Is celiac axis resection justified for T4 pancreatic body cancer?

Background The clinical impact of the distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer remains unclear. Methods We reviewed the records of 13 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection between 1991 and 2009, 58 patients who...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2012, Vol.151 (1), p.61-69
Hauptverfasser: Yamamoto, Yusuke, MD, Sakamoto, Yoshihiro, MD, Ban, Daisuke, MD, Shimada, Kazuaki, MD, Esaki, Minoru, MD, Nara, Satoshi, MD, Kosuge, Tomoo, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 61
container_title Surgery
container_volume 151
creator Yamamoto, Yusuke, MD
Sakamoto, Yoshihiro, MD
Ban, Daisuke, MD
Shimada, Kazuaki, MD
Esaki, Minoru, MD
Nara, Satoshi, MD
Kosuge, Tomoo, MD
description Background The clinical impact of the distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer remains unclear. Methods We reviewed the records of 13 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection between 1991 and 2009, 58 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic body cancer involving major vessels, the extrapancreatic neural plexus or other organs (T4 according to the Japanese stage classification) between 1991 and 2009, and 24 patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases (unresectable group) between 2001 and 2009. The clinicopathologic factors and overall survival among the 3 groups were compared. Results The distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group was associated with a significantly higher incidence of morbidity (92% vs 60%, P = .03) and positive surgical margins (69% vs 26%, P = .003) than the distal pancreatectomy group; however, no survival difference was found between the 2 groups. No survivor has lived more than 3 years after operation in the distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group. The distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group had a significantly better prognosis than the unresectable group (median survival time, 20.8 vs 9.8 months; P = .01). Conclusion Aggressive resection for T4 pancreatic body cancer by distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection can be justified for otherwise unresectable tumors. The surgical indication should be evaluated carefully because of the higher incidence of morbidity and lower incidence of curability compared with distal pancreatectomy, as well as because there have been no long-term survivors so far.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911944073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0039606011003138</els_id><sourcerecordid>911944073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-2e20a53c6a62b8aa336aef21ea8015cc8934c0232d13df8295adab20bcd500363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotuWF-CAfEGcks7YietIiKqqKFSqxKHlbDn2BDlkk8VOEPv2ONoFJA492Za-fzzzDWOvEUoEVBd9mZb4rRSAWIIqQcIztsFaiuJSKnzONgCyKRQoOGGnKfUA0FSoX7ITIUBrjbBh13eJOxqCddz-ColHSuTmMI28X9IcukCed1PkjxXf2dFFsnNwvJ38nrv8pnh1zl50dkj06niesa-3Hx9vPhf3Xz7d3VzfF64GNReCBNhaOmWVaLW1UipLnUCyGrB2TjeyciCk8Ch9p0VTW29bAa3zdZ5DyTP27lB3F6cfC6XZbEPKrQ92pGlJpkFsqgouZSbFgXRxSilSZ3YxbG3cGwSzmjO9Wc2Z1ZwBZbK5HHpzLL-0W_J_I39UZeDtEbDJ2aGLefyQ_nG1wlponbn3B46yjJ-BokkuUFblQ8xqjZ_C0318-C_uhjCG_ON32lPqpyWOWbNBk4QB87DueF0xYr6h1PI3NNGfqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>911944073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is celiac axis resection justified for T4 pancreatic body cancer?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Yamamoto, Yusuke, MD ; Sakamoto, Yoshihiro, MD ; Ban, Daisuke, MD ; Shimada, Kazuaki, MD ; Esaki, Minoru, MD ; Nara, Satoshi, MD ; Kosuge, Tomoo, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yusuke, MD ; Sakamoto, Yoshihiro, MD ; Ban, Daisuke, MD ; Shimada, Kazuaki, MD ; Esaki, Minoru, MD ; Nara, Satoshi, MD ; Kosuge, Tomoo, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background The clinical impact of the distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer remains unclear. Methods We reviewed the records of 13 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection between 1991 and 2009, 58 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic body cancer involving major vessels, the extrapancreatic neural plexus or other organs (T4 according to the Japanese stage classification) between 1991 and 2009, and 24 patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases (unresectable group) between 2001 and 2009. The clinicopathologic factors and overall survival among the 3 groups were compared. Results The distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group was associated with a significantly higher incidence of morbidity (92% vs 60%, P = .03) and positive surgical margins (69% vs 26%, P = .003) than the distal pancreatectomy group; however, no survival difference was found between the 2 groups. No survivor has lived more than 3 years after operation in the distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group. The distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group had a significantly better prognosis than the unresectable group (median survival time, 20.8 vs 9.8 months; P = .01). Conclusion Aggressive resection for T4 pancreatic body cancer by distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection can be justified for otherwise unresectable tumors. The surgical indication should be evaluated carefully because of the higher incidence of morbidity and lower incidence of curability compared with distal pancreatectomy, as well as because there have been no long-term survivors so far.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22088810</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SURGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - mortality ; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - pathology ; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - surgery ; Celiac Artery - surgery ; Celiac Plexus - surgery ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; General aspects ; Humans ; Japan - epidemiology ; Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pancreas - pathology ; Pancreatectomy ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2012, Vol.151 (1), p.61-69</ispartof><rights>2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012. Published by Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-2e20a53c6a62b8aa336aef21ea8015cc8934c0232d13df8295adab20bcd500363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-2e20a53c6a62b8aa336aef21ea8015cc8934c0232d13df8295adab20bcd500363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25615288$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22088810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yusuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Yoshihiro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ban, Daisuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Kazuaki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esaki, Minoru, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nara, Satoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosuge, Tomoo, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Is celiac axis resection justified for T4 pancreatic body cancer?</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Background The clinical impact of the distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer remains unclear. Methods We reviewed the records of 13 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection between 1991 and 2009, 58 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic body cancer involving major vessels, the extrapancreatic neural plexus or other organs (T4 according to the Japanese stage classification) between 1991 and 2009, and 24 patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases (unresectable group) between 2001 and 2009. The clinicopathologic factors and overall survival among the 3 groups were compared. Results The distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group was associated with a significantly higher incidence of morbidity (92% vs 60%, P = .03) and positive surgical margins (69% vs 26%, P = .003) than the distal pancreatectomy group; however, no survival difference was found between the 2 groups. No survivor has lived more than 3 years after operation in the distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group. The distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group had a significantly better prognosis than the unresectable group (median survival time, 20.8 vs 9.8 months; P = .01). Conclusion Aggressive resection for T4 pancreatic body cancer by distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection can be justified for otherwise unresectable tumors. The surgical indication should be evaluated carefully because of the higher incidence of morbidity and lower incidence of curability compared with distal pancreatectomy, as well as because there have been no long-term survivors so far.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - surgery</subject><subject>Celiac Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Celiac Plexus - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pancreas - pathology</subject><subject>Pancreatectomy</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotuWF-CAfEGcks7YietIiKqqKFSqxKHlbDn2BDlkk8VOEPv2ONoFJA492Za-fzzzDWOvEUoEVBd9mZb4rRSAWIIqQcIztsFaiuJSKnzONgCyKRQoOGGnKfUA0FSoX7ITIUBrjbBh13eJOxqCddz-ColHSuTmMI28X9IcukCed1PkjxXf2dFFsnNwvJ38nrv8pnh1zl50dkj06niesa-3Hx9vPhf3Xz7d3VzfF64GNReCBNhaOmWVaLW1UipLnUCyGrB2TjeyciCk8Ch9p0VTW29bAa3zdZ5DyTP27lB3F6cfC6XZbEPKrQ92pGlJpkFsqgouZSbFgXRxSilSZ3YxbG3cGwSzmjO9Wc2Z1ZwBZbK5HHpzLL-0W_J_I39UZeDtEbDJ2aGLefyQ_nG1wlponbn3B46yjJ-BokkuUFblQ8xqjZ_C0318-C_uhjCG_ON32lPqpyWOWbNBk4QB87DueF0xYr6h1PI3NNGfqg</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Yamamoto, Yusuke, MD</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Yoshihiro, MD</creator><creator>Ban, Daisuke, MD</creator><creator>Shimada, Kazuaki, MD</creator><creator>Esaki, Minoru, MD</creator><creator>Nara, Satoshi, MD</creator><creator>Kosuge, Tomoo, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Is celiac axis resection justified for T4 pancreatic body cancer?</title><author>Yamamoto, Yusuke, MD ; Sakamoto, Yoshihiro, MD ; Ban, Daisuke, MD ; Shimada, Kazuaki, MD ; Esaki, Minoru, MD ; Nara, Satoshi, MD ; Kosuge, Tomoo, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-2e20a53c6a62b8aa336aef21ea8015cc8934c0232d13df8295adab20bcd500363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - surgery</topic><topic>Celiac Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Celiac Plexus - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pancreas - pathology</topic><topic>Pancreatectomy</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yusuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Yoshihiro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ban, Daisuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Kazuaki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esaki, Minoru, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nara, Satoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosuge, Tomoo, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamamoto, Yusuke, MD</au><au>Sakamoto, Yoshihiro, MD</au><au>Ban, Daisuke, MD</au><au>Shimada, Kazuaki, MD</au><au>Esaki, Minoru, MD</au><au>Nara, Satoshi, MD</au><au>Kosuge, Tomoo, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is celiac axis resection justified for T4 pancreatic body cancer?</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>61-69</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><coden>SURGAZ</coden><abstract>Background The clinical impact of the distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer remains unclear. Methods We reviewed the records of 13 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection between 1991 and 2009, 58 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic body cancer involving major vessels, the extrapancreatic neural plexus or other organs (T4 according to the Japanese stage classification) between 1991 and 2009, and 24 patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases (unresectable group) between 2001 and 2009. The clinicopathologic factors and overall survival among the 3 groups were compared. Results The distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group was associated with a significantly higher incidence of morbidity (92% vs 60%, P = .03) and positive surgical margins (69% vs 26%, P = .003) than the distal pancreatectomy group; however, no survival difference was found between the 2 groups. No survivor has lived more than 3 years after operation in the distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group. The distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection group had a significantly better prognosis than the unresectable group (median survival time, 20.8 vs 9.8 months; P = .01). Conclusion Aggressive resection for T4 pancreatic body cancer by distal pancreatectomy-celiac axis resection can be justified for otherwise unresectable tumors. The surgical indication should be evaluated carefully because of the higher incidence of morbidity and lower incidence of curability compared with distal pancreatectomy, as well as because there have been no long-term survivors so far.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22088810</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.030</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2012, Vol.151 (1), p.61-69
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911944073
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - mortality
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - pathology
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - surgery
Celiac Artery - surgery
Celiac Plexus - surgery
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
General aspects
Humans
Japan - epidemiology
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pancreas - pathology
Pancreatectomy
Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality
Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology
Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Tumors
title Is celiac axis resection justified for T4 pancreatic body cancer?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A21%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20celiac%20axis%20resection%20justified%20for%20T4%20pancreatic%20body%20cancer?&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Yamamoto,%20Yusuke,%20MD&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=61-69&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft.coden=SURGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E911944073%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=911944073&rft_id=info:pmid/22088810&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0039606011003138&rfr_iscdi=true