJH4c6eR5hoHcNEXYi0DuMcg6fB0e0c-wk7Wuc2DxYj3SDOfukf1cFjmJYuvKf1ZbxJYUDfd4BvnpJHDnzCZ7v_kFx8ODmvT9dnXz9-qo_P1rYQZl5bDVIBl8hRoVJWOGVVJ5SqoBUOVdkyZQ1qg510zFXAXIdQaMUUM9qCPCSv77tTDFcZ09wMfWrRexgx5NQYLkQlq9L8V2ojhS5FVe5lG0NKEV0zxX6AeNNw1tyN1ezGWuSLXTPbAbu_7s86C3i1A5Ba8C7C2PZp76TmTEu2uJf3zkFo4EdczMVWMC4ZN4UUBduXbB_CiP886TdsO7F_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>893285275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Buttercup Squash Provides a Marketable Alternative to Blue Hubbard as a Trap Crop for Control of Striped Cucumber Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Cavanagh, Andrew F ; Adler, Lynn S ; Hazzard, Ruth V</creator><creatorcontrib>Cavanagh, Andrew F ; Adler, Lynn S ; Hazzard, Ruth V</creatorcontrib><description>Winter squash is a vital agricultural commodity worldwide. In the Northeastern United States, the primary insect pest is the striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittatum F. Using a Blue Hubbard squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) perimeter trap crop system can reduce insecticide use by &gt;90% in butternut squash (C. moschata Poir), the primary winter squash grown in this region. Despite the savings in insecticide costs, growers may be reluctant to give up field space for a perimeter crop of Blue Hubbard squash, which comprises only 5% of the winter squash market in New England as compared with 19% for buttercup squash. Finding a more marketable trap crop would lower the barrier for adoption of this system. We tested eight varieties of three species of cucurbits for attractiveness to beetles relative to Blue Hubbard and butternut squash, and chose buttercup squash as the most promising replacement. We compared the effect of a buttercup border, Blue Hubbard border, or control (no border) on beetle numbers, herbivory, insecticide use, pollination, and pollen limitation in the main crop. We found that buttercup squash performed equally well as Blue Hubbard as a trap crop, with 97% reduction in total insecticide use compared with control fields. Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) and squash bees (Peponapis pruinosa Say) were the predominant pollinators, and border treatments did not affect visitation. Hand pollination did not increase reproduction or yield, indicating that natural pollination was sufficient for full yield. This study confirms the effectiveness of perimeter trap crop systems and offers growers a more marketable trap crop for managing cucumber beetle damage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-225X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2936</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0046-225X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/EN10056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22182562</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVETBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Acalymma vittatum ; Agriculture - methods ; Animals ; Apis mellifera ; Biological and medical sciences ; butternut squash ; Chrysomelidae ; Coleoptera ; Control ; Cucurbita - parasitology ; Cucurbita maxima ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbivory ; Insect Control - methods ; Insecticides ; Integrated pest control ; integrated pest management (IPM) ; PEST MANAGEMENT ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Pollination ; Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><ispartof>Environmental entomology, 2010-12, Vol.39 (6), p.1953-1960</ispartof><rights>2010 Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b429t-b8a36a13e1e6e66b2f6b6d2667ac2fe65c06b9e89ed3f0f7a0fdea48606098ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b429t-b8a36a13e1e6e66b2f6b6d2667ac2fe65c06b9e89ed3f0f7a0fdea48606098ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1603/EN10056$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,26978,27924,27925,52363</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23810830$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22182562$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cavanagh, Andrew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, Lynn S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazzard, Ruth V</creatorcontrib><title>Buttercup Squash Provides a Marketable Alternative to Blue Hubbard as a Trap Crop for Control of Striped Cucumber Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)</title><title>Environmental entomology</title><addtitle>Environ Entomol</addtitle><description>Winter squash is a vital agricultural commodity worldwide. In the Northeastern United States, the primary insect pest is the striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittatum F. Using a Blue Hubbard squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) perimeter trap crop system can reduce insecticide use by &gt;90% in butternut squash (C. moschata Poir), the primary winter squash grown in this region. Despite the savings in insecticide costs, growers may be reluctant to give up field space for a perimeter crop of Blue Hubbard squash, which comprises only 5% of the winter squash market in New England as compared with 19% for buttercup squash. Finding a more marketable trap crop would lower the barrier for adoption of this system. We tested eight varieties of three species of cucurbits for attractiveness to beetles relative to Blue Hubbard and butternut squash, and chose buttercup squash as the most promising replacement. We compared the effect of a buttercup border, Blue Hubbard border, or control (no border) on beetle numbers, herbivory, insecticide use, pollination, and pollen limitation in the main crop. We found that buttercup squash performed equally well as Blue Hubbard as a trap crop, with 97% reduction in total insecticide use compared with control fields. Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) and squash bees (Peponapis pruinosa Say) were the predominant pollinators, and border treatments did not affect visitation. Hand pollination did not increase reproduction or yield, indicating that natural pollination was sufficient for full yield. This study confirms the effectiveness of perimeter trap crop systems and offers growers a more marketable trap crop for managing cucumber beetle damage.</description><subject>Acalymma vittatum</subject><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>butternut squash</subject><subject>Chrysomelidae</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cucurbita - parasitology</subject><subject>Cucurbita maxima</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Insect Control - methods</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Integrated pest control</subject><subject>integrated pest management (IPM)</subject><subject>PEST MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><issn>0046-225X</issn><issn>1938-2936</issn><issn>0046-225X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1u1DAUhmELgehQEHcA3iDKYsA_iWOz60SFIpUfaVqJXXScHNOAE6d2XKkX0vslVQdmhfDGm0evjvQR8pyzt1wx-e7kC2esVA_Iihup18JI9ZCsGCvUWojy-wF5ktJPtjwtqsfkQAiuRanEitxu8jxjbPNEt1cZ0iX9FsN132GiQD9D_IUzWI_02C9qhLm_RjoHuvEZ6Wm2FmJH4c6eR5hoHcNEXYi0DuMcg6fB0e0c-wk7Wuc2DxYj3SDOfukf1cFjmJYuvKf1ZbxJYUDfd4BvnpJHDnzCZ7v_kFx8ODmvT9dnXz9-qo_P1rYQZl5bDVIBl8hRoVJWOGVVJ5SqoBUOVdkyZQ1qg510zFXAXIdQaMUUM9qCPCSv77tTDFcZ09wMfWrRexgx5NQYLkQlq9L8V2ojhS5FVe5lG0NKEV0zxX6AeNNw1tyN1ezGWuSLXTPbAbu_7s86C3i1A5Ba8C7C2PZp76TmTEu2uJf3zkFo4EdczMVWMC4ZN4UUBduXbB_CiP886TdsO7F_</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Cavanagh, Andrew F</creator><creator>Adler, Lynn S</creator><creator>Hazzard, Ruth V</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Buttercup Squash Provides a Marketable Alternative to Blue Hubbard as a Trap Crop for Control of Striped Cucumber Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)</title><author>Cavanagh, Andrew F ; Adler, Lynn S ; Hazzard, Ruth V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b429t-b8a36a13e1e6e66b2f6b6d2667ac2fe65c06b9e89ed3f0f7a0fdea48606098ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Acalymma vittatum</topic><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>butternut squash</topic><topic>Chrysomelidae</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cucurbita - parasitology</topic><topic>Cucurbita maxima</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Insect Control - methods</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Integrated pest control</topic><topic>integrated pest management (IPM)</topic><topic>PEST MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cavanagh, Andrew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, Lynn S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazzard, Ruth V</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cavanagh, Andrew F</au><au>Adler, Lynn S</au><au>Hazzard, Ruth V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Buttercup Squash Provides a Marketable Alternative to Blue Hubbard as a Trap Crop for Control of Striped Cucumber Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)</atitle><jtitle>Environmental entomology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Entomol</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1953</spage><epage>1960</epage><pages>1953-1960</pages><issn>0046-225X</issn><eissn>1938-2936</eissn><eissn>0046-225X</eissn><coden>EVETBX</coden><abstract>Winter squash is a vital agricultural commodity worldwide. In the Northeastern United States, the primary insect pest is the striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittatum F. Using a Blue Hubbard squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) perimeter trap crop system can reduce insecticide use by &gt;90% in butternut squash (C. moschata Poir), the primary winter squash grown in this region. Despite the savings in insecticide costs, growers may be reluctant to give up field space for a perimeter crop of Blue Hubbard squash, which comprises only 5% of the winter squash market in New England as compared with 19% for buttercup squash. Finding a more marketable trap crop would lower the barrier for adoption of this system. We tested eight varieties of three species of cucurbits for attractiveness to beetles relative to Blue Hubbard and butternut squash, and chose buttercup squash as the most promising replacement. We compared the effect of a buttercup border, Blue Hubbard border, or control (no border) on beetle numbers, herbivory, insecticide use, pollination, and pollen limitation in the main crop. We found that buttercup squash performed equally well as Blue Hubbard as a trap crop, with 97% reduction in total insecticide use compared with control fields. Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) and squash bees (Peponapis pruinosa Say) were the predominant pollinators, and border treatments did not affect visitation. Hand pollination did not increase reproduction or yield, indicating that natural pollination was sufficient for full yield. This study confirms the effectiveness of perimeter trap crop systems and offers growers a more marketable trap crop for managing cucumber beetle damage.</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>22182562</pmid><doi>10.1603/EN10056</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-225X
ispartof Environmental entomology, 2010-12, Vol.39 (6), p.1953-1960
issn 0046-225X
1938-2936
0046-225X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912273759
source MEDLINE; BioOne Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Acalymma vittatum
Agriculture - methods
Animals
Apis mellifera
Biological and medical sciences
butternut squash
Chrysomelidae
Coleoptera
Control
Cucurbita - parasitology
Cucurbita maxima
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Herbivory
Insect Control - methods
Insecticides
Integrated pest control
integrated pest management (IPM)
PEST MANAGEMENT
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Pollination
Protozoa. Invertebrates
title Buttercup Squash Provides a Marketable Alternative to Blue Hubbard as a Trap Crop for Control of Striped Cucumber Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A30%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Buttercup%20Squash%20Provides%20a%20Marketable%20Alternative%20to%20Blue%20Hubbard%20as%20a%20Trap%20Crop%20for%20Control%20of%20Striped%20Cucumber%20Beetles%20(Coleoptera:%20Chrysomelidae)&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20entomology&rft.au=Cavanagh,%20Andrew%20F&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1953&rft.epage=1960&rft.pages=1953-1960&rft.issn=0046-225X&rft.eissn=1938-2936&rft.coden=EVETBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/EN10056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E912273759%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=893285275&rft_id=info:pmid/22182562&rfr_iscdi=true