Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center

Abstract Background Trauma patients are exposed to potentially high levels of low-dose radiation during radiologic studies. Objectives To assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation exposure (RE) in 177 successive patients admitted to a trauma service from January 1 through February 28,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of emergency medicine 2011-12, Vol.41 (6), p.640-648
Hauptverfasser: Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS, Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS, Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD, Krugh, Kerry, PhD, Culler, Amy Sue, MD, Spangler, Matthew, PA-C, Ethington, Morgan, PA-C, Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP, Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 648
container_issue 6
container_start_page 640
container_title The Journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 41
creator Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS
Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS
Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD
Krugh, Kerry, PhD
Culler, Amy Sue, MD
Spangler, Matthew, PA-C
Ethington, Morgan, PA-C
Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP
Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN
description Abstract Background Trauma patients are exposed to potentially high levels of low-dose radiation during radiologic studies. Objectives To assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation exposure (RE) in 177 successive patients admitted to a trauma service from January 1 through February 28, 2006. Results Patients received a total of 1505 radiographs and 400 computed tomography (CT) scans in the study period. The CED was 14.56 mSv (0.97 mSv radiographs, 13.59 mSv CT scans) per patient total length of stay (LOS). CED averaged 8.66 mSv in the first hour and 11.76 mSv in the first 24 h after arrival. The most commonly performed CT scan was brain (n = 147), followed by abdomen and pelvis (n = 80), and cervical spine (n = 69). CT scans of the brain and cervical spine were the most commonly performed combined imaging tests (35%). Twelve percent of patients received no radiographs, and 15% received no CT scans. Six or more CT scans were done in 6% of patients. RE increased with longer LOS (> 6 days vs. 3–5 days vs. 1 day, p < 0.05). “Pan-scans” (a combination of CTs of the brain, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were done in 13% (n = 23) of patients. There was a higher total RE from CT scans (25.09 mSv ± 19.48 mSv vs. 4.93 mSv ± 14.20 mSv) in patients with injury severity score (ISS) > 9 vs. ≤ 9 ( p < 0.0001). First hour and first 24-h RE rates from radiographs were lower in patients younger than 15 years vs. 15–45 years and older-than-45-year age cohorts ( p < 0.05). Conclusions In this study, CED was 14.56 mSv per patient. CT scans accounted for 21% of radiologic studies and 93% of CED. There was a higher CED rate in patients with ISS > 9 and longer LOS.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912110100</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0736467911002794</els_id><sourcerecordid>912110100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b310fcf12ba9e16275a351ad24cd99a9feba82ee4bf3638cb8dcb17655f9775a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1P3DAQxa0KVLa0_wLyjVPSGTsf6wsCraBFWqkVH2fLcSaSQz4WO0Hsf4-jZS-99DSH996M5vcYu0BIEbD42aYt9eR7qlMBiCnIFCD7wlZC5iLJQagTtoJSFklWlOqMfQuhBcAS1viVnQnMZZEBrtj2ZjDdPrjAx4Y_mNqZyY0Dv33fjWH2xN3An7yZe8P_RoWGKXAzccO39EYdvz-Km6iQ_85OG9MF-vE5z9nz3e3T5ney_fPrfnOzTWwmxJRUEqGxDYrKKMJClLmROZpaZLZWyqiGKrMWRFnVyEKubbWubYVlkeeNKhfzObs87N358XWmMOneBUtdZwYa56AVCoyUAKKzODitH0Pw1Oidd73xe42gF5C61UeQegGpQeoIMgYvPk_M1aIdY0dy0XB9MFB89M2R18FGPpZq58lOuh7d_29c_bPCdm5w1nQvtKfQjrOP5QSNOggN-nGpc2kz_gaiVJn8ACZ0m_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912110100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS ; Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS ; Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD ; Krugh, Kerry, PhD ; Culler, Amy Sue, MD ; Spangler, Matthew, PA-C ; Ethington, Morgan, PA-C ; Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP ; Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS ; Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS ; Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD ; Krugh, Kerry, PhD ; Culler, Amy Sue, MD ; Spangler, Matthew, PA-C ; Ethington, Morgan, PA-C ; Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP ; Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Trauma patients are exposed to potentially high levels of low-dose radiation during radiologic studies. Objectives To assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation exposure (RE) in 177 successive patients admitted to a trauma service from January 1 through February 28, 2006. Results Patients received a total of 1505 radiographs and 400 computed tomography (CT) scans in the study period. The CED was 14.56 mSv (0.97 mSv radiographs, 13.59 mSv CT scans) per patient total length of stay (LOS). CED averaged 8.66 mSv in the first hour and 11.76 mSv in the first 24 h after arrival. The most commonly performed CT scan was brain (n = 147), followed by abdomen and pelvis (n = 80), and cervical spine (n = 69). CT scans of the brain and cervical spine were the most commonly performed combined imaging tests (35%). Twelve percent of patients received no radiographs, and 15% received no CT scans. Six or more CT scans were done in 6% of patients. RE increased with longer LOS (&gt; 6 days vs. 3–5 days vs. 1 day, p &lt; 0.05). “Pan-scans” (a combination of CTs of the brain, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were done in 13% (n = 23) of patients. There was a higher total RE from CT scans (25.09 mSv ± 19.48 mSv vs. 4.93 mSv ± 14.20 mSv) in patients with injury severity score (ISS) &gt; 9 vs. ≤ 9 ( p &lt; 0.0001). First hour and first 24-h RE rates from radiographs were lower in patients younger than 15 years vs. 15–45 years and older-than-45-year age cohorts ( p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions In this study, CED was 14.56 mSv per patient. CT scans accounted for 21% of radiologic studies and 93% of CED. There was a higher CED rate in patients with ISS &gt; 9 and longer LOS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-4679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21536401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Emergency ; Emergency care ; Female ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation injuries ; Radiology ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Trauma ; Trauma Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; X-ray computed ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of emergency medicine, 2011-12, Vol.41 (6), p.640-648</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b310fcf12ba9e16275a351ad24cd99a9feba82ee4bf3638cb8dcb17655f9775a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b310fcf12ba9e16275a351ad24cd99a9feba82ee4bf3638cb8dcb17655f9775a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21536401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krugh, Kerry, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culler, Amy Sue, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spangler, Matthew, PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ethington, Morgan, PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center</title><title>The Journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Trauma patients are exposed to potentially high levels of low-dose radiation during radiologic studies. Objectives To assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation exposure (RE) in 177 successive patients admitted to a trauma service from January 1 through February 28, 2006. Results Patients received a total of 1505 radiographs and 400 computed tomography (CT) scans in the study period. The CED was 14.56 mSv (0.97 mSv radiographs, 13.59 mSv CT scans) per patient total length of stay (LOS). CED averaged 8.66 mSv in the first hour and 11.76 mSv in the first 24 h after arrival. The most commonly performed CT scan was brain (n = 147), followed by abdomen and pelvis (n = 80), and cervical spine (n = 69). CT scans of the brain and cervical spine were the most commonly performed combined imaging tests (35%). Twelve percent of patients received no radiographs, and 15% received no CT scans. Six or more CT scans were done in 6% of patients. RE increased with longer LOS (&gt; 6 days vs. 3–5 days vs. 1 day, p &lt; 0.05). “Pan-scans” (a combination of CTs of the brain, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were done in 13% (n = 23) of patients. There was a higher total RE from CT scans (25.09 mSv ± 19.48 mSv vs. 4.93 mSv ± 14.20 mSv) in patients with injury severity score (ISS) &gt; 9 vs. ≤ 9 ( p &lt; 0.0001). First hour and first 24-h RE rates from radiographs were lower in patients younger than 15 years vs. 15–45 years and older-than-45-year age cohorts ( p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions In this study, CED was 14.56 mSv per patient. CT scans accounted for 21% of radiologic studies and 93% of CED. There was a higher CED rate in patients with ISS &gt; 9 and longer LOS.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation injuries</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Trauma Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>X-ray computed</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0736-4679</issn><issn>2352-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1P3DAQxa0KVLa0_wLyjVPSGTsf6wsCraBFWqkVH2fLcSaSQz4WO0Hsf4-jZS-99DSH996M5vcYu0BIEbD42aYt9eR7qlMBiCnIFCD7wlZC5iLJQagTtoJSFklWlOqMfQuhBcAS1viVnQnMZZEBrtj2ZjDdPrjAx4Y_mNqZyY0Dv33fjWH2xN3An7yZe8P_RoWGKXAzccO39EYdvz-Km6iQ_85OG9MF-vE5z9nz3e3T5ney_fPrfnOzTWwmxJRUEqGxDYrKKMJClLmROZpaZLZWyqiGKrMWRFnVyEKubbWubYVlkeeNKhfzObs87N358XWmMOneBUtdZwYa56AVCoyUAKKzODitH0Pw1Oidd73xe42gF5C61UeQegGpQeoIMgYvPk_M1aIdY0dy0XB9MFB89M2R18FGPpZq58lOuh7d_29c_bPCdm5w1nQvtKfQjrOP5QSNOggN-nGpc2kz_gaiVJn8ACZ0m_A</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS</creator><creator>Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS</creator><creator>Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD</creator><creator>Krugh, Kerry, PhD</creator><creator>Culler, Amy Sue, MD</creator><creator>Spangler, Matthew, PA-C</creator><creator>Ethington, Morgan, PA-C</creator><creator>Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP</creator><creator>Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center</title><author>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS ; Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS ; Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD ; Krugh, Kerry, PhD ; Culler, Amy Sue, MD ; Spangler, Matthew, PA-C ; Ethington, Morgan, PA-C ; Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP ; Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b310fcf12ba9e16275a351ad24cd99a9feba82ee4bf3638cb8dcb17655f9775a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation injuries</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Trauma Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>X-ray computed</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krugh, Kerry, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culler, Amy Sue, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spangler, Matthew, PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ethington, Morgan, PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Om P., MD, FACS</au><au>Oswanski, Michael F., MD, FACS</au><au>Sidhu, Ramandeep, MD</au><au>Krugh, Kerry, PhD</au><au>Culler, Amy Sue, MD</au><au>Spangler, Matthew, PA-C</au><au>Ethington, Morgan, PA-C</au><au>Stombaugh, Heather A., BS, CCRP</au><au>Lauer, Sherry K., BSN, RN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>640</spage><epage>648</epage><pages>640-648</pages><issn>0736-4679</issn><eissn>2352-5029</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Trauma patients are exposed to potentially high levels of low-dose radiation during radiologic studies. Objectives To assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation exposure (RE) in 177 successive patients admitted to a trauma service from January 1 through February 28, 2006. Results Patients received a total of 1505 radiographs and 400 computed tomography (CT) scans in the study period. The CED was 14.56 mSv (0.97 mSv radiographs, 13.59 mSv CT scans) per patient total length of stay (LOS). CED averaged 8.66 mSv in the first hour and 11.76 mSv in the first 24 h after arrival. The most commonly performed CT scan was brain (n = 147), followed by abdomen and pelvis (n = 80), and cervical spine (n = 69). CT scans of the brain and cervical spine were the most commonly performed combined imaging tests (35%). Twelve percent of patients received no radiographs, and 15% received no CT scans. Six or more CT scans were done in 6% of patients. RE increased with longer LOS (&gt; 6 days vs. 3–5 days vs. 1 day, p &lt; 0.05). “Pan-scans” (a combination of CTs of the brain, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were done in 13% (n = 23) of patients. There was a higher total RE from CT scans (25.09 mSv ± 19.48 mSv vs. 4.93 mSv ± 14.20 mSv) in patients with injury severity score (ISS) &gt; 9 vs. ≤ 9 ( p &lt; 0.0001). First hour and first 24-h RE rates from radiographs were lower in patients younger than 15 years vs. 15–45 years and older-than-45-year age cohorts ( p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions In this study, CED was 14.56 mSv per patient. CT scans accounted for 21% of radiologic studies and 93% of CED. There was a higher CED rate in patients with ISS &gt; 9 and longer LOS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21536401</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.004</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-4679
ispartof The Journal of emergency medicine, 2011-12, Vol.41 (6), p.640-648
issn 0736-4679
2352-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_912110100
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Emergency
Emergency care
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Radiation Dosage
Radiation injuries
Radiology
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics & numerical data
Trauma
Trauma Centers - statistics & numerical data
Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging
X-ray computed
Young Adult
title Analysis of Radiation Exposure in Trauma Patients at a Level I Trauma Center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A06%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Radiation%20Exposure%20in%20Trauma%20Patients%20at%20a%20Level%20I%20Trauma%20Center&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Sharma,%20Om%20P.,%20MD,%20FACS&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=640&rft.epage=648&rft.pages=640-648&rft.issn=0736-4679&rft.eissn=2352-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E912110100%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912110100&rft_id=info:pmid/21536401&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0736467911002794&rfr_iscdi=true