Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center
Abstract Background Trauma patients are exposed to potentially high levels of low-dose radiation during radiologic studies. Objectives To assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation exposure (RE) in 177 successive patients admitted to a trauma service from January 1 through February 28,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of emergency medicine 2011-12, Vol.41 (6), p.640-648 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 648 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 640 |
container_title | The Journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD Krugh, Kerry, PhD Culler, Amy Sue, MD Spangler, Matthew, PA-C Ethington, Morgan, PA-C Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN |
description | Abstract Background Trauma patients are exposed to potentially high levels of low-dose radiation during radiologic studies. Objectives To assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation exposure (RE) in 177 successive patients admitted to a trauma service from January 1 through February 28, 2006. Results Patients received a total of 1505 radiographs and 400 computed tomography (CT) scans in the study period. The CED was 14.56 mSv (0.97 mSv radiographs, 13.59 mSv CT scans) per patient total length of stay (LOS). CED averaged 8.66 mSv in the first hour and 11.76 mSv in the first 24 h after arrival. The most commonly performed CT scan was brain (n = 147), followed by abdomen and pelvis (n = 80), and cervical spine (n = 69). CT scans of the brain and cervical spine were the most commonly performed combined imaging tests (35%). Twelve percent of patients received no radiographs, and 15% received no CT scans. Six or more CT scans were done in 6% of patients. RE increased with longer LOS (> 6 days vs. 3–5 days vs. 1 day, p < 0.05). “Pan-scans” (a combination of CTs of the brain, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were done in 13% (n = 23) of patients. There was a higher total RE from CT scans (25.09 mSv ± 19.48 mSv vs. 4.93 mSv ± 14.20 mSv) in patients with injury severity score (ISS) > 9 vs. ≤ 9 ( p < 0.0001). First hour and first 24-h RE rates from radiographs were lower in patients younger than 15 years vs. 15–45 years and older-than-45-year age cohorts ( p < 0.05). Conclusions In this study, CED was 14.56 mSv per patient. CT scans accounted for 21% of radiologic studies and 93% of CED. There was a higher CED rate in patients with ISS > 9 and longer LOS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912110100</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0736467911002794</els_id><sourcerecordid>912110100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b310fcf12ba9e16275a351ad24cd99a9feba82ee4bf3638cb8dcb17655f9775a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1P3DAQxa0KVLa0_wLyjVPSGTsf6wsCraBFWqkVH2fLcSaSQz4WO0Hsf4-jZS-99DSH996M5vcYu0BIEbD42aYt9eR7qlMBiCnIFCD7wlZC5iLJQagTtoJSFklWlOqMfQuhBcAS1viVnQnMZZEBrtj2ZjDdPrjAx4Y_mNqZyY0Dv33fjWH2xN3An7yZe8P_RoWGKXAzccO39EYdvz-Km6iQ_85OG9MF-vE5z9nz3e3T5ney_fPrfnOzTWwmxJRUEqGxDYrKKMJClLmROZpaZLZWyqiGKrMWRFnVyEKubbWubYVlkeeNKhfzObs87N358XWmMOneBUtdZwYa56AVCoyUAKKzODitH0Pw1Oidd73xe42gF5C61UeQegGpQeoIMgYvPk_M1aIdY0dy0XB9MFB89M2R18FGPpZq58lOuh7d_29c_bPCdm5w1nQvtKfQjrOP5QSNOggN-nGpc2kz_gaiVJn8ACZ0m_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912110100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS ; Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS ; Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD ; Krugh, Kerry, PhD ; Culler, Amy Sue, MD ; Spangler, Matthew, PA-C ; Ethington, Morgan, PA-C ; Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP ; Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS ; Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS ; Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD ; Krugh, Kerry, PhD ; Culler, Amy Sue, MD ; Spangler, Matthew, PA-C ; Ethington, Morgan, PA-C ; Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP ; Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Trauma patients are exposed to potentially high levels of low-dose radiation during radiologic studies. Objectives To assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation exposure (RE) in 177 successive patients admitted to a trauma service from January 1 through February 28, 2006. Results Patients received a total of 1505 radiographs and 400 computed tomography (CT) scans in the study period. The CED was 14.56 mSv (0.97 mSv radiographs, 13.59 mSv CT scans) per patient total length of stay (LOS). CED averaged 8.66 mSv in the first hour and 11.76 mSv in the first 24 h after arrival. The most commonly performed CT scan was brain (n = 147), followed by abdomen and pelvis (n = 80), and cervical spine (n = 69). CT scans of the brain and cervical spine were the most commonly performed combined imaging tests (35%). Twelve percent of patients received no radiographs, and 15% received no CT scans. Six or more CT scans were done in 6% of patients. RE increased with longer LOS (> 6 days vs. 3–5 days vs. 1 day, p < 0.05). “Pan-scans” (a combination of CTs of the brain, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were done in 13% (n = 23) of patients. There was a higher total RE from CT scans (25.09 mSv ± 19.48 mSv vs. 4.93 mSv ± 14.20 mSv) in patients with injury severity score (ISS) > 9 vs. ≤ 9 ( p < 0.0001). First hour and first 24-h RE rates from radiographs were lower in patients younger than 15 years vs. 15–45 years and older-than-45-year age cohorts ( p < 0.05). Conclusions In this study, CED was 14.56 mSv per patient. CT scans accounted for 21% of radiologic studies and 93% of CED. There was a higher CED rate in patients with ISS > 9 and longer LOS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-4679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21536401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Emergency ; Emergency care ; Female ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation injuries ; Radiology ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics & numerical data ; Trauma ; Trauma Centers - statistics & numerical data ; Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; X-ray computed ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of emergency medicine, 2011-12, Vol.41 (6), p.640-648</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b310fcf12ba9e16275a351ad24cd99a9feba82ee4bf3638cb8dcb17655f9775a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b310fcf12ba9e16275a351ad24cd99a9feba82ee4bf3638cb8dcb17655f9775a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21536401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krugh, Kerry, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culler, Amy Sue, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spangler, Matthew, PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ethington, Morgan, PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center</title><title>The Journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Trauma patients are exposed to potentially high levels of low-dose radiation during radiologic studies. Objectives To assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation exposure (RE) in 177 successive patients admitted to a trauma service from January 1 through February 28, 2006. Results Patients received a total of 1505 radiographs and 400 computed tomography (CT) scans in the study period. The CED was 14.56 mSv (0.97 mSv radiographs, 13.59 mSv CT scans) per patient total length of stay (LOS). CED averaged 8.66 mSv in the first hour and 11.76 mSv in the first 24 h after arrival. The most commonly performed CT scan was brain (n = 147), followed by abdomen and pelvis (n = 80), and cervical spine (n = 69). CT scans of the brain and cervical spine were the most commonly performed combined imaging tests (35%). Twelve percent of patients received no radiographs, and 15% received no CT scans. Six or more CT scans were done in 6% of patients. RE increased with longer LOS (> 6 days vs. 3–5 days vs. 1 day, p < 0.05). “Pan-scans” (a combination of CTs of the brain, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were done in 13% (n = 23) of patients. There was a higher total RE from CT scans (25.09 mSv ± 19.48 mSv vs. 4.93 mSv ± 14.20 mSv) in patients with injury severity score (ISS) > 9 vs. ≤ 9 ( p < 0.0001). First hour and first 24-h RE rates from radiographs were lower in patients younger than 15 years vs. 15–45 years and older-than-45-year age cohorts ( p < 0.05). Conclusions In this study, CED was 14.56 mSv per patient. CT scans accounted for 21% of radiologic studies and 93% of CED. There was a higher CED rate in patients with ISS > 9 and longer LOS.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation injuries</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Trauma Centers - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>X-ray computed</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0736-4679</issn><issn>2352-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1P3DAQxa0KVLa0_wLyjVPSGTsf6wsCraBFWqkVH2fLcSaSQz4WO0Hsf4-jZS-99DSH996M5vcYu0BIEbD42aYt9eR7qlMBiCnIFCD7wlZC5iLJQagTtoJSFklWlOqMfQuhBcAS1viVnQnMZZEBrtj2ZjDdPrjAx4Y_mNqZyY0Dv33fjWH2xN3An7yZe8P_RoWGKXAzccO39EYdvz-Km6iQ_85OG9MF-vE5z9nz3e3T5ney_fPrfnOzTWwmxJRUEqGxDYrKKMJClLmROZpaZLZWyqiGKrMWRFnVyEKubbWubYVlkeeNKhfzObs87N358XWmMOneBUtdZwYa56AVCoyUAKKzODitH0Pw1Oidd73xe42gF5C61UeQegGpQeoIMgYvPk_M1aIdY0dy0XB9MFB89M2R18FGPpZq58lOuh7d_29c_bPCdm5w1nQvtKfQjrOP5QSNOggN-nGpc2kz_gaiVJn8ACZ0m_A</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS</creator><creator>Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS</creator><creator>Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD</creator><creator>Krugh, Kerry, PhD</creator><creator>Culler, Amy Sue, MD</creator><creator>Spangler, Matthew, PA-C</creator><creator>Ethington, Morgan, PA-C</creator><creator>Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP</creator><creator>Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center</title><author>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS ; Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS ; Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD ; Krugh, Kerry, PhD ; Culler, Amy Sue, MD ; Spangler, Matthew, PA-C ; Ethington, Morgan, PA-C ; Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP ; Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b310fcf12ba9e16275a351ad24cd99a9feba82ee4bf3638cb8dcb17655f9775a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation injuries</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Trauma Centers - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>X-ray computed</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krugh, Kerry, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culler, Amy Sue, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spangler, Matthew, PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ethington, Morgan, PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS</au><au>Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS</au><au>Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD</au><au>Krugh, Kerry, PhD</au><au>Culler, Amy Sue, MD</au><au>Spangler, Matthew, PA-C</au><au>Ethington, Morgan, PA-C</au><au>Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP</au><au>Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>640</spage><epage>648</epage><pages>640-648</pages><issn>0736-4679</issn><eissn>2352-5029</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Trauma patients are exposed to potentially high levels of low-dose radiation during radiologic studies. Objectives To assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation exposure (RE) in 177 successive patients admitted to a trauma service from January 1 through February 28, 2006. Results Patients received a total of 1505 radiographs and 400 computed tomography (CT) scans in the study period. The CED was 14.56 mSv (0.97 mSv radiographs, 13.59 mSv CT scans) per patient total length of stay (LOS). CED averaged 8.66 mSv in the first hour and 11.76 mSv in the first 24 h after arrival. The most commonly performed CT scan was brain (n = 147), followed by abdomen and pelvis (n = 80), and cervical spine (n = 69). CT scans of the brain and cervical spine were the most commonly performed combined imaging tests (35%). Twelve percent of patients received no radiographs, and 15% received no CT scans. Six or more CT scans were done in 6% of patients. RE increased with longer LOS (> 6 days vs. 3–5 days vs. 1 day, p < 0.05). “Pan-scans” (a combination of CTs of the brain, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were done in 13% (n = 23) of patients. There was a higher total RE from CT scans (25.09 mSv ± 19.48 mSv vs. 4.93 mSv ± 14.20 mSv) in patients with injury severity score (ISS) > 9 vs. ≤ 9 ( p < 0.0001). First hour and first 24-h RE rates from radiographs were lower in patients younger than 15 years vs. 15–45 years and older-than-45-year age cohorts ( p < 0.05). Conclusions In this study, CED was 14.56 mSv per patient. CT scans accounted for 21% of radiologic studies and 93% of CED. There was a higher CED rate in patients with ISS > 9 and longer LOS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21536401</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.004</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0736-4679 |
ispartof | The Journal of emergency medicine, 2011-12, Vol.41 (6), p.640-648 |
issn | 0736-4679 2352-5029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912110100 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Emergency Emergency care Female Humans Length of Stay Male Middle Aged Radiation Dosage Radiation injuries Radiology Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics & numerical data Trauma Trauma Centers - statistics & numerical data Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging X-ray computed Young Adult |
title | Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A06%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Radiation%20Exposure%20in%20Trauma%20Patients%20at%20a%20Level%20I%20Trauma%20Center&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Sharma,%20Om%20P.,%20MD,%20FACS&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=640&rft.epage=648&rft.pages=640-648&rft.issn=0736-4679&rft.eissn=2352-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E912110100%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912110100&rft_id=info:pmid/21536401&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0736467911002794&rfr_iscdi=true |